Bitcoin Forum
March 21, 2019, 01:23:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 221677 times)
starcrys
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 01:12:38 PM
 #1641

Been trying out the program. I'm not sure why but my shares are not submitting correctly...

2017-12-10 11:43:35 PM|#  zm 0.5.6
2017-12-10 11:43:35 PM|#  GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1080         MB: 8192  PCI: 1:0
2017-12-10 11:43:35 PM|
2017-12-10 11:43:35 PM|#  telemetry server started
2017-12-10 11:43:35 PM|#  GPU0  connected to: equihash.mine.zpool.ca:2142
2017-12-10 11:43:39 PM|#  GPU0  server supports extranonce
2017-12-10 11:43:39 PM|#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 00002003e07c0f81f0000000...
2017-12-10 11:44:00 PM|>  GPU0  54C  Sol/s: 187.2  Sol/W: 1.34  Avg: 187.2  I/s: 97.3   Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-10 11:44:20 PM|>  GPU0  55C  Sol/s: 175.1  Sol/W: 1.30  Avg: 181.1  I/s: 91.8   Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-10 11:44:41 PM|>  GPU0  54C  Sol/s: 170.8  Sol/W: 1.28  Avg: 177.7  I/s: 91.6   Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-10 11:45:01 PM|   GPU0  54C  Sol/s: 233.5  Sol/W: 1.37  Avg: 191.7  I/s: 124.0  Sh: 0.00   . .


Can anyone help me on this? I'm really lost.

PS: Ignore the sol/s values, I was doing something else and it lagged the mining process.

The server sets a pretty high difficulty so it will take some time (on average) to find a share especially with the low solution rate you have.

Hm...But my actual sol/s is about 490-500 actually (I was double opening 2 miners at that time, hence the 170-230 sol/s rate). I've tried using MPH, and it worked perfectly fine.

2017-12-11 8:41:46 PM|#  zm 0.5.6
2017-12-11 8:41:46 PM|#  GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1080         MB: 8192  PCI: 1:0
2017-12-11 8:41:46 PM|
2017-12-11 8:41:46 PM|#  telemetry server started
2017-12-11 8:41:46 PM|#  GPU0  connected to: asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17023
2017-12-11 8:41:50 PM|#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000080000000000000000000...
2017-12-11 8:42:11 PM|>  GPU0  52C  Sol/s: 508.9  Sol/W: 2.62  Avg: 508.9  I/s: 272.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-11 8:42:31 PM|   GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 498.8  Sol/W: 2.59  Avg: 503.8  I/s: 270.2  Sh: 1.50   1.00 71  +
2017-12-11 8:42:51 PM|>  GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 501.5  Sol/W: 2.57  Avg: 503.1  I/s: 269.5  Sh: 1.00   1.00 71
2017-12-11 8:43:11 PM|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 498.7  Sol/W: 2.77  Avg: 502.0  I/s: 262.7  Sh: 0.75   1.00 71
2017-12-11 8:43:31 PM|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 504.0  Sol/W: 2.86  Avg: 502.4  I/s: 266.8  Sh: 0.60   1.00 71

I guess there's probably something not very well with the server from zpool?
1553174637
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553174637

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553174637
Reply with quote  #2

1553174637
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
dandyqb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 02:15:23 PM
 #1642

I'm new to dstm and would like to know if you can use dstm on flypool?

that's my setup right now  Smiley
wsnake
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 02:37:28 PM
 #1643

please add algo for ZERO (ZER)  equihash-192.7
chuck732
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 03:09:37 PM
 #1644

What OS are you using?


I'm new to dstm and would like to know if you can use dstm on flypool?

that's my setup right now  Smiley
marti718
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 03:32:53 PM
 #1645

Does anyone else get trouble with ZM and Zenmine.pro? no matter what server of theirs is set?

