Bitcoin Forum
March 22, 2019, 09:17:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 221683 times)
ganzocrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 09:09:54 PM
 #1661

can someone share their GPU settings?

I have the following cards with settings:
 - 5 Zotac GTX 1060 6Gb       around 320 Sol/s        Power Limit: 90 / Core Clock: +110 / Mem Clock: +900
 - 3 Zotac GTX 1070 TI 8Gb   around 515 Sol/s        Power Limit: 75 / Core Clock: +200 / Mem Clock: +700

the all system (Win10) runs at 1080 Watts.

anyone has better Sol/s with different settings?
1553246232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553246232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553246232
Reply with quote  #2

1553246232
Report to moderator
1553246232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553246232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553246232
Reply with quote  #2

1553246232
Report to moderator
1553246232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553246232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553246232
Reply with quote  #2

1553246232
Report to moderator
100% New Software
PC, Mac, Android, & HTML5 Clients
Krill Rakeback
Low Rake
Bitcoin Poker 3.0
Bad Beat Jackpot
SwC Poker Relaunch
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1553246232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553246232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553246232
Reply with quote  #2

1553246232
Report to moderator
pubix
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 09:22:56 PM
 #1662

can someone share their GPU settings?

I have the following cards with settings:
 - 5 Zotac GTX 1060 6Gb       around 320 Sol/s        Power Limit: 90 / Core Clock: +110 / Mem Clock: +900
 - 3 Zotac GTX 1070 TI 8Gb   around 515 Sol/s        Power Limit: 75 / Core Clock: +200 / Mem Clock: +700

the all system (Win10) runs at 1080 Watts.

anyone has better Sol/s with different settings?

I'm running at very power efficient method tho:
1060 3gb - around 270 sol/s     pwr limit 60 / core clock +110
1060 6gb - around 285 sol/s     pwr limit 60 / core clock +130

I have 2 cards of each, so entire system with 4 cards is pulling 350 watts
ganzocrypt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 09:31:16 PM
 #1663

can someone share their GPU settings?

I have the following cards with settings:
 - 5 Zotac GTX 1060 6Gb       around 320 Sol/s        Power Limit: 90 / Core Clock: +110 / Mem Clock: +900
 - 3 Zotac GTX 1070 TI 8Gb   around 515 Sol/s        Power Limit: 75 / Core Clock: +200 / Mem Clock: +700

the all system (Win10) runs at 1080 Watts.

anyone has better Sol/s with different settings?

I'm running at very power efficient method tho:
1060 3gb - around 270 sol/s     pwr limit 60 / core clock +110
1060 6gb - around 285 sol/s     pwr limit 60 / core clock +130

I have 2 cards of each, so entire system with 4 cards is pulling 350 watts

looks super power efficient !
does the +130 core clock on the 1060 6Gb have any instability issue?

tharkas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 12:20:36 AM
 #1664

ZENcash mining on Suprnova pool w/ Linux Ubuntu 6 x 1070 Zotac Mini.  Noticed some issues with 0.5.7.

While my CPU usage was noticably less, I also noticed my Sol/w slightly less on 0.5.7.  The biggest issue was seeing the share rate cut by 2/3 or more.  Additionally, the pool showed my hash rate cut in half, and the screen output also indicated very few submitted shares to the pool (rarely did a plus sign
  • appear.)

For obvious reasons, I switched back to 0.5.6.  See below for details:

0.5.7
>  GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 460.1  Sol/W: 3.54  Avg: 460.1  I/s: 247.2  Sh: 5.14   1.00 115 +
>  GPU1  61C  Sol/s: 466.7  Sol/W: 3.57  Avg: 465.4  I/s: 248.9  Sh: 2.56   1.00 115
>  GPU2  55C  Sol/s: 449.5  Sol/W: 3.53  Avg: 457.8  I/s: 246.5  Sh: 2.56   1.00 117
>  GPU3  62C  Sol/s: 459.8  Sol/W: 3.58  Avg: 462.2  I/s: 248.4  Sh: 0.85   1.00 116 +
>  GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 480.5  Sol/W: 3.66  Avg: 473.5  I/s: 252.3  Sh: 1.28   1.00 116
>  GPU5  60C  Sol/s: 476.0  Sol/W: 3.65  Avg: 471.1  I/s: 251.4  Sh: 2.56   1.00 115
   ========== Sol/s: 2792.6 Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 2790.1 I/s: 1494.6 Sh: 14.96  1.00 115

   GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 459.6  Sol/W: 3.54  Avg: 460.0  I/s: 246.4  Sh: 4.49   1.00 115
   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 464.9  Sol/W: 3.58  Avg: 465.4  I/s: 248.8  Sh: 2.24   1.00 115
   GPU2  55C  Sol/s: 458.8  Sol/W: 3.53  Avg: 457.9  I/s: 246.5  Sh: 2.24   1.00 117
   GPU3  63C  Sol/s: 465.4  Sol/W: 3.58  Avg: 462.6  I/s: 248.2  Sh: 0.75   1.00 116
   GPU4  65C  Sol/s: 474.2  Sol/W: 3.66  Avg: 473.6  I/s: 251.9  Sh: 1.12   1.00 116
   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 469.8  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 471.0  I/s: 251.4  Sh: 2.24   1.00 115
   ========== Sol/s: 2792.6 Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 2790.4 I/s: 1493.3 Sh: 13.09  1.00 115

   GPU0  62C  Sol/s: 467.3  Sol/W: 3.54  Avg: 460.8  I/s: 247.0  Sh: 3.99   1.00 115
   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 468.2  Sol/W: 3.58  Avg: 465.7  I/s: 248.8  Sh: 1.99   1.00 115
   GPU2  56C  Sol/s: 457.8  Sol/W: 3.53  Avg: 457.9  I/s: 246.4  Sh: 1.99   1.00 117
   GPU3  63C  Sol/s: 463.8  Sol/W: 3.58  Avg: 462.7  I/s: 248.2  Sh: 0.66   1.00 116
   GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 470.0  Sol/W: 3.66  Avg: 473.2  I/s: 251.9  Sh: 1.00   1.00 116
   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 473.6  Sol/W: 3.64  Avg: 471.2  I/s: 251.3  Sh: 1.99   1.00 115
   ========== Sol/s: 2800.6 Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 2791.6 I/s: 1493.7 Sh: 11.63  1.00 115

0.5.6
>  GPU1  59C  Sol/s: 462.5  Sol/W: 3.60  Avg: 465.4  I/s: 249.1  Sh: 10.46  1.00 116 +++
>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 466.1  Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 464.4  I/s: 246.9  Sh: 8.21   1.00 126 ++
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 461.0  Sol/W: 3.57  Avg: 459.7  I/s: 246.3  Sh: 7.47   1.00 116 ++
>  GPU3  60C  Sol/s: 468.2  Sol/W: 3.60  Avg: 463.5  I/s: 248.5  Sh: 3.72   1.00 124 +
   GPU4  63C  Sol/s: 473.6  Sol/W: 3.70  Avg: 474.6  I/s: 252.1  Sh: 3.72   1.00 120
   GPU5  58C  Sol/s: 473.0  Sol/W: 3.69  Avg: 473.8  I/s: 251.4  Sh: 5.96   1.00 119 ++
   ========== Sol/s: 2804.4 Sol/W: 3.62  Avg: 2801.4 I/s: 1494.2 Sh: 39.54  1.00 120

