Bitcoin Forum
March 25, 2019, 03:16:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 221706 times)
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 09:12:27 AM
 #1461


#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]

whats that?

On what pool does this happen?
Your Bitcoin transactions
The Ultimate Bitcoin mixer
made truly anonymous.
with an advanced technology.
Mix coins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Herbalking
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 12:29:45 PM
 #1462

Dstm can you help me. Why new version lost conn? And old 5.5 is stable?
vld75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 01:15:27 PM
 #1463

I had some problem with "Share above target " - Nicehash pool.

I have problem with stability too. Rig - 6  xdifferent type of 1070 cards, differnet OC. Maybe is problem OC, but I can not find good solution for rig yet.
With EWBF I have not problem at all. So I switched to ZM only for short time.

If I compare second rig /ZM and EWBF/ with my 1080ti cards - there is not difference for me.

Thanks for good job.

Code:
017-11-26 12:42:48|#  GPU0  connected to: equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
Code:
2017-11-26 12:45:52|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:45:52|#  GPU3  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-26 12:45:54|#  GPU4  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-26 12:45:58|>  GPU0  71C  Sol/s: 459.3  Sol/W: 3.65  Avg: 467.6  I/s: 249.4  Sh: 1.66   1.00 63  +
2017-11-26 12:45:59|   GPU1  70C  Sol/s: 497.2  Sol/W: 2.99  Avg: 495.2  I/s: 264.7  Sh: 2.66   0.88 63  ++
2017-11-26 12:46:00|#  GPU3  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:00|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:01|>  GPU2  67C  Sol/s: 493.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 496.1  I/s: 265.1  Sh: 3.33   1.00 51 
2017-11-26 12:46:03|   GPU3  73C  Sol/s: 505.1  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 495.3  I/s: 264.0  Sh: 2.33   0.86 47  +++
2017-11-26 12:46:05|>  GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 475.4  Sol/W: 3.70  Avg: 474.3  I/s: 251.8  Sh: 2.65   1.00 47  ++
2017-11-26 12:46:07|   GPU5  64C  Sol/s: 467.6  Sol/W: 3.09  Avg: 466.8  I/s: 249.6  Sh: 4.32   1.00 54 
2017-11-26 12:46:07|   ========== Sol/s: 2898.0 Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 2895.4 I/s: 1544.6 Sh: 16.94  0.94 54
2017-11-26 12:46:15|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:16|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:16|#  GPU3  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
cTnko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 01:25:52 PM
 #1464

@dstm Is there any reason why the process wouldn't exit on its own under such condition?


Thx for reporting. 0.5.6 has some changes how it handles GPU crashes - it contains some initial recover infrastructure. Previous versions exited immediately in this case - I'll look into it.

Thanks for acknowledging this, ill keep an eye on the next version in the future, keep up the good work  Cool
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 01:31:14 PM
 #1465

Dstm can you help me. Why new version lost conn? And old 5.5 is stable?

There are no changes with respect to this in 0.5.6.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 01:31:57 PM
 #1466

I had some problem with "Share above target " - Nicehash pool.

I have problem with stability too. Rig - 6  xdifferent type of 1070 cards, differnet OC. Maybe is problem OC, but I can not find good solution for rig yet.
With EWBF I have not problem at all. So I switched to ZM only for short time.

If I compare second rig /ZM and EWBF/ with my 1080ti cards - there is not difference for me.

Thanks for good job.

Code:
017-11-26 12:42:48|#  GPU0  connected to: equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
Code:
2017-11-26 12:45:52|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:45:52|#  GPU3  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-26 12:45:54|#  GPU4  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-26 12:45:58|>  GPU0  71C  Sol/s: 459.3  Sol/W: 3.65  Avg: 467.6  I/s: 249.4  Sh: 1.66   1.00 63  +
2017-11-26 12:45:59|   GPU1  70C  Sol/s: 497.2  Sol/W: 2.99  Avg: 495.2  I/s: 264.7  Sh: 2.66   0.88 63  ++
2017-11-26 12:46:00|#  GPU3  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:00|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:01|>  GPU2  67C  Sol/s: 493.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 496.1  I/s: 265.1  Sh: 3.33   1.00 51 
2017-11-26 12:46:03|   GPU3  73C  Sol/s: 505.1  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 495.3  I/s: 264.0  Sh: 2.33   0.86 47  +++
2017-11-26 12:46:05|>  GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 475.4  Sol/W: 3.70  Avg: 474.3  I/s: 251.8  Sh: 2.65   1.00 47  ++
2017-11-26 12:46:07|   GPU5  64C  Sol/s: 467.6  Sol/W: 3.09  Avg: 466.8  I/s: 249.6  Sh: 4.32   1.00 54 
2017-11-26 12:46:07|   ========== Sol/s: 2898.0 Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 2895.4 I/s: 1544.6 Sh: 16.94  0.94 54
2017-11-26 12:46:15|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:16|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:16|#  GPU3  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]

