Well I was more asking the question rather than calling for a vote. If we did vote again it needs a proper plan and be the right time like after the coin is fully developed. But my question is still does being closed source explain the low price? Yes, voting is over. There's no point to change anything at the moment. The community made decision. Also I don't see any connection between closed source and low price. Really Dzarmush? Even though as a NXT follower you watched the coin explode in price prior to OS. Sorry but I question your sincerity. You also have said yourself that Clones help a coin. You seem to of changed your view? Plus this coin has been held back by the idea it is a clone, proving that would make a difference I expect. |
|
|
|
|
Good luck people. My work is done here. People can now choose to listen or be controlled by greed to the point they let go of logic. I've seen it many times before. Bye now.
|
|
|
|
other than a Black coin or NXT clone Do you understand the difference between C++, java and javascript via node.js? Do you understand the difference between this scam http://digitalcoin.co/forums/index.php?topic=625.0And this scam? http://crypti.meThat's right there isn't one, look at the logo choices and general promises. It's all ten same stuff from the guy that did Silkcoin and nummus. These scams never stop it seems. As always I get a ton of abuse when I reveal scams and no one ever thanks me after, even blaming me for the coins demise. Anyway price wise I would say TIMBER! |
|
|
|
You are very persistent in your idiocy nextgencoin, but you forgot to use giant red letters for all of your posts.
Everytime you post the coin looks more like a scam. |
|
|
|
Someone please decompile the wallet.
Wait, didn't you already decompile the wallet and expertly inspected all the inner workings of crypti? For those with poor short term memory go back some pages in this thread and this nextgencoin person came on shouting that crypti devs are the same devs as silkcoin and therefore we have been warned and will get scammed. Why are you calmer now? Or did you forget and think you are in your sockpuppet account rabbiter? At the risk of interjecting logic into this fun little display, nextcoingen clearly has no idea what Crypti even is. Decompile the wallet? Two problems with that: 1. No one has access to the wallet yet. But, you already know that. 2. It's written in node.js. Not C++. There's nothing to decompile. The source code will be obfuscated, but totally available for anyone to see, if they have the right mind to deconstruct it. Even a little bit of research at all could have told you there's nothing to decompile. So let's get things straight here. Crypti has collected thousands of dollars and has proven so far nothing other than talk? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Big scam have existed that followed exactly this pattern with beautiful wallets and websites, teams of developers, decentralised markets promised. What do you have other than superficial wallets and talk? let me remind you how elaborate scams are these days. They had a wallet, collected loads of BTC, a team, many followers and promises of amazing decentralised ebay like stores. What's different? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599438.0 |
|
|
|
Someone please decompile the wallet.
Wait, didn't you already decompile the wallet and expertly inspected all the inner workings of crypti? For those with poor short term memory go back some pages in this thread and this nextgencoin person came on shouting that crypti devs are the same devs as silkcoin and therefore we have been warned and will get scammed. Why are you calmer now? Or did you forget and think you are in your sockpuppet account rabbiter? After hearing the FUD that Crypti is created by the Silkcoin devs, I analyzed the writing styles of the old Silkcoin posts and compared them to the Crypti team's writing styles. I also used waybackmachine to bring up the old Silkcoin web site and compared the code to Crypti's web site. I did not find a single similarity. Not even close. So anyone who claims Crypti is created by the Silkcoin devs is just trying to spread FUD. Period. As a side note, I do believe that Silkcoin was created by the same devs who pulled off the Numus scam. You seem technically the perfect person to decompile the wallet. Why not? |
|
|
|
Someone please decompile the wallet.
Wait, didn't you already decompile the wallet and expertly inspected all the inner workings of crypti? For those with poor short term memory go back some pages in this thread and this nextgencoin person came on shouting that crypti devs are the same devs as silkcoin and therefore we have been warned and will get scammed. Why are you calmer now? Or did you forget and think you are in your sockpuppet account rabbiter? I'm not Rabbiter but it was actually him posting today that brought me back over here as he said he has some insider info that this is a scam. I genuinely forgot about this coin but now I want answers, basic precautions. Why you ask, cause I ended buying some cause the price was going up on after so I sold out of half my Qora and bought in. I actually Got a PM from Syrenity to assure me it's legit and vouched for the coin so I bought some. Now I'm genuinely worried and seeking answers. If I get them I can relax if I get nothing but evasion to basic decompiling of the wallet I'm worried. |
|
|
|
You're an idiot. In technical sense. Code is just a language in which algo is written. You can take Bitcoin algo an rewrite it Golang or other language. It doesn't change the design and core algorithm. Do you understand what I'm talking about? You you are just a stupid nxt troll which spreads FUD?
ai get it, you are protecting your investment but that can't stop even basic checking of the coin. Someone needs to decompile and of they don't soon, I suggest people need to walk away from the coin as suspicious. The problem is the wallet looks like a few other wallets. |
|
|
|
Has anyone looked a decompile of this coin to check it is not a clone?