   GPU1  61C  Sol/s: 464.5  Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 465.2  I/s: 248.7  Sh: 11.96  1.00 117 ++++++
   GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 458.9  Sol/W: 3.57  Avg: 463.3  I/s: 246.9  Sh: 7.76   1.00 127 ++
   GPU2  55C  Sol/s: 461.5  Sol/W: 3.57  Avg: 460.0  I/s: 246.0  Sh: 6.58   1.00 115 +
   GPU3  62C  Sol/s: 468.0  Sol/W: 3.61  Avg: 464.4  I/s: 248.0  Sh: 5.38   1.00 124 ++++
   GPU4  64C  Sol/s: 474.2  Sol/W: 3.70  Avg: 474.6  I/s: 251.8  Sh: 5.97   1.00 120 +++++
   GPU5  60C  Sol/s: 468.1  Sol/W: 3.67  Avg: 472.7  I/s: 251.2  Sh: 5.97   1.00 116 ++
   ========== Sol/s: 2795.3 Sol/W: 3.62  Avg: 2800.2 I/s: 1492.6 Sh: 43.60  1.00 119

   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 466.1  Sol/W: 3.59  Avg: 465.4  I/s: 248.3  Sh: 11.46  1.00 116 +++
   GPU0  62C  Sol/s: 468.2  Sol/W: 3.58  Avg: 464.1  I/s: 246.6  Sh: 8.46   1.00 126 ++++
   GPU2  56C  Sol/s: 462.7  Sol/W: 3.57  Avg: 460.5  I/s: 245.9  Sh: 6.47   1.00 116 ++
   GPU3  63C  Sol/s: 463.4  Sol/W: 3.60  Avg: 464.2  I/s: 247.9  Sh: 4.98   1.00 124 +
   GPU4  65C  Sol/s: 470.6  Sol/W: 3.69  Avg: 473.9  I/s: 251.6  Sh: 6.96   1.00 119 ++++
   GPU5  61C  Sol/s: 470.0  Sol/W: 3.66  Avg: 472.2  I/s: 250.9  Sh: 5.97   1.00 117 ++
   ========== Sol/s: 2801.0 Sol/W: 3.61  Avg: 2800.3 I/s: 1491.3 Sh: 44.30  1.00 119

Hope this helps.
puch0021
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 01:25:41 AM
 #1665

ZENcash mining on Suprnova pool w/ Linux Ubuntu 6 x 1070 Zotac Mini.  Noticed some issues with 0.5.7.

While my CPU usage was noticably less, I also noticed my Sol/w slightly less on 0.5.7.  The biggest issue was seeing the share rate cut by 2/3 or more.  Additionally, the pool showed my hash rate cut in half, and the screen output also indicated very few submitted shares to the pool (rarely did a plus sign
  • appear.)

For obvious reasons, I switched back to 0.5.6.

Can confirm with my Awesome miner + 1060s. With .5.7 compared to .5.6. I have noticed significantly less + signs. Whether that is by design I am not sure, however, in my sum output I also noticed roughly 5x less shares. With 0.5.6 the hash rate is down however, as you indicated it seems the 1060 improvements worked (roughly +100 sol/s overall with 7 cards).

I am concerned however regarding the share output.


TheHas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 119

WPP ENERGY - BACKED ASSET GREEN ENERGY TOKEN


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 03:05:35 AM
 #1666

Tried your most recent miner and it works great - I'm getting higher hash rates consistently across equihash coins compared to the more well known ewbf miner. Not sure why more people aren't jumping on this miner for their nvidia cards, given it seems to consistently perform better. Also seems to be running stable across my cards so don't think that is putting people off trying this - maybe people just don't know about it?


           ﹏﹏﹋﹌﹌ WPP ENERGY ﹌﹌﹋﹏﹏
☆═══━┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈━═══☆
≈ WORLD POWER PRODUCTION ≈


【 BACKED ASSET GREEN ENERGY TOKEN 】
☆═━┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈━═☆
chuck732
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 06:01:24 AM
 #1667

Can anyone tell me what this is? But I already now the temp, Sols and average Sols/W. But what is the rest?

GPU3 43C Sol/s: 439.7 Sol/W: 3.86 Avg: 443.1 I/s: 237.6 Sh: 1.41 1.00 41
Andrey09
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 08:04:49 AM
 #1668

v0.5.7
A significant decrease in the accepted share on the pool. The numbers in the program window are large, but on the pool it is 20-30% lower than usual.
ShowMeCoins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 08:50:32 AM
 #1669

Can anyone tell me what this is? But I already now the temp, Sols and average Sols/W. But what is the rest?

