I believe that this one will be the big decider. Everyone talks about how Celtics do not lose back to back, and for a long time they haven't either so people could be right and Celtics could win this game as well, but it will be Warriors home-court advantage, so it is not going to be that simple.

I guess that it is going to be a big trouble for Celtics. If they lose, then Warriors are up, and I believe it is going to be easier for Warriors to take over the series after that, 3-2 is not an easy task, anyone who reaches 3 first, has an immense advantage. Of course that is not the case at all times, Warriors knows it very well, they lost from 3-1 up.

Robert Kiyosaki always talks about real estate, and I get it, USA is one of the best places to invest for real estate, but not every nation is like that, some parts of the world where houses are SUPER expensive, like literally 200 years of minimum wage salary worth of houses, when you are making just a bit more.

I would need to work for 87 years to buy a house without spending a dime, does that make sense as an investment? But the idea could be replicated for crypto, the market is low, and it will recover "eventually", maybe not today, but it will happen one day and we could literally profit from that whenever we want to, that is the most important part.

Unfortunately, most of us believed about the happening of reversal of trend, but market proved that bottom was not around $30k levels. This is why I always say that chart reading and indicators do not show the whole picture. They are definitely good to trade daily if you can, but when you look at the long term results, there could be some crazy dude selling 50k bitcoins in a single sale and drop it all alone, that would be quite possible.

The "possibility" of that is all we need to understand that market is not something that you play with, or even think that you can predict with 100% accuracy, because anything could happen and that risk is always there. I do not know the reason of todays drop, but I know that charts didn't show it, and none of us expected it.

I think Lewandowski is not just great at positioning, but finding that angle for a good shot. Everyone at the very top level (and I mean like mane, Lewandowski levels) could make the shots Lewa can, but not everyone can see it clearly, others may need a few more seconds to see that, whereas Lewa does it with instincts, which is why he is capable of scoring such goals, because he sees the best angle to shoot even before the ball comes to him.

Mane is good, don't get me wrong he is very good, like top level player, but Lewa is something else, Lewa is the top of the top names, Ballon D'or levels of amazing player that Bayern can't replace whoever they got, only a few names can compare.

Why would we care about a CEO saying something, if the world is in such a terrible financial situation, half of it is due to all these CEO's wanting more and more and more profit, if you make 1 billion profit today, why not make 2 tomorrow, and 3 the day after.

These people are always hungry for more, and the mindset overlaps with the idea that it will be 250k. Not saying that it won't happen, it will definitely happen one day, I never say anything is guaranteed in crypto, but about this I can say so, 250k is guaranteed, we just do not know if it will be within 1 year, or 10. This guy is saying something similar so I am not going to argue against it.

I agree that they had a bad season this year in UCL, but that is expected, they haven't been good or even went there too much, which caused them a little bit of a shock. They didn't faced these type of tough games for a while now, and they need to keep repeating it for a few times before they can be any good.

That doesn't mean that they will be doing awesome in a few years when they keep going there, but at least they could make some money for just being there and use that money to buy out some players and make some profit. This will of course take some time, but they can do it if they could just buy players that play well, with the money they make from titles and UCL entry.

I would say that it is quite unlikely for us to drop there, even with a huge fiscal responsibility movement from all around the world. Don't get me wrong, it is not impossible, but it is not going to be that easy neither. We are going to be probably at these prices for a while, even after all the FED and stuff, it is going to stay here, and then we are going to end up with going up eventually.

This much is clear for me, maybe some people can argue against that, maybe they will try to do something else, but for me, the best thing about the current situation is that we are not going to drop that much, not to 20k, because that would mean a lot of people going out, and I am not seeing that right now.

DAI is decentralized which still creates another problem. What we see in a decentralized one is the fact that it is managed in a "system", so if someone brokes in there, suddenly it could be "hacked" or whatever it would be called and however it is done, and it could crash.

When there is someone there, like a centralized stablecoin then we are talking about those people not being trustworthy, like I do not trust Tether for example, when it's DAI and decentralized, I do not believe that it could be kept there and there is no one protecting it. So, both of them feels a bit bad, I never really trust anything that says "we worth x much" and stable, that just doesn't make sense in crypto for me.

It feels like a list that was made by random dice rolling and nothing more. I get the btc and eth part, then maybe matic would make sense as well even though it is not a known and loved one as much as btc and eth, but at least it is still a known one. after that it makes absolutely no sense at all. Apecoin? Really, so you are telling me that OP is asking if Ape which was created based on some overhyped NFT project, is a good coin to invest or not?

Aave, which already seen its prime, or even Astar, which is a coin I am hearing for the first time ever. This wasn't done to ask a serious question, OP just wanted to troll and nothing more, nobody would make a portfolio like this, at least nobody should.

Practice is not really something that we should based the real races on. I mean just because one is better than the other on practice, doesn't mean they will be doing anything that will matter, it just means that we are going to end up with something that would be "similar" on how they will driver, the mindset, but not the pace.

As we all know, during the race we start with much lower paces, and then break way above these levels and be super fast by the end of it (fuel). So, do not be shocked if Max leads the whole race, or Charles does, or Perez does, or hell even Sainz could do something like that and I wouldn't be shocked to be fair.

