Sorry but after reading your reply i can already say this wont have any longterm success.To many bs posted
No, why would they? First off, I know you are obsessed with these large wallets, but it seems you´ve never considered that this wallets could be cold storage of exchanges.
The diffrence between the smart people and the rest of the community/you is that we checked the blockchain by auditing it and can say without concern that these coins havent been bought via exchanges.
Of course there are a few bigger buyers but they make arround 5% out of 100% and would never ever explain the big wallets.
You are like Kolin trying to sell the smart part of the community for stupid if you think they are going to belive you that these wallets are from exchanges (after the audit).
You dont change/fix any major issue.You didnt learn anything out of the past or have a clue why the community left the coin.
I would recommend to study a bit more about the history why this community went down and maybe focus on fixing the community.
This has been proved for the largest wallets.
Haha what a joke.Seems like high educated ex members were stupid to audit the bc correctly
There is no proof whatsoever that the blockchain has been manipulated
Just proofs again you know nothing about quark.
There was already proof posted which you can also see on bitcointalk if you look for it.Of course you the new leading part have no clue about it.WOW what a great new leadership.No changes from the old coin
You guys still didnt learn anything.
You studied macro economics ?Sorry but you dont even understand what these big wallets mean for a "currency" .Its kills instantly the main idea of a cryptocurrency.
But like i said at the beginning of quark in november quark was never created to get a currency but to create a ponzi which wont change with your idea
The POB coin can and will have major success if handled correctly and tranparently.
What exactly are you claiming about these large wallets? Be precise and back up these claims with hard evidence. Do not say things that can't be proven else you will lose all credibility and will just be ignored in future.
I am trying to understand what angle you have here.
I was here at the launch and i know for a fact there was no premine, there was an instamine of sorts by steve lamb, who i affectionately named the coin rapist because of his instamining super powers with huge processing power. He did this on many coins.
However, the dev took very few coins and the rest of us just made do with mining on our rigs like the vast majority.
I can not say how many exactly steve took but if you look at his screen shot i guess he got a LOT of coins at the start.
Please tell us exactly who you think this wallet is holding 33M and how they attained those coins? Bring evidence or at least credible reasoning with you not baseless accusations.
If you can PROVE some kind of scam here i am open to hearing about it and i am sure others are too.
I don't see how there can be one though, since the only way to get coins was to mine them, if you wanted to buy them from another miner it is down to them to decide the price.
MAX never got many coins, from the start he never really did any promotion of the coin and it was soon all dumped on cryptsy for next to nothing. The wallet with 33M or any wallet would have had to buy them or mine them. There is no scam that i can see could have happened.
If there is a scam please outline right now how it took place and the motivation of the huge wallet to accrue 10% of the minting only to let the coin sink to a very low value, this is a terrible scam if it ever was one.
NEXT
The POB coin if handled correctly could do a lot of great things for qrk. This is a seperate issue to the 33M wallet. Just because we have not turned attention to this 33M wallet yet does not follow POB will have no long term success.
We need funding to aid development of features and services. This is the bottom line.
However the POB coin can be also used to filter out these whales you don't like. The rate of POB could be limited according to your activity or any multiple other ways of getting fat cats involved or left unable to burn.
There are multiple possible advantages that have been covered to death and yet NO credible disadvantage above and beyond any other of the 5 new coins released per day now.
I like POB. i like qrk only IPO. Both give qrk holders a transfer of share into the new coin if they choose. It allows new features and experimentation without altering the qrk core. It allows us to attract new blood with new btc, it gives an indication qrk is not dead, the development pot is the most important part and that if handled correctly and efficiently can take qrk back into being one of the main players today.
Those saying the real work has no call for privacy are wrong. I was totally anti privacy at the start but i can see now that it is very desirable, anyone watching the markets and saying nobody cares about anon features are not being realistic. BTC is a terrible example people always quote. BTC was the first rules that apply to other coins do not essentially apply to BTC. It is not playing in the alt domain. Also BTC has taken the mainstream route, it would not be good for BTC to have anon features in my opinion.. The best part is QRK can stay fully transparent and aimed at more mainstream business but we will attract also the BTC of those wanting anon and other features we are not sure we want to see in qrk itself.
Thule explain the qrk scam in specific detail. Make sure to explain how it took place and why. I am interested in how you believe one wallet got control of 10% of the minting without mining or buying it. To me it seems impossible. However, if you can show me how it happened and it was not via mining or buying then YES perhaps we will think of a way to rectify this situation.
Let me say though that i was mining at the start along with a few others i know on only our home machines and over the next months mined fairly over 2M quark, we did hire a couple of cheap servers with dual core xeons that were like 80 bucks each a month.
So even if they mined them all i see that could have been quite possible for any one other than a bunch of noobs with a few rigs at home. That is only 15x what we mined.
QRK was very fair to those that chose to mine it, as the price sunk less people mined and moved to mining other coins.
Anyway, i will await your detailed explanation of this 33M wallet issue that you are upset about. I think though you will find they either bought or mined it fairly on closer scrutiny.
If you can not prove the 33m and other whale wallets attained these coins in a way that was unfair i hope you will please move on to other parts of the discussion here.