GPU3 43C Sol/s: 439.7 Sol/W: 3.86 Avg: 443.1 I/s: 237.6 Sh: 1.41 1.00 41
That's the number of shares submitted.
Look at block finding like swallowing an elephant that swallowed a golden nugget. To swallow an elephant we need to devide it in to slices (=shares).
Big people/eaters get bigger slices (=big miners get bigger shares). We chew this slice (Sols or hashes) until finished and ask for a new one.
If your slice is to big, it takes to long to process and it gets rotten (stale share). If you you find the nugget......hoerah....next elephant.
Last one....the bigger the elephant.....I think you can guess this one (hint: difficulty)
nUm81
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 11


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2017, 09:57:58 AM
 #1670

I have also had to revert back to v0.5.6, there was a noticeable decrease in speed at the pool, almost 20%.

Cheers - nUm - SnowGem Dev
Website- https://snowgem.org/ | Join our Discord | Reddit
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 09:58:12 AM
Last edit: December 13, 2017, 10:18:58 AM by m1n1ngP4d4w4n
 #1671

ZENcash mining on Suprnova pool w/ Linux Ubuntu 6 x 1070 Zotac Mini.  Noticed some issues with 0.5.7.

While my CPU usage was noticably less, I also noticed my Sol/w slightly less on 0.5.7.  The biggest issue was seeing the share rate cut by 2/3 or more.  Additionally, the pool showed my hash rate cut in half, and the screen output also indicated very few submitted shares to the pool (rarely did a plus sign
  • appear.)

For obvious reasons, I switched back to 0.5.6.

Can confirm with my Awesome miner + 1060s. With .5.7 compared to .5.6. I have noticed significantly less + signs. Whether that is by design I am not sure, however, in my sum output I also noticed roughly 5x less shares. With 0.5.6 the hash rate is down however, as you indicated it seems the 1060 improvements worked (roughly +100 sol/s overall with 7 cards).

I am concerned however regarding the share output.


It would help sometimes, to read, and understand what you are doing...

Code:
Pools which adjust the difficulty based on the share rate won't be able to distinguish between the GPUs because zm uses a single connections now - so the difficulty and thus the share rate might change.

not  even able to read a changelog or understand what mining is ?

With the change of 0.5.7 making one unified connection to the pool, the share rate will decrease alot, but the difficulty of each share is also going up by alot, so basically your share amount is less, but each share earn you alot more (10x share diff=10 at 0.1 earn you 1, and 1x share diff=100 at 1, earn you one) so you earn the same. Also alot of pools seeing the increase of miners, have upped  the difficulty quite a bit so that less share are exchanged (basically the pool give you a bigger work to do, reducing his communication with you, since it take you more time to solve this work), to sum it up, instead of the pools seeing X cards coming to mine they see one rig as a big card and give out work accordingly (1x big card = massive hashrate = higher difficulty share)

I can confirm better performance, my s/w went up, and the average sols/s is also better, good job !
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 10:14:15 AM
 #1672

New Version 0.5.7
nvml: handle invalid values

What does it mean?

NVML is NVIDIA's Management Library - it is used to read e.g. the temperatures of your GPUs.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 10:15:42 AM
 #1673

ZENcash mining on Suprnova pool w/ Linux Ubuntu 6 x 1070 Zotac Mini.  Noticed some issues with 0.5.7.

While my CPU usage was noticably less, I also noticed my Sol/w slightly less on 0.5.7.  The biggest issue was seeing the share rate cut by 2/3 or more.  Additionally, the pool showed my hash rate cut in half, and the screen output also indicated very few submitted shares to the pool (rarely did a plus sign
  • appear.)

For obvious reasons, I switched back to 0.5.6.  See below for details:

Actually 0.5.7 performs slightly faster on your system - as seen by the I/s - don't forget: the solution rate (Sol/s) is probabilistic.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 10:19:19 AM
 #1674

ZENcash mining on Suprnova pool w/ Linux Ubuntu 6 x 1070 Zotac Mini.  Noticed some issues with 0.5.7.