This is exactly why stunna and primedice team bought stake. I mean they could have turned primedice into a casino as well, they didn't need to buy stake, and they bought it for a pretty cheap price if I am not wrong, cheap compared to what they are doing with it right now of course.

But, they bought it because they believed that if they had a good brandable name, they could be working everywhere, and they got handles for it as well on social media. If you can buy a name like that, which is both English and brandable that would be perfect. If not, then do not go with xxxdice and put whatever there, or anything like that, make it reasonable and related to the topic.

There is really nothing going on with it, it is just a regular thing and we shouldn't be shocked about it. I personally believe that SEC just saw that there is a good chance they could end up making some money from it, investigate it further, find any loopholes or problems there, and end up using that to extort money out of Binance saying they did something wrong.

Binance will want to continue to work with USA, so they will pay it, to keep it silent and not create any issues and that way everyone wins. Remember the old USDT one? That was a hoax as well, USDT had a ton of problems but paid a small fee and got out without any damages to them at all.

This isn't always the case, it needs to be a bull season at the same time as well. Like when bitcoin reaches 70k, and then it fails to go up, and domination sees a resistance, that means we are in a bull season because it reached so high but can't go any higher due to how much money is required to make it go even further up, so people instead move to other coins and use them to make it go that much higher.

I personally would prefer it this way, makes a lot more sense. If you are insisting on this, then we are going to be quite upset about the situation because we are not in a bull run, and expecting alts to have a "season" right now would be a bad expectation.

There will always be some that will try to scam customers, and there will be some that will pay. There is no denying that this happens in all parts of the market, it could be put into anything. Like there will be some casinos which are legit, and some that will scam you, or you could go with some exchanges that are legit and some exchanges will "exit scam" people.

We could say plenty of versions of this and bounty is no different at all. I could have gotten paid a lot more if I went with a bounty for example instead of a regular btc paid place, and yet I didn't, why? Because of the unpaid risk, if someone tells you 100% guaranteed 50+ dollars vs no so guaranteed and risky 100 bucks, you go with the 50+ one for sure.

Bullish is what I am expecting for the upcoming second half for sure. If we had a time to drop this low during the first half of it, then why shouldn't be capable of increasing back again for the upcoming period? It is totally possible for all of us to see something like that happen again. I am not saying that we are going to see 100k or 200k or something like that, it may not happen like that.

But at the very least we could see like 50k+? I mean would that be so hard to achieve, it should be something quite simpler and we would be able to make a lot more profitable decisions based on that. Hopefully we would be doing a bit better in the short term, like during summer, at least 40k, and then during autumn we would do like 50k+ and get in 2023 with an increasing momentum.

I have to say, I do not trust any person that says that the price will be "exactly x when we hit Y date" because that is not a sustainable thing. Certainly you can say one right now and be right, hell do it 10 times and be right 10 times, but when you hit long term, it is not going to be true.

Moreover, we are talking about supporting someone who didn't risk anything, and wants to take a cut from the profits, and not taking any responsibility if there is a loss. I would be willing to share 10% of my profits, if that person is willing to give 10% of my losses back, would that person be able to do that? I doubt so, hence why I believe that it is not really a good deal.

Something "about" similar is going on in my nation as well, and as far as I know minimum wage workers in USA as well. The minimum wage is so small that, there are people who know that they will not be paid the amount they deserve, and even the amount they can survive. If the poverty line is 600 dollars a month in a nation, and you offer them let's say 250 dollars, then do not expect those people to work.

Hence, there are a ton of people who are not even seeking jobs anymore, they are getting unemployment checks which forces them to go check a job, and that ended up with them not getting paid and they keep on collecting the welfare instead. Business' need to offer more in order for people to go back to work.

I really didn't expected Celtics to get ahead on this series and they did it twice. I get that the first game could be a shocking situation, Warriors didn't know how to play against Celtics, they of course scouted them a lot but they just watched them, actually playing against a team during finals is a different situation.

However, the third game, this one that Celtics got a win, is a different situation. First of all, it is obvious that Draymond Green is just a dirty player who doesn't have any talent and only shined because he played with Curry and Klay, let that be open. He had a great season or two, but right now he sucks. Secondly, it is not enough for Curry and Klay to score, but they need better defense for sure, Tatum and Brown running circles around them at this point.

It is really funny to think what would happen to the world if stake was the "worst gambling site", like imagine the website that deals with drake, ufc, nba and watford all at once is actually the "worst" one, there are so many that would be doing much better than THAT, it would be a dream world to live in.

I seriously would love to have stake as the worst one, I mean I imagine how great stake is right now, and think that the greatness of stake would be shrimped by the greatness of all the others that would be even better. But unfortunately, we do not have that and right now stake is the best one out there, could be challenged, but not right now.

Racing incidents are part of the racing world, it just happens without any type of mistake, when you are going that fast, sometimes mistakes happens. I get that when you repeat it, that becomes a bit of a trouble and if you let it happen again and again, you will be seeing that and people will riot eventually, or protest at least.

So, you need to make some people examples on why you shouldn't do that in repeat, but then you are missing out on real racing and seeing people who are staying away from each other's paths in order to not get high penalties, which is good for the health of the drivers, but we are not seeing 100% given in that case.