DimensionsOfHell
|
|
October 23, 2013, 02:59:22 PM |
|
Just an update for anyone that has paid order from Aug 6th: I've sent an email regarding my Order# 516X paid Aug 6th in regards to my status being in progress for a full week now. They've sent me a response saying they are shipping my Saturn today and gave me the DHL tracking number. I have no activity on BTCGuild for any kind of "burn-in" period, and according to DHL, they picked up the package at 10:14AM in Sweden. I don't see anywhere on the DHL tracking page as to when the estimated delivery date should be though, gotta give them a call later and see. So anyone with a pay date from Aug 6th up should be getting delivered soon. Oh and btw, my status on the KnCMiner page still says "In progress" and not shipped. I would recommend anyone wanting to know their true status, contact the sales team at KnC, and ask them politely (and not aggressively). My email to them: Hi, I wanted inquire as to when I might be receiving my miner? It is now a week past the 15th deadline. I've been patiently waiting for an update, as my status has been "In progress" for a week now. You guys originally said you would clear the log within 3-4 days, and it has been well passed 5 days. The difficulty is about to change again in 3 days, I need my unit as soon as I can. I am loosing a lot of money everyday (about $100 per day), and I know you guys have no plans of compensation for that. Please, I need an answer as soon as you can. Thank you. and their response: Hello Asif, Apologies for the delay. Your order is shipping today with DHL. Your tracking number is; 689XXXXXXX Regards, Liam Med vänlig hälsning | Best regards Liam Vardy Kncminer www.kncminer.comOffice: +46 8559 253 20
|
|
|
|
zoro
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:01:35 PM |
|
i got my Mercury today. very quiet at 100GH with 0.9.7 FW 120W/220v !!! great job KNC i guess we cannot overclock it yet :p
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:10:00 PM |
|
Another day is over and my hosted 39xx Saturn (ordered and paid on the 18th of July) still has status "Paid". Maybe tomorrow, then...
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” “We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.” “It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
Basil
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:14:00 PM |
|
Another day is over and my hosted 39xx Saturn (ordered and paid on the 18th of July) still has status "Paid". Maybe tomorrow, then...
did you try to call KNC near few days, when they start hosting clients?
|
|
|
|
sbfree
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:30:05 PM |
|
I can confirm *on my Sat* that 0.97 is faster then previous firmwares. From 270gh/s to 278gh/s.
So far my Saturn seems improved in regards to flushwork and WU....I still have a high HW error rate, maybe slightly higher even...but at this point i am happier....30 mins in....will check back later. Mining Status CGMiner Status Running (pid=1735) Last Checked Wed Oct 23 15:22:26 UTC 2013 Avg. Hash Rate 257 Gh/s Difficulty Accepted 261,376 Difficulty Rejected 7,168 (2.1 %) Hardware Errors 74,775 (18.0 %) WU 4,058 Difficulty Stale 0 Network Blocks 19 Pool Rejected 2.7 % Pool Stale 0 Best Share 946,168 Found Blocks 0 The hardware error rate is killing me, seems that no matter what firmware I use, some firmware lowers the WU but improves the error rate, and others raise the WU but increase the error rate......most of my cores are running and flushwork is better. Any ideas on why such a high error rate??
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:30:10 PM |
|
Wow, my first found block. On Slush. A few days ago, I just noticed. Can't think of any other reason this one Found Block is listed on my profile page. The block number 265105.
|
|
|
|
cognoscente
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:34:31 PM |
|
Wow, my first found block. On Slush. A few days ago, I just noticed. Can't think of any other reason this one Found Block is listed on my profile page. The block number 265105.
You da man.
|
|
|
|
yuriygeorge
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
I hate my family
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:35:00 PM |
|
Another day is over and my hosted 39xx Saturn (ordered and paid on the 18th of July) still has status "Paid". Maybe tomorrow, then...
Same here, on a Jupiter, paid 16 of July. And people who paid middle of August are getting theirs shipped. Hosting customers getting fucked bad, I don't understand, what's the issue with their data center? Have they run out of space? Why the eff are they shipping mid August orders before mid July hosting orders? WHAT IS UP WITH HOSTING? Day 1 & Day 2 hosting customers are good. Every other hosting customers are effed. Something smells fishy about this.
|
|
|
|
madsusies
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
BitcoinEvo [$XBTE]
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:36:59 PM |
|
Another day is over and my hosted 39xx Saturn (ordered and paid on the 18th of July) still has status "Paid". Maybe tomorrow, then..
