Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 12:37:06 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote Windows CPU Miner v4.0  (Read 565436 times)
macsga
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002


Strange, yet attractive.


View Profile
September 29, 2014, 08:53:21 AM
 #161

Thanks for the prompt reply. I guess that no workaround that you are aware of, is feasible at the moment...

Thanks again for your excellent miner.

Chaos could be a form of intelligence we cannot yet understand its complexity.
TimeHacker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 521
Merit: 256


View Profile
October 10, 2014, 10:26:44 AM
 #162

I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?

Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 10, 2014, 10:39:41 AM
 #163

I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?

Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
allcoinminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 504


View Profile
October 10, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
 #164

I'm getting virus warning like below in the latest Panda Antivirus.
Anyone else experiencing the same?
Trj/CI.A allows hackers to get into and carry out dangerous actions in affected computers, such as capturing screenshots, stealing personal data, etc.
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 10, 2014, 01:58:33 PM
 #165

I'm getting virus warning like below in the latest Panda Antivirus.
Anyone else experiencing the same?
Trj/CI.A allows hackers to get into and carry out dangerous actions in affected computers, such as capturing screenshots, stealing personal data, etc.

Three pages back:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7908079#msg7908079

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 04:44:59 PM
 #166

I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?

Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements.

Hello, third day is almost end, how long we have to wait ? Thank you.
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 05:14:16 PM
 #167

I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?

Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements.

Hello, third day is almost end, how long we have to wait ? Thank you.

Almost finished, I need a few hours to finish/test it, so it will be available either today or tomorrow.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
allcoinminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 504


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 06:21:07 PM
 #168

I've seen the dev fee was decreased in GPU miner to 2.5%. Will you consider decreasing also the CPU miner fee any time soon?

Yes, I will release an update in 2-3 days, it will also include some other improvements.

Hello, third day is almost end, how long we have to wait ? Thank you.

Almost finished, I need a few hours to finish/test it, so it will be available either today or tomorrow.

Eagerly waiting fir that to test.
Ready for any pre-launch or beta release?
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 08:41:40 AM
 #169

v3.4 is available:

- Reduced dev fee, now it is 2.5%.
- Improved speed by 1-3%.
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
saul.goodman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 11:40:20 AM
Last edit: October 14, 2014, 12:12:07 PM by saul.goodman
 #170

Xeon-E3 1230v2 (Ivy)

-t 4 240 h/s -> 260 h/s

THX! Smiley
allcoinminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 504


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 12:22:22 PM
 #171

How much hashrate is possible with 7950?
Anyone using this GPU for CryptoNote?
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 12:52:20 PM
 #172

How much hashrate is possible with 7950?
Anyone using this GPU for CryptoNote?

Wrong thread. GPU miner discussion is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638915.0

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
NeuroticFish
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3864
Merit: 6591


Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 02:18:54 PM
 #173

I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.

Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...

███████████████████████
████▐██▄█████████████████
████▐██████▄▄▄███████████
████▐████▄█████▄▄████████
████▐█████▀▀▀▀▀███▄██████
████▐███▀████████████████
████▐█████████▄█████▌████
████▐██▌█████▀██████▌████
████▐██████████▀████▌████
█████▀███▄█████▄███▀█████
███████▀█████████▀███████
██████████▀███▀██████████

███████████████████████
.
BC.GAME
▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
▄▀▀░▄██▀░▀██▄░▀▀▄
▄▀░▐▀▄░▀░░▀░░▀░▄▀▌░▀▄
▄▀▄█▐░▀▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▀░▌█▄▀▄
▄▀░▀░░█░▄███████▄░█░░▀░▀▄
█░█░▀░█████████████░▀░█░█
█░██░▀█▀▀█▄▄█▀▀█▀░██░█
█░█▀██░█▀▀██▀▀█░██▀█░█
▀▄▀██░░░▀▀▄▌▐▄▀▀░░░██▀▄▀
▀▄▀██░░▄░▀▄█▄▀░▄░░██▀▄▀
▀▄░▀█░▄▄▄░▀░▄▄▄░█▀░▄▀
▀▄▄▀▀███▄███▀▀▄▄▀
██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████
.
..CASINO....SPORTS....RACING..


▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀███▄
██████████
▀███▄░▄██▀
▄▄████▄▄░▀█▀▄██▀▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀▀████▄▄██▀▄███▀▀███▄
███████▄▄▀▀████▄▄▀▀███████
▀███▄▄███▀░░░▀▀████▄▄▄███▀
▀▀████▀▀████████▀▀████▀▀
Rytir_fik
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 04:28:11 PM
 #174

I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.

Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem.

I like Bytecoin (BCN). BYTECOIN.ORG the best to mine with MinerGate
NeuroticFish
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3864
Merit: 6591


Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!


View Profile
October 15, 2014, 10:38:06 AM
 #175

I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.

Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem.

I did some more tests and ... still bad.
If I use 4 threads I get low hash rate, if I use 8 threads I don't have enough memory and go into slow mode.

███████████████████████
████▐██▄█████████████████
████▐██████▄▄▄███████████
████▐████▄█████▄▄████████
████▐█████▀▀▀▀▀███▄██████
████▐███▀████████████████
████▐█████████▄█████▌████
████▐██▌█████▀██████▌████
████▐██████████▀████▌████
█████▀███▄█████▄███▀█████
███████▀█████████▀███████
██████████▀███▀██████████

███████████████████████
.
BC.GAME
▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
▄▀▀░▄██▀░▀██▄░▀▀▄
▄▀░▐▀▄░▀░░▀░░▀░▄▀▌░▀▄
▄▀▄█▐░▀▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▀░▌█▄▀▄
▄▀░▀░░█░▄███████▄░█░░▀░▀▄
█░█░▀░█████████████░▀░█░█
█░██░▀█▀▀█▄▄█▀▀█▀░██░█
█░█▀██░█▀▀██▀▀█░██▀█░█
▀▄▀██░░░▀▀▄▌▐▄▀▀░░░██▀▄▀
▀▄▀██░░▄░▀▄█▄▀░▄░░██▀▄▀
▀▄░▀█░▄▄▄░▀░▄▄▄░█▀░▄▀
▀▄▄▀▀███▄███▀▀▄▄▀
██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████
.
..CASINO....SPORTS....RACING..


▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀███▄
██████████
▀███▄░▄██▀
▄▄████▄▄░▀█▀▄██▀▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀▀████▄▄██▀▄███▀▀███▄
███████▄▄▀▀████▄▄▀▀███████
▀███▄▄███▀░░░▀▀████▄▄▄███▀
▀▀████▀▀████████▀▀████▀▀
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 15, 2014, 11:22:24 AM
 #176

I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.

Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem.

I did some more tests and ... still bad.
If I use 4 threads I get low hash rate, if I use 8 threads I don't have enough memory and go into slow mode.

I don't have 920 CPU here to test it, so I cannot investigate this issue. If some other miner works better for you then probably you should use it instead.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 04:51:25 PM
 #177

Thank you for the new version. Problem with L2 cache is solved and hashes is permanent in time.  

Core i7 2600K (3.5 Ghz) - 285 H\s
2 x Xeon E5645 ES (2.5 Ghz) - 370 H\s
Rytir_fik
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 08:21:25 PM
 #178

I gave a try to the new version and, on i7 920 it's still slower than my super-old cpuminer-multi 1.0.3.

Is that normal? Am I missing anything? If I would get (for myself) at least the same hash rate as the old miner, I would use yours, at least for the failsafe options...
what about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7977109#msg7977109 maybe it helps you. I was not able to make it work, but it is my problem.

I did some more tests and ... still bad.
If I use 4 threads I get low hash rate, if I use 8 threads I don't have enough memory and go into slow mode.
Finally the Calymore works on my PC. I was not able to update the shortcut properties as described in readme.txt point 2nd. Then I recognized it has to be written different way like in this advice http://superuser.com/questions/29569/how-to-add-command-line-options-to-shortcut. I put pool and parameters behind the quotes and all work properly.

Thank you - Calymore is the fastest CPU miner I have ever had.

Calymore, maybe think to update the readme for total noob like me. :-)

Here is my example just in case somebody is "lama" like me: "C:\Claymore CryptoNote CPU Miner v3.4 Beta - POOL\NsCpuCNMiner64.exe" -o stratum+tcp://mcn-bcn.pool.minergate.com:45650 -u email -p x -t 3

I like Bytecoin (BCN). BYTECOIN.ORG the best to mine with MinerGate
nitro64
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 21, 2014, 09:56:44 PM
 #179

so which one is better Claymore's or Wolf's?
sleepdog
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 22, 2014, 07:58:48 AM
 #180

You have to try them both yourself I'm afraid, there's no definitive answer. It depends on your system and there's very little benchmark data available.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!