While my CPU usage was noticably less, I also noticed my Sol/w slightly less on 0.5.7.  The biggest issue was seeing the share rate cut by 2/3 or more.  Additionally, the pool showed my hash rate cut in half, and the screen output also indicated very few submitted shares to the pool (rarely did a plus sign
  • appear.)

For obvious reasons, I switched back to 0.5.6.

Can confirm with my Awesome miner + 1060s. With .5.7 compared to .5.6. I have noticed significantly less + signs. Whether that is by design I am not sure, however, in my sum output I also noticed roughly 5x less shares. With 0.5.6 the hash rate is down however, as you indicated it seems the 1060 improvements worked (roughly +100 sol/s overall with 7 cards).

I am concerned however regarding the share output.


It would help sometimes, to read, and understand what you are doing...

Code:
Pools which adjust the difficulty based on the share rate won't be able to distinguish between the GPUs because zm uses a single connections now - so the difficulty and thus the share rate might change.

not  even able to read a changelog or understand what mining is ?

With the change of 0.5.7 making one unified connection to the pool, the share rate will decrease alot, but the difficulty of each share is also going up by alot, so basically your share amount is less, but each share earn you alot more (10x share diff=10 at 0.1 earn you 1, and 1x share diff=100 at 1, earn you one) so you earn the same. Also alot of pools seeing the increase of miners, have upped  the difficulty quite a bit so that less share are exchanged (basically the pool give you a bigger work to do, reducing his communication with you, since it take you more time to solve this work)


Exactly, thx m1n1ngP4d4w4n for writing this explanation.
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 10:37:48 AM
 #1675


With the change of 0.5.7 making one unified connection to the pool, the share rate will decrease alot, but the difficulty of each share is also going up by alot, so basically your share amount is less, but each share earn you alot more (10x share diff=10 at 0.1 earn you 1, and 1x share diff=100 at 1, earn you one) so you earn the same. Also alot of pools seeing the increase of miners, have upped  the difficulty quite a bit so that less share are exchanged (basically the pool give you a bigger work to do, reducing his communication with you, since it take you more time to solve this work), to sum it up, instead of the pools seeing X cards coming to mine they see one rig as a big card and give out work accordingly (1x big card = massive hashrate = higher difficulty share)

I can confirm better performance, my s/w went up, and the average sols/s is also better, good job !


Exactly, thx m1n1ngP4d4w4n for writing this explanation.

You are welcome sir, keep up the good work, only failover to go and this miner will be awesome  Cool
topteam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 10:38:24 AM
 #1676

i think different difficult for each gpu good idea Cool
Andrey09
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 10:48:31 AM
 #1677

So does 0.5.7 earn no less than 0.5.6? That's for sure? I did not understand why the algorithm changed, which establishes the complexity of the pool?
H4r4ld
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 11:02:43 AM
 #1678

What I get with 0.5.7:

