macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
September 29, 2014, 08:53:21 AM |
|
Thanks for the prompt reply. I guess that no workaround that you are aware of, is feasible at the moment...
Thanks again for your excellent miner.
|
Chaos could be a form of intelligence we cannot yet understand its complexity.
|
|
|
TimeHacker
|
|
October 10, 2014, 10:26:44 AM |
|
I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 10:39:41 AM |
|
I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?
Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements.
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 01:31:36 PM |
|
I'm getting virus warning like below in the latest Panda Antivirus. Anyone else experiencing the same? Trj/CI.A allows hackers to get into and carry out dangerous actions in affected computers, such as capturing screenshots, stealing personal data, etc.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 01:58:33 PM |
|
I'm getting virus warning like below in the latest Panda Antivirus. Anyone else experiencing the same? Trj/CI.A allows hackers to get into and carry out dangerous actions in affected computers, such as capturing screenshots, stealing personal data, etc.
Three pages back: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7908079#msg7908079
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:44:59 PM |
|
I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?
Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements. Hello, third day is almost end, how long we have to wait ? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 13, 2014, 05:14:16 PM |
|
I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?
Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements. Hello, third day is almost end, how long we have to wait ? Thank you. Almost finished, I need a few hours to finish/test it, so it will be available either today or tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer
|
|
October 13, 2014, 06:21:07 PM |
|
I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?
Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements. Hello, third day is almost end, how long we have to wait ? Thank you. Almost finished, I need a few hours to finish/test it, so it will be available either today or tomorrow. Eagerly waiting fir that to test. Ready for any pre-launch or beta release?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 14, 2014, 08:41:40 AM |
|
v3.4 is available:
- Reduced dev fee, now it is 2.5%. - Improved speed by 1-3%. - Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
|
|
|
|
saul.goodman
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 14, 2014, 11:40:20 AM Last edit: October 14, 2014, 12:12:07 PM by saul.goodman |
|
Xeon-E3 1230v2 (Ivy) -t 4 240 h/s -> 260 h/s THX!
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer
|
|
October 14, 2014, 12:22:22 PM |
|
How much hashrate is possible with 7950? Anyone using this GPU for CryptoNote?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 14, 2014, 12:52:20 PM |
|
How much hashrate is possible with 7950? Anyone using this GPU for CryptoNote?
Wrong thread. GPU miner discussion is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638915.0
|
|
|
|
NeuroticFish
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 6591
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
|
|
October 14, 2014, 02:18:54 PM |
|
I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.
Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
|
|
|
|
Rytir_fik
|
|
October 14, 2014, 04:28:11 PM |
|
I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.
Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem.
|
|
|
|
NeuroticFish
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 6591
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
|
|
October 15, 2014, 10:38:06 AM |
|
I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.
Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem. I did some more tests and ... still bad. If I use 4 threads I get low hash rate, if I use 8 threads I don't have enough memory and go into slow mode.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 15, 2014, 11:22:24 AM |
|
I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.
Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem. I did some more tests and ... still bad. If I use 4 threads I get low hash rate, if I use 8 threads I don't have enough memory and go into slow mode. I don't have 920 CPU here to test it, so I cannot investigate this issue. If some other miner works better for you then probably you should use it instead.
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
October 19, 2014, 04:51:25 PM |
|
Thank you for the new version. Problem with L2 cache is solved and hashes is permanent in time.
Core i7 2600K (3.5 Ghz) - 285 H\s 2 x Xeon E5645 ES (2.5 Ghz) - 370 H\s
|
|
|
|
Rytir_fik
|
|
October 19, 2014, 08:21:25 PM |
|
I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.
Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem. I did some more tests and ... still bad. If I use 4 threads I get low hash rate, if I use 8 threads I don't have enough memory and go into slow mode. Finally the Calymore works on my PC. I was not able to update the shortcut properties as described in readme.txt point 2nd. Then I recognized it has to be written different way like in this advice http://superuser.com/questions/29569/how-to-add-command-line-options-to-shortcut. I put pool and parameters behind the quotes and all work properly. Thank you - Calymore is the fastest CPU miner I have ever had. Calymore, maybe think to update the readme for total noob like me. :-) Here is my example just in case somebody is "lama" like me: "C:\Claymore CryptoNote CPU Miner v3.4 Beta - POOL\NsCpuCNMiner64.exe" -o stratum+tcp://mcn-bcn.pool.minergate.com:45650 -u email -p x -t 3
|
|
|
|
nitro64
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
October 21, 2014, 09:56:44 PM |
|
so which one is better Claymore's or Wolf's?
|
|
|
|
sleepdog
|
|
October 22, 2014, 07:58:48 AM |
|
You have to try them both yourself I'm afraid, there's no definitive answer. It depends on your system and there's very little benchmark data available.
|
|
|
|
|