SolarSilver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 17, 2013, 07:50:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
luffy
|
|
March 17, 2013, 09:49:54 PM |
|
during April it will be ~100TH with Avalon #2. (avalon earnings 3-4 BTC) lets see if BFL will appear also. With 200TH earnings go to 1.5-2 BTC,...etc even with 1PH avalon is profitable with current BTC value (i am expecting though btc>100$ before that) long live Asics, long live Avalon team
|
|
|
|
ewibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 17, 2013, 10:55:26 PM |
|
how to disable the blue LED? (only with cutting?) TIA
|
|
|
|
arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
|
March 17, 2013, 11:50:18 PM |
|
during April it will be ~100TH with Avalon #2. (avalon earnings 3-4 BTC) lets see if BFL will appear also. With 200TH earnings go to 1.5-2 BTC,...etc even with 1PH avalon is profitable with current BTC value (i am expecting though btc>100$ before that) long live Asics, long live Avalon team even with crazy difficulty numbers (like adding a 0 to go from 4.8 mil to 48 mil) even a jalepeno is profitable... assuming it's stats bear out, etc etc... gonna be funny if i end up buying a jalepeno (i'm broke...) and using it to pay for an avalon.
|
i don't post much, but this space for rent.
|
|
|
invader
|
|
March 18, 2013, 10:01:48 AM |
|
Is there someone who tried to move hashmodules lower? Does this improove cooling or not? As i see, bottom fan just mostly passing cool air thru case (without fourth hashmodule)...
|
|
|
|
SolarSilver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2013, 10:37:00 AM |
|
Is there someone who tried to move hashmodules lower? Does this improove cooling or not? As i see, bottom fan just mostly passing cool air thru case (without fourth hashmodule)...
One picture I've seen posted on a Chinese forum is this one: but I'm not sure if this is much of an improvement, it would force all the air through the fins of the left module
|
|
|
|
invader
|
|
March 18, 2013, 10:40:54 AM |
|
I really smiled when i seen this picture, this is a strange solution.
|
|
|
|
SolarSilver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2013, 10:53:34 AM |
|
I really smiled when i seen this picture, this is a strange solution.
I'm sure ngzhang will post that he puked when he saw that picture :-)
|
|
|
|
invader
|
|
March 18, 2013, 12:25:57 PM |
|
So i moved the modules, and it seems to be better at first look. WARNING: use your own mind when considering doing the same. before [2013-03-18 12:37:02] Avalon: Fan1: 0/m, Fan2: 2280/m, Fan3: 2280/m Temp1: 22C, Temp2: -1C, Temp3: 45C, TempMAX: 46C
after [2013-03-18 16:19:23] Avalon: Fan1: 0/m, Fan2: 2040/m, Fan3: 2040/m Temp1: 19C, Temp2: -1C, Temp3: 44C, TempMAX: 44C
|
|
|
|
Bogart
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2013, 02:23:53 PM |
|
I encountered the fan/temp bug again this morning. I noticed it cycled the fans on maximum speed for about 200ms, and when I checked the cgminer status page again the temp and fanspeed readings showed non-sane values that varied rapidly and were sometimes negative.
It also stopped hashing. I presume as a safety measure.
I let it go like this for about 3 minutes this time to see if it would recover. It cycled the fans onto maximum for 200ms a few more times, but never did.
When I restarted cgminer via System --> Startup in the web UI, it then mined normally again and showed normal sensor values.
|
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
|
March 18, 2013, 03:02:48 PM |
|
Anyone have such high HW errors? What does this indicate?
[Getworks] => 1963 [Accepted] => 27062 [Rejected] => 963 [Hardware Errors] => 866 [Utility] => 30.57 [Discarded] => 3649
|
|
|
|
Bogart
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2013, 03:37:35 PM |
|
Anyone have such high HW errors? What does this indicate?
