[ANN] Cinni | Mandatory: Convert your Cinni to Stakecoin. Instuctions posted.

[skip60]

i am so bored of cinni

i am selling my coins at mintpal @5555...

i am sure; soon someone buys

[pawlo74]

i am so bored of cinni

i am selling my coins at mintpal @5555...

i am sure; soon someone buys

Good move. Thanks for coins.
We don't need that kind of people here.
Bye 

[Bl4ckw00d]

i am so bored of cinni

i am selling my coins at mintpal @5555...

i am sure; soon someone buys

Good move. Thanks for coins.
We don't need that kind of people here.
Bye 

The size of the sell @ 5555 is rather hilarious

[skip60]

i am so bored of cinni

i am selling my coins at mintpal @5555...

i am sure; soon someone buys

Good move. Thanks for coins.
We don't need that kind of people here.
Bye 

The size of the sell @ 5555 is rather hilarious

if whales are still interested in cinni
then that wall sould be eaten, otherwise 

[CinniCoin]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707843.0
Voting is done on the logo thread
The logo that won was


Made by unlock.mk
I will send him a pm now to see what currency he want to be paid the $300 worth of cryptocurrency in and where to send.

Thank you all for participating  

[skip60]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707843.0
Voting is done on the logo thread
The logo that won was


Made by unlock.mk
I will send him a pm now to see what currency he want to be paid the $300 worth of cryptocurrency in and where to send.

Thank you all for participating  

maybe some people will not like what i will say, but logo is no better than the old one

it is not even possible to read that it is written "cinni"

anyway, thx to everyone who has participated

[skip60]

As someone who is working on anonymous features I am really offended by this post (for the record I have no idea who owns the website). I deleted the name in the quote and most of the offensive quote it came from (because I think quoting negative things just makes it worse).

If CINNI is going to attract investors who are interested in privacy we cannot have this sort of thing in the forum. Some of you I have talked about this with by private message. I am really mad at certain community members right now.

I am DONE working on CINNI until all posts (from current community members who are still active and therefore reading this) are deleted that attack and/or try to personally identify other community members who value their privacy.

You dont have to agree with me. However I don't have to continue working on my CINNI project if these personal attacks/requests for personal information continue in the public forum.

Maybe you will find another dev who cares less about privacy than I do. However you wont change my mind on this issue. If you agree with me send a PM to those who have made personal attacks (or requests for personal information) against/about other community members and ask them to stop/remove those posts.

what i can tell u; if they attack it means u re at the right road

there are some peole who has benefit of low cinni price...so dont leave cinni, dont let them win...u can do really good things

[Splatters]

I'm holding since 8k.
Any news coming, it rose over 2k today. Good signal.

[skip60]

As someone who is working on anonymous features I am really offended by this post (for the record I have no idea who owns the website). I deleted the name in the quote and most of the offensive quote it came from (because I think quoting negative things just makes it worse).

If CINNI is going to attract investors who are interested in privacy we cannot have this sort of thing in the forum. Some of you I have talked about this with by private message. I am really mad at certain community members right now.

I am DONE working on CINNI until all posts (from current community members who are still active and therefore reading this) are deleted that attack and/or try to personally identify other community members who value their privacy.

You dont have to agree with me. However I don't have to continue working on my CINNI project if these personal attacks/requests for personal information continue in the public forum.

Maybe you will find another dev who cares less about privacy than I do. However you wont change my mind on this issue. If you agree with me send a PM to those who have made personal attacks (or requests for personal information) against/about other community members and ask them to stop/remove those posts.

what i can tell u; if they attack it means u re at the right road

there are some peole who has benefit of low cinni price...so dont leave cinni, dont let them win...u can do really good things

I don't make these decisions without careful consideration. I have a programmer friend who was going to help me with part of my project but he made comments about how ridiculous it was that a coin promoting privacy would have people trying to identify each other in a public forum. I am not sure if he wants to help me anymore.

I am still willing to work on CINNI, but only if the type of posts I quoted above are deleted and stop being made in this thread.

i totally agree with u and support u about privacy of people......those posts related witl real names, identity, etc.  will be deleted, leave that part to me...i

from now on; u have my full support, and ready to help u with problems u are facing...i am sure community will be happy to help u

lets open a new page and forget old things...u gained my support with the way how u behave...i believe in u

 and again telling u "welcome aboard"

[sdersdf2]

Rynomster still dealing with family issues: Shadowcoin family issues
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8189429#msg8189429

Let's see...

So far, rynomster and his team have delivered instant p2p encrypted messaging... and released an updated EM wallet with rich-text messaging support.  Now they are releasing ShadowSend this thursday with uniquely implemented dual-key stealth addresses for anonymous transactions, and then later zk-snarks for layered security... and who knows what crypto firsts they will release next week?

And this coin is only around 2 weeks old?  They will have already been nearly caught up with XC by this Thursday, and in many ways ahead... Undervalued much?  I think so...

The anon tech he said he was developing for CINNI went elsewhere. That's why he hasn't responded to you, codecaffeinecode.

