piuk
|
|
March 13, 2012, 05:55:53 PM |
|
Tycho, Any chance you could tag Deepbit's coinbases? Make it easier to detect the Mystery one block miner.
|
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 13, 2012, 06:44:10 PM |
|
Tycho, Any chance you could tag Deepbit's coinbases? Make it easier to detect the Mystery one block miner. Not yet, sorry. This site uses block hashes provided by me, so it's always accurate: http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
P4man
|
|
March 13, 2012, 10:51:07 PM |
|
Tycho, Any chance you could tag Deepbit's coinbases? Make it easier to detect the Mystery one block miner.
You can use the transaction count of 1 as filter to detect the Mystery miner. Its a crutch but would be fairly accurate for now.
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
March 14, 2012, 12:06:36 AM |
|
Tycho, Any chance you could tag Deepbit's coinbases? Make it easier to detect the Mystery one block miner.
You can use the transaction count of 1 as filter to detect the Mystery miner. Its a crutch but would be fairly accurate for now. Deepbit's blocks always go to 1VayNert.... don't they? Could tag them that way.
|
|
|
|
iamapi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2012, 01:21:36 AM |
|
I can't connect to http://f1.deepbit.net:8332 but I can connect to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332However, the miner will always try to connect to f1 then f2, could I connect to f2 directly? Tycho, Any chance you could tag Deepbit's coinbases? Make it easier to detect the Mystery one block miner. Not yet, sorry. This site uses block hashes provided by me, so it's always accurate: http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/
|
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 14, 2012, 01:54:46 AM |
|
Which miner and what settings are you using ? Usually setting pool address as http://pit.deepbit.net:8332 is enough for automatic connection.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 14, 2012, 02:03:30 AM |
|
Tycho, Any chance you could tag Deepbit's coinbases? Make it easier to detect the Mystery one block miner.
You can use the transaction count of 1 as filter to detect the Mystery miner. Its a crutch but would be fairly accurate for now. Deepbit's blocks always go to 1VayNert.... don't they? Could tag them that way. Eh? No, DeepBit still uses something like bitcoind to put a new address in each new block. DeepBit: you considered changing that after the last few pool hacks that have occurred elsewhere? i.e. your mining bitcoinds (or equivalent) can have a wallet with no value if you change it to accept your own fixed address to payout to that's not in that wallet. ... of course this requires the payout code to also be somewhere else ... which should be ... well ... more secure than if it isn't already
|
|
|
|
iamapi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2012, 02:15:14 AM |
|
Ufasoft miner I set the pool address as http://pit.deepbit.net:8332It will first try to connect to http://f1.deepbit.net:8332, then switch to f2 after f1 failed. But it will switch back to f1 after some time! How to avoid this? Which miner and what settings are you using ? Usually setting pool address as http://pit.deepbit.net:8332 is enough for automatic connection.
|
|
|
|
iamapi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2012, 02:29:05 AM |
|
The log: 116.9 MHash/s Switching back to http://f1.deepbit.net:8332117.1 MHash/s Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out 117.1 MHash/s Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:833203/14/12 10:06:43 Result: D56619B1 accepted 116.7 MHash/s Switching back to http://f1.deepbit.net:8332116.7 MHash/s Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out 116.9 MHash/s Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:833203/14/12 10:22:53 Result: 29F2DFB2 accepted 03/14/12 10:22:54 Result: 26ED1AC9 accepted 117 MHash/s Switching back to http://f1.deepbit.net:8332117 MHash/s Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out 117 MHash/s Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out
|
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 14, 2012, 02:56:29 AM |
|
How to avoid this? Looks like a little problem on my side. Hope to fix it soon.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 14, 2012, 03:58:36 AM |
|
Eh? No, DeepBit still uses something like bitcoind to put a new address in each new block.