[Getworks] => 1963 [Accepted] => 27062 [Rejected] => 963 [Hardware Errors] => 866 [Utility] => 30.57 [Discarded] => 3649
I did when I was overclocking with --avalon-options 115200:24:10:45:300 Changing to --avalon-options 115200:24:10:42:300 cleared it up for me (thanks to luffy for suggesting it). Supposedly the fourth parameter is a "controller timeout". I'm not sure why reducing it helps.
|
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 18, 2013, 03:41:16 PM |
|
I encountered the fan/temp bug again this morning. I noticed it cycled the fans on maximum speed for about 200ms, and when I checked the cgminer status page again the temp and fanspeed readings showed non-sane values that varied rapidly and were sometimes negative.
It also stopped hashing. I presume as a safety measure.
I let it go like this for about 3 minutes this time to see if it would recover. It cycled the fans onto maximum for 200ms a few more times, but never did.
When I restarted cgminer via System --> Startup in the web UI, it then mined normally again and showed normal sensor values.
is there a way to automate the cgminer restart?
|
|
|
|
Bogart
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2013, 03:49:48 PM |
|
I encountered the fan/temp bug again this morning. I noticed it cycled the fans on maximum speed for about 200ms, and when I checked the cgminer status page again the temp and fanspeed readings showed non-sane values that varied rapidly and were sometimes negative.
It also stopped hashing. I presume as a safety measure.
I let it go like this for about 3 minutes this time to see if it would recover. It cycled the fans onto maximum for 200ms a few more times, but never did.
When I restarted cgminer via System --> Startup in the web UI, it then mined normally again and showed normal sensor values.
is there a way to automate the cgminer restart? Probably. I imagine the restart will be the easy part. Detecting the failure condition programmatically will be the harder part.
|
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 18, 2013, 03:57:04 PM |
|
... Probably. I imagine the restart will be the easy part. Detecting the failure condition programmatically will be the harder part.
Of course not ... my API has all sorts of information that will show the condition ... and if the API isn't working, you take that to mean the condition exists also. Of course there are updates to the API but ...
|
|
|
|
invader
|
|
March 18, 2013, 04:01:45 PM |
|
Someone asked if i moved all modules, or just one - the answer is MOVE ALL THE MODULES
|
|
|
|
Bogart
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2013, 04:03:45 PM |
|
... Probably. I imagine the restart will be the easy part. Detecting the failure condition programmatically will be the harder part.
Of course not ... my API has all sorts of information that will show the condition ... and if the API isn't working, you take that to mean the condition exists also. Of course there are updates to the API but ... Cool. I'm not too familiar with it. Is it JSONRPC just like bitcoind? Care to give a cookbook query string to get the current hashrate?
|
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
|
March 18, 2013, 06:25:44 PM Last edit: March 19, 2013, 01:24:37 AM by johnyj |
|
Anyone have such high HW errors? What does this indicate?
[Getworks] => 1963 [Accepted] => 27062 [Rejected] => 963 [Hardware Errors] => 866 [Utility] => 30.57 [Discarded] => 3649
I did when I was overclocking with --avalon-options 115200:24:10:45:300 Changing to --avalon-options 115200:24:10:42:300 cleared it up for me (thanks to luffy for suggesting it). Supposedly the fourth parameter is a "controller timeout". I'm not sure why reducing it helps. I tried different parameters, including the default 45/282 value, the result is almost the same, hardware error rate about 3% of accepted, and my ambient temp is -3 degree now [fan1] => 0 [fan2] => 720 [fan3] => 720 [temp1] => -3 [temp2] => -1 [temp3] => 28 [temp_max] => 28
|
|
|
|
SZD
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2013, 12:34:55 AM |
|
How loud are these things? Also looks like if you have 20amp circuits you can only have 3 units per circuit assuming you don't have a ton of other stuff already plugged in! Then maybe just 2. So much power use...
|
|
|
|
opentoe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Personal text my ass....
|
|
March 19, 2013, 03:07:06 AM |
|
I'm in the US. Will one of these work on my 15-20amp circuit? I have all 110V lines of course, regular house. Do I need to install a 240 or something?
|
|
|
|
|