I ordered on 19. July payment 1 August, status in progres i got 10 day but i got email from dhlit is pretty quick on my way the mercury
|
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:37:51 PM |
|
I can confirm *on my Sat* that 0.97 is faster then previous firmwares. From 270gh/s to 278gh/s.
So far my Saturn seems improved in regards to flushwork and WU....I still have a high HW error rate, maybe slightly higher even...but at this point i am happier....30 mins in....will check back later. Mining Status CGMiner Status Running (pid=1735) Last Checked Wed Oct 23 15:22:26 UTC 2013 Avg. Hash Rate 257 Gh/s Difficulty Accepted 261,376 Difficulty Rejected 7,168 (2.1 %) Hardware Errors 74,775 (18.0 %) WU 4,058 Difficulty Stale 0 Network Blocks 19 Pool Rejected 2.7 % Pool Stale 0 Best Share 946,168 Found Blocks 0 The hardware error rate is killing me, seems that no matter what firmware I use, some firmware lowers the WU but improves the error rate, and others raise the WU but increase the error rate......most of my cores are running and flushwork is better. Any ideas on why such a high error rate?? I don't really care about the error rate. I only look my hash rate @ the pool.
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:40:47 PM |
|
DPoS I'm really glad that you're able to sort that out, so now your "faulty" jupiter is not faulty anymore Let me just do a quick recap: 0) someway u were able to set input voltage for you miner to 0.9V 1) u've tweaked the cgimner.conf fiel in such way that cgminer start but do nothing (so no enable/siable core dance anymore) 2) run enablecore repeatedly trying to maximize the number of working cores. 3) use Like-jr bfgminer instead of cgminer to mine is this right? a few other quests: a) is this jup a 8 VRM or a 4 VRM one? b) which is the version firmware currently used on that box? c) wattage at the wall? d) u get a die completely turned off on one of your asic board, right? thanks for sharing your experience. edit1: theoretically with a 1200W CPU we could turn a good miner into a super miner using this procedure? edit2: do you have lower system load while using bfgminer (uptime command output)? I'll be getting a 1000 or 1200w psu today for it.. the 850 is nice but I dont want to kill it yes the 4 steps you list are correct a) all 4 VRM boards b) using .94 (since I have a dead die issue, .93 and earlier can't ignore that and goes on an error tantrum) c) I have to get another kill-o-watt, but would be scared to know while on the 850, will know later today d) yes this miner has one die that won't come back anymore and another that sometimes turns off but so far come back on reboots. uptime/load: 15:39pm up 7:53, 2 users, load average: 1.54, 1.41, 1.36 I just put .97 on the other miner so need to wait to get a comparison
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinorama
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:41:27 PM |
|
I see network hashrate that was 3.25PH/s when I looked late yesterday was a moment ago only 2.72 and now is 2.9. I wonder if it's KnC miner users shutting down and restarting with the new firmware.
KNC Pool ( https://portal.kncminer.com/) speed already 70 +TH/s (from about 25 TH/s for 24 hrs ). What it mean? The firmware worked in the datacentre. It was tested on the hosting facility last night, then released today as it was deemed stable.
|
Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful BTC Address ---> 1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
|
|
|
sbfree
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:42:26 PM |
|
I can confirm *on my Sat* that 0.97 is faster then previous firmwares. From 270gh/s to 278gh/s.
So far my Saturn seems improved in regards to flushwork and WU....I still have a high HW error rate, maybe slightly higher even...but at this point i am happier....30 mins in....will check back later. Mining Status CGMiner Status Running (pid=1735) Last Checked Wed Oct 23 15:22:26 UTC 2013 Avg. Hash Rate 257 Gh/s Difficulty Accepted 261,376 Difficulty Rejected 7,168 (2.1 %) Hardware Errors 74,775 (18.0 %) WU 4,058 Difficulty Stale 0 Network Blocks 19 Pool Rejected 2.7 % Pool Stale 0 Best Share 946,168 Found Blocks 0 The hardware error rate is killing me, seems that no matter what firmware I use, some firmware lowers the WU but improves the error rate, and others raise the WU but increase the error rate......most of my cores are running and flushwork is better. Any ideas on why such a high error rate?? I don't really care about the error rate. I only look my hash rate @ the pool. well those errors ultimately affect my hash rate @ the pool that is why I am concerned. 257GH/s on CGminer = 225GH/s on server
|
|
|
|
sbfree
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:44:35 PM |
|
I see network hashrate that was 3.25PH/s when I looked late yesterday was a moment ago only 2.72 and now is 2.9. I wonder if it's KnC miner users shutting down and restarting with the new firmware.
