Evidence or no evidence, it shouldnt matter at all after reading the fact that he did business with a known criminal(Zhou even told us this).
What are your feelings on asking Kevin Mitnick
for some advice on your company before going live?
At the same time his website: http://www.sgitcoin.com/
under Disclaimer proudly states they dont encourage criminal activity.
I've never seen a single shred of evidence that SGITCOIN.COM was involved in any illegal activity.
Why anyone still wants to believe anything comine from Zhou is remarkable.
I'm still not seeing any evidence, just lots of people butthurt at Bitcoinica LP who are looking for a scapegoat and using Zhou's eagerness for transparency against him. The most ridiculous party in all of this is AurumXChange who if it weren't for the fact that no one involved in bitcoinica wants an investigation, would be sued up the ass for the little stunt they pulled in that other thread.
1) Discussing an active investigation carries a sentence of up to 10 years
2) Holding funds for more than 7 days without an active investigation is also illegal
3) Publicly discussing the details of their customers is unlawful as a breach of their customer privacy agreement
Even one of the confirming parties told me that they had -no- clue Roberto was going to be posting this stuff publicly as they -know- that is unlawful and potentially illegal. The only reason AurumXchange isn't commenting is because they finally figured out how screwed they are.
This is interesting! I've just connected Kevin Mitnick to the last name on the infamous Mt Gox email dump list: