organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 11:23:37 AM |
|
Q: how exactly is calculated expected time to block when block found? Current pool hash rate or some average of time that block was mined? I`m still not sure that our luck chart is good... If we founding blocks "in time" I`m gettin much more than from any pps pool... For me luck is much higher than 90% ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) What's your average daily earnings and average hashrate for the current difficulty period? If you can tell me that, I'll tell you whether or not you're getting more or less than expected. It is my desktop, so avg is about 140MH/s. I`m taking 0.025 per block or more (even 0.05) from P2pool. I was mining on 2 pps pools and get about 0.07-0.075 BTC/day. For me P2pool is best ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) What are your average daily earnings for the current diff period? Last 2 days: 16-06: 0.04103741 BTC 0.03053837 BTC 0.03054256 BTC 0.03571901 BTC 0.03559559 BTC Total: 0,17343294 15-06: 0.03603529 BTC 0.03502059 BTC 0.03518694 BTC 0.03513995 BTC 0.04118142 BTC Total: 0,18256419 ANY PPS pool give me that ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) BTW fixed BTCLauncher, uploaded to skydrive. There was bug in saving run_p2pool.exe patch to options. The pool has been exceedingly lucky since the 14th June, with a mean round length of 0.6975. This means you'll get paid much more than PPS. However, this is a reflection of the variance inherent in bitcoin mining. If you recorded your fortnightly average, you'd find it much less than PPS, since the average p2Pool roundlength for the last two weeks was 1.204. The average round length since the start of p2Pool is about 1.11. So, since the start of p2Pool, average miner earnings are less than PPS.
|
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 11:30:26 AM |
|
The pool has been exceedingly lucky since the 14th June, with a mean round length of 0.6975. This means you'll get paid much more than PPS.
However, this is a reflection of the variance inherent in bitcoin mining. If you recorded your fortnightly average, you'd find it much less than PPS, since the average p2Pool roundlength for the last two weeks was 1.204.
The average round length since the start of p2Pool is about 1.11. So, since the start of p2Pool, average miner earnings are less than PPS.
Yes, because we have "dry days" just before. As someone said: in long run it is all the same. P2pool have few BIG advantages over other pools, thats why I support it, not only for income. In fact, I pay more for electric power than I make coins on my machine. But I like Bitcoin idea too much ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 11:36:15 AM Last edit: June 17, 2012, 01:37:32 PM by organofcorti |
|
The pool has been exceedingly lucky since the 14th June, with a mean round length of 0.6975. This means you'll get paid much more than PPS.
However, this is a reflection of the variance inherent in bitcoin mining. If you recorded your fortnightly average, you'd find it much less than PPS, since the average p2Pool roundlength for the last two weeks was 1.204.
The average round length since the start of p2Pool is about 1.11. So, since the start of p2Pool, average miner earnings are less than PPS.
Yes, because we have "dry days" just before. As someone said: in long run it is all the same. No, you're missing the point. In the long run, it's not the same. In the long run you're earning less than at a PPS pool. P2pool have few BIG advantages over other pools, thats why I support it, not only for income.
And that's the reason you should continue mining at p2Pool, despite the lower earnings. I have no doubt that the current round length problem will be fixed eventually, but at the moment you are paying a price for the p2Pool advantages.
|
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 01:29:36 PM |
|
15% of pool is on v3. Keep updating ppl!
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 04:41:04 PM |
|
Is there any way to reduce the verbosity of the logs that P2Pool keeps? I've searched this topic but come up empty-handed.
|
|
|
|
cabin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 05:49:44 PM |
|
Is there any way to reduce the verbosity of the logs that P2Pool keeps? I've searched this topic but come up empty-handed.
If you're running from source edit main.py, around line 894 to this: if time.time() > last_time + 60: This will print out pool stats one a minute instead every 15 seconds or less.
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 05:52:15 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FBx5Fx.png&t=665&c=ctdjjC9ZCJYcGQ) The correlation is just crazy ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 06:24:48 PM |
|
Nevermind, I'm an idiot.
|
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 07:32:08 PM |
|
20% of network is updated so far, download and install fresh version!
|
|
|
|
ebereon
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 07:44:54 PM |
|
updated my node, thanks forrestv!
|
|
|
|
bulanula
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 08:20:26 PM |
|
The pool has been exceedingly lucky since the 14th June, with a mean round length of 0.6975. This means you'll get paid much more than PPS.
However, this is a reflection of the variance inherent in bitcoin mining. If you recorded your fortnightly average, you'd find it much less than PPS, since the average p2Pool roundlength for the last two weeks was 1.204.
The average round length since the start of p2Pool is about 1.11. So, since the start of p2Pool, average miner earnings are less than PPS.
Yes, because we have "dry days" just before. As someone said: in long run it is all the same. P2pool have few BIG advantages over other pools, thats why I support it, not only for income. In fact, I pay more for electric power than I make coins on my machine. But I like Bitcoin idea too much ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) LOL. Too bad we don't have more of you people. Too many profiteers around here wishing to suck the gold stream dry like BFL and gigavps.
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 11:04:56 PM |
|
P2Pool release 3.0 tag: 3.0 hash: a4cde222d397b47ae5646ca74a8036025d745df8 Windows binary: http://u.forre.st/u/lgljvrzx/p2pool_win32_3.0.zipSource zipball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/zipball/3.0Source tarball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/tarball/3.0Changes: * P2Pool will "skip ahead" to building on blocks not yet processed by the local bitcoind based on block headers received from P2Pool peers. This should significantly reduce the number of orphaned blocks we have if everyone upgrades.* Latency/high CPU usage caused by requesting shares from old nodes is fixed by now not downloading shares more than a day old This change increments the share version to 3, so once 50% of people upgrade, the rest will be notified by messages on their P2Pool console. So, please upgrade! Note that this isn't a hard fork of the P2Pool chain, so old nodes will continue to work, only spamming the upgrade messages. I'm pointing one of my miners to a local instance of this... hoping it works better than last time. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2012, 11:44:03 PM |
|
Almost 30% updated, keep it coming!
|
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2012, 06:51:14 AM |
|
What is with all the orphans? Is the large block size too much for miners with slow uplinks?
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2012, 10:42:05 AM |
|
Passed 50% of nodes on v3. A MAJORITY OF SHARES CONTAIN A VOTE FOR AN UNSUPPORTED SHARE IMPLEMENTATION! You have it in your log? Time to update then! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
Ente
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2012, 11:14:14 AM |
|
Passed 50% of nodes on v3. A MAJORITY OF SHARES CONTAIN A VOTE FOR AN UNSUPPORTED SHARE IMPLEMENTATION! You have it in your log? Time to update then! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Nice! That was quick! Lets do it! Ente
|
|
|
|
rdponticelli
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Our highest capital is the Confidence we build.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2012, 02:02:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
rav3n_pl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1361
Merit: 1003
Don`t panic! Organize!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2012, 02:17:59 PM |
|
Passed 50% of nodes on v3. A MAJORITY OF SHARES CONTAIN A VOTE FOR AN UNSUPPORTED SHARE IMPLEMENTATION! You have it in your log? Time to update then! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Nice! That was quick! Lets do it! Ente Almost 8% is still using bugged v2 - 15 nodes Almost 40% is using v1 (very old or rollbacked form v2) - 72 nodes Close to 55% are updated to v3 already - 107 nods Well... make it happen finally! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
|