That's all what you can say ?
It's 101% decentralized just because you said it ? Without any proves ?
1300 uniqe nodes with equal right to vote and equal power of vote. Name more decentralized coin. Bitcoin's 4 biggest pools has 50% of network hashrate - 50% of votes. Idena is 160 times more decentralized than bitcoin is.
This is not true. And you know it.
Many users have 2 nodes in 2 virtual machines on the same PC. And there are those who have 3 nodes.
Therefore, really unique people, well, maybe 600.
Not a great achievement for a coin which is 2 years old.
Is it lie ? No.
Especially point 3, where you, as a schoolboy, with CAPS LOCK and "!!!" scream about "killing" users ))
101% decentralized...
Is it lie?
YES. Reb0rn is not dev. Its telegram admin that write his own opinion. You know why? Because this project is decentralized. Everyone is doing what's the best for network in his opinion and is free to convince others to do the same. If its shitty suggestion (like numbering flips) than none will fallow. If it's killing toxic members than some nodes might fallow. Why convincing others? Because this is decentralized network and 1 person ... no matter how rich (POS) or how much earth supply he is able to burn on guessing random number (POW) ... is not able to change/harm it.
He is admin in the Telegram, admin in the discord ...
Are you 101% sure that he is not one of the developers?
I'm not sure.
The chance that he is one of the developers is very high...
Whatever, as admin - he is the official face of this coin, and not just a user. He needs to be more restrained in his statements.
But since no one has accurate data about whether he is a developer or not, lets correct point 3.
Why is this project not decentralized (as stated on the main site):
1. You cannot dispose of your property. You generate (mining) invitations, but you cannot sell them, you can only give them out for free. Because the developers intentionally do not disable the termination of newbies and candidates.
2. Candidates and newbies are always at risk of being "killed".
3. Official coin Administrator (maybe one of the Dev team) urge to kill invitations from those people who make bad flips (bad in their opinion).
Here are some screenshots.
Admin calls for killing those who make bad flips:
https://i.imgur.com/ltADmRh.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/UBBXxUX.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/Aiw9SV1.jpg4. Developers urge to send reports on bad flips - flips with porn, with politics and so on. But what about the freedom of speech mentioned on the main site?
5. Incredibly huge premine.
As a result, for each of these points, you depend on the third party. Is this decentralization? No. This is totalitarian control.
And nothing has changed. All of these points still indicate that the actions of developers (and 101% Admin) contradict decentralization.
-All network users should have equal rights. There should not be anyone who can be "killed".
-There should be no censorship.
-You should have the full rights to dispose of your invitations, because this is your property. But the developers specifically limit you in your rights (to sell invitations), because they do not disable the "killing" of newcomers.
Even Bitcoin created in 2009 doesn't needs this protection...
Sybil attacks are avoided in Bitcoin by requiring block generation ability to be proportional to computational power available through the proof-of-work mechanism. That way, an adversary is limited in how many blocks they can produce. This provides strong cryptographic guarantees of Sybil resilience.
Bitcoin's sybil attack protection is called Proof of Work - who waste more energy wins. Idena sybil attack protection is called Proof of Person - every person has equal vote.
Who has 3 virtual machines with 3 nodes has 3 votes.
Also...
This huge amount of traffic from this coin...
10-15 gigabytes per day easily!
If you have a weak router - you need vps.
If you do not have unlimited traffic - you need vps.
If you have a weak provider - you need vps.
And how does this cancel the dullness of the idea of this coin?
The whole world, the whole scientific community develops Artificial Intelligence, and you begin to move in the opposite direction, which is called regression.
Why prove that you are a person, if all areas of life are automated more and more every day ??
Who needs to sit at the computer, spend time and solve these pictures?
Everything is said correctly...
Why do I find this project dumb?
Because we are obliged to engage in stupidity.
1. Artificial intelligence (AI) is our future. Why create things that prevent it?
2. Developers prohibit numbering flips. This, by the way, is again a reference to the violation of decentralization and freedom of speech.
Let's clarify some things.
We are all different people.
Different nationalities, different cultures, different logics, different imaginations, and so on and so on and so forth.
One person creates a flip and considers it quite logical, but another person may simply not understand it. And this is natural. We are all different.
But then confusion arises.
And a similar mess appeared thousands of years ago. And then SMART people came up with numbers. One for all. People simplified their lives and agreed to count the numbers so that there was order.
But in this coin, people are calling us to the opposite and want some kind of “quality flips” ...
It is a step backward, not progress.
But does regression make sense?
Only if it’s just scam, and all these flips, it’s just to attract more people for a "fun game" of pictures, but in fact another pump-dump scheme with premine.
People came up with numbers and numbering to live comfortably.
Your coin goes in the opposite direction, it makes it stupid.
But numbering can be smart.
You can number flips with emoticons, figures, lines, dots, the number of angles of a star, and anything else. Turn on fantasy.
But not just the numbers printed on the picture, which can be recognized by bots.
But it still makes no sense.
AI is the future. AI-resistant - not.