I think it is a really good idea, and take it all the way down to DT4+ with different colors to give more incentives to be positive for Bitcointalk..

I asked everyone in public for help with you... Still am..

Go ahead..
I am ready and willing to compromise with the community on this situation, have already been very transparent and honest about it, but as of right now my original action still stands because I think that it is correct..

Please everyone go ahead on over to that thread and give your input on my actions in that situation, and if I'm wrong I will take your advice, and learn something.. Please do..
(2 year old tag when I was not DT)


Lol, prolly took 5 seconds or was out of memory..

I didn't even have to dig your posts myself!!
Are you sure you want to fuck with suchmoon?
I would advise listening to suchmoon if I were you.. You won't find much more of a worthy opponent around here than suchmoon..


 

Nice knowin ya..



Heyyyyy.... I'll save that just incase tyvm..

No...
That was meant to address twitchy..
Finished your post and yeah, I was not trying to include you in the witch hunting party.. I see you as a pretty neutral truth seeker..

Right..

So you think you see a series of ponzi associations here..
Do you think it would have been reasonable for him to assume that BFL was a ponzi? Or was he just doing a community project?
I'm not real up on BFL but I know they scammed a LOT of very smart people..



If you got me on the exact definition I'll concede, but you know what I mean..

What is your goal of an outcome here? And others posting or who have posted here?
Is the goal to take down OG or something else?

Why don't you source threads of the time period to tell of OGNasty's part in this, rather than a non-historical witch hunt thread with obvious anti-OG bias based mostly on speculation?

I would like to see all the old threads related to this.. Not this drama..

I think that it would be best to completely do away with usernames, emails, and passwords, and just register a BTC public address to make an account..

To log in, enter your BTC public address, click login and it gives you a timestamp hashed against your public key that you must sign within 1-3 minutes, enter the BTC signed message of the timestamp hash like a password, BTCT verifies your signature, you are logged in..

Simple..

Let an unlimited amount of "Anonymous" usernames exist and make usernames optional, like 4chan but you could only ever choose one username..
Make emails optional..
No passwords..

No captcha for login, just reduce it to 10 tries an hour..
You can't bruteforce a BTC signed message signature.. No hacked password hashes problems ever again..

It would give everyone excellent practice on handling their keys...
Lose your keys = lose your account, no recourse you LOSE..


I may be missing a lot here because I'm pretty code stupid, but I think that setup would be epic..

Where are the compaints?
If their are no complaints, then why are you even digging for dirt, unless it is a witch hunt?

This shit is ancient and you are just trying to find ancient dirt..
I don't see the intentions of this to make any possible victims whole.. Just to take down OGNasty..

I do respect admitting when you are wrong though..

It is meant to be untrue thereby proving your criteria false..
Their was no insult intended because it is quite obvious that your IQ is higher than 2, evidence being you seem to have found the power button on a computer..


I like "whales" manipulating the market.. It's just free market to me, and they keep the market interesting..
As long as they have the coin to risk manipulating the market with then have at it.. Put on a show!!

What I dislike is exchanges manipulating the market that don't actually have the coins.. Fake coins (or $$)..

I think you could get caught up by reading my posts in this thread starting here for a couple pages or so..


Same here..
I am soooo ready to see some damning evidence against OG after all of this half baked, circumstantial, and speculative attacking of him basically across the entire forum..

Some of the best of the best are here constantly trying to dig at whatever they can find and keep coming up with nothing much, while still insisting he is such a horrible scammer and causing ridiculous amounts of drama..

At this point I really just want to finally be convinced that he is indeed a piece of shit so I can quit caring about all of this, but nothing good yet..

Maybe they got em this time, and if they do, I want to see it..

Did this postal letter contain the formal accusation of fraud documents (whatever they are called) against OG that you originally threatened?


I think that was pretty low, but..
This is far from the first time I have seen this link, I believe you referenced it first, it did not originate from OG did it?
It is basically old news, hence not having to be contained to the investigations board..


Anyway, this is off topic..

I want to know if OG middleman scammed his pirate pass through investors or not..


Burden of proof is on the accuser.. If their is proof I want to see it, but it's not my job to go find it..
First you need to prove that OG got whatever refund, then you need to prove that he did not pay whatever refund..

So I should trust what Trendon Shavers has to say about who he paid? I'm not sure about that..

Cool, post links..

BTW did you actually call the IRS on OG, putting his life in danger, the 500BTC of forum funds in danger, and possibly the forum itself in legal danger, or did you lie about contacting the IRS?
JJG want's to know too..

So the accusation is that OG was fully refunded by BS&T, but told the "investors" that he was not, only paid the reserve to the investors, and pocketed the refund WD from BS&T?

Looks like a mistake of incorrectly linking than intentional plagiarism to me..


https://better.fyi/trackers/twimg.com/


So he kinda even has a twitter link in there.. No?

