----
If your account gets limited for whatever reasons, and you create a new account to bypass those limits, at least for me, you are cheating. Do note that I'm not defending that the accounts can get limited, and I have no clue how they decide to do so; but if it does happen, for whatever reason, you can complain all you want (it may work), but having a strategy to bypass the limits? Not the way to go I'm still curious to know about how the "account closing" is enforced tough... Hope both betnomi and OP do reply to that |
|
|
|
maybe we can get in summary what exactly the problem is and why not paid out the winnings?
in summary.
So far, the user is claiming that their account was frozen and closed after being asked to go trough KYC; and betnomi is presenting some evidence of this user having used multiple accounts to bypass the limits; something that goes against the rules. It's still going on, so if you have some spare time, give it some read |
|
|
|
----
Well, if multi accounting is not allowed, and this winnings were a result of a multi accounting scheme; I'd only return the deposited money (if any). If the user had been following the rules, they wouldn't have been able to make such winnings.... I'm talking about any user doing this; not this particular case btw. Now, getting on what I've read so far.... First, some questions for OP: The last message from the support team say that "your account has been closed". Does that mean that you can't even log in? Also, what day did the reply to this? For betnomi: You should improve communication with the security team; that for starters. I personally don't see a pattern on the things you've provided; but I have no clue about how these security system works and so on. Let's see if some other user can vocuh for that. Publishing the KYC photos... is a bit questionable here For the rest: I've also been reading the official betnomi ANN; and I'm surprised (not really) by your ability to pick specific posts and take them as if that was an absolute truth of the universe. They've said that they will not ask for KYC UNLESS: A) there's some kind of jackpot winning B)they detect fraudulent activity or any kind of wrongdoing.
Now, this is not the first, and won't be the last thread created in this section to try to stronghold a casino into forcing to pay some winnings that shouldn't have existed in first place, so let's wait before we jump into any conclusion. For what it seems to me, this is a user that was trying to cheat and got caught; and is now angry that they got caught without being able to withdraw the winnings (remember the mt.gox hacker lmao). So I'd ask everyone to stop speculating and start reading the bloody evidence provided by both sides before answering some useless BS, and once you've read everything, give it some thought |
|
|
|
Seeing what happened last time; I'd make the part in which you say that funds are escrowed bigger (personal opinion) Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=903175Current amount of posts (including this one): 1540 Amount of EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 133 SegWit BTC Address for payouts: bc1q4zatdqhm79fv0crtxlkxe5q59u8ruxwsejnr3c |
|
|
|
----
Gracias por el enlace; ya he practida el ritual de sacrilegio de revivir al cadaver de hilo; ahora a ver como va la cosa.... Aprovecho que estás por aquí para preguntar a ver que piensas de los cambios de secciones un par de mensajes más arriba? |
|
|
|
|
Necrobumping this because I still consider it to be a great idea and I'm not sure why it was forgotten so easily
|
|
|
|
2 responses from global moderators so far with different view
The first moderator said that my thread poll deleted due to low value
The second moderator said that my thread poll deleted due to spammers attract
That my friend, means exactly the same. The thread would bring nothing new/substantial/interesting to the forum, it'd just be people posting nonsense to increase their post count or make some posts for their shitcoin scam signature campaign. The forum has some rules, and they are enfornced. If you don't agree with how things are handled, you can always leave; no one is forcing you to stay in a place where you are not comfortable. |
|
|
|
Aurox terminal has been put on hold Round 2 Payments have been sent out!
Thank you all for another great 2nd week! As of now this campaign has been put on HOLD. If it were to continue I'd update you all in this thread. Thank you for these 2 weeks, it's been my pleasure to work with all of you! You can now remove your Signature & Avatar. |
|
|
|
Hello all. Dumb question but this thread is 557 pages long, how do I know if I have signed an address here ? I think I might have but can't remember for sure.
