|
Unless you needing it is a priority, may I suggest you get some sleep. It's been 20 hrs from since soon and 3 1/2 hrs since imminent and it seems that they have a little while to go yet.
|
|
|
|
What's the status of XMR's collaboration with i2p?
Ongoing, we've formed a working group with i2p, Abscond, i2pd, and Anoncoin, called Privacy Solutions. i2pd is reaching a level of working-ness that should allow us to start integrating it soon. Given the number of moving parts it's extremely hard to put a timeframe on it. There is also an updated link on the OP (look for "announcements") with the latest detail on it. In other news, we updated the list of exchanges, adding latest exchanges and deleting those that failed to deliver. Please remember that we do not endorse any exchange; we only list them once we check they actually propose exchanging Monero. Although you have 0.8.8.2 at the top of the page, further down above the blockchain downloads you have listed and linked 0.8.8 from June 11th. |
|
|
|
~980 BTC sold in the first 70 minutes of Supernet ICO on BTer. Not including NXT Asset Exchange volume
Busoni is raking in so much cash from trading/escrow fees lol  It's not on Poloniex. |
|
|
|
Maybe try this pool.  Why aren't more people using http://cryptonotepool.org.uk/ ? It donates all it's fee to the devs. Easy choice! Great uptime and everything. Get on it people! |
|
|
|
|
David, Your link to the Monero Community Hall of Fame is for the current one while the link on the first page of this thread is for the original one which then has a link to the current one. I don't know if you want to change the link on page 1.
|
|
|
|
All new systems have bugs; based on the code I've looked at I fully expect we'll find an order of magnitude or three more serious bugs in the Cryptonote codebase than we found in the Bitcoin codebase.
Besides, by re-using the Bitcoin codebase you get the benefit of all the bugs that have been fixed over the past few years.
Are you offering help Not quite - I've been hired as an advisor. There are other things besides ring signatures that are good and I have no idea how compatible they are. As always, tradeoffs.
I can't think of anything in Monero that would be fundementally incompatible with the Bitcoin codebase, although you'd certainly need to write some code. One good thing is that there's been a lot of recent work on the Bitcoin codebase to make it significantly more modular, to that reusing it for altcoins is easier than it used to be. Thank you Peter. |
|
|
|
not just monero but all cryptonote coins are at risk.
How do you know? did you read TacoTimes' preliminary explanation? It seems that the issue is with the cryptonote protocol that all cryptonote coins share. However let's wait and see what happens. Most of us are speculating from a position of ignorance. |
|
|
|
Lets keep the record straight: Bitcoin v1.0 had significantly better code quality than Cryptonote does from what I've seen; I just checked and there weren't any goto statements in the codebase. Cleaning up this mess isn't going to be easy, although it certainly is doable.
I'd strongly suggest taking the good part of Cryptonote - the ring signatures - and porting them over to the Satoshi codebase. Monero could be re-released based on that much better codebase and the UTXO set ported over at the same time so all coin owners on the old system were coin owners on the new system.
what about the bug that created billions of BTC? All new systems have bugs; based on the code I've looked at I fully expect we'll find an order of magnitude or three more serious bugs in the Cryptonote codebase than we found in the Bitcoin codebase. Besides, by re-using the Bitcoin codebase you get the benefit of all the bugs that have been fixed over the past few years. Are you offering help There are other things besides ring signatures that are good and I have no idea how compatible they are. As always, tradeoffs. |
|
|
|
|
On IRC they said that mining should be suspended so I shut down my miner. We will be told when to restart.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it is addictive but I'm not big enough to have much of an effect on price. I've been buying brick by brick for a couple of months. This hasn't built a castle but the third little pig would be proud.
|
|
|
|
Well I lied again. I bought more Monero today at 1% above the recent bottom if indeed it is a bottom. Also bought at 3% above the last bottom. I have no feel for tops as I only buy  Now that I have finished buying, no I mean it this time, I will start looking for tops. I don't think we will moon until Moneo is ready for prime time. |
|
|
|
|
What are the thoughts on using multiple wallets?
I have a small amount in my original wallet from mining. I just created another wallet as I want to move most of my stash off the exchange and I'm considering more than one for this. I have multiple btc wallets and understand that the primary reason for doing this does not exist with Monero. I guess for Monero I'm thinking of it more as my own organization, [mining wallet, long term wallet(s), transaction wallet(s)], as well as a don't keep all your eggs in one basket reflex.