[sdersdf2]

As someone who is working on anonymous features I am really offended by this post (for the record I have no idea who owns the website). I deleted the name in the quote and most of the offensive quote it came from (because I think quoting negative things just makes it worse).

If CINNI is going to attract investors who are interested in privacy we cannot have this sort of thing in the forum. Some of you I have talked about this with by private message. I am really mad at certain community members right now.

I am DONE working on CINNI until all posts (from current community members who are still active and therefore reading this) are deleted that attack and/or try to personally identify other community members who value their privacy.

You dont have to agree with me. However I don't have to continue working on my CINNI project if these personal attacks/requests for personal information continue in the public forum.

Maybe you will find another dev who cares less about privacy than I do. However you wont change my mind on this issue. If you agree with me send a PM to those who have made personal attacks (or requests for personal information) against/about other community members and ask them to stop/remove those posts.

what i can tell u; if they attack it means u re at the right road

there are some peole who has benefit of low cinni price...so dont leave cinni, dont let them win...u can do really good things

I don't make these decisions without careful consideration. I have a programmer friend who was going to help me with part of my project but he made comments about how ridiculous it was that a coin promoting privacy would have people trying to identify each other in a public forum. I am not sure if he wants to help me anymore.

I am still willing to work on CINNI, but only if the type of posts I quoted above are deleted and stop being made in this thread.

I'm a bit unclear on what happened here - who was offended/how?

[sdersdf2]

As someone who is working on anonymous features I am really offended by this post (for the record I have no idea who owns the website). I deleted the name in the quote and most of the offensive quote it came from (because I think quoting negative things just makes it worse).

If CINNI is going to attract investors who are interested in privacy we cannot have this sort of thing in the forum. Some of you I have talked about this with by private message. I am really mad at certain community members right now.

I am DONE working on CINNI until all posts (from current community members who are still active and therefore reading this) are deleted that attack and/or try to personally identify other community members who value their privacy.

You dont have to agree with me. However I don't have to continue working on my CINNI project if these personal attacks/requests for personal information continue in the public forum.

Maybe you will find another dev who cares less about privacy than I do. However you wont change my mind on this issue. If you agree with me send a PM to those who have made personal attacks (or requests for personal information) against/about other community members and ask them to stop/remove those posts.

what i can tell u; if they attack it means u re at the right road

there are some peole who has benefit of low cinni price...so dont leave cinni, dont let them win...u can do really good things

I don't make these decisions without careful consideration. I have a programmer friend who was going to help me with part of my project but he made comments about how ridiculous it was that a coin promoting privacy would have people trying to identify each other in a public forum. I am not sure if he wants to help me anymore.

I am still willing to work on CINNI, but only if the type of posts I quoted above are deleted and stop being made in this thread.

I'm a bit unclear on what happened here - who was offended/how?

Read my previous post where one such quote (which I edited carefully) was referenced. This is a coin which will promote privacy, yet there are community members seeking to publicly identify each other on this public forums (asking for real names, address, etc).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8209856#msg8209856

I can't seem to find the original message you referenced and dont remember coming across anything with anyone's real name - maybe it's already been deleted. I agree that no one's identity should be revealed unless they've already chosen to publicly reveal it themselves.

As far as the practical matter of marketing, it seems Cinni doesn't even have control of it's own original website and twitter feed. <Facepalm>

[skip60]

As someone who is working on anonymous features I am really offended by this post (for the record I have no idea who owns the website). I deleted the name in the quote and most of the offensive quote it came from (because I think quoting negative things just makes it worse).

If CINNI is going to attract investors who are interested in privacy we cannot have this sort of thing in the forum. Some of you I have talked about this with by private message. I am really mad at certain community members right now.

I am DONE working on CINNI until all posts (from current community members who are still active and therefore reading this) are deleted that attack and/or try to personally identify other community members who value their privacy.

You dont have to agree with me. However I don't have to continue working on my CINNI project if these personal attacks/requests for personal information continue in the public forum.

Maybe you will find another dev who cares less about privacy than I do. However you wont change my mind on this issue. If you agree with me send a PM to those who have made personal attacks (or requests for personal information) against/about other community members and ask them to stop/remove those posts.

what i can tell u; if they attack it means u re at the right road

there are some peole who has benefit of low cinni price...so dont leave cinni, dont let them win...u can do really good things

I don't make these decisions without careful consideration. I have a programmer friend who was going to help me with part of my project but he made comments about how ridiculous it was that a coin promoting privacy would have people trying to identify each other in a public forum. I am not sure if he wants to help me anymore.

I am still willing to work on CINNI, but only if the type of posts I quoted above are deleted and stop being made in this thread.

I'm a bit unclear on what happened here - who was offended/how?

Read my previous post where one such quote (which I edited carefully) was referenced. This is a coin which will promote privacy, yet there are community members seeking to publicly identify each other on this public forums (asking for real names, address, etc).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8209856#msg8209856

I can't seem to find the original message you referenced and dont remember coming across anything with anyone's real name - maybe it's already been deleted. I agree that no one's identity should be revealed unless they've already chosen to publicly reveal it themselves.

