Bitcoin Forum
October 21, 2017, 02:45:00 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 [343] 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 865142 times)
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 12:41:10 AM
 #6841


My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
1508597100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508597100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508597100
Reply with quote  #2

1508597100
Report to moderator
1508597100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508597100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508597100
Reply with quote  #2

1508597100
Report to moderator
1508597100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508597100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508597100
Reply with quote  #2

1508597100
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508597100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508597100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508597100
Reply with quote  #2

1508597100
Report to moderator
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 12:45:03 AM
 #6842

Next difficulty retarget occurs at block 280223.0 (eta 1.1 days): 2068618701.42 / +45.8% [est.]

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 12:46:59 AM
 #6843

nice photoshop Smiley

but I think rashfast was on the street handing out escort cards

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 12:53:15 AM
 #6844

Next difficulty retarget occurs at block 280223.0 (eta 1.1 days): 2068618701.42 / +45.8% [est.]

http://bitcoindifficulty.com/

If you are going to be a bitcoin miner, at least get your facts straight.  Tongue
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 12:54:07 AM
 #6845

If you are going to be a bitcoin miner, at least get your facts straight.  Tongue
It's the whole day that i do stupid things - i'm not surprised by this mistake as well.

(source of my mistake: a post on the knc thread referencing http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator )

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
fenwick
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 01:23:27 AM
 #6846

me wonders if lovely cara has the same curiculum vitae as other members of the hashfast team    Wink
She at least seems to have the body for it and probably no problem to get a new job in this business after HFs liquidation.
Guys, would you please show some respect for the lady? (Seriously.)

(She might very well be an outsider, just hired because they needed a nice person for the face of the company.)
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 03:00:52 AM
 #6847


Look! I'm outta quarters and somebody stole our fans.
So, I guess I get to go home now.

Meanwhile, at the Badlands Saloon.

Coin_Master
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 03:18:29 AM
 #6848

you may as well let them run away with your money.
I would really love to have the data HF has about the % of people who agreed to a USD refund and the % that actually sent a certified letter demanding a proper refund.

I would love to know the % of refunders who paid with usd vs btc.  My guess is so far it as predominantly been usd-ers.  I can't see any btc-ers willing to take a 90% haircut for HF.
jcambond posted an address HashFast used to collect payments.
I sent my entire payment to: 1B3FHM4Ax5BFuRidKBcfURfMaPBEDMDvQ8
Is there a way to know whether these BTC were eventually cashed out through bitpay?
This payment was then sent directly to address 17hCi8apMUkzzLLJgUwfXxRJuykuo5Lcur
We can be confident this is HashFast's own address by looking at the first and last deposits to the address, and the dates.
On August 6 2013 at 6:30pm a test deposit of 0.001 BTC was received, this is in line with the timeline for the first sales.
On October 28 2013 the last transaction can be observed, from this point deposits were directed to another collection address.
By this time it had become evident to customers there was a problem, and HashFast began directing payments elsewhere.
Looking at the total BTC deposits it is clear HashFast have received most of the payments in BTC.  It also appears HashFast have oversold the number of stated units available.  This may explain why Batch 2,3 and 4 Baby Jet orders are not published.  It can also be confirmed that not all of the BTC deposits have been converted to USD through BitPay as suggested.  Here at address 17Vj6tneMEueGgS64aEiNr1fHurEiEHZas we find 1.25 BTC.  This deposit came from address 1BGWkLdRwK8PPGH5ziToopTSdnsjtjM8aa which in turn came from 17hCi8apMUkzzLLJgUwfXxRJuykuo5Lcur
There can be no confusion because both addresses have had only one deposit.  Hope this helps.
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 03:28:44 AM
 #6849



Where all the magicians go!

            ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄
        ▄▄█████████████████████▄
      ▄██████████████████████████▄
    ▄█████████████████▀▀▀██████████
   █████████████████       ███████
  ██████▀▀▀████████   ███   ██████   █
 █████       ██████   ███   ██████   ██
 ████   ███   █████   ███   █████   ███
█████   ███   █████   ███    ████   ████
█████   ███   █████   ████   ████   ████
████    ███   ████   █████   ███   █████
████   ████   ████   █████   ███   █████
▀███   ████   ████   ██████       █████
 ███   █████   ███   ████████▄▄▄███████
  █   ██████   ███   █████████████████
      ███████       █████████████████
     ██████████▄▄▄█████████████████▀
     ▀███████████████████████████▀
       ▀▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀



Worldcore
▄▄
██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
▀▀  ██
    ██
    ▄▄
    ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ██
██  ▀▀
██   
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 04:00:38 AM
 #6850

you may as well let them run away with your money.
I would really love to have the data HF has about the % of people who agreed to a USD refund and the % that actually sent a certified letter demanding a proper refund.

