Finally, together with one of the forum users, we have almost completed work on the creation of UniJoin custom cards.
The good news is that each of these 20 cards will find its owner through the raffle.
The card design is really cool, I can't wait to take part in this raffle! It'll make some really nice collectibles, it's a really nice initiative. 
Otherwise, I've just published the French translation of your topic: 🌀 [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Mixer | Votre anonymat est notre priorité !Please let me know if anything needs to be changed |
|
|
|
Auteur : UniJoinTexte original : 🌀 [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Mixer | Your Anonymity Is Our Priority!
/fr/faq][banned mixer] est un mixer de crypto-monnaies qui restaure l'anonymat de vos crypto-monnaies. UniJoin utilise CoinJoin qui permet de combiner plusieurs transactions Bitcoin en une seule avec plusieurs entrées et sorties. Cela offre haut un niveau d'anonymat et de sécurité puisqu'il devient difficile de déterminer quelle entrée correspond à quelle sortie. Comment cela fonctionne-t-il ?- Créer une nouvelle adresse de portefeuille
- Allez sur https://[banned mixer]/fr/coinjoin/btc
- Saisissez la nouvelle adresse du portefeuille que vous avez créé
- Choisir la répartition des portefeuilles et le délai d'attente
- Rejoignez l'UniPool avec des coins traçables en les déposant à partir de votre ancienne adresse
- Recevez des coins intraçables dans votre nouveau portefeuille
Questions fréquemment posées
|
| | CoinJoin est une méthode qui permet à différentes personnes de rejoindre une pool unique et de créer ensemble une transaction unique où chacune d'entre elles donne des coins en entrée et des adresses fraîches et anonymes en sortie. L'objectif est de rompre le lien entre l'entrée et la sortie. Nous rendons cela possible en nous assurant que les montants de sortie sont exactement les mêmes.
|
|
| | Une fois que vous avez envoyé coins pour une commande de mixage, nous vous fournissons une confirmation signée numériquement, qui est la lettre de garantie. Elle sert à prouver nos obligations et les utilisateurs sont tenus de la sauvegarder et de la conserver après avoir envoyé des BTC. Comme vos données sont effacées de nos serveurs, il s'agit de la seule preuve pour les vérifications futures en cas de problèmes. Vous pouvez vérifier la lettre de garantie directement sur notre site web, "restaurer une session" https://[banned mixer]/fr/restore
|
|
| | Afin de préserver votre anonymat et de rendre les analyses de blockchain aussi difficiles que possible, nous avons décidé de générer de manière aléatoire les frais pour les opérations de mixage. Les frais par opération de mixage varient entre 1 % et 3 % et sont générés avec un nombre décimal de 4 chiffres. De plus, les frais de minage sont payés par l'utilisateur et déduits du montant total mixé.
|
|
| | UniJoin ne stocke les informations que pour la durée de l'exécution de l'ordre de mixage et uniquement celles qui sont nécessaires d'un point de vue technique. Une fois la commande de mixage terminée, elle est immédiatement supprimée. Par conséquent, le lien de commande n'est plus accessible après le rechargement de la page. De même, nous ne conservons pas les historiques de chat dans notre section d'assistance après qu'un problème a été résolu et que le chat a été fermé, car ils peuvent contenir des informations pouvant être associées à un utilisateur individuel.
|
|
| | Si vous avez déjà envoyé des coins à l'adresse générée par UniJoin, votre ordre sera exécuté normalement, même si vous avez fermé le navigateur ou la fenêtre. Vous pouvez utiliser le lien de l'ordre ou la lettre de garantie pour rétablir la session. Vous pouvez soit introduire le lien de votre ordre dans le champ url, soit récupérer le lien en joignant la lettre de garantie /fr/restore]ici.
|
|
| | Notre mécanisme de mixage n'a techniquement pas de limites. Cependant, le temps de traitement augmente proportionnellement avec le montant à mixer. C'est pourquoi nous avons limité le montant maximum par ordre de mélange à 1000 BTC.