I get this on all miners every 5 mins approx;

Code:
GPU0  69C  Sol/s: 659.9  Sol/W: 3.65  Avg: 656.1  I/s: 354.2  Sh: 2.40  1.00 1727 +
   GPU1  79C  Sol/s: 626.0  Sol/W: 3.81  Avg: 621.1  I/s: 331.5  Sh: 2.40  1.00 3086 +++
   GPU2  71C  Sol/s: 461.8  Sol/W: 3.10  Avg: 464.9  I/s: 248.5  Sh: 0.90  1.00 1979
   ========== Sol/s: 1747.7 Sol/W: 3.52  Avg: 1742.1 I/s: 934.2  Sh: 5.70  1.00 2264
#  connection closed by server r:0
#  reconnecting
#  GPU0  connected to: us.zenmine.pro:9009
#  GPU1  connected to: us.zenmine.pro:9009
#  GPU2  connected to: us.zenmine.pro:9009
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000471c71c71c71c69e06522...
#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000471c71c71c71c69e06522...
#  GPU2  server set difficulty to: 000471c71c71c71c69e06522...
>  GPU0  65C  Sol/s: 670.7  Sol/W: 3.70  Avg: 670.7  I/s: 360.3  Sh: 6.00  1.00 1495 ++
>  GPU1  75C  Sol/s: 633.1  Sol/W: 3.81  Avg: 633.1  I/s: 337.9  Sh: 0.00  . .
>  GPU2  65C  Sol/s: 459.9  Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 459.9  I/s: 250.8  Sh: 0.00  . .

Yes, I get it also. I've searched for an answer and have posted about it but no reply so far. I switched to Zecminer and the hashrate is 10% lower, but that is better than all the disconnects I get.
dandyqb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 06:33:45 PM
 #1646

What OS are you using?


I'm new to dstm and would like to know if you can use dstm on flypool?

that's my setup right now  Smiley

win 10 64bit ver 1703
Delota
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 07:49:50 PM
 #1647

Works quite well for me using SMOS

With the GTX 1080 Ti on 200W, 1800 core, 5080 mem
I am getting:

Code:
GPU0 51C Sol/s: 707.4 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 714.2 I/s: 382.1 Sh: 3.62 1.00 30
GPU0 51C Sol/s: 701.1 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 714.0 I/s: 382.0 Sh: 3.73 1.00 33
GPU0 51C Sol/s: 719.2 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 714.1 I/s: 382.0 Sh: 3.83 1.00 30
GPU0 51C Sol/s: 728.6 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 714.4 I/s: 381.7 Sh: 3.82 1.00 31
GPU0 51C Sol/s: 712.8 Sol/W: 3.58 Avg: 714.3 I/s: 382.0 Sh: 3.86 1.00

I haven't OC'd the card that much, only +150Core, and +150 mem
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 12:35:40 AM
 #1648

All of my testing of dstm to date has been on flypool.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Infpwnz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 01:21:23 AM
Last edit: December 12, 2017, 02:51:12 AM by Infpwnz
 #1649

So idk if this is a MiningPoolHub problem or dstm miner problem but im getting paid really low in BTG on mph.

Should be about 0.057 in 24 hours with 2030kh and its 0.047?
Anyone else mining BTG on mph? results?

Edit: So I just switched to Bminer and my hashrate and income appear to be like they should be on MPH.
it WAS a miner problem.
Even tho the miner was showing good hashrate the pool was showing 1.7kh
My miner shows 2050 now and the pool says the same.
Kejvu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 07:56:51 AM
 #1650

Hello, is this ok for mining Bitcoin Gold with dstm's on coinotron?
It finded just 1 share with 1060 and 1080ti isnt?
and what "unknown method client.get_version" means?

