|
nextblast
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 12:52:11 PM |
|
Wow, I found this too late. It is truely good for those who want to have a personalized address. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
Prompyboo
Sr. Member
  

Activity: 807
Merit: 251
World's First Crowd Owned Cryptocurrency Exchange
|
 |
October 12, 2014, 01:19:15 PM |
|
yup too late 
|
|
|
|
snazz
Newbie

Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 20, 2014, 05:48:19 PM |
|
I'm constantly getting mismatched GPU/CPU hashes with oclvanitygen on my Windows (10) x64 Tech preview with Nvidia GTX 660 Ti and driver v344.11 e.g. oclvanitygen.exe -v 1abc
Prefix difficulty: 4553521 1abc Difficulty: 4553521 Device: GeForce GTX 660 Ti Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation (10de) Driver: 344.11 Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.1 CUDA Max compute units: 7 Max workgroup size: 1024 Global memory: -2147483648 Max allocation: 536870912 OpenCL compiler flags: -DPRAGMA_UNROLL -cl-nv-verbose Loading kernel binary dda8fd690f1d7ccbbb3690e8ae52b4f6.oclbin Grid size: 3584x2048 Modular inverse: 7168 threads, 1024 ops each Using OpenCL prefix matcher Match idx: 0 CPU hash: 4c4d139270e27dab4ab9a3de0b671d7a68c25e58 GPU hash: 065a9e86f02103a24fcdf5c88b4f6605d6dc3851 Found delta: 6607128 Start delta: 1 [5.70 Mkey/s][total 7340032][Prob 80.1%][90% in 0.6s] Match idx: 0 CPU hash: 1b1c77d0f608eb3ff10341abb770c6f0994b3de6 GPU hash: 065a9e7012412266e26eb740bf195c3ab70b7d0b I hope someone can help me get this running properly. I have searched for answers to no avail.
|
|
|
|
|
snazz
Newbie

Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 21, 2014, 08:23:23 AM |
|
Never mind, using older drivers fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Loco
Newbie

Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 31, 2014, 05:03:09 PM |
|
Hi, I was wondering if someone could help me.
Is there a parameter for vanitygen to stop it from outputting stuff to the console? I want it to run on the background of my ubuntu server, so I use './vanitygen -i 1jerodev &', but it keeps sending things to the console and it is verry anoying.
Thanks for helping, Jerodev.
i have the same problem, does anyone can use it on background?? :S
|
|
|
|
|
|
shifty252
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 07:02:11 PM |
|
Hi,
Trying to do some mining with vanity gen on vanity pool, but i am having a hard time with it.
I am on windows 8.1, got a Radeon R9 270x card and Xeon E3 cpu, could someone please post an example of the bat file to start the miner?
Also tried finding it in the thread, but after browsing the pages could not find the info.
thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 07:27:01 PM |
|
Trying to do some mining with vanity gen on vanity pool, [...] tried finding it in the thread, but after browsing the pages could not find the info. You must have missed the first post: $ ./oclvanityminer -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com/ -a 1samr7UZxtC6MEAFHqr1h3Kq453xJJbe4 So on windows, your .bat file would look something like: oclvanityminer64.exe -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress Or start "Vanity Miner: Pool" /low oclvanityminer64.exe -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress To give it a nice window caption and slightly deprioritize the process. If it's not working, I recommend that you try to get oclvanitygen working first - in case there's any issues using it with your card or having to select the right OpenCL platform.
|
|
|
|
PointBlank
Newbie

Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 07:32:44 PM |
|
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
|
|
|
|
|
crazytasty
Newbie

Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 07:48:19 PM |
|
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
No more than 8 characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 09:05:33 PM |
|
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
What's the maximum prefix you can generate with a top end computer?
No more than 8 characters. It's a bit more nuanced than that. You can certainly generate longer ones: vanitygen 1abcdefghijkLmnopqrstuvwxyz Difficulty: 164888818503458230623158005923420463190199545920 [830.19 Kkey/s][total 6228992][Prob 0.0%][50% in 4.365470e+033y]
Except that it would take, on average, a very very very very very long time. But 9 characters is perfectly doable - this is on a not-all-that-beefy laptop: oclvanitygen64 -p 1 1abcdefgh Difficulty: 2988734397852220 [5.39 Mkey/s][total 75497472][Prob 0.0%][50% in 12.2y] I still wouldn't want to wait 12 years, but if you do.. why not. Moreover, it's an 'on average'. It's possible you could get a hit a split second after you call the command, and it's also possible it would take centuries to get a hit. Note that this is if you absolutely must generate one for whatever reason. If you're talking about mining, then perhaps a 'maximum prefix' would be contingent upon profitability, in which case you'd have to consider whether the bounty equals or exceeds your expenses for vanity mining - and that is a calculation that is, again, subject to that 'on average' caveat. The only theoretical limit is, I think, 30 (including the leading '1'), as that's when you exhaust the number of characters available in a bitcoin address to begin with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shifty252
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 09:41:39 PM |
|
Trying to do some mining with vanity gen on vanity pool, [...] tried finding it in the thread, but after browsing the pages could not find the info. You must have missed the first post: $ ./oclvanityminer -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com/ -a 1samr7UZxtC6MEAFHqr1h3Kq453xJJbe4 So on windows, your .bat file would look something like: oclvanityminer64.exe -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress Or start "Vanity Miner: Pool" /low oclvanityminer64.exe -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress To give it a nice window caption and slightly deprioritize the process. If it's not working, I recommend that you try to get oclvanitygen working first - in case there's any issues using it with your card or having to select the right OpenCL platform. Thanks! didn't miss it just didn't understand right. i had to open a command prompt and enter the 2nd command you post but it wouldn't start untill i added "-D 0:0" which is my GPU, so in my case the command line is: oclvanityminer64.exe -D 0:0 -u https://vanitypool.appspot.com -a 1youraddress Now i am mining with ~20Mkey for "1Smoothie" with 50% prob in 3.3y. Any way i can further optimize it? Thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 10:24:28 PM |
|
Now i am mining with ~20Mkey for "1Smoothie" with 50% prob in 3.3y. Any way i can further optimize it?
You can try playing with some of the finer parameters, but it's probably not going to get much better; even if you speed it up 2x it'll still be well over 18 months (average) 
|
|
|
|
|
shifty252
|
 |
November 03, 2014, 10:38:16 PM |
|
Now i am mining with ~20Mkey for "1Smoothie" with 50% prob in 3.3y. Any way i can further optimize it?
You can try playing with some of the finer parameters, but it's probably not going to get much better; even if you speed it up 2x it'll still be well over 18 months (average)  I raised it to 22Mkey by overclocking the card. got no idea which params to try, but it's late now for me. maybe i'll try tomorrow. If i get lucky and solve it where is the result saved and how can i redeem the reward? Also, can i choose which work to do, instead of being assigned by the pool?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
 |
November 04, 2014, 12:31:36 AM |
|
I raised it to 22Mkey by overclocking the card. got no idea which params to try, but it's late now for me. maybe i'll try tomorrow. Basically the -s, -t, -g, -b parameters, there's really not much else to tweak. A better option would be to see if you can optimize the actual code further / specifically for your card. Also use the "-F compressed" option, that should boost performance a bit further. And if you're not already using the lifeboat version, see if that gives you a performance boost as well - though read its thread for details and possible concerns. If i get lucky and solve it where is the result saved and how can i redeem the reward? If you're using the oclvanityminer, then the result is automatically submitted and the pool should pay out to the address specified. Also, can i choose which work to do, instead of being assigned by the pool? Technically it's not assigned by the pool - the utility downloads the complete list and does a calculation of which is the most profitable given reward vs difficulty (the 'lavishness') to decide on the vanity to mine for. There's an alternative code base that has some additional control: https://github.com/WyseNynja/vanitygen/commit/fb37cfbcfaf8a6922cc2b872cb19a11fdc252c92But if you want further control - say, only mine if a given address should be generated within a week (on average!) - you'd have to set something up manually or mess with the source code yourself. Also just to note (though I believe you understand this, mostly repeating it here for the new eyeballs on this thread) - keep in mind that it isn't really a 'pool' so much as a distributed task. If you don't find a requested vanity address, you get nothing, even if your machine's been powering away at it 24/7.
|
|
|
|
|
fran2k
|
 |
November 09, 2014, 07:35:48 PM |
|
I spend several hours getting oclvanitygen working with AMD Radeon 7xxx on 64-bit Linux - Ubuntu 12.04 and Ubuntu 14.04. In the end only the following is needed: - Ubuntu drivers
- vanitygen patch
- 1 userspace library file from AMD APP SDK v2.7
I created a minimal instruction text file. Maybe this will save someone some hours of searching the internet. https://nastyfans.org/download/oclvanitygen.txtGreat, thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
 |
November 10, 2014, 10:30:14 PM |
|
OK
I'll offer a bounty for keyconv to work with BTC/LTC/DOGE/DRK for split key generation.
Check my repo @ https://github.com/kangaderoo/vanitygenthis keyconv should support the -X switch ./keyconv -c 5JVyzR3wUqJJB2aV7twThzs3HftVeZ2fH9rqpsGvWuTc76c1yFj 6JWNzw3CpQdqavm8XaNXNQVEn2bhc5aZwy8zkt4xf8B191Mf2e9 Address: 1GHeVSRy4CiSnrCwydCJ3yMVJszpZfEELB Privkey: 5Jsk7iB6f25MTLXBQtF7NjcvNgBjYNTsu8oq35fF7VaLGmfpJoG
./keyconv -X 30 -c 5JVyzR3wUqJJB2aV7twThzs3HftVeZ2fH9rqpsGvWuTc76c1yFj 6JWNzw3CpQdqavm8XaNXNQVEn2bhc5aZwy8zkt4xf8B191Mf2e9 Address: DLRk2hNcMccjKrPYiDBrbjX6C1j7r1Pnkg Privkey: 5Jsk7iB6f25MTLXBQtF7NjcvNgBjYNTsu8oq35fF7VaLGmfpJoG
The Vanitygen updates are fixed to my development env. at the moment. Build only the new keyconv code. Have fun. [1KangaNsFtfsr7vgVhdvfdY8LyRVbm1Mbh] Is this version of keyconv avaliable for windows anywhere?
|
|
|
|
|
cryptocoinfan
Newbie

Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 10, 2014, 11:50:05 PM |
|
Am I reading this right, that it generates 23k addresses per second? And this particular address was found after 80,000?
yes you are right
|
|
|
|
|
|
Racer8
|
 |
November 15, 2014, 05:56:29 PM |
|
Great program!
I'm running the following command on windows 7: vanitygen -f patterns.txt
It only seems to find addresses for the first pattern in patterns.txt which was generated by notepad.exe. I.e. if I have a file with the following 2 lines: 1234 1x
it will only ever find addresses starting with 1234. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
 |
November 15, 2014, 06:38:33 PM Last edit: November 15, 2014, 06:51:59 PM by TheRealSteve |
|
It only seems to find addresses for the first pattern in patterns.txt which was generated by notepad.exe. I.e. if I have a file with the following 2 lines: 1234 1x
it will only ever find addresses starting with 1234. Any ideas?
Try making adding an empty line at the end, so: 1234{enter} 1x{enter} {blank}
|
|
|
|
|