KNC Pool ( https://portal.kncminer.com/) speed already 70 +TH/s (from about 25 TH/s for 24 hrs ). What it mean? The firmware worked in the datacentre. It was tested on the hosting facility last night, then released today as it was deemed stable. Hey Bitcoinorama, any ideas as to why my Saturn has such a high error rate, I don't see others with such?
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:51:30 PM Last edit: October 23, 2013, 04:22:20 PM by edgar |
|
was happy with 0.97 until my average just dropped to 1.344 Mh/s
i enabled CGminer API and restarted CGminer - touch wood its picking up again
Mining Status
CGMiner Status Running (pid=14460) Last Checked Wed Oct 23 16:21:05 UTC 2013 Avg. Hash Rate 520 Gh/s WU 7908 Difficulty Accepted 145920 HW Status
ASIC slot #1 44.0 ℃ ASIC slot #2 - ASIC slot #3 51.0 ℃ ASIC slot #4 45.0 ℃ ASIC slot #5 41.0 ℃ ASIC slot #6 -
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:52:47 PM |
|
The hardware error rate is killing me, seems that no matter what firmware I use, some firmware lowers the WU but improves the error rate, and others raise the WU but increase the error rate......most of my cores are running and flushwork is better. Any ideas on why such a high error rate??
I don't really care about the error rate. I only look my hash rate @ the pool. what kills the hashrate the most seems to be the enabling and disabling of cores (besides flushwork of course) bfgminer removes that and gives control to the user (aided by asic_test to map the really bad ones off for you) cgminer .96/.97 is doing better since it maps asic_test to ignore the bad ones and plays with ones that shouldn't be much trouble. It usually takes at least 10-15 mins for these to ramp up and you will see your HW error % go down low if you have good modules I am tempted to run .93/bfgminer on my good miner to see if can avg 600Gh stable but think that is a bit risky/greedy at this time
|
|
|
|
ElGabo
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:57:32 PM |
|
The 0.97 firmware doesn't worked for me. The hashrate dropped down from 550 to 540, the HW rate went up to 10%.
Now I'm back to 0.96 with hashrate between 557-560, HW error 4,4%.
What do you guys think?
|
" I'm waiting for my punishment, I know it's on my way So cut, cut, cut me up and fuck, fuck, fuck me up"
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 23, 2013, 04:04:41 PM |
|
The 0.97 firmware doesn't worked for me. The hashrate dropped down from 550 to 540, the HW rate went up to 10%.
Now I'm back to 0.96 with hashrate between 557-560, HW error 4,4%.
What do you guys think?
you have to give .96/.97 longer time to see their real hashrate about 15mins to see if it increases, and about an two hours to see how it stabilizes
|
|
|
|
ElGabo
|
|
October 23, 2013, 04:10:14 PM |
|
The 0.97 firmware doesn't worked for me. The hashrate dropped down from 550 to 540, the HW rate went up to 10%.
Now I'm back to 0.96 with hashrate between 557-560, HW error 4,4%.
What do you guys think?
you have to give .96/.97 longer time to see their real hashrate about 15mins to see if it increases, and about an two hours to see how it stabilizes I gave more then 2 hours for 0.97. 0.96 was runing before at 500 for long. There is a picture about it a few post ago. After half an hour since I back to 0.96 it's runing 555 rock solid... with 4,5% HW.
|
" I'm waiting for my punishment, I know it's on my way So cut, cut, cut me up and fuck, fuck, fuck me up"
|
|
|
Rawbit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2013, 04:14:40 PM |
|
Any1 tried enablecores.bin on .97? I get: root@Jupiter-E8F:/config# ./enablecores.bin ./enablecores.bin: ./enablecores.bin: line 1: �bǎPi�-uP: not found ��M��^�: Invalid argument ./enablecores.bin: line 1: aR�Z TSW�: not found JR��֚�7���3k�������f��}���9���Ϲ�{��0h��CY�ɢ���)��Ǎ�2#{��+�T���,��Re*UJ�2 )32U�وR����j�6����J�M��F�����Қi�i�: not found ./enablecores.bin: line 2: syntax error: unexpected "(" root@Jupiter-E8F:/config#
|
|
|
|
|