|
The missives are written regularly. They are written when it is appropriate to communicate the recent developments. There have been 22 missives written in 7 months. That seems fairly regular to me. Please forgive those who love alliteration.
I am not a pigeon, I love pudding.
|
|
|
|
|
I also noticed recently that the diff was down to 3 to 4 for a short while recently, I believe a couple of days ago.
Is the diff history recorded somewhere?
|
|
|
|
|
09:46:28

setstakesplitthreshold 3000
09:46:28

{
"split stake threshold set to " : 3000,
"saved to wallet.dat " : "true"
}
I copied the above from the Debug/Console window. I had restarted the wallet at least once since the time I originally initiated the setstakesplitthreshold. A block of ~5600>5700 just split.
|
|
|
|
|
For years there have been bots that can beat most players at HU limit holdem. When there are 3 players I don't think they work so well and then make it NL and they may be avg or below avg.
If you want a no bot experience play PLO/pot limit omaha. I think they will need quantum computers for that game.
|
|
|
|
I decided to merge these 550 coins into a larger block in order to kick start them. Startide  Your a brave man... I need to do this, but I just can't get myself to go through with it  May I suggest you combine a small percentage of the blocks in that situation and see what happens  |
|
|
|
I have been mining for a couple months at backup-pool for monero. I have noticed that every once in a while someone moves their farm or botnet, etc.(~60+KH) to the pool and it gets really unlucky for finding blocks. Is is possible that someone is exploiting the pool with some exploit, or is it coincidence? I have noticed it more than once. http://backup-pool.com/monero/#pool_blocksWell the last 3 blocks were found rather quickly. CyrptonotePoolUK is a small pool as well and has a stat that shows the block finding luck factor which they call more appropriately "pool variance" with >100 is worse than expected and <100 is better. I was over 100 for quite a while being as high as 126 and then went down to the low 90s. What would you have thought of the variance when it went from 126 to 92? If you take smooth's suggestion please let us know but I believe you will find it is variance and/or selective memory. |
|
|
|
alright that was pretty impressive, I was critical of Astrid in private message, but what else does Monero need? I too have a team of developers, now that the community can make some things worthwhile
ok can someone quickly tell us whats gone down in the past day? whats the big bounty going on for? thanks and sorry, just busy life and less time..  edit. if its' a good thing, i may have some spare xmr for ya project. I'll donate 200 for the bazaar-project
Edit; I can't see an xmr-address to donate to. Will send it to the normal donation address of XMR.
9d1b28c145352c3b6188e61a8458711ec81b8d22d32f17c2ad46aa3330eedfe2
Edit; I kept getting "Server error" at mymonero.com when logging in.
The address is : 45jWVQzoyRdH8bd8CA66yBHYQ4ZXmfw81KCr1PdbzcDJND65L5sFzFmN5ty1tzhk3EPHnUfLqB8SpLfPRQAnNnaB1x958c9 I just gave 100 XMR. |
|
|
|
Wasn't the name "multisend" picked due to proposed feature to perform multiple s4c ? (More than 2).
David, correct me if I am wrong on this.
Also, I think "reaccuring" is only the nature of the function and should be undertood and expected by user, as it would continue to preform a set function untill changed by user again. multisend was just a temporary name. Of course, we all know what happens to code name... they stick multisend is an improvement of the current S4C but from the beginning, I named the whole thing HyperSend, S4C being just a subset. That being said, both multisend and recurringsend are correct: You can can to several persons at once and you can send in an automated way. HyperSend
HyperSend is a generalization of the idea that first came up with Stake for Charity. [...] This can be used for a variety of purposes:
The above-mentioned well-known Stake for Charity.
[other examples] So, just sticking to the original name HyperSend would make the most sense. multisending is just the latest improvement. Granted, we lose the "immediate understanding" of "recurring send" but we stay on the marque thing with "Hyper-*". as iantunc said, a "Feature name™". RecurringSend Multisend HyperSend - I vote for this one As the features we are trying to describe cannot be accurately done with a single word, HyperSend with a mouse over explanation seems good. If this function evolves only the mouse over description needs to be changed. One very small request. Commas for the displayed wallet balance |
|
|
|
I sweated. A lot. I could hear my heart beating. I had to refill TWICE. But I did it  Lesson taken ( again). These 100K HYP are now Invested in Luckyalt.
