The fact that they keep creating/using new domains on a regular basis, is an indication that they've succeeded ^{[unfortunately]}.

You've got to be kidding me

---

When I reported their last domain from the previous thread, I received the following emails from "DomainsPricedRight ^[screenshot]" and "GoDaddy ^[screenshot]" and I'm starting to think, there's no point in reporting them to their registrar ^{[wildwestdomains]} since it appears they're not doing anything to stop this user.

AFAIK, the pop-up window that we see based on our previously entered data has nothing to do with the forum itself; I think it has to do with the browsers that we use and that's something that the forum software might not be able to interfere with altering a portion of its data while saving anything that it doesn't count as a link ^{[I'm not a back-end coder or developer by any means, so don't quote me on this one]}.

---

Having said those, most of us would probably welcome having a set of predefined messages in a form of a pop-up window.

What for? So you can take advantage of his/her information; besides, @PETER18 already knows the true nature of your so-called "Professional Loan Service" ^{[read the last comment on your thread]}.
- In addition to those, pay attention to the following information:

Imagine Cøbra doing the following thing, then it's safe to say that CSW is never going to get his filthy hands on those funds

---

I may not agree with some of Cøbra's previous actions, but I do agree with the following tweet...

I'm not a back-end coder/developer by any means but AFAICR, you can achieve that with both Blockchair and BlockCypher.
^{Note: The first one that I mentioned it's not free.}

I had a quick glance at your platform and because of the above feature combined with the auto-refresh part, I'll be bookmarking it

I think this would've been better if it was part of the "Pro" mode instead.

A dark mode and an independent review section might come in handy.

You can find a bunch of them from the following lists: List A and List B
^{- It's only focused on cryptocurrency YouTubers but most of them are active on other platforms as well.}

Ironically, most of them don't have accounts in here; In other words, you have to approach them instead.

No, you don't!

FTFY

In case you forgot, you're renting out ^{[pretending to]} ASIC miners, not a computer ^{[there's a big difference]}.

And in addition to that: [Warning] Pagerminer has plagiarized content

Based dun sa mga ginamit nilang kulay para sa mga tokens, I'd go with the following:

• USD Coin ^[USDC], Tether ^[USDT], and Chainlink ^[LINK].
• yearn.finance ^[YFI], Maker ^[MKR], and TrueUSD ^[TUSD].
  

Since tatlo lang ang tokens dun sa picture, sa palagay ko tatlong token lang ang madadagdagan.

From what I've read in the past few days, most of them have partnered with other companies; In other words, their influence/control over those mining operations is somehow limited.
^{- I don't think it's fair to generalize them... I'm sure there's a big difference between them and their government.}

Those are the type of risks that they have to "always" deal with it ^{[regardless of the location]}.

IMO, Texas isn't a suitable location; AFAIK, they have their own issues when it comes to power outages.

Based on the following things, you may need a few fans to keep their temps down or within a normal range:

• Size of your mining room matters.
• Location of your mining rigs in relation to the air conditioner in question.
• The manner in which your mining rigs are placed next to each other.

Wow

I read about the part that said in return, we'll be receiving $200 and we could use that for booking cruises on your platform, but I don't think that's feasible in the long run ^{[unless I'm missing something]}.

Can you explain more in regards to that?

I assume you already know some of those issues but for some reason, you're still wearing their signature; Care to explain why?

---

Exactly! @Desmong refer to #4 from the following list ^{[a bit outdated]}: Things not against forum rules but frowned upon by community!

It looks like you forgot to archive it so "here it is" and while I was browsing it, it felt like I've already read some of its parts before; So I did some more digging, and here are some of the other fake platforms that use similar words:

All of the following websites should be considered as fake/scam:
^{- In other words, Cryptobold is nothing but a rip-off.}

• ProfitFact ^[archived]
• excelinvestment ^[archived]
• btcflutter ^[archived]
• growrichworld ^[archived]
• bitcoinminingplatform ^[archived]
• stocktopia ^[archived]

@remotemass
This only makes sense if a lot of online stores have BTCitcoin as one of their payment methods, but that's not the case ^{[unfortunately]} and even then, we can achieve similar results ^{["pumping BTCitcoin"]} without using a Salvadoran‎ IP.
^{- I read all of your posts in this thread and I do agree with what @avikz said; It's going to be more beneficial to El Salvador than it'll be for BTCitcoin.}

Not sure if I'm missing something ^{[I've double-checked everything]}, but I went through all of the tweets and in none of them I saw any sign that Musk has accepted the invitation...
^{- Personally, I can't see him [EM] and someone that knows more than him [in regards to BTCitcoin], sitting next to each other in "any" event and having conversations about BTCitcoin [it's a risky move for that freaking clown].}

Update:
You're right Thank you for posting it ^{[I really hate how Twitter works]}

Thank you for doing that

---

$84,400 <sup>[box 259]
- Initially, I came up with $84,482.34 but box 260 was already taken by @LFC_Bitcoin, so I went with the closest one.</sup>

Reason/formula:

• I based everything on 2013/2017 BTCitcoin's value ^{[specifically the first day in June and December]}, then calculated the downtrend growth in those periods.
  
  
  • Jun,1,2013 = $89.53
    Dec,1,2013 = $732
    732/89.53 = 8.17 growth
    
    Jun,1,2017 = $2,465.49
    Dec,1,2017 = $13,880
    13,880/2,465.49 = 5.62 growth
    
    Jun,1,2021 = $33,130.33
    Dec,7,2021 = ?
    Growth = ?
    
    • 8.17 ^[2013] - 5.62 ^[2017] = 2.55 ^{[possible growth in 2021 (Jun - Dec)]}
      33,130.33 x 2.55 = $84,482.34 ^[Dec,7,2021]

I doubt mangyayari yun ^{[at least for now]}... Tulad nung sinabi ni @sir_danny ^{[kind of]}, mas malaki ang chance na gumawa sila ng sarili nilang CBDC kaysa gawin legal tender ang BTCitcoin and since may mga banks na hindi na tumatangap ng crypto TXs ^{[like BPI]}, then maliit ang chance nito ^{[indirectly related]}.

To some extent, yes.

If online businesses ang pinag-uusapan, then may ilan gateways/processors na may auto-conversions.

You have a point but if that's indeed the case and they're that poor, then perhaps "some of them" have problems when it comes to owning a cellphone as well.
^{- A big portion of their adult population might never be able to utilize this airdrop [unfortunately].}

---

They can't; Check the following video:

Judging by its timing ^{["after what I said"]}, it does look like what you mentioned.

They probably made that up and it's a perfect case wherein none of the affected users ^{[if there are any]} are going to disclose such information and they'd probably do the same as well ^{[nature of their service]}.

---

None of their recent announcements makes much sense and I see the following things as possibilities:

• A marketing strategy to create some buzz and increase their reputation.
• It was never a "non-custodial service".
• Somehow it really got hacked.

Personally, I'm leaning towards the first two being the case, but I could be wrong.