Code:
2017-12-12 08.50.45|#  telemetry server started
2017-12-12 08.50.45|#  GPU0  connected to: coinotron.com:3349
2017-12-12 08.50.45|unknown method client.get_version
2017-12-12 08.50.46|#  GPU1  connected to: coinotron.com:3349
2017-12-12 08.50.46|unknown method client.get_version
2017-12-12 08.50.48|#  GPU0  server supports extranonce
2017-12-12 08.50.48|#  GPU1  server supports extranonce
2017-12-12 08.50.48|#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 0000cccccccc000000000000...
2017-12-12 08.50.50|#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 0000cccccccc000000000000...
2017-12-12 08.51.08|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 747.2  Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 747.2  I/s: 402.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.10|>  GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 334.4  Sol/W: 3.40  Avg: 334.4  I/s: 175.9  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.10|   ========== Sol/s: 1081.6 Sol/W: 3.30  Avg: 1081.6 I/s: 577.9  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.28|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 748.7  Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 747.9  I/s: 400.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.30|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 326.2  Sol/W: 3.31  Avg: 330.3  I/s: 175.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.30|   ========== Sol/s: 1074.9 Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 1078.3 I/s: 575.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.48|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 743.6  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 746.5  I/s: 400.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.50|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 320.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 326.9  I/s: 174.6  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.51.50|   ========== Sol/s: 1063.6 Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 1073.4 I/s: 575.4  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.08|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 757.9  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 749.3  I/s: 400.6  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.11|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 327.5  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 327.1  I/s: 173.1  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.11|   ========== Sol/s: 1085.5 Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 1076.4 I/s: 573.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.29|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 742.5  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 748.0  I/s: 400.5  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.31|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 321.6  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 326.0  I/s: 173.3  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.31|   ========== Sol/s: 1064.1 Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 1073.9 I/s: 573.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.49|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 739.7  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 746.6  I/s: 400.6  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.51|   GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 320.7  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 325.1  I/s: 173.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.52.51|   ========== Sol/s: 1060.4 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1071.7 I/s: 574.4  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.09|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 749.5  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 747.0  I/s: 400.7  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.11|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 327.4  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 325.4  I/s: 174.1  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.11|   ========== Sol/s: 1076.9 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1072.4 I/s: 574.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.29|   GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 742.8  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 746.5  I/s: 400.7  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.31|>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 330.6  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 326.1  I/s: 174.4  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.31|   ========== Sol/s: 1073.4 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1072.6 I/s: 575.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.49|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 752.8  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 747.2  I/s: 400.3  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.51|   GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 320.9  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 325.5  I/s: 173.3  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.53.51|   ========== Sol/s: 1073.7 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1072.7 I/s: 573.6  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.09|>  GPU0  60C  Sol/s: 747.1  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 747.2  I/s: 400.5  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.11|>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 323.6  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 325.3  I/s: 174.0  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.11|   ========== Sol/s: 1070.7 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1072.5 I/s: 574.4  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.29|   GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 746.4  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 747.1  I/s: 400.3  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.31|>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 325.2  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 325.3  I/s: 173.8  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.31|   ========== Sol/s: 1071.6 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1072.4 I/s: 574.1  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.49|>  GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 737.0  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 746.3  I/s: 400.5  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.54.51|   GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 326.7  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 325.4  I/s: 174.0  Sh: 0.25   1.00 82  +
2017-12-12 08.54.51|   ========== Sol/s: 1063.8 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1071.7 I/s: 574.4  Sh: 0.25   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.55.09|>  GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 740.2  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 745.8  I/s: 400.4  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.55.11|>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 318.9  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 324.9  I/s: 175.1  Sh: 0.23   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.55.11|   ========== Sol/s: 1059.1 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 1070.7 I/s: 575.4  Sh: 0.23   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.55.30|   GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 745.1  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 745.8  I/s: 400.4  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.55.31|>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 328.1  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 325.1  I/s: 174.5  Sh: 0.21   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.55.31|   ========== Sol/s: 1073.3 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 1070.9 I/s: 574.9  Sh: 0.21   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.55.50|>  GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 743.8  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 745.6  I/s: 400.4  Sh: 0.00   . .   *
2017-12-12 08.55.51|   GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 328.5  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 325.4  I/s: 174.1  Sh: 0.20   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.55.51|   ========== Sol/s: 1072.3 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 1071.0 I/s: 574.4  Sh: 0.20   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.56.10|>  GPU0  61C  Sol/s: 749.1  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 745.8  I/s: 400.3  Sh: 0.00   . .
2017-12-12 08.56.12|>  GPU1  66C  Sol/s: 328.7  Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 325.6  I/s: 174.5  Sh: 0.19   1.00 82
2017-12-12 08.56.12|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.8 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1071.4 I/s: 574.8  Sh: 0.19   1.00 82
chuck732
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 11:04:32 AM
 #1651

Thank you sir. Can you help me with one more thing? I use SMOS for a while now no problems. Just want to try a different miner. I've been using ewbf on flypool. Ok on SMOS dashboard for me the dstm has a string for miningpoolhub. Here's what I'm talking about
Quote
--server europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --port 20570 --user youraccount.$rigName --pass x
How would I change it to flypool? Would I use the same string that is in my miner for ewbf/flypool?




What OS are you using?