As far as the practical matter of marketing, it seems Cinni doesn't even have control of it's own original website and twitter feed. <Facepalm>

orginal message has already been deleted by the member who posted...and everyone agrees to respect privacy....and no real name known or posted before or will be posted later

it is better u also delete ur post or stop quoting that post

[cryptoholic11]

Rynomster is the lead dev of ShadowCoin. I dont understand why CinniCoin and him couldnt tell us upfront that he had left Cinni, instead of leading us on for weeks. But in any case, now you know where ShadowCoin is headed, and it's probably the opposite direction to Cinni.

[johnnyrocket]

Rynomster is the lead dev of ShadowCoin. I dont understand why CinniCoin and him couldnt tell us upfront that he had left Cinni, instead of leading us on for weeks. But in any case, now you know where ShadowCoin is headed, and it's probably the opposite direction to Cinni.

Cinni was a great coin a few months ago, but development seems to have stagnated now especially with the loss of Rynomster and the features he was working on. What else is planned on the development roadmap to keep everyone interested?

[sdersdf2]

Rynomster is the lead dev of ShadowCoin. I dont understand why CinniCoin and him couldnt tell us upfront that he had left Cinni, instead of leading us on for weeks. But in any case, now you know where ShadowCoin is headed, and it's probably the opposite direction to Cinni.

I have no problem with Rynomster going off to Shadowcoin, just as I had no problem with battbot going off to XC - if that's all there was to it, I'd wish them well. What I have a big problem with is that these people strung us along for weeks pretending to promote and develop CINNI to buy time for them to dump their CINNI loads (they were the real "whales" that everyone was complaining about who dumped on every attempt CINNI made to rally). Rynomster on this thread and in PM repeatedly affirmed that he was developing this EM-based anon tech for CINNI and then suddenly "family issues" came up. It's the lying and deceit. Lying and deceit that cost a lot of people a lot of money.

Yes, the past is the past, but what confidence does that give you about the future when part of the old team is still here: I have no idea whether or not he was involved, but the past gives me no confidence in "Cinnicoin" dev's management of the future either - at best, he is naive/inept. At worst, he may have been involved. Oh, and congratulations on the logo.

[sdersdf2]

Depending on what the community wants to do and whether we can wrest control of the OP/cinnocoin-dev/twitter accounts, I'd propose that they all be handed over to Schild_ so we can proceed on a truly clean slate and a real recovery with someone more trustworthy.

I speak only for myself, but I dont think a true, clean, robust and sustainable recovery for this coin is possible as long as vestiges of the old leadership remain. A big wildcard is whether the old team still has a lot of coin they're itching to dump the next time CINNI makes an attempt at a recovery - richlist should be examined closely for that.

A P.S. to codecaffinecode: I again agree with you regarding privacy, but there is one big caveat: anonymity has been systematically used on this forum by a lot of devs to evade responsibility and accountability. When there's no consequence to reputation, there's less incentive to be accountable. Going forward, especially in light of the wave of scams on bitcointalk over the past few weeks, I have a lot less interest in coins with newbie devs - not with people who don't at least have established reputations online (doesn't have to be real-name, can be pseudonymous, as long as it's a long-standing reputation that is valuable to the account holder). Complete, "costless" anonymity makes people a lot less accountable for their actions/promises -- let's face it.

[Geminus]

Btw. I didn't expect skip60 to post names here in public, I wanted to know wether he has the information or not.
It's not about defacement of some people, it's about getting the accounts of cinnicoin.com website !

[Schild_]

Depending on what the community wants to do and whether we can wrest control of the OP/cinnocoin-dev/twitter accounts, I'd propose that they all be handed over the Schild_ so we can proceed on a truly clean slate and a real recovery with someone more trustworthy.

I speak only for myself, but I dont think a true, clean, robust and sustainable recovery for this coin is possible as long as vestiges of the old leadership remain. A big wildcard is whether the old team still has a lot of coin they're itching to dump the next time CINNI makes an attempt at a recovery - richlist should be examined closely for that.

A P.S. to codecaffinecode: I again agree with you regarding privacy, but there is one big caveat: anonymity has been systematically used on this forum by a lot of devs to evade accountability. When there's no consequence to reputation, there's less incentive to be accountable. Going forward, especially in light of the wave of scams on bitcointalk over the past few weeks, I have a lot less interest in coins with newbie devs - not with people who don't at least have established reputations online (doesn't have to be real-name, can be pseudonymous, as long as it's long-standing reputation that is valuable to the account holder). Complete, "costless" anonymity makes people a lot less accountable for their actions/promises -- let's face it.

Everyone posting negative content right now is taking the risk to make codecoiffeincode leave us. Please delete, this discussion is going nowhere. Cinnicoin is staying, we know you are still angry, but you ask for his departure every week and the community says we want him to stay.  We are really happy right now with what we have, we are FINALLY moving forward, don't spoil our joy please.

[skip60]

Btw. I didn't expect skip60 to post names here in public, I wanted to know wether he has the information or not.
It's not about defacement of some people, it's about getting the accounts of cinnicoin.com website !

i know...it is ok..i dont know the names anyway

everybody knows u dont have any bad intension

we agreed what "codecaffeincode" asked for

so now it is up to him to continue or leave cinni