fr0wn3r
Member
 Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 14, 2014, 12:45:33 PM |
|
@ Claymore
Any advice how to get more hash out of the Core i7 920? Or the below is pretty much it...
I dl-ed the 2.0 miner. Ran it as admin, made a .bat file with -t 7 command (8 threaded CPU, 4 cores and 8 MB of L2 cache, no L3; 6GB of RAM; Win7 x 64 with UAC turned off) and got 65-66 H/s which is lower than cpumulti gives...
Though it works fine, stable.
Thanks for the work you've done with the miners!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 14, 2014, 12:58:59 PM |
|
@ Claymore
Any advice how to get more hash out of the Core i7 920? Or the below is pretty much it...
I dl-ed the 2.0 miner. Ran it as admin, made a .bat file with -t 7 command (8 threaded CPU, 4 cores and 8 MB of L2 cache, no L3; 6GB of RAM; Win7 x 64 with UAC turned off) and got 65-66 H/s which is lower than cpumulti gives...
Though it works fine, stable.
Thanks for the work you've done with the miners!
It must show "fast mode enabled". What h/s cpumulti gives? |
|
|
|
fr0wn3r
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:25:19 PM |
|
@ Claymore
Any advice how to get more hash out of the Core i7 920? Or the below is pretty much it...
I dl-ed the 2.0 miner. Ran it as admin, made a .bat file with -t 7 command (8 threaded CPU, 4 cores and 8 MB of L2 cache, no L3; 6GB of RAM; Win7 x 64 with UAC turned off) and got 65-66 H/s which is lower than cpumulti gives...
Though it works fine, stable.
Thanks for the work you've done with the miners!
It must show "fast mode enabled". What h/s cpumulti gives? It does show. cpumulti shows 75 H/s... |
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:32:49 PM |
|
@ Claymore
Any advice how to get more hash out of the Core i7 920? Or the below is pretty much it...
I dl-ed the 2.0 miner. Ran it as admin, made a .bat file with -t 7 command (8 threaded CPU, 4 cores and 8 MB of L2 cache, no L3; 6GB of RAM; Win7 x 64 with UAC turned off) and got 65-66 H/s which is lower than cpumulti gives...
Though it works fine, stable.
Thanks for the work you've done with the miners!
It must show "fast mode enabled". What h/s cpumulti gives? It does show. cpumulti shows 75 H/s... That's strange. But I don't have this CPU here to see the reason, so if cpumulti works better use it instead. |
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:33:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
earther
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 02:18:27 PM |
|
I already restart but it still occurred.  |
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 14, 2014, 02:47:39 PM |
|
I already restart but it still occurred. Windows version? |
|
|
|
earther
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 03:09:34 PM |
|
I already restart but it still occurred. Windows version? i5-3570K z77x-D3H Ram 16GB his 280x windows 8 64bit  |
|
|
|
|
darkcond0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 03:53:46 PM |
|
Seems most of the problems are happening with Windows 8 x64?
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:02:35 PM |
|
Seems most of the problems are happening with Windows 8 x64?
Yes, Windows 8 is a problem, I will check it soon. |
|
|
|
darkcond0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:11:12 PM |
|
I went from 185 h/s to 220 h/s with version 2 on i7-4770, with windows 8 x64.
If there's anything I could help with testing, let me know
|
|
|
|
|
dezzuria
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:22:54 PM |
|
You should probably try a lower thread count on your 920, 3 threads seems optimal for my i7-2600 and im getting ~220H/s.
This miner is really fast on both Intel and AMD, my fx-8320 (@ 4,8) is putting out ~400 H/s using 7 threads. (320 using Wolf´s miner)
Great work Claymore, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:59:58 AM |
|
I have a Pentium G3220 x64 with windows 8.1
Is it worth mining with this, what hr could I expect?
It has 4GB RAM, any benefit increasing it?
|
|
|
|
|
seljak
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 09:04:52 AM |
|
i am forced to keep using wolfs miner on ec2...getting 270h/s while your miner gives only 170h/s in "slow mode"
|
|
|
|
|
|
juve4v
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:50:18 PM |
|
What does this mean :
DevFee: 06/15/14-10:06:37 - SHARE FOUND (target 1941) - (THR 1)
06/15/14-10:08:05 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 1)
06/15/14-10:08:16 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 2)
06/15/14-10:08:17 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 1)
DevFee: 06/15/14-10:09:39 - SHARE FOUND (target 1941) - (THR 0)
06/15/14-10:10:42 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 3)
DevFee: 06/15/14-10:11:33 - SHARE FOUND (target 1941) - (THR 0)
Especially the DeVFee and target 1941 part, cause the miner changed to this output from first started after a while.
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:20:22 PM |
|
What does this mean :
DevFee: 06/15/14-10:06:37 - SHARE FOUND (target 1941) - (THR 1)
06/15/14-10:08:05 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 1)
06/15/14-10:08:16 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 2)
06/15/14-10:08:17 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 1)
DevFee: 06/15/14-10:09:39 - SHARE FOUND (target 1941) - (THR 0)
06/15/14-10:10:42 - SHARE FOUND (target 20000) - (THR 3)
DevFee: 06/15/14-10:11:33 - SHARE FOUND (target 1941) - (THR 0)
Especially the DeVFee and target 1941 part, cause the miner changed to this output from first started after a while.
DevFee - means that this share was found by thread that handles 5% developer fee. Target is the share value that is defined by pool (lower target - cheaper share), most pools adjust target to achieve some average speed of shares, too low target will cause a lot of cheap shares and pool overload, too high target will cause you can search for a share for a long time. Since developer fee is handled by separate thread and it has only 5% of total power, pool sets much less target for it, as result you will see "dev fee" shares more than 5% of total shares but these shares are cheaper than main shares (in your example 1941 and 20000 so dev fee shares are >10 times cheaper than main shares). |
|
|
|
|
ajeef
|
|
June 15, 2014, 10:56:05 PM |
|
  need fix issue |
|
|
|
|
darkcond0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2014, 06:29:06 AM |
|
Is there any way you could change it to allow mining at pools that don't require only payment address as username? I'm trying to mine at minergate, but it gets the "something is wrong with devfee connection" and stops every 30 seconds or so for 30 seconds.
Maybe have the devfee part hard set to a certain pool with your address?
|
|
|
|
|
seljak
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
June 16, 2014, 07:41:44 AM |
|
i think this miner still needs a lot of work...
Is anyone having issues with it?
My gpu miners get totaly kockblocked by it. ccminer drops to 10% of speed when Claymores cpu miner is on...no mather the number of used threads, also with -lowcpu option.
A fail over pool option is urgent with this kind of pools with no ddos protection.
a way to start the miner in "fast mode" without a restart.
|
|
|
|
|
earther
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:24:40 PM |
|
I got about 200h/s on E3-1230. Is it normal. So sad because FX8320 got about 3-400h/s  |
|
|
|
|
|