3750K @ 4.5GHz, Win 10Pro, 1080Ti @ +150 Core, -300 MEM

2017-12-13 11:52:03|>  GPU0  49C  Sol/s: 708.9  Sol/W: 3.38  Avg: 657.1  I/s: 381.5  Sh: 2.40   1.00 109 ++
2017-12-13 11:52:23|>  GPU0  51C  Sol/s: 703.2  Sol/W: 3.39  Avg: 660.0  I/s: 373.5  Sh: 2.25   1.00 109
2017-12-13 11:52:43|   GPU0  53C  Sol/s: 708.4  Sol/W: 3.41  Avg: 662.9  I/s: 378.4  Sh: 2.29   1.00 107 +
2017-12-13 11:53:03|   GPU0  54C  Sol/s: 706.6  Sol/W: 3.42  Avg: 665.3  I/s: 376.1  Sh: 2.33   1.00 133 +
2017-12-13 11:53:23|>  GPU0  55C  Sol/s: 710.0  Sol/W: 3.43  Avg: 667.6  I/s: 380.0  Sh: 2.52   1.00 111 ++
2017-12-13 11:53:43|   GPU0  55C  Sol/s: 725.8  Sol/W: 3.45  Avg: 670.5  I/s: 382.8  Sh: 2.40   1.00 111
2017-12-13 11:54:03|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 717.3  Sol/W: 3.45  Avg: 672.8  I/s: 383.7  Sh: 2.28   1.00 111
2017-12-13 11:54:23|>  GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 709.4  Sol/W: 3.46  Avg: 674.4  I/s: 382.6  Sh: 2.18   1.00 111
2017-12-13 11:54:43|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 709.9  Sol/W: 3.47  Avg: 676.0  I/s: 380.8  Sh: 2.21   1.00 110 +
2017-12-13 11:55:03|>  GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 708.8  Sol/W: 3.48  Avg: 677.4  I/s: 380.5  Sh: 2.37   1.00 109 ++
2017-12-13 11:55:23|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 718.2  Sol/W: 3.49  Avg: 679.0  I/s: 378.5  Sh: 2.28   1.00 109 *
2017-12-13 11:55:43|   GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 695.3  Sol/W: 3.49  Avg: 679.6  I/s: 370.6  Sh: 2.42   1.00 103 ++
2017-12-13 11:56:03|>  GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 688.4  Sol/W: 3.49  Avg: 679.9  I/s: 370.8  Sh: 2.33   1.00 103
2017-12-13 11:56:24|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 694.0  Sol/W: 3.49  Avg: 680.4  I/s: 371.2  Sh: 2.25   1.00 103
2017-12-13 11:56:44|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 704.7  Sol/W: 3.50  Avg: 681.3  I/s: 373.9  Sh: 2.27   1.00 110 +
2017-12-13 11:57:04|>  GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 699.5  Sol/W: 3.50  Avg: 681.9  I/s: 374.5  Sh: 2.30   1.00 110 +
2017-12-13 11:57:24|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 693.5  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 682.3  I/s: 370.3  Sh: 2.32   1.00 103 +
2017-12-13 11:57:44|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 697.5  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 682.7  I/s: 373.9  Sh: 2.34   1.00 116 +*
2017-12-13 11:58:04|>  GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 687.7  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 682.9  I/s: 370.8  Sh: 2.81   1.00 105 ++++++
2017-12-13 11:58:24|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 708.5  Sol/W: 3.51  Avg: 683.6  I/s: 380.9  Sh: 2.91   1.00 109 ++
2017-12-13 11:58:44|>  GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 702.8  Sol/W: 3.52  Avg: 684.2  I/s: 380.7  Sh: 2.99   1.00 110 ++
2017-12-13 11:59:04|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 710.3  Sol/W: 3.52  Avg: 684.9  I/s: 376.8  Sh: 2.99   1.00 112 +
2017-12-13 11:59:24|   GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 697.0  Sol/W: 3.52  Avg: 685.2  I/s: 372.1  Sh: 2.91   1.00 112
2017-12-13 11:59:44|>  GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 705.2  Sol/W: 3.53  Avg: 685.8  I/s: 372.6  Sh: 2.92   1.00 103 +

Pretty poor Share-rate!
chuck732
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 11:25:39 AM
 #1679

You didn't have to go that far. So how come it doesn't show watts used? Or invalid shares?

Can anyone tell me what this is? But I already now the temp, Sols and average Sols/W. But what is the rest?

GPU3 43C Sol/s: 439.7 Sol/W: 3.86 Avg: 443.1 I/s: 237.6 Sh: 1.41 1.00 41
That's the number of shares submitted.
Look at block finding like swallowing an elephant that swallowed a golden nugget. To swallow an elephant we need to devide it in to slices (=shares).
Big people/eaters get bigger slices (=big miners get bigger shares). We chew this slice (Sols or hashes) until finished and ask for a new one.
If your slice is to big, it takes to long to process and it gets rotten (stale share). If you you find the nugget......hoerah....next elephant.
Last one....the bigger the elephant.....I think you can guess this one (hint: difficulty)
JmHooper
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2017, 11:38:00 AM
 #1680

Apologies for being 'that guy' but I'm pretty new to the whole mining thing, just prodding it with my home PC right now to see how various pools and miners work and such.