Le montant minimum pour mixer des bitcoins est variable, car il dépend de la valeur du BTC en dollars américains du moment. Actuellement, le montant minimum pour mélanger est de : 0,001 BTC. Si vous envoyez moins que le montant minimum pour une commande, la commande sera annulée et vous recevrez un remboursement moins les frais de transaction encourus.
|
|
| | Un processus de mixage peut être achevé au moins en une heure, mais peut prendre plus de temps en fonction du délai de transfert que vous avez défini, ajouté au temps nécessaire pour obtenir deux confirmations sur la blockchain. Nous ne recommandons pas de fixer le délai de transfert à 1 heure, car c'est le délai qui a le moins d'impact sur l'anonymat.
Lors de la création d'un ordre de mixage, le dépôt doit être effectué à l'adresse générée dans les 24 heures, y compris les 2 confirmations du réseau, afin que l'ordre puisse être automatiquement traité par notre système. Si vous avez envoyé les coins après 24 heures, ne vous inquiétez pas, vos fonds ne sont pas perdus (contactez notre support et joignez la lettre de garantie).
|
|
| | UniCode est une chaîne de caractères unique qui est générée lorsque vous passez votre première commande de mixage. Nous vous recommandons d'utiliser ce code pour toutes les commandes de mixages ultérieures, car cela garantit que vous effectuez une rotation au sein des pools CoinJoin disponibles et que vous ne recevrez jamais partiellement vos pièces provenant de commandes antérieures.
|
|
| ________________________________ | |
Vos données étant supprimées de nos serveurs, la lettre de garantie est la seule preuve pour des vérifications ultérieures en cas de problèmes. |
|
|
|
If the respective local board is not active, perhaps you are both right about the (lack of) utility of translating these topics in your language.
babygun, however, if you are passionate about translations or if you think that one of my topics would be useful to Dutch local board, you may give it a try. After all, you can see if the new topic would get some attention from Dutch forum users. From my perspective, I have nothing against this. But, of course, it's up to you. No pressure here.
I agree, there's nothing to lose by producing these translations if he feels motivated to do so. If I may say so, not everyone who reads and browses the forum has an account. There are probably lurkers and people who will find these subjects on search engines, aren't there? I personally don't think that any translation is done for nothing, I mean if only one person has benefited from it, that's already something appreciable (from my point of view anyway). Even if it's true that most Dutch people speak English, the comfort of reading interesting and quality content in your mother tongue shouldn't be underestimated. |
|
|
|
|
Well, the structure of your text makes it a bit unreadable in my opinion.
Couldn't it all boil down to educating yourself on the subject and understanding in depth what you're getting into?
I don't see how that's any different from any other form of investment, to be honest. As long as you're aware of the risks involved, and understand the subject in depth, it's all a matter of personal decision. Not everyone needs to be "embrace discomfort" to invest in BTC, others are willing to, it's a case by case basis... I don't think it can be used as universal advice.
|
|
|
|
Guten Morgen zusammen.
It's an interesting idea, but wouldn't that risk increasing the number of shares in the event of a block and thus dividing the reward among too many? In that case, I imagine that you'd have to estimate how many BTC your 195th contribution is worth in order to divide the reward. Because, logically, if you almost double the hashrate, I imagine you'd want half the reward? I don't think anyone here would agree with that.  |
|
|
|
Hello @Joker_josue, I just notice that searching talkimg on google for the first time doesn’t gave the exact website as result on seach. It happened to me when I try to search talkimg on my new device. I check carefully the url so I’m sure it’s correct. The only time I manage to search the website is when I visit by using the forum links that you provide on this ann thread.
Is this some SEO issue?
This is yet another good reason to use DuckDuckGo instead of Google. It respects your privacy and will give you results without modifying your search. (and if you need google results, just add " !g" at the end of your search for example, the !Bang system is great if you have this search engine as your default search engine)  |
|
|
|
Sinbad OP doesn't say how many posts I'm allowed each day. What's the maximum x posts I'm allowed for count towards payment? Where's the rules for daily posting I don't want to break it next week. You should pay remaining 8 posts for W39.
There isn't necessarily a written rule on the subject but if you put yourself in the shoes of the campaign manager, you'll understand that burstposting is not desirable (in some campaigns it's even mentioned in the rules that it's forbidden). I'm not saying that's what you're doing, let's be clear about this, I just want to illustrate that from the point of view of the manager and the project, someone who posts quality is required, but also quantity, and with a regular frequency over the week. You're paid to give the project a good image thanks to your personality on the forum and your knowledge, as well as for advertising some links through your profile's signature. It's in the interests of those who pay you that you don't post all your messages in a few hours or 2 days, but rather regularly throughout the week. This gives greater visibility to the project you're promoting, and shows a form of personal involvement from the said forum user. Sorry to say this, but I think this is the last statement I ever expected anybody to come public here to say, because it clearly just show your lack of knowledge how this forum work, by coming here to say a campaign manager must pay you your remaining 8 post for W39. Lolz!! It's kind of funny.. But on a serious note, if you could have a look at the campaign spreadsheets, you will see that there is a column for both "Total post", "Post Denied" and "Eligible Post", which the campaign manager has the right to deny any post he/she feels add no value to the forum discussion.
I just see this as an attempt to improve himself. It's always best to ask the questions that are bothering you, don't you think? There's no such thing as a stupid question when it comes to money. I think the fact that he doesn't know all the rules of the forum, even the implicit ones, is rather positive, as it proves that he didn't join the forum just to take advantage of the signature campaigns, and that he's not an alt of anyone. |
|
|
|
Auteur : GazetaBitcoinTexte original : The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto - We all should read it
Dans la lignée du topic de bitmover, un autre texte devant être lu absolument est Le Manifeste Crypto-Anarchiste, écrit par Tim May. L'essai a été rendu public pour la première fois en 1988 (4 ans avant l'article d'Eric Hughes Un Manifeste Cypherpunk), à la conférence Crypto '88 et décrit la vision extraordinaire de Tim May sur certains aspects qui sont devenus réels 30 ans plus tard. Ce texte explique comment la technologie basée sur la cryptographie et les systèmes de réputation va changer le monde tel que nous le connaissons, notamment en ce qui concerne la gouvernance, les impôts ou le contrôle économique : "La technologie informatique est sur le point de permettre aux individus et aux groupes de communiquer et d'interagir les uns avec les autres de manière totalement anonyme. Deux personnes peuvent échanger des messages, faire des affaires et négocier des contrats électroniques sans jamais connaître le véritable nom ou l'identité légale de l'autre. Les interactions sur les réseaux seront intraçables, grâce au réacheminement étendu de paquets cryptés et à des boîtes inviolables qui mettent en œuvre des protocoles cryptographiques avec une assurance presque parfaite contre toute falsification. Les réputations seront d'une importance capitale, bien plus importantes dans les transactions que les notations de crédit d'aujourd'hui. Ces développements modifieront complètement la nature de la réglementation gouvernementale, la capacité de taxer et de contrôler les interactions économiques, la capacité de garder les informations secrètes et modifieront même la nature de la confiance et de la réputation.". La vision de May est appréciée dans le domaine de la cryptographie, tout comme la vision de Jules Verne dans le domaine de la