DeepBit: you considered changing that after the last few pool hacks that have occurred elsewhere? i.e. your mining bitcoinds (or equivalent) can have a wallet with no value if you change it to accept your own fixed address to payout to that's not in that wallet. ... of course this requires the payout code to also be somewhere else ... which should be ... well ... more secure than if it isn't already :)
Sorry, I don't understand what do you mean :) Only a small amount is stored online for payments, the rest is in our cold storage.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 14, 2012, 04:35:54 AM |
|
Eh? No, DeepBit still uses something like bitcoind to put a new address in each new block. DeepBit: you considered changing that after the last few pool hacks that have occurred elsewhere? i.e. your mining bitcoinds (or equivalent) can have a wallet with no value if you change it to accept your own fixed address to payout to that's not in that wallet. ... of course this requires the payout code to also be somewhere else ... which should be ... well ... more secure than if it isn't already Sorry, I don't understand what do you mean Only a small amount is stored online for payments, the rest is in our cold storage. I'm obviously talking stuff you clearly already know but I'll word it this way to explain what I mean: At the moment you must be using bitcoind (or a similar program) to generate the getwork answers. (I'll just assume it is bitcoind, but it could be another program that does the same work required to create a getwork) When someone requests a getwork, somewhere at the end of the request chain bitcoind replies with the header and the midstate with a payment address that is unused. When someone sends back a proof of work >= block difficulty, that will of course be to that same payment address, then the next available payment address will be used for all subsequent getwork requests ... until the next block etc. Thus the bitcoind that is providing the getworks also contains the wallet with the addresses that all the blocks are paid into (and waiting to mature for the next 100 blocks) If you modify bitcoind to accept an address to pay the blocks into rather then using it's wallet to supply addresses, then the bitcoind does not actually contain any wallet addresses with value and that payment address could be in a wallet anywhere you like Thus if anyone hacks into the server (or has admin access to it like Linode allowed to happen to slush) they cannot steal much since they firstly will need to restart bitcoind with a new address - which would be rather obvious when it happens - and only any blocks generated after that with the wrong address would be lost - and it's not too hard to see that the address has changed and thus the server has been hacked into and needs something done about it.
|
|
|
|
cmg5461
|
|
March 14, 2012, 05:56:30 AM |
|
Statistics don't seem to be updating o.o 171081 2012-03-14 05:23:03 00000000000002a74060d0dd7f97a6484ac047b0d39c33dc7fe86caee73a8e0d 171079 2012-03-14 04:49:00 000000000000022c9ddc7ade486b22dcf5673c0083d4f89333d30e09bacf147b 171077 2012-03-14 03:45:46 000000000000060baca81bb980618d3def95edfe3b7c70dfa4b9c6a85631d8df 171066 2012-03-14 02:01:29 0000000000000a2b80893930de6f5eddb3fc59a767363963a76b2018cb2a38de 171061 2012-03-14 01:12:17 000000000000040da70c1ac9e7b2fc4e97ab72fa8bd266ba35ecec00e2dd6b49
and from deepbit Time/Link Found in Your Total Reward 13.03 20:12:58 0h 06m 177 361842 0.02372444
|
If I've helped: 1CmguJhwW4sbtSMFsyaafikJ8jhYS61quz
Sold: 5850 to lepenguin. Quick, easy and trustworthy.
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 14, 2012, 05:59:09 AM |
|
Statistics don't seem to be updating o.o 171081 2012-03-14 05:23:03 00000000000002a74060d0dd7f97a6484ac047b0d39c33dc7fe86caee73a8e0d 171079 2012-03-14 04:49:00 000000000000022c9ddc7ade486b22dcf5673c0083d4f89333d30e09bacf147b 171077 2012-03-14 03:45:46 000000000000060baca81bb980618d3def95edfe3b7c70dfa4b9c6a85631d8df 171066 2012-03-14 02:01:29 0000000000000a2b80893930de6f5eddb3fc59a767363963a76b2018cb2a38de 171061 2012-03-14 01:12:17 000000000000040da70c1ac9e7b2fc4e97ab72fa8bd266ba35ecec00e2dd6b49
Your source is incorrect. Statistics are updated properly.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
forsetifox
|
|
March 14, 2012, 10:59:19 PM Last edit: March 14, 2012, 11:24:08 PM by forsetifox |
|
The block stats show "Average in last 24 hours: 2133680 (+42.5%)" which means terrible luck I think? According to my rewards I think that makes sense. However I've never seen so many long polls showing up in cgminer today. >.> What's up with that?
|
|
|
|
slider1978
|
|
March 14, 2012, 11:55:59 PM |
|
The block stats show "Average in last 24 hours: 2133680 (+42.5%)" which means terrible luck I think? According to my rewards I think that makes sense. However I've never seen so many long polls showing up in cgminer today. >.> What's up with that?
Longpolls mean a new block is starting, but doesn't mean that deepbit found the block.
|
|
|
|
forsetifox
|
|
March 15, 2012, 02:16:37 AM Last edit: March 15, 2012, 04:18:34 AM by forsetifox |
|
A new block on the entire bitcoin network?
|
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 15, 2012, 03:06:22 AM |
|
A new block on the entire bitcoin network? Yes.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
|
DeepBit (OP)
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
|
|
March 15, 2012, 04:06:43 AM |
|
As I said earlier, this site is not 100% accurate, use http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks ! Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
|
|
|
|