If that is your criteria for how "smart" you are about Bitcoin then even I'm "smarter" than you, and I can't even read code..
Many people here are a hundred times smarter than you, and if we assume an IQ high of like 200, your IQ would be about 2 compared to them according to this criteria..

Not really unless you do.. The public here are pretty good arbiters and any escrow is just about as likely to croak as either of us..

Sure, let it simmer for a bit..

I think I would have to know what software you used to sign it and use the same software to verify it? Not sure..
It didn't work on the one I tested mine with..

Sounds good, and Jan 31 sounds fine.. No rush.. I could see a lot of drama happening to slow the process..
Thanks for that concedence..

You want to write up a contract with that for me to sign after review?
I'm warming up my signature maker..

1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
test test 12/7/19 eddie13
HzecTQsukcjqPt/fLhcXosLAevcRnNPnHwK6hlP1SUjfLSyWE7zKV8Rezo5lK0L4YlfC379+HzKh8LQyYsvZcP0=

Bump for annoying me..



Are you sure I did that?
I don't recall doing that..
I don't think I would "demand" it but you are making it very hard for me not to recommend it since you don't seem to be coming around to reason as I hoped you would..

P.S.
I think you got your quote boxes mixed up in your last post in this thread.. Can you fix them so I'm sure I understand you correctly?

Also, I was not DT back then so my tag was "untrusted" feedback anyway, so it mattered a lot less..

But I think my tag is still good enough as it is..
Anyone think I should take it down?


Feel free to dig my account some more Mr. mosprognoz and let me know about any inconsistencies you may find and I'll offer what I can for an explanation.. I think you would be far from the first, or the best, to do so, so bring it.. I think more worthy opponents than you have tried..

I think I could dig your account and find hundreds of inconsistencies based on all of the ones I have already found in your current posts, much less look at your old posts, which frankly I don't care enough to do, because you are insignificant to me..
I wouldn't draw any more attention to myself in relation to DT fitness if I were you, but hey, whatever floats your boat..

I said it so I will honor it..

I think I was thinking more along the lines of "Trump would beat any of them in an election" Which would be more contingent on him running at all, including being alive to do so, or not simply retiring after his success and handing it off to someone else, which I wouldn't really blame him for.. Their isn't really even a race yet to bet on..
But that is not what I said..

In order to honor what I said exactly I guess Trump has to win the 2020 election from this very moment barring any and all circumstances or "rules"..
If Trump doesn't win 2020 I lose basically no matter the reason, which is kinda a shit bet, but I'll take it if you feel like holding me to it..

I like your contingency on the EC because what if Trump wins the EC but, the EC is abolished between now and then?
But I guess I would still loose if Trump lost because the EC was abolished..
I see all sorts of dirty tricks they could play..



Sadly this is a concern, but it would be decided through "If the Electoral College doesn't meet by December 31 or some other reasonable date it's a draw (no winner)." because serious investigations of voter fraud wold hold up the meeting, right?

I don't think I ever tried hard to convince him to come here and show proofs, but I am (was) confident Jim's original account was being controlled by someone else..

It was obvious to me that it wasn't Jim by the writing style, as mentioned in my left rating..
""when will legalization bitcoin? why this does not happen? are there any countries that have legalized bitcoin?
or already somehow now it is possible to legalize the income received from Bitcoin?"

Jim does not write in chinglish nor ask such stupid questions.."


I am also quite confident that this account is the real Jim..


I think I last talked to Jim on Telegram about the time of youtucoin, iirc that is why I was on telegram..
I don't really "know him personally" but he is a bit of an oldschool crypto celebrity, the DEV of UNB, and was very active with the cryptsy guys back in the day.. I used to chat with him a lot back then.. I think it was Christmas time 2014 when he sent me a free kickass UNB T-shirt that I still have..


As far as I know the original account never denied the change in ownership, protested my rating or anything, and it hasn't logged in since 2018..
I think I told Jim he should come here and get it back but he was uninterested..


So you suggest I change my rating on the account because I don't have 100% proof even though it is uncontested? I think it is fine..

I could probably drag Jim into here to prove it but I think that would be annoying to him..



I don't really think it is necessary to go through all the hassle get more tags on the account.. Your actions here are correct TP..



I don't claim to be an "expert" on all things, and this was over 2 years ago..
Is this the best you could find to complain about?

I think you are just taking a pot shot at me here but it is fine, I can take it and embrace the skepticism..
I don't think their is anything wrong with my tag.. It is unproven to all beyond any doubt, but also uncontested, and I would say very reasonable to assume that I am right..


Any more critiques or suggestions on this situation from anyone? TP or even mosprognoz?
What do you think I should do from here Mr. mosprognoz?