Thx for reporting, will check.
mountaintoy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 02:30:09 PM
 #1467

I had some problem with "Share above target " - Nicehash pool.

I have problem with stability too. Rig - 6  xdifferent type of 1070 cards, differnet OC. Maybe is problem OC, but I can not find good solution for rig yet.
With EWBF I have not problem at all. So I switched to ZM only for short time.

If I compare second rig /ZM and EWBF/ with my 1080ti cards - there is not difference for me.

Thanks for good job.

Code:
017-11-26 12:42:48|#  GPU0  connected to: equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
Code:
2017-11-26 12:45:52|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:45:52|#  GPU3  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-26 12:45:54|#  GPU4  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-26 12:45:58|>  GPU0  71C  Sol/s: 459.3  Sol/W: 3.65  Avg: 467.6  I/s: 249.4  Sh: 1.66   1.00 63  +
2017-11-26 12:45:59|   GPU1  70C  Sol/s: 497.2  Sol/W: 2.99  Avg: 495.2  I/s: 264.7  Sh: 2.66   0.88 63  ++
2017-11-26 12:46:00|#  GPU3  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:00|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:01|>  GPU2  67C  Sol/s: 493.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 496.1  I/s: 265.1  Sh: 3.33   1.00 51 
2017-11-26 12:46:03|   GPU3  73C  Sol/s: 505.1  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 495.3  I/s: 264.0  Sh: 2.33   0.86 47  +++
2017-11-26 12:46:05|>  GPU4  66C  Sol/s: 475.4  Sol/W: 3.70  Avg: 474.3  I/s: 251.8  Sh: 2.65   1.00 47  ++
2017-11-26 12:46:07|   GPU5  64C  Sol/s: 467.6  Sol/W: 3.09  Avg: 466.8  I/s: 249.6  Sh: 4.32   1.00 54 
2017-11-26 12:46:07|   ========== Sol/s: 2898.0 Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 2895.4 I/s: 1544.6 Sh: 16.94  0.94 54
2017-11-26 12:46:15|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:16|#  GPU1  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-26 12:46:16|#  GPU3  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]

Thx for reporting, will check.

If it's any help I've seen this a couple times on usa.nicehash as well.

Code:
2017-11-26 4:57:11 AM|#  GPU0  connected to: equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357

Code:
2017-11-27 3:55:49 AM|#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
2017-11-27 3:55:50 AM|   GPU0  55C  Sol/s: 499.2  Sol/W: 3.55  Avg: 506.7  I/s: 270.9  Sh: 2.75   1.00 75  +
2017-11-27 3:55:58 AM|#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-27 3:56:01 AM|#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-27 3:56:10 AM|   GPU0  55C  Sol/s: 502.0  Sol/W: 3.55  Avg: 506.5  I/s: 270.7  Sh: 2.98   0.93 70  +++
2017-11-27 3:56:14 AM|#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-27 3:56:24 AM|#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
2017-11-27 3:56:30 AM|   GPU0  55C  Sol/s: 510.5  Sol/W: 3.55  Avg: 506.7  I/s: 270.8  Sh: 3.30   0.87 90  ++++
Herbalking
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 03:02:32 PM
 #1468

For me 1080ti 5.6 lost con. And 5.5 is stable.
Vispilio
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 714
Merit: 295



View Profile
November 30, 2017, 06:53:11 PM
 #1469

let the fee at least be 1%, when the fee is almost non existent for your main competitor, it's a bit strange to hard code it at 2%, at this rate there is absolutely no visible improvement on 1080ti's when using your miner...

smurfymurfy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 07:38:46 PM
 #1470

@ DSTM my computer occasionally crashes and the log shows nvmlDeviceGetTemperature failed. Sometime happens after 10 mins or 2 days.

any ideas what this might be?

Running GTX1070
5.6 version on windows

Thanks

CreamyG31337
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 07:50:54 PM
 #1471

let the fee at least be 1%, when the fee is almost non existent for your main competitor, it's a bit strange to hard code it at 2%, at this rate there is absolutely no visible improvement on 1080ti's when using your miner...

Yeah, that's why I was asking too -- I have 1080 Ti + 1080 in my desktop computer and don't really see any difference between this and EWBF. It just sucks to know your miner *is* faster but the fee eats all the profit. But at least if I use nicehash I'm not losing anything by being stuck with EWBF

BTC tip jar: bc1qtepyll2c9fkn67wpnhunclw4mf39nc2jx79zdh
Kejvu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 08:12:49 PM
 #1472

Cant mine Bitcoin Gold?
r3lentleSs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 08:53:03 PM
 #1473

On one miner i'm see seeing on telemetry Page.
Uptime over 6 hours. And con time only 30 minutes.

Miner is mining and everything looks good. But i have a very small share rate.

What's causing this con time error ? The last six hours Ive been basicly mining only 30 minutes ?
thebd
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 11:12:33 PM
 #1474

Do you consider selling the miner without the dev fee?
toptek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 11:30:29 PM
Last edit: December 01, 2017, 01:07:19 AM by toptek
 #1475

Cant mine Bitcoin Gold?


Yes dstm's ZCash can mine Bitcoin Gold.  I'm using it to mine Bitcoin Gold right now

Lower the fee and you might get less complaints an more users.

They don't mind paying it but it is to high at least with CM zec miner it's adjustable i know CM Zec miner only runs AMD cards but don't look at it that way because what happens if CM decides to give it NV card support most here now will use it,don't think they won't .

Do you consider selling the miner without the dev fee?

I would Pay as long as it's reason able and a one time charge .... with no fee  updates he will make a lot selling it with no fee an others will keep buying it and if any one wanted to use the fee version they could but most would op for the one time charge if i seem greedy then I'm greedy at least i won't lie and say I'm not .if i could write some thing like this i would share it with no fee, i hate using the word free in some cases because nothing is free some one pays it some place .





For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:36:39 AM
 #1476

@ DSTM my computer occasionally crashes and the log shows nvmlDeviceGetTemperature failed. Sometime happens after 10 mins or 2 days.

any ideas what this might be?

Running GTX1070
5.6 version on windows

Thanks



Overcloking / unstable power supply / driver issues could cause this.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:37:38 AM
 #1477

On one miner i'm see seeing on telemetry Page.
Uptime over 6 hours. And con time only 30 minutes.

Miner is mining and everything looks good. But i have a very small share rate.

What's causing this con time error ? The last six hours Ive been basicly mining only 30 minutes ?

Contime denotes the time passed since the last reconnect in this case.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:38:06 AM
 #1478

Do you consider selling the miner without the dev fee?

Sry, no.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:43:22 AM
 #1479

Cant mine Bitcoin Gold?


Yes dstm's ZCash can mine Bitcoin Gold.  I'm using it to mine Bitcoin Gold right now

Lower the fee and you might get less complaints an more users.

They don't mind paying it but it is to high at least with CM zec miner it's adjustable i know CM Zec miner only runs AMD cards but don't look at it that way because what happens if CM decides to give it NV card support most here now will use it,don't think they won't .




I'm not sure if you're talking about Claymore's Zcash miner but that's what he states on his thread:
                                                                                                                               
This miner is free-to-use, however, current developer fee is 2% if you use secure SSL/TLS connection....
If you use unsecure connection to mining pool, current developer fee is 2.5%....
If you don't agree with the dev fee - don't use this miner, or use "-nofee" option.
-nofee   set "1" to cancel my developer fee at all. In this mode some recent optimizations are disabled so mining speed will be slower by about 5%.
benjamoyne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 265
Merit: 101


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:57:24 AM
 #1480

No issues with 5.6 here on 1060 and 1080ti rigs.

Was a slight issue when I first started using 5.5, it would crash out, but I dropped the core clock back by 10 and it worked fine.

Your fee is fair.  In the grand scheme of things 2% is stuff all of what we are making. 
To put it into prospective, 2% of $1 is 2c !
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!