science-fiction. En si peu de mots, il a anticipé tant de développements technologiques actuels, tels que les contrats intelligents, Tor, la technologie Bitcoin ou le système de réputation (utilisé, par exemple, sur BitcoinTalk comme les systèmes Merit et Trust). La référence au "Véritable nom" pourrait s'inspirer du roman de Vernor Vinge " True Names" (1981), qui est une véritable œuvre d'art. Il a également prévu l'apparition de marchés noirs et la lutte des gouvernements pour empêcher l'information de parvenir aux citoyens : "L'État tentera bien sûr de ralentir ou d'arrêter la diffusion de cette technologie, en invoquant des problèmes de sécurité nationale, l'utilisation de la technologie par les trafiquants de drogue et les fraudeurs fiscaux, et la crainte d'une désintégration de la société. Nombre de ces préoccupations seront valables ; la crypto-anarchie permettra aux secrets nationaux d'être échangés librement et aux matériaux illicites et volés d'être échangés. Un marché informatisé anonyme rendra même possible des marchés odieux pour les assassinats et les extorsions. Divers criminels seront des utilisateurs actifs de CryptoNet. Mais cela n'arrêtera pas la propagation de l'anarchie cryptographique.". L'essai se termine par "Levez-vous, vous n'avez rien d’autre à perdre que vos barrières !". Les barrières avec du fil de fer barbelé sont bien connues des Américains. Elles font partie de leur histoire : les territoires de l'Ouest étaient bordés de fils barbelés et les cow-boys, qui avides de liberté, coupaient les fils. C'est un appel à lutter contre la corruption et l'oppression des gouvernements, et contre les efforts des agences secrètes pour étouffer l'information. Nous devons tous poursuivre le travail des Cypherpunks et lutter pour la liberté ! |
|
|
|
|
I watched the Tik Tok video linked in the article about this guy.
In the video, we can see his Nicehash page showing "8$ per day revenue". Does-it mean that the guy is not paying electricity at all nor a possible solar installation ?
His 8$ per day are not real until he has hit the ROI point. If he paid 2k for his S19, it will take some time.
And about the comment saying "if you had 10 antminers, you could earn 80 per day?" and the guy answering "Correct", it is a little bit naive. His electrical installation should be able to handle 30 kw constantly first, and he should also hit ROI as I said before.
|
|
|
|
|
You can check with ZeusBTC but they often have minimum orders of X units, they rarely accept orders for 1 unit but we never know, it cost nothing to ask them.
Otherwise on Ebay, you have buyer protection and you can be generally safe by choosing your seller correctly.
Or you can always post an ad here on the forum and go through a reputable escrow.
|
|
|
|
It's an interesting project and it looks promising! Thanks for sharing it OP I really like the page dedicated to creating a paper wallet ( https://getcryptoaddress.github.io/paper-wallet-editor/), it's cool that you can at least add your own text ! However, before using it seriously and sending funds to such a wallet, I'm going to wait for someone knowledgeable on the forum to confirm that the code is ok. You can never be too careful |
|
|
|
|
Prediction 1: $29,451.11
bech32 address: redacted
|
|
|
|
I am confirming that I have received the loan of USDC. Thank you ! |
|
|
|
Message: Please send collateral to 0xd2af3a1a9c567670cb01cb2aa65e29482f4b7a6f
Verification BTC wallet: bc1qe49zeuwmg8whqa26jgn5pzm6ul4fzpdccz9s4l
Signature: HwlEsyGLY9A8IlgA7lPgdipHQa7euHVQY8qCp4h9oQiKHJsrhCpYWAsz70lUIRLY30nZ78GVCXNuLzU qwspew2g=
Thank you ! 0,4 ETH sent to 0xd2af3a1a9c567670cb01cb2aa65e29482f4b7a6f TXID : 0xa00e13b40b5008e05a529bb538a156cbb8396987cfc129348c9e719a1208ce05 |
|
|
|
Lol dude. The Azov battalion is recognized by the US Congress as neo-Nazi, extremist and anti-Semitic, parliamentarians called it a "disgusting Nazi formation", while it is quite officially part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The main national hero of Ukraine, Bandera, is a Nazi, and in honor of him, thousands of marches on Khreshchatyk were held and fifty streets were named. The universal password-greeting of Ukrainians "Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes" - is rooted in the far-right nationalist organization OUN and this is only a slightly modified password-greeting of the Third Reich "Heil Hitler, Sieg Heil". What more proof do you need?
