Hey there Monero Developers. What say you to the following: Moolah (@moolah_io) tweeted at 6:40pm - 14 Oct 14:
@deadlyonetwo3 All [XMR] coins are still there. The developers have refused our attempts at contact to resolve daemon issues.
https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/522185275049406464Thanks! Well there was this post ITT 2 days ago. I got a reply from Mintpal. Hi there, I apologize for the delayed reply. XMR (Monero) is one of the coins where the daemon was having issues at the time of launch. The devs are working hard to get it up and running as soon as possible. Your balance is still there and your coins are safe. Thank you for your patience And now the company that runs MP is declaring bankruptcy and nobody has access to any of their coins but they assure us they are safe. Well either they lied 2 days ago or they lied today, or they lied both 2 days ago and today.
|
|
|
Schadenfreude
VTC is at 2% of it's ATH I don't understand @nioc, what you mean? ____ I am sure that there are optimized GPU miners, but they not yet shown into the world and a certain group of people working with them they take a lot more coins per day from us What I don't understand is, wasn't this from another thread? Posts must have been deleted for obvious reasons. No point in reconstructing them. If you really don't understand then imagine I posted it in the VTC thread. As far as optimized private miners, of course. As far as taking coins from us, are you us? That is do you mine or own Monero?
|
|
|
Schadenfreude
VTC is at 2% of it's ATH
|
|
|
Pinky I see you post in other coins' thread as well trying to dissuade people. Thank you for your altruism.
Which coin of yours would you like us to buy?
|
|
|
Daddy are we there yet? For once the answer is yes. But this looks like home! Yes you are safe and sound
|
|
|
What settings are you guys using?
I keep seeing this.............
This user is currently ignored.
.........but when you quote I see something else.
|
|
|
Dump that shitty fiat you bag hodlers!!!
What can I get for $43?
|
|
|
Devs - are these minor issues, business as usual? block timing out of sequence blocks with the same time stamp ----- ----- They seem to be within the boundaries of acceptability. Just wondering, just in case. (not posted here in any particular order) As I understand it the time stamps are from the miners. Being that every miners' clock is not in sync causes this. It has no effect on the network. Did I pass the test?
|
|
|
Congratulations it is now the 13th GMT.
While waiting for this milestone I have confirmed my braindeadedness by watching Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death.
|
|
|
10 votes
Vote proposal #2.
|
|
|
TY Jorge, I could have figured it out or maybe even looked it up but today I am braindead with justification which needs to be remedied by tomorrow.
|
|
|
Clearly he meant 22 lunar days, since we all know that monero is going to the moon With respect to the stars, the Moon takes 27 Earth days, 7 hours and 43.2 minutes to complete its orbit; but since the Earth-Moon system advances around the Sun in the meantime, the Moon must travel further to get back to the same phase. On average, this synodic period lasts 29 days, 12 hours, 44 minutes and 3 seconds. So by my calculations, the attack should be happening sometime in late 2015 or early 2016 The problem with those calculations is that the lunar days are taken from the perspective of the earth. What would be a lunar day from a lunar perspective. Signed, the loony lunatic.
|
|
|
10 votes
discussion
I agree with smooth
|
|
|
Also if an attacker possessed those private keys from the centralized exchanges and could rewind the block chain with a 51% attack, he could in theory double-spend everyone's coins on the block chain. Checkpoints exist to try to unwind such, yet if a 51% attack was sustained and many users got their desired transactions intertwined with the attacker's sustained chain, one might be able to envision political fighting over which chain to revert to. Also centralized exchanges pool risk (e.g. cascade from double-spend attacks) and can be subject to massive theft.
Yes this applies to most every cryptocoin... Yes. It is important the new poster understand his theories were already covered upthread. If UnunoctiumTesticles sees "this was already discussed upthread" instead of walls of text that obfuscate that fact and try to make it is appear that there is no risk from centralized exchanges, then he (or she ) might toss his balls into this thread to make that clear. UnunoctiumTesticles is interested in decentralized exchanges. UnunoctiumTesticles doesn't give a left statestical about political ramifications on BTT. UnunoctiumTesticles is interested in factual statements about the merits of technological alternatives. UnunoctiumTesticles contemplates that centralized exchanges present some risks which may in theory be alleviated with decentralized exchanges. Thus UnunoctiumTesticles is interested in unmasking the obfuscation (by the walls of text on this page) of the new poster's concern about centralized exchanges. UnunoctiumTesticles is very entertaining. Yes, he's quite the noble gas, but I'm concerned about his half-life. Being that only 3 or 4 atoms of Uuo have existed it is not known what state they exist in but the latest prediction is that it is a solid due to relativistic effects. IIT we are currently waiting for relativistic effects.
|
|
|
Did any of you stop to think that Satoshi = Sir Richard?
no there should be no decimals, only whole numbers When btc is a billion $, (or whatever, I can't count), decimals can be added So you want us to work from satoshis. Personally, I believe that you are the exception, and most people are good with two decimal places b/c we are used to it, and we can easily identify two digits behind the decimal without developing a major brain fart. So it seems that we agree on two digits beyond the decimal. It's just a matter of how it gets implemented. I wasn't being totally serious in my answer but I guess my point was not to do it in a way that necessitates the need to keep making changes. Now that we have solved that, how about world peace? BTW I just talked to Satoshi and he thinks that everybody here speculating about his identity is really quite amusing.
|
|
|
Their total HR has now declined a bit but with the # of miners they have the avg HR per miner is 25,000 H/s
|
|
|
why is market dilution too hard of a concept to grasp ? saturating the scene with more and more and more a coins is NOT healthy for crypto. there is a finite amount of guys holding fiat to buy crypto coins.. fact. there was less than 50 coins when i started and now well over 1,000+ coins. when there was -50 coins i kept screaming over and over stop making them or your gonna ruin it for us all bad. it happened. why do i have to spell it you to you ? do you enjoy playing dumb or what ? if you have $1,000 dollars and you have to decide how much to put in each of say 50 coins.. then you have to start over and decide how much of a $1,000 to put in 1,000+ coins and then every guy in crypto has to face the same decision.. then what do you think happens ? market caps get diluted really badly ! maybe cash out some of your Monero scam coins and go grab some crayons and construction paper and we can hash this out with some pictures you will understand..
No. There is no such thing as dilution. Wealth is not a cake. You don't hold pieces of it. Economy doesn't work like that. You have to understand that wealth/value only exist if there are exchanges between people. The more trades, the more wealth. Do not forget that a part of it is subjective : You can call a crypto a scam and think it is worth nothing but it is only your opinion and you are wrong because people buy it. The market always say the truth. Altcoins are worth something because people exchange them. From those trades, wealth/value is created. (I'm responding to you but I am actually not reading you so don't bother replying. I'm talking for the other people here) hello! bonjour!
|
|
|
Did any of you stop to think that Satoshi = Sir Richard?
no there should be no decimals, only whole numbers When btc is a billion $, (or whatever, I can't count), decimals can be added
|
|
|
|