IYFTech
|
|
October 01, 2014, 01:52:15 AM |
|
Anyone know if the XBTech Pacific 1250's work OK with p2pool?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
|
October 01, 2014, 02:31:44 AM |
|
I've set up a private pool solution for a reasonably large miner using a combination of p2pool and ckpool technology. You should all see a decent increase in the overall pool size over the next 24-48 hours.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
October 01, 2014, 03:44:34 AM |
|
I've set up a private pool solution for a reasonably large miner using a combination of p2pool and ckpool technology. You should all see a decent increase in the overall pool size over the next 24-48 hours.
Very cool! Any plans to release the p2pool+ckpool combined solution?
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
|
October 01, 2014, 03:50:27 AM |
|
I've set up a private pool solution for a reasonably large miner using a combination of p2pool and ckpool technology. You should all see a decent increase in the overall pool size over the next 24-48 hours.
Very cool! Any plans to release the p2pool+ckpool combined solution? It's all there as the free software that exists already (I've been working on ckproxy changes all week aimed at p2pool). I'm providing the server and setting it up for them and running it as a customised solution in an optimised fashion for their particular hardware combination and geographical location.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
mahrens917
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:12:24 AM |
|
I've set up a private pool solution for a reasonably large miner using a combination of p2pool and ckpool technology. You should all see a decent increase in the overall pool size over the next 24-48 hours.
How does ckpool and p2pool work together? Ckpool is essentially a centralized service offering solo mining, correct? How does that interact with the p2pool network? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
|
October 01, 2014, 11:04:07 PM |
|
I've set up a private pool solution for a reasonably large miner using a combination of p2pool and ckpool technology. You should all see a decent increase in the overall pool size over the next 24-48 hours.
How does ckpool and p2pool work together? Ckpool is essentially a centralized service offering solo mining, correct? How does that interact with the p2pool network? Thanks. You're thinking of solo.ckpool.org . ckpool is the software, it is not a pool, but there are numerous ckpool based pools. It can also run as ckproxy which when it sits in front of p2pool it can take the load off the p2pool software allowing far more high speed clients to connect to the one p2pool node without adversely affecting its latency or efficiency. Yes that does make it yet another layer you need running which makes it even more awkward and I wasn't recommending that for anyone else, but it happens to be quite a good solution for very large miners as it ends up acting like a mini private pool for them while still being part of the distributed p2pool and avoid joining a regular pool. As the author of the ckpool software, I'm offering various mining solutions. You'll note that I'm personally not running a regular pool of my own, only the solo pool which is filling a different niche.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
October 02, 2014, 11:08:22 AM |
|
I've set up a private pool solution for a reasonably large miner using a combination of p2pool and ckpool technology. You should all see a decent increase in the overall pool size over the next 24-48 hours.
How does ckpool and p2pool work together? Ckpool is essentially a centralized service offering solo mining, correct? How does that interact with the p2pool network? Thanks. You're thinking of solo.ckpool.org . ckpool is the software, it is not a pool, but there are numerous ckpool based pools. It can also run as ckproxy which when it sits in front of p2pool it can take the load off the p2pool software allowing far more high speed clients to connect to the one p2pool node without adversely affecting its latency or efficiency. Yes that does make it yet another layer you need running which makes it even more awkward and I wasn't recommending that for anyone else, but it happens to be quite a good solution for very large miners as it ends up acting like a mini private pool for them while still being part of the distributed p2pool and avoid joining a regular pool. As the author of the ckpool software, I'm offering various mining solutions. You'll note that I'm personally not running a regular pool of my own, only the solo pool which is filling a different niche. Managed to run proxy with -p but With -P it fails and have no clue what this means.. This is from a gentoo box so there should be those build essentials without any change - might be wrong though.. boxi src # ./ckpool -A -P [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy generator starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy generator ready [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy stratifier starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy connector starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] Failed to get a json result in passthrough_stratum, got: {"error": {"message": "Method not found", "code": -32601, "data": null}, "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": null, "result": null} [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy connector ready [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy stratifier ready
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
|
October 02, 2014, 11:22:37 AM |
|
Managed to run proxy with -p but With -P it fails and have no clue what this means.. This is from a gentoo box so there should be those build essentials without any change - might be wrong though..
