Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com

[soy]

soy are these temps and current outputs ok?

are they similar to your stats?

how long have you been on .90?

I don't have an answer for your first question, as for the rest it's posted a few pages ago.

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills.

[ASIC-K]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

damn, my mercury is topping out at 119 ghs and that with me doing a lot of reboots. i went back to .95 firmware and so far its the best. havent tried .90 though. the pool shows 103ghs unfortunately tho....i might have to try this .90 like you are using

[Phoenix1969]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

few mins later...  couple more WU. 1 more gh/s

[timmmers]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills.

warming up in here and need air movement while running so on comes a fan.  won't be after bering sea gold as I swim like a rock.  and the bitcoin may buy me a new car one day

[Phoenix1969]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running...  I know....   seems to continue to rise...  more WU & another GH/s...

[btc_uzr]

(...)  and the bitcoin may buy me a new car one day

I'd say you can do so after some hours of mining, depending on your standards




or maybe never

[sbfree]

soy, .90 crashed....and everything below .94 didn't work or help me...back to .95 square 1 again see what happens....

.90, knc if you are listening had great numbers for me, but not sure what why it crashed....

[timmmers]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running...  I know....   seems to continue to rise...  more WU & another GH/s...

It would be nice to know the theoretical limit. I'm sitting on a merc hashing at 140 solidly. So that may be a good one. Sats should manage 280 at least  then from that? Maybe more in time, it's only been a week after all.

[sbfree]

I think it's time KNC allowed for us to play with some volt settings within reason so we don't fry our units but yet get to squeeze more out of them, they can take it....per .90  

[Phoenix1969]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running...  I know....   seems to continue to rise...  more WU & another GH/s...

It would be nice to know the theoretical limit. I'm sitting on a merc hashing at 140 solidly. So that may be a good one. Sats should manage 280 at least  then from that? Maybe more in time, it's only been a week after all.

Yes, I have one Sat that stays rock-solid on 280...

so maybe 560 for Jupiter?...anyone got a Jup with better?

edit:  still climbing WU's & Gh/s on the slo sat.... slowly
was 253/3920  now   262/3973  still going...

[josh_nc]

http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/

Count   265,677



Blocks
last 24h:         87    <<<<<   Is this correct??? First time I see this since the beginning of the year....
avg. per hour: 3.63  <<<<<   If this is right wow!!! It could mean diff going down for 1st time ever!!!


Difficulty   267,731,249
Next Difficulty in 435 blocks 371,623,920

[btc_uzr]

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

more than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?

[Micky25]

sorry, I tripped over a wire.

[ffernandex]

Yes, I have one Sat that stays rock-solid on 280...

so maybe 560 for Jupiter?...anyone got a Jup with better?

edit:  still climbing WU's & Gh/s on the slo sat.... slowly
was 253/3920  now   262/3973  still going...

My hosted jupiter used to be in that range, and a couple times it even averaged +600GH/s, but now since the last FW update it's been stuck in the 400's range for at least a couple days.

very very disappointing

[Phoenix1969]

264/3984
1st red mark is 0.97, second is vrm wiggle

[ImI]

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

more than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?

you ever heard the term "variance"?

[btc_uzr]

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

more than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?

you ever heard the term "variance"?

Yes sir.
And I'm aware what mathematical probability is and how hashrate is being approximated.