Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 09:55:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 1557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 2032138 times)
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005


View Profile
April 29, 2012, 11:27:17 PM
 #861

Two must-reads:

The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar

and

The Sunday Night Massacre, One Year Later

The first is a classic, explaining that only a perspective shift is necessary for a gold standard to function.

The TF Metals article explains exactly what has been going on for the past decade and is coming to a transition point - the banks are balancing themselves and will soon be in a position to actually profit from a move up in the precious metals.
1714211731
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714211731

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714211731
Reply with quote  #2

1714211731
Report to moderator
TalkImg was created especially for hosting images on bitcointalk.org: try it next time you want to post an image
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714211731
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714211731

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714211731
Reply with quote  #2

1714211731
Report to moderator
1714211731
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714211731

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714211731
Reply with quote  #2

1714211731
Report to moderator
1714211731
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714211731

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714211731
Reply with quote  #2

1714211731
Report to moderator
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 04:27:24 AM
 #862

perhaps you don't know.  the demand for credit is non-existent, hence the low rates.

The demand for credit is stratospheric. However, the demand for safety is greater. End result: stagnation.

Does this sound familiar? Which gold price are new trade transactions using?

Any guess as to why gold is refusing to break down? I'm impressed that even the paper side is staying aloft.

Recall our discussion a while back about the difference in transparency between Bitcoin and gold, and why I'm only investing - not trading outside of Bitcoin.

I think you'll like the asteroid mining article, though.

is this the credit demand you were talking about?  http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100016668/europe-faces-japan-syndrome-as-credit-demand-implodes/
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005


View Profile
April 30, 2012, 05:55:08 AM
 #863


Credit demand is immense, just not from traditional banking sources. These statistics cannot capture the growing undercurrent of private contract (esp. hard money) lending. The banks may be hurting, but that leaves plenty of room for more nimble outfits with low overhead.

Credit demand destruction is exaggerated - it isn't collapsing, it simply is migrating to where it is treated best. The main losers are major banks, although everyone loses when the money supply is inflated. Again - the statistics are blind to this.
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 01:20:54 PM
 #864

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/funds-cut-positions-gold-4-and-silver-20-gold-positions-3-year-low
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 01:55:34 PM
 #865

We're going to fill the Apple gap real fast and then $500 here we come! Wink
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 02:00:44 PM
 #866

y'all been double topped.
silverbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
April 30, 2012, 03:40:32 PM
 #867

and the correlation continues!!

AAPL down,  BTC down!!
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 03:41:16 PM
 #868

and the correlation continues!!

AAPL down,  BTC down!!

the divergence begins today!
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 03:59:51 PM
 #869

cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 05:22:11 PM
 #870

iz it tim yet?:

silverbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
April 30, 2012, 05:27:24 PM
 #871

It sure is, time to buy them miners, super cheap atm!!

Are those our dates for when we FTJ after BTC becomes the global reserve currency?
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 06:28:29 PM
 #872

It sure is, time to buy them miners, super cheap atm!!

Are those our dates for when we FTJ after BTC becomes the global reserve currency?

cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 07:16:42 PM
 #873

Charge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005


View Profile
April 30, 2012, 07:31:04 PM
 #874


Funds can't make a return when there's so little movement, so of course they'll drop anything that's holding steady. When they dump, the real players scoop up shares on the cheap. These market conditions are slaughtering momentum-chasers.

If you're going to use funds as part of your argument, you should remain consistent - they've piled into Apple. You advocate selling Apple and selling gold miners, yet major funds are doing the opposite in each. So which is it - are funds to be followed or not?
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 08:07:00 PM
 #875


Funds can't make a return when there's so little movement, so of course they'll drop anything that's holding steady. When they dump, the real players scoop up shares on the cheap. These market conditions are slaughtering momentum-chasers.

If you're going to use funds as part of your argument, you should remain consistent - they've piled into Apple. You advocate selling Apple and selling gold miners, yet major funds are doing the opposite in each. So which is it - are funds to be followed or not?

it really doesn't matter to me who is selling Apple and miners.  all that matters to me is that the prices of both are dropping and my shorts are benefitting. 
silverbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
April 30, 2012, 08:19:36 PM
 #876

Till the bearded one announces QE3 and your short gains will be erased in like 2 milli seconds..  Grin
Hunterbunter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 30, 2012, 10:43:14 PM
 #877

Till the bearded one announces QE3 and your short gains will be erased in like 2 milli seconds..  Grin

He will do it when he knows everyone is short I bet.
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 30, 2012, 10:50:13 PM
 #878

perhaps he lets the stock market collapse 54% and 57% like he did back in 2000 and 2008-9?  or perhaps as much as the housing market has collapsed?  aren't we back to prices in 1998?

i guess that would just be a flesh wound  Wink
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005


View Profile
May 01, 2012, 03:32:13 AM
 #879

perhaps he lets the stock market collapse 54% and 57% like he did back in 2000 and 2008-9?  or perhaps as much as the housing market has collapsed?  aren't we back to prices in 1998?

The banks are more levered up now than they were three years ago, so that magnitude of collapse wouldn't just threaten to wipe them out - they'd be craters. If such a drop does occur, bank holidays will be guaranteed along with major distracting events - war, for instance.
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
May 01, 2012, 03:38:18 AM
 #880

perhaps he lets the stock market collapse 54% and 57% like he did back in 2000 and 2008-9?  or perhaps as much as the housing market has collapsed?  aren't we back to prices in 1998?

The banks are more levered up now than they were three years ago, so that magnitude of collapse wouldn't just threaten to wipe them out - they'd be craters. If such a drop does occur, bank holidays will be guaranteed along with major distracting events - war, for instance.

precisely.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 1557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!