A clone of what? There are no other coins with the same features. What features are you referring to? A wallet? Promising a feature is not a feature until we see it. Proof of Identity, Proof of Purchase, Proof of Time. What are you talking about? Part of the code probably is taken from another coin, that's how open source development works. What are YOU talking about. The coin is clearly advertised as a new source, that can't mean half a clone. Lol If I say proof of bullshit, proof of apples and proof of Putin does that mean something I can check now. It's words on a page. Until we see either a source code or so one of reputation has decompile the code we can't know it's not anything other than a Black coin or NXT clone. I'm not being a jerk I just need to know if this coin is based on talk or reality. OK fine, I forgot they said anything about all new code, but you can't clone something which doesn't exist. Sure we need to see it working - we are all waiting for the full launch, but if it is there and works then it can't be a clone because you can only clone things which actually exist. Launch? You have already collected a large amount of BTC and the coin is now being traded, you can't evade responsibility and transparency like that. You forgot that it said new source over the coin...are you serious? This is after you claim to know all about the technical innovations of the coin. NO WAY.. Someone please decompile the wallet. |
|
|
|
Has anyone looked a decompile of this coin to check it is not a clone?
If you read through our documents and posts we explain the system we are using. When you see it in action you will know it isn't a clone. No other system exists to my knowledge that functions off of PoT (node up-time) + purchase weight. It took considerable hours (months) for us to get the algorithms and system to work the way we envisioned. I can assure you it was all built from scratch. Mind you, we definitely used ideas from other coins to help spur innovation and probably never would have been able to design Crypti without those who came before and their significant accomplishments, just like they would not have existed with Bitcoin. Sorry that's talk. We need someone to decompile the code who is not part of your coins inner circle. Lots of money is involved here. People have every motivation in the world to BS a coin up. |
|
|
|
Has anyone looked a decompile of this coin to check it is not a clone?
A clone of what? There are no other coins with the same features. What features are you referring to? A wallet? Promising a feature is not a feature until we see it. Proof of Identity, Proof of Purchase, Proof of Time. What are you talking about? Part of the code probably is taken from another coin, that's how open source development works. What are YOU talking about. The coin is clearly advertised as a new source, that can't mean half a clone. Lol If I say proof of bullshit, proof of apples and proof of Putin does that mean something I can check now. It's words on a page. Until we see either a source code or so one of reputation has decompile the code we can't know it's not anything other than a Black coin or NXT clone. I'm not being a jerk I just need to know if this coin is based on talk or reality. |
|
|
|
Has anyone looked a decompile of this coin to check it is not a clone?
A clone of what? There are no other coins with the same features. What features are you referring to? A wallet? Promising a feature is not a feature until we see it. |
|
|
|
Where's the source code?
As we stated multiple times (since the original ANN), the source code will be released in a quarterly fashion, to allow competitive advantage again possible clones. But you didn't give any time to the 'quarterly fashion' in 2020? It's about as vague as you can get. So when will the first quarter be? |
|
|
|
|
Has anyone looked a decompile of this coin to check it is not a clone?
|
|
|
|
Well I was more asking the question rather than calling for a vote. If we did vote again it needs a proper plan and be the right time like after the coin is fully developed. But my question is still does being closed source explain the low price? |
|
|
|
It's amazing how overlooked this coins functions are. There are only a few real completely new coded coins out in the wild. BTC, NXT, Qora, Ripple ..really what else is new apart from some protocol built on Bitcoin or a semi clone like NEM and NODE? BTC, NXT and Ripple rightfully are valued high because of this but Qpra possibly the best coin among them is worth almost nothing in comparison. Something has to change either the price does a moon shoot or this coin disappears as a scam cause that what it's valued as at the moment, a scam or a clone. is closed source holding us back? I want people to see the quality of Qoras ideas in his coding. many coins have copied Qora and labelled their coin new source but I highly doubt there are all theses brand new coin, they are either plagiarised of another one or lying completely. |
|
|
|
|
I bought some Qora today. I think now is the time for the community if they do have any spare coins and want to get the price moving to buy. We must work together and not argue even if idiots are on here dividing us.
|
|
|
|
Which one is Qora? This is the fork of NXT or the fork of eMunie?  By the way this wouldn't be the second exchange, there's 3-4 other exchanges in other coins already.. NXT is the biggest one and has the most volume (IIRC - the volume of all the assets put together would be in the top 20 of cryptos). I know it's only a forum but be man and be honest. Qora is a new source code based on no other cryptocurrency. I used to be a believer in NXT but the community started to become jerks. There's a decent argument for the coin being undervalued, I think we might see a higher price if the AE works nicely. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