You can use the search funtion on the forum, or the improved one on Tryninja's website. I did the quick search for you, and you hace staked none here
I strongly disagree; in case of using the forum search function, he should only select the Meta board, and add an author to the search function. It is more precise, and usually faster |
|
|
|
Paso un poco de reflotar cosas viejas (me da pereza buscar, seamos sinceros) asique aprovecho este hilo que tiene razon para preguntar: Al final se habló algo sobre cambiar las keywords de busqueda para la sección nuestra? Me quiere sonar que se habló de ello pero no se si acabo en algún sitio (creo que seoincorporation lo llevó a Meta pero seguimos en las mismas). Si al final la cosa se quedo pendiente, podriamos aprovechar a cuando mandemos la "reestructuración" (si es que alguno se digna a comentar....) y hacerle un lavado de cara completo a la sección. Que estaría bien ver caras nuevas para variar, y que vengan por interes al bitcoin y no para spamearnos como el Gilipollas de DdmrDdmr (todavía me estoy riendo y casi lo merito; pero estaría usando un poco mal los smerit). Como dato curioso, he seguido a ese spammer por secciones locales rusas, japonesas, indias y de algún que otro idioma más. A ver si se quedan sin cuentas de una vez |
|
|
|
Do not know exactly which account he means cannot be accessed.
Maybe you are right, @maartenhaha, sold or hacked.
Since the post is in "investor based games" I'd say it's the one from the scam service the user participated; see OP
Regarding the languages; it's not strange that a Dutch national does also speak French and/or German, they're close so it does make sense. Same thing happens in Spain with portuguese and french. The Indonesian post doesn't really match; there's a posting gap between December 03, 2016 and the next post is the Indonesian one you provided; December 2017. A one year gap in which the account was probably hacekd and then sold |
|
|
|
----
Wow, tenia ese hilo en el mas absoluto de los olvidos, y mira que llegue a responder! No recuerdo 2019 como un año especialmente activo, asique supongo que sera por eso. Lo que si que me parece curioso es que al final Welsh acabó en el puesto "por proxy", y haciendo un repaso rápido, he visto que no hay ningún post suyo por aquí desde que tiene el puesto, aunque si que por lo menos responde a los privados. Algo que también he notado, es que los reportes sobre todo el el Local de Alts se mueven lentos, pero supongo que es cuestión de tener algo de tiempo (y ganas). Y bueno, evidentemente llego casi un año tarde al tema, pero si volviera a haber oportunidad; y teniendo en cuenta lo que he leido (más voluntario y menos estresante que ser staff staff; aparte de que ya conocemos como se mueve la sección), no me importaría ocuparme de reportes de aquí  Que evidentemente si no hay necesidad, pues nada; pero en caso de que en un futuro haga falta, recordad mis palabritas |
|
|
|
---- En realidad creo que te has colado con el quote.... If someone wants to be a mod just keep reporting and if theymos feels you'd be beneficial on staff he may ask you at some point.
Pero si bien es cierto que puede ser un factor a tener en cuenta a la hora de añadir a alguien a la plantilla, creo que la predisponibilidad del usuario en cuestión es lo más importante. Ser un moderador es ya en general un marron de magnitudes impensables hasta que te ves en la situación, y en este foro que es enorme, no me quiero hacer a la idea... Si bien es cierto que somos pocos los que reportamos por gusto, a nada que nos juntemos 5/10 personas en un momento podriamos estar hablando de más de 200 reportes distribuidos por todo el foro en cosa de 5 minutos; incluso más si todos tenemos el script de suchmoon instalado. Por otro lado el amigo DDmr es bastante conocido en el foro por las estadisticas que saca sobre todo, a brainboss solo lo conozco como manager de campañas y de alguna que otra cosa por reputación; Vod es un personaje bastante polemico y lovesmyfamily me suena también de reputación. El tema de elegir/nominar posibles mods por su grado de reconocimiento, es que puedes meter la pata muy hasta el fondo. Mucha gente solo "conoce" ciertos nombres o por la cantidad de méritos que tienen o por haber trabajado con ellos, y es todo demasiado subjetivo como para no liarla. Si lo que te gusta es ver estadisticas curiosas del foro, aparte de lo que suele haber por Meta, puedes mirar Bpip de vez en cuando; hay varias clasificaciones según distintos criterios. Me quiere sonar que el hilo en especifico que menciones es sobre el porcentaje de méritos enviados/méritos que podrias enviar. Si en tu caso, has mandado todos los posibles, tienes un 100% de ratio.