I would love to know the % of refunders who paid with usd vs btc.  My guess is so far it as predominantly been usd-ers.  I can't see any btc-ers willing to take a 90% haircut for HF.
jcambond posted an address HashFast used to collect payments.
I sent my entire payment to: 1B3FHM4Ax5BFuRidKBcfURfMaPBEDMDvQ8
Is there a way to know whether these BTC were eventually cashed out through bitpay?
This payment was then sent directly to address 17hCi8apMUkzzLLJgUwfXxRJuykuo5Lcur
We can be confident this is HashFast's own address by looking at the first and last deposits to the address, and the dates.
On August 6 2013 at 6:30pm a test deposit of 0.001 BTC was received, this is in line with the timeline for the first sales.
On October 28 2013 the last transaction can be observed, from this point deposits were directed to another collection address.
By this time it had become evident to customers there was a problem, and HashFast began directing payments elsewhere.
Looking at the total BTC deposits it is clear HashFast have received most of the payments in BTC.  It also appears HashFast have oversold the number of stated units available.  This may explain why Batch 2,3 and 4 Baby Jet orders are not published.  It can also be confirmed that not all of the BTC deposits have been converted to USD through BitPay as suggested.  Here at address 17Vj6tneMEueGgS64aEiNr1fHurEiEHZas we find 1.25 BTC.  This deposit came from address 1BGWkLdRwK8PPGH5ziToopTSdnsjtjM8aa which in turn came from 17hCi8apMUkzzLLJgUwfXxRJuykuo5Lcur
There can be no confusion because both addresses have had only one deposit.  Hope this helps.


This may help some more: https://www.google.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fblockchain.info+%22hashfast%22&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&oq=https%3A%2F%2Fblockchain.info+%22hashfast%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.6767j0j4&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#es_sm=122&espv=210&q=site:https:%2F%2Fblockchain.info+%22hashfast%22
Coin_Master
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 04:12:24 AM
 #6851

Thanks Phin.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 05:32:07 AM
 #6852

Next difficulty retarget occurs at block 280223.0 (eta 1.1 days): 2068618701.42 / +45.8% [est.]
http://bitcoindifficulty.com/
If you are going to be a bitcoin miner, at least get your facts straight.  Tongue
I have no clue what "bitcoindifficulty.com" is calculating, but the timestamps since the last re-target say:
$ bitcoind getnetworkhashps
14783251099573804

Which would be a 45% increase.. and across 1830 blocks, thats probably a pretty good estimate.

If you're going to correct people's facts, it might be wise to cite something that explains what they're actually calculating.

But who cares? 24% vs 45% ... Hashfast customers are screwed either way. Smiley

Edit:  Ah, the getnetworkhashps got changed to default to "last 120 blocks" instead of "since the last retarget" by default. There was a huge step up in hashrate ~5 says ago. I'd be betting on an actual change of 27% or 28%.

Bitcoin will not be compromised
RickJamesBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 05:33:36 AM
 #6853


But who cares? 24% vs 45% ... Hashfast customers are screwed either way. Smiley

Like  Grin
testerx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 572



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 06:10:46 AM
 #6854

Next difficulty retarget occurs at block 280223.0 (eta 1.1 days): 2068618701.42 / +45.8% [est.]

http://bitcoindifficulty.com/

If you are going to be a bitcoin miner, at least get your facts straight.  Tongue
They're just using different algorithms for the calculations, they were both reasonable estimates depending on how you're estimating.
SolarSilver
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1117


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 07:19:09 AM
 #6855

I liked the slogan "Bitcoin mining and transaction verification happening live @ CES"

Were they hiding an Avalon under the table or just playing a movie?

Too bad, I would really have liked to meat them at their stand (it's not a typo)
Coin_Master
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 07:36:11 AM
 #6856

Too bad, I would really have liked to meat them at their stand (it's not a typo)
Nice... Smiley
defcon23
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 08:28:54 AM
 #6857

Ok, i'm officially going mad.
I guess i'm not alone.
you dont ...., you dont..  Grin i loose a part of my mind in this story too ..
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 10:09:55 AM
 #6858

Since that the thread is dead, i would like to share my last stupid tough... if you compare the branding used at the december booth and the CES one, you will see that the december one was studied, it was done by someone that knew what he was doing, while the CES one seems like to have been done with word and/or paint.

(bullet points with that interline? please)
(logo on black background? has that something to do with black being the default color to replace transparencies in PNG? please)

(i got some good ideas for points against them but i won't share them or my lawyer would kill me Cheesy)

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Hoofprint
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155


View Profile
January 12, 2014, 11:35:22 AM
 #6859

Since that the thread is dead, i would like to share my last stupid tough... if you compare the branding used at the december booth and the CES one, you will see that the december one was studied, it was done by someone that knew what he was doing, while the CES one seems like to have been done with word and/or paint.

(bullet points with that interline? please)
(logo on black background? has that something to do with black being the default color to replace transparencies in PNG? please)

(i got some good ideas for points against them but i won't share them or my lawyer would kill me Cheesy)

im sure the thread will start again soon as Hashfast lies about something else or steals another potential clients money

MT GOX, WE.exchange (WE.Scam), BFL (Brutally Fkn Last), Hashfast (ScamFast), IceDrill (Licedrill),
No wonder the governments don't like Bitcoin with all these parasites
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
January 12, 2014, 11:50:11 AM
 #6860

im sure the thread will start again soon as Hashfast lies about something else or steals another potential clients money
Something tells me that the people who are responsible for the last 4PH jump (and i'm not saying that it's HF) don't really care about making more sales, since that they already do in the millions per day of money they don't have to pay taxes over.

But those people can't reach 50%+ of the network by self mining, and if they are avid enough, they will start selling this hardware as well.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Pages: « 1 ... 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 [343] 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!