boxi src # ./ckpool -A -P [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy generator starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy generator ready [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy stratifier starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy connector starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] Failed to get a json result in passthrough_stratum, got: {"error": {"message": "Method not found", "code": -32601, "data": null}, "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": null, "result": null} [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy connector ready [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy stratifier ready
If you read the docs, -P MUST have a full ckpool instance upstream or it will not work, so you can only use -p with another pool, like p2pool.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
October 02, 2014, 11:27:41 AM |
|
Managed to run proxy with -p but With -P it fails and have no clue what this means.. This is from a gentoo box so there should be those build essentials without any change - might be wrong though..
boxi src # ./ckpool -A -P [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy generator starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy generator ready [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy stratifier starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy connector starting [2014-10-02 13:10:04] Failed to get a json result in passthrough_stratum, got: {"error": {"message": "Method not found", "code": -32601, "data": null}, "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": null, "result": null} [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy connector ready [2014-10-02 13:10:04] ckproxy stratifier ready
If you read the docs, -P MUST have a full ckpool instance upstream or it will not work, so you can only use -p with another pool, like p2pool. Ok thanks, works great with -p
|
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
|
October 03, 2014, 10:13:10 AM |
|
Anyone know if the XBTech Pacific 1250's work OK with p2pool?
Thanks.
Anyone? Also the Technobit HEX4M's? Looks like the S4's are having problems mining on a centralised pool - let alone p2pool. I've asked on the S4 thread if someone would try them with p2pool, but I think they're too busy drowning in fail......I can't believe Bitmain didn't test the firmware properly before shipping them
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 04, 2014, 12:32:32 AM |
|
Anyone know if the XBTech Pacific 1250's work OK with p2pool?
Thanks.
Anyone? Also the Technobit HEX4M's? Looks like the S4's are having problems mining on a centralised pool - let alone p2pool. I've asked on the S4 thread if someone would try them with p2pool, but I think they're too busy drowning in fail......I can't believe Bitmain didn't test the firmware properly before shipping them S3 is basically a faster S1, and S1s worked fine (well, okay) with p2pool. Stands to reason a S4 is basically a faster S2. And we know how well S2s work with p2pool. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
PatMan
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:30:06 AM |
|
Well, according to Bitmain - they work with p2pool: Replied questions:
1. S4 is compatible with p2pool? Yes
But the proof is in the pudding. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone tried?
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 04, 2014, 07:14:05 AM |
|
Well, according to Bitmain - they work with p2pool: Replied questions:
1. S4 is compatible with p2pool? Yes
But the proof is in the pudding. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone tried? S2s "work" as well. Just not very well. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
|
truten
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
October 04, 2014, 07:49:41 PM |
|
Hello, Why not support script Dogekoin?
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
October 05, 2014, 12:36:14 AM |
|
Hello, Why not support script Dogekoin?
because your a moron... seriously, just take a p2pool with moronKoin in it...
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 05, 2014, 04:29:19 AM |
|
Truten, I do not believe this thread is the right place to discuss altcoin p2pools as it is focused on Bitcoin. Having said that I believe Rav removed dogecoin from his repository since he believes running a dedicated dogecoin pool is no longer a good idea due to doge now supporting auxPOW. Added to that it appears that a number of nodes never updated their dogecoind so the dogecoin p2pool is finding blocks in both chains. For the most part I would say that the dogecoin p2pool is dead.
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
October 05, 2014, 04:32:22 AM |
|
Hello, Why not support script Dogekoin?
It does, there's just problem with change to difficulties recently. Move them back and you should be fine.
|
|
|
|
|