I browsed through a number of pages on this thread and was unable to find any numbers for a GTX980 4GB (obviously most have moved on to the 10xx series by now). Was wondering if anyone could give some insight on my numbers and if they seem reasonable.

Code:
2017-12-13 3:15:36 AM|#  zm 0.5.7
2017-12-13 3:15:36 AM|#  GPU0 + GeForce GTX 980          MB: 4096  PCI: 1:0
2017-12-13 3:15:36 AM|
2017-12-13 3:15:36 AM|#  telemetry server started
2017-12-13 3:15:36 AM|#  connected to: zec-us-west1.nanopool.org:6666
2017-12-13 3:15:38 AM|#  server set difficulty to: 00028f5c0000000000000000...
2017-12-13 3:15:59 AM|>  GPU0  63C  Sol/s: 401.6  Sol/W: 1.90  Avg: 401.6  I/s: 212.7  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-13 3:16:19 AM|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 391.4  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 396.5  I/s: 211.9  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-13 3:16:39 AM|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 394.0  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 395.7  I/s: 209.1  Sh: 1.00   1.00 200 +
2017-12-13 3:16:59 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 395.8  Sol/W: 1.87  Avg: 395.7  I/s: 213.0  Sh: 0.75   1.00 200
2017-12-13 3:17:19 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 403.3  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 397.2  I/s: 215.7  Sh: 1.20   1.00 197 +
2017-12-13 3:17:39 AM|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 399.7  Sol/W: 1.87  Avg: 397.6  I/s: 215.9  Sh: 1.50   1.00 196 +
2017-12-13 3:17:59 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 394.3  Sol/W: 1.87  Avg: 397.2  I/s: 215.7  Sh: 1.28   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:18:19 AM|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 403.5  Sol/W: 1.87  Avg: 398.0  I/s: 215.5  Sh: 1.12   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:18:39 AM|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 411.6  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 399.5  I/s: 215.6  Sh: 1.00   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:18:59 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 405.7  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 400.1  I/s: 214.9  Sh: 0.90   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:19:19 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 397.8  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 399.9  I/s: 214.5  Sh: 0.82   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:19:39 AM|>  GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 406.0  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 400.4  I/s: 215.1  Sh: 0.75   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:19:59 AM|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 395.5  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 400.0  I/s: 214.6  Sh: 0.69   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:20:19 AM|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 401.9  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 400.2  I/s: 215.6  Sh: 0.64   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:20:39 AM|>  GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 407.9  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 400.7  I/s: 215.9  Sh: 0.60   1.00 196
2017-12-13 3:20:59 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 412.7  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.4  I/s: 215.9  Sh: 0.75   1.00 197 +
2017-12-13 3:21:19 AM|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 400.5  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.4  I/s: 214.0  Sh: 0.71   1.00 197
2017-12-13 3:21:40 AM|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 399.6  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.3  I/s: 213.2  Sh: 0.83   1.00 200 +
2017-12-13 3:22:00 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 397.6  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.1  I/s: 214.0  Sh: 0.79   1.00 200
2017-12-13 3:22:20 AM|   GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 399.3  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.0  I/s: 214.4  Sh: 0.75   1.00 200
2017-12-13 3:22:40 AM|>  GPU0  64C  Sol/s: 403.6  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.1  I/s: 215.5  Sh: 0.71   1.00 200
2017-12-13 3:23:00 AM|   GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 412.5  Sol/W: 1.88  Avg: 401.6  I/s: 214.6  Sh: 0.82   1.00 195 +

This is with what seems to be my max stable overclock.

When optimizing for efficiency I seem to get around 362 Sol/s and 2.24 Sol/W, however electricity costs aren't a concern for me at the moment.

Just looking wondering if these numbers seem acceptable for the card, appreciate the help in advance.
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!