Enhorabuena @Csmiami, eres como Hércules ahí a diestro y siniestro cortando cabezas Cheesy contribuyendo al sistema inmune del foro. Jejeje, gracias! He tenido ahora un par de dias un poco flojitos, pero estoy llegando a los 1100 correctos; seguramente 1200 para despues del fin de semana. Deberias animarte tu también a hacer limpieza; la cosa engancha Edit: lo llego a mencionar antes.....  Y creo que nos estamos empezando a ir un poco por las ramas.... |
|
|
|
haha are you serious?
Yes. You can defend yourself tough accusing me from changing accounts while nutildah was the one who tried to sell his account a while ago
lmao
My god; I've only been around this reputation board for a couple of days and I'm already tired about hearing from this story. Get over it, for fucks sake. There's no reason why the "nutildah tried to sell their account 3 years ago" and "your account is a bought one" can't coexist |
|
|
|
|
Just for the sake of clarification; I actually had to read OP a few times before I realized what had actually happened.
You contacted or were contacted by someone (the 2 guys) that wanted to buy 1.5BTC in cash. 23.000USD in cash. I'm pretty sure that's rather ilegall and goes against many anti moeny laundering regulations, but that's not the point here.
You bought some BTC (1.52033000), and met with the guys.
You sent the guys the coins, and they ran away both with the coins and the 23k.
Is this part right so far?
Because there are a couple of things that don't match to your story. First of all, let me say that I'm calling you a liar, but there are a couple of things that stand out and require some clarification. Let's see...
You bought the 1.52033000BTC on the 10th of November at 10:00AM, and sent them to 12o7wnUF574txi3jGBxBM6cgPxc69xAFZW
From 12o7wnUF574txi3jGBxBM6cgPxc69xAFZW, the coins were sent to both 1HU46MCbGcZ3huKLGBPjtpHUP6bjaad6ep (your address) and 1MhAywXcTF78eWVttBsVawSUZyhc53DMkf. Same day, but at 10:25AM
You then sent the coins to 1MhAywXcTF78eWVttBsVawSUZyhc53DMkf, which is the scammers account and then they ran away. That happened at ALSO at 10:25AM.
So the problems with this timeline are the following:
-You sent money twice (?) to the thieves address
-Only 25 minutes happened between the operation in which you bought the coins and when you were robbed.
So... did you meet this guys to sell BTC, or did they offer you a price for using your binance account to buy them some coins? It's just odd that the time lapse is that small, and well, the fact the you sent money twice is also strange.
As a side note, no; there's not much you can do to track them down. Your only chance is to get in contact with authorities so that they get in touch with binance and see if a ring bells; but while doing this, I'm pretty sure you'd be incriminating yourself in a couple of felonies too....
|
|
|
|
Está genial que se haya compartido; como dato curioso añadire que el otro día me encontre en el foro en inglés con un hilo parecido, y al ver que Elwar había contestado y era miembro responsable del equipo, tardé poco en escribirle para mandarle el CV (tengo un perfil nautico). A ver si las cosas van bien, y en verano os escribo desde allí  ¿Quizá para acogerse a beneficios legales por encontrarse en aguas internacionales? Como en aquél capítulo de los Simpsons, que montaban un chiringuito en alta mar en el yate de Burns y la liaban parda...
Aunque se supone que la embarcación debe llevar bandera, y se le aplicarían las leyes de su país si no me equivoco.
Toda embarcación tiene que estar abanderada; en caso de no estarlo, se la considera una embarcación pirata y se puede usar como diana para practicas de tiro, ser abordada o cualquier burrada que se os pase por la cabeza. En el caso especifico del MV Satoshi, el plan es que el buque no abandone aguas panameñas, por lo que va a tener que regirse por toda la legislación local (aunque seguramente consigan beneficios de algún tipo) |
|
|
|
|
The only thing I see missing from the local rule is the genre; so maybe the mod handling the report deemed it not to be such a big thing. Even if the link is embedded in the text instead of in a separate space
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like both Suite and Bridge got updated? Couldn't find anything on the trezor website and I don't really feel like installing some malicious version of the wallet
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