I'm new to dstm and would like to know if you can use dstm on flypool?

that's my setup right now  Smiley

win 10 64bit ver 1703
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 12:12:16 PM
 #1652

New Version 0.5.7

reduce cpu load
minor performance improvements
con: use single pool connection
con: ssl: clear session data before reconnect
nvml: handle invalid values


This release contains quite some technical work/optimizations, which results most notably in a lower cpu load - about 40% - 30%. It also contains minor solver performance improvements - most notable on an 1060 - about 0.5%, pretty small - however it's still there. ZM uses now a single connection to the pool, since some pools/routers seemed to have difficulties with multiple connections - this might help people who had regular disconnects. Pools which adjust the difficulty based on the share rate won't be able to distinguish between the GPUs because zm uses a single connections now - so the difficulty and thus the share rate might change.

People who requested failover pool support: I'm planning to support it in the next release, I'm releasing this iteration first to make sure the transition to a single connection works as expected.
Seb83
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 01:02:34 PM
 #1653

New Version 0.5.7

reduce cpu load
minor performance improvements
con: use single pool connection
con: ssl: clear session data before reconnect
nvml: handle invalid values


This release contains quite some technical work/optimizations, which results most notably in a lower cpu load - about 40% - 30%. It also contains minor solver performance improvements - most notable on an 1060 - about 0.5%, pretty small - however it's still there. ZM uses now a single connection to the pool, since some pools/routers seemed to have difficulties with multiple connections - this might help people who had regular disconnects. Pools which adjust the difficulty based on the share rate won't be able to distinguish between the GPUs because zm uses a single connections now - so the difficulty and thus the share rate might change.

People who requested failover pool support: I'm planning to support it in the next release, I'm releasing this iteration first to make sure the transition to a single connection works as expected.

Nice improvement!
I'm testing right now on a small rig with 2x 1070 and 2x 1080ti (2330 sols)
I have more than half cpu load on windows 10, same hashrate.

IMO, it would be nice to also add an option to launch the miner with higher cpu priority (like ccminer --cpu-priority)
I change the priority in a BAT file, and it helps a lot.
Nokia555
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com


View Profile WWW
December 12, 2017, 01:11:15 PM
 #1654

EthMonitoring.com updated to 0.5.7 for EthControl

Hekgrim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 01:13:17 PM
 #1655

New Version 0.5.7
nvml: handle invalid values

What does it mean?
cTnko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 01:15:12 PM
 #1656

New Version 0.5.7

reduce cpu load
minor performance improvements
con: use single pool connection
con: ssl: clear session data before reconnect
nvml: handle invalid values


This release contains quite some technical work/optimizations, which results most notably in a lower cpu load - about 40% - 30%. It also contains minor solver performance improvements - most notable on an 1060 - about 0.5%, pretty small - however it's still there. ZM uses now a single connection to the pool, since some pools/routers seemed to have difficulties with multiple connections - this might help people who had regular disconnects. Pools which adjust the difficulty based on the share rate won't be able to distinguish between the GPUs because zm uses a single connections now - so the difficulty and thus the share rate might change.

People who requested failover pool support: I'm planning to support it in the next release, I'm releasing this iteration first to make sure the transition to a single connection works as expected.

Thank you for an awesome update, the overall cpu usage on my 8 GPU rig dropped from 45-50% to 25-30% which is quite significant improvement.
I can also see the 0.5% improvement on the 1060 cards, great job!
chuck732
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 02:36:16 PM
 #1657

Can some help me with this?

I use SMOS for a while now no problems. Just want to try a different miner. I've been using ewbf on flypool. Ok on SMOS dashboard for me the dstm has a string for miningpoolhub. Here's what I'm talking about

Quote
--server europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --port 20570 --user youraccount.$rigName --pass x
How would I change it to flypool? Would I use the same string that is in my miner for ewbf/flypool?
Dylmine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 03:37:22 PM
 #1658

Is there any way I can disable GPU0 in this miner and let zm run on other Gpus?
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 04:03:26 PM
 #1659

Is there any way I can disable GPU0 in this miner and let zm run on other Gpus?

Read first post, you may find the answer...
topteam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 08:54:02 PM
 #1660

can i switch from single to multi gpu connections to pool in new version (0.5.7)?
i have less profit in single pool connection Sad
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!