I've also heard advice that one should do a test transfer to a new wallet to make sure everything is working. Is this necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome back cAPSLOCK.
I have sent 0.04 btc to the btc address listed on the first page which equals 10 XMR at the time sent. Look I just bought 10 more XMR!
tx id 654bc10fe4d0e4c7d966ee94f0875d1611fee3c40be422f626d682b2004607d6
I would like to know when I can expect shipment of my bale of high quality hygiene paper.
|
|
|
|
stuff
All the socialists that I know are dead set against the actions you seem to think that they are committed to. They are in 3 counties and include 3 generations. Personally I don't sleep with pigeons. I eat pudding. |
|
|
|
|
Drooling Masses update.
After much trepidation about updating due to never having done so before, I just successfully did so. Windows 8.1, what else would The Drooling Masses have, and it couldn't have been easier. The deleted p2pstate.bin has recreated itself but not the poolstate.bin. I haven't closed the daemon yet so maybe it has yet to happen. Also the "seed" command didn't work before updating and now it works. My coins are safe and sound. Below is a copy of the continuous errors I am now getting. I believe it had been posted a few days ago but I don't remember what was said.
2014-Aug-31 23:09:44.401790 [P2P3]ERROR ..\..\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:91
transaction fee is not enough: 0.009000000000, minumim fee: 0.100000000000
2014-Aug-31 23:09:44.401790 [P2P3]Transaction verification failed: <7f1da07abb12
057c0dda36cc22b5889e5e621374df9fa894b64f0ca8e2c6dcf0>
2014-Aug-31 23:09:44.417415 [P2P3][212.175.132.210:53944 INC]Tx verification fai
led, dropping connection
2014-Aug-31 23:09:46.151806 [P2P4]ERROR ..\..\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:91
transaction fee is not enough: 0.009000000000, minumim fee: 0.100000000000
2014-Aug-31 23:09:46.151806 [P2P4]Transaction verification failed: <7f1da07abb12
057c0dda36cc22b5889e5e621374df9fa894b64f0ca8e2c6dcf0>
2014-Aug-31 23:09:46.151806 [P2P4][42.159.201.221:1040 INC]Tx verification faile
d, dropping connection
2014-Aug-31 23:10:02.761347 [P2P0]ERROR ..\..\src\cryptonote_core\tx_pool.cpp:91
transaction fee is not enough: 0.009000000000, minumim fee: 0.100000000000
2014-Aug-31 23:10:02.761347 [P2P0]Transaction verification failed: <7f1da07abb12
057c0dda36cc22b5889e5e621374df9fa894b64f0ca8e2c6dcf0>
2014-Aug-31 23:10:02.761347 [P2P0][121.8.54.188:64976 INC]Tx verification failed
, dropping connection
2014-Aug-31 23:12:54.934930 [P2P2][sock 1144] Some problems at write: An existin
g connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
|
|
|
|
|
It was mentioned that in the next Missive there would be info on donations. Something along the lines of something tangible for donations given. I am curious to learn what this is. It has been delayed due to problems that arose and had to be dealt with. I have been looking forward to it.
|
|
|
|
Slow pony edit. I wrote this and then saw that smooth replied but I will post this anyway as it may have details that have some meaning for you. My final answer was not edited ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Your expectation for how many coins you could mine seems to have come from  If the parameters stay the same in the long run you will mine the same # of coins. The long run is however very long in your case. That is why people join pools, to decrease variance. Also the likelihood of the HR increasing in the future along with the reward slowly decreasing is another reason people choose to decrease their variance. Many take it to the other extreme and look for the pool with the largest HR. This is also not good for the network as you don't want the network HR concentrated. It is also not necessary in regards to variance IMO. I mine on a small pool and it can take 2 days or an hour to find a block. In a couple of weeks it averages out which is fine for me. So if my arithmetic was correct and you will find a block in 83 days on average and the block reward is ~ 14.6 then 14.6/83=0.176 XMR/day |
|
|
|
|
24 hrs?
What is your HR, ~200 h/s?
What is the network HR? Currently ~ 24,000,000 h/s
How many blocks mined in 24 hrs? 60x24=1440
24,000,000/200/1440=~83
So at the current difficulty you will find a block on average every 83 days. With variance that could be 8 days or a year.
And if the network HR goes up.................
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