Willy from LuckyAlt/HYP just released a reward program for HYP - up to 3000 HYP for free if you invite friends: here. Remember this is not only about getting some more HYP. It is also about gaining some visibility by having some use - casino is a beginning. I propose we share our screenshots like I did. Biggest wins, bizarre wins, losses at investing (I'm presently negative, I suspect Zeewolf is responsible for it , etc.
OK so... I need 20 days on average to get 20% interest on my coins. If I place 1000 HYP on luckyalt, I must get a profit of at least 200 HYP after 20 days to make it more interesting than stacking (keeping in mind that these HYP do not secure the network and that I basically trust a stranger with my money). Let's see how it goes. So when you won that 77,175.1936 bet you won 0.1472 overall  The problem with the strategy of doubling after every loss is that it's possible to either run out of money or hit the bet limit of the casino. That's a lot on the line for a 0.1472 win. |
|
|
|
So I forgot to split this block... it will be interesting to see how long it takes to stake.  Why does the block above it have which is the same age have no weight? |
|
|
|
Finally, a standard transaction will allow a transaction ID to be added to every transaction. This data can be used for anything, or nothing at all. For example, it can be used to provide tracking between you and another person without the use of the view key.
So, as far as 'fully anonymous' goes, I would say that is only a part of Monero, and not the entire deal.
Thank you for the detailed explanations today Did you mean payment ID? |
|
|
|
|
The Monero forum is working once again. I even see a post from somebody who had not previously been able to use the site.
|
|
|
|
Happy Staking New Year I bought 40K HYP for a good start of the year.  From what I understand you should have blocks exactly the same size as you do with your 9 blocks of 4k. I forget exactly why but I think it has some effect on the staking of those identical blocks. When you use the SplitBlock function in the wallet it will make each block a slightly different size. You would put your 40K purchase in SplitBlock, select 10 as the # of blocks and it would give you 10 blocks of ~4K each at a slightly different size. |
|
|
|
That's why I am opening an investment foundation for devepoling of FreeBazaar.
Don't you need the XMR devs to figure out multi-sig before integrating XMR into OpenBazaar? FreeBazaar not OpenBazaar (if that is indeed a difference) and I believe the plan is to start with escrow until multisig is in place. |
|
|
|
Well, I am in the same camp as some of us. I had a couple of coin blocks more than a hundred days old, that still did not stake. One was a 100 coins and
the other was 400 coins. Still said I had estimated time of a 121 days to stake. I have most of my blocks in 2k blocks and they are taking 30 days to
stake. I messed around with coin control and I made different size blocks and the lowest days to staking was a 40k block in 10 days. I made some 1.5k blocks and they were 40 days to stake. 10k blocks were 20 days and 5k blocks were 25 days. So I do not see how I am actually getting 750%? I know it is only a guestimate as to the real percentage as there are variables involved. I have had 1.5k blocks hit the wall, due to staking in a 40 days period. So from my observations you have to decide on time vs. weight. So I have been trying the middle of the road between time and weight. My best guess is about 2k blocks in 30 days. Will have to see how it actually works out. Since smaller blocks take more time to increase in weight and still hit the wall. I have a few 750-800 blocks that have hit the wall already and still have not staked in 60 days. According to the coin controls new features. Will find out when they actually stake. Several POS coins are not delivering the stated percentage, though I already knew it was pretty much a guestimation due to variables in the equation.
Peace!
Dennis
From the OP............. Recommended Block Size - 1,000-4,000 HYP (see tutorial for splitting blocks)
BLOCKS LESS THAN 1000 HYP WILL TAKE MUCH LONGER TO STAKE BECAUSE OF HIGH DIFFICULTY
For small blocks, consider joining our staking pool, HyperPool_______________________________________________________________________________ __ The smallest block that will max out at 1000 HYP at 30 days is 1623. I see no reason to have blocks smaller than that. Even with the recent increase in difficulty 2 of my smaller blocks of ~1700 staked in the last few days at ages of 15 and 17 days. My oldest block was 3000 HYP and staked in 32 days after maxing at 1000 HYP in ~17 days. Obviously there is variance and any one person's experience is not indicative of what to expect. |
|
|
|
I'm glad you used the word potential. Casheer platform launch October 2015At least they have a " Passionate community builder and fastidious connector" on their team |
|
|
|
The odds are 1 out of 7 |
|
|
|
|
A dark blue circle with a light blue design of a BTC at the center of what looks like 3 electron orbits.
|
|
|
|
|
I have an icon when I minimize. Windows 8.1 and also when I used XP.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