There could be 100,000 neo-Nazis in Ukraine and it wouldn't change the problem, to be honest. It's rather those who invade their neighbours, kill, rape and kidnap civilians who are the actual Nazis, don't you think? And you know what's even worse than degenerate, out-of-touch Nazi leaders like your Putler? The morons who are their standard-bearers and propagandists, the morons who have been shit on by this same leader for years with corruption but who continue to kiss his ass. |
|
|
|
what are the potential ethical issues and challenges arising from the increasing centralization of mining power and wealth in very few dominant mining pools in the Bitcoin network and what can the bitcoin community do? what measures can be taken to maintain decentralization of the network while addressing these concerns?
like the risk of 51% attack when big pools have more power, etc.
From my point of view, laws and legislation represent a non-negligible risk when it comes to centralising the BTC hashrate. I will quote an excellent message posted by mikeywith recently : If you follow this topic from start you will see that situation changed a lot, and having more than 51% of hashrate was always problematic.
Before the China ban it was Bitmain with their pools (Antpool, BTC.com and Viabtc) arguably even Poolin which was founded by an ex-Bitmain employee before the 2020 lawsuit, and then, on the other side, you had F2pool, those pools combined always had well over 50% of the total hashrate, and don't be fooled by all the names, essentially, 2-4 Chinese men sitting in closed room had the final say on what to do with all that hashrate. Fast forward, China banned mining, and U.S players started to get into the business, creating their own mining pools, and now it's no more 2-3 Chinese men, it's 1-2 Chinese and 1-2 Americas, still the same number of entities who control well over 50% of the total hashrate, and since BTC doesn't care about those folk's nationality or names, nothing has changed in terms of hashrate distribution. I have been professionally mining BTC long before this topic took place, and I have been following hashrate distribution years before Foundry USA pool came into existence and the fact that 2-3 entities owning over 50% of the hashrate have been the case since at least 2016, it's a lot more than just looking at a pie chart and thinking you solved the puzzle, you need to understand how are all these pools are connected, then use that knowledge to compare hashrate distribution for the past decade, and you will come to the same conclusion. Furthermore, pool distribution is pretty irrelevant compared to gear ownership and the physical location of that hash power, at least 80% of the hashrate comes from a single manufacturer, that's more to worry about than some random pool distribution which can change drastically over the course of a few hours, the physical location of the gears and the law which they operate under is also a serious matter. I'd rather see 3 large pools each owning 33% but hashrate divided between 50 different countries where no country has over 10% of it, rather than seeing 100 pools, each with 1% hashrate but 70% of that hashrate located in the same countries with the same laws and regulation, even worse, that majority of that 70% is owned by a single entity.I agree with him 100%, the importance of geographical situation of miners is too often underestimated, I think that a distribution in more countries would be beneficial to the general health of the Bitcoin hashrate. With too large a majority of miners concentrated in just 2 or 3 countries, the risks associated with a change in legislation are too big. |
|
|
|
I know nothing and would send 50k to binance each week and set a limit order every monday. Is there a better way?
It all depends on how well you can justify the source of your 50k per week. Binance will undoubtedly ask you for EDD / SoW type documents for such amounts. You also need to take into account your country's tax policy if you plan to resell it one day. If you really want to go through a CEX for these transactions (indeed volumes are likely to be a problem with most P2P solutions), you should first contact them and negotiate some VIP status, so that you have a little more professional and personal support in case of problems. |
|
|
|
I am able to accept the request if you bear all the transaction fees. If it is okay then let me know, thanks.
Thank you for your answer Of course, I am okay to pay all the fees, no problem ! |
|
|
|
Hey ! Loan Amount: 600 USDC - ERC20 Loan Purpose: Personal Loan Repay Amount: 640 USDC - ERC20 Loan Repay Date: On or before the 11th of October Type of Collateral: 0,4 ETH ERC20 - USDC address: redacted |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
