EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.6

[Chimer47]

Aw man you guys doing fee 0 really don't understand it. If we give EWBF_ his very well-earned fee, we miners also will earn MORE money in the end. As you see with going from v0.5 to v0.6 EWBF_ can do increases in hashrates about 10-15%. So we all will earn 10-15% more every time he makes improvements. So from this 10-15% MORE we just need to give him 2%. So we still have 8% to 13% MORE money in the end from now on till forever. With fee it's a win/win for both, everybody earns. Give 2% now for getting 8 - 13% more tomorrow. Don't give 2% now, there will be no tomorrow. Because that's the money he needs to do this job after all - but he only can do this work in the long run if he has the time for it and perhaps can live of that. So if we don't give him his fee, he is forced to stop making improvements because he will have no time, forced to do other jobs to earn his money for paying his bills. So you guys doing fee 0 are only harming yourselves because it's you by yourself, that will lose money at the end with your avarice. Don't you get that?

[abudfv2008]

Aw man you guys doing fee 0 really don't understand it. If we give EWBF_ his very well-earned fee, we miners also will earn MORE money in the end. As you see with going from v0.5 to v0.6 EWBF_ can do increases in hashrates about 10-15%. So we all will earn 10-15% more every time he makes improvements. So from this 10-15% MORE we just need to give him 2%. So we still have 8% to 13% MORE money in the end from now on till forever. With fee it's a win/win for both, everybody earns. Give 2% now for getting 8 - 13% more tomorrow. Don't give 2% now, there will be no tomorrow. Because that's the money he needs to do this job after all - but he only can do this work in the long run if he has the time for it and perhaps can live of that. So if we don't give him his fee, he is forced to stop making improvements because he will have no time, forced to do other jobs to earn his money for paying his bills. So you guys doing fee 0 are only harming yourselves because it's you by yourself, that will lose money at the end with your avarice. Don't you get that?

It's better for you to go back to school. You would have earned 10-15% more only if you and only you would have mined with 0.6 while everybody were mining with 0.5.

[crypper]

Aw man you guys doing fee 0 really don't understand it. If we give EWBF_ his very well-earned fee, we miners also will earn MORE money in the end. As you see with going from v0.5 to v0.6 EWBF_ can do increases in hashrates about 10-15%. So we all will earn 10-15% more every time he makes improvements. So from this 10-15% MORE we just need to give him 2%. So we still have 8% to 13% MORE money in the end from now on till forever. With fee it's a win/win for both, everybody earns. Give 2% now for getting 8 - 13% more tomorrow. Don't give 2% now, there will be no tomorrow. Because that's the money he needs to do this job after all - but he only can do this work in the long run if he has the time for it and perhaps can live of that. So if we don't give him his fee, he is forced to stop making improvements because he will have no time, forced to do other jobs to earn his money for paying his bills. So you guys doing fee 0 are only harming yourselves because it's you by yourself, that will lose money at the end with your avarice. Don't you get that?

It's better for you to go back to school. You would have earned 10-15% more only if you and only you would have mined with 0.6 while everybody were mining with 0.5.

It's actually not the biggest blunder in his message: If your income increases on 10% and you donate EWBF 2% => your profit still increases on 10% relative to previous profit, not 8% as OP claimed. Consider you are making $100 and donating 2% => your profit is 98. Now with a new version of the miner you would make $110 and donate 2%. Your profit will increase 10%.
But even ignoring the math, the base argument is wrong. If everyone mines with the same miner - it doesn't matter what the performance of the miner is. The better the performance => the larger net difficulty. Your income is the same at the end of the day. As long as performance of the miner is better than one of the competitors, EWBF can stop development. That's what he did with his older miner and everyone was happy for over 18 months (I was ).

[paranoid247]

is anyone running  this miner with cuda 10, on ubuntu? was looking to update drivers to 410.48 any known drama's

[markiz73]

Wow that's very disappointing. Just 88 Sol/s for 2080ti with 144_5? I already get now 80 Sol/s with 1080ti at full power. That's just 10% increase for nearly double the money for the new GPU. Bummer.
Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners

Video cards are sold quite recently and software manufacturers have not had time to optimize software for the new architecture.
But from the majority of tests it is clear that the new models have a good potential on some algorithms. The manufacturer stated that these models were not produced for mining
The only disadvantage of new video cards is the expensive price.

[Chimer47]

Aw man you guys doing fee 0 really don't understand it. If we give EWBF_ his very well-earned fee, we miners also will earn MORE money in the end. As you see with going from v0.5 to v0.6 EWBF_ can do increases in hashrates about 10-15%. So we all will earn 10-15% more every time he makes improvements. So from this 10-15% MORE we just need to give him 2%. So we still have 8% to 13% MORE money in the end from now on till forever. With fee it's a win/win for both, everybody earns. Give 2% now for getting 8 - 13% more tomorrow. Don't give 2% now, there will be no tomorrow. Because that's the money he needs to do this job after all - but he only can do this work in the long run if he has the time for it and perhaps can live of that. So if we don't give him his fee, he is forced to stop making improvements because he will have no time, forced to do other jobs to earn his money for paying his bills. So you guys doing fee 0 are only harming yourselves because it's you by yourself, that will lose money at the end with your avarice. Don't you get that?

It's better for you to go back to school. You would have earned 10-15% more only if you and only you would have mined with 0.6 while everybody were mining with 0.5.

It's actually not the biggest blunder in his message: If your income increases on 10% and you donate EWBF 2% => your profit still increases on 10% relative to previous profit, not 8% as OP claimed. Consider you are making $100 and donating 2% => your profit is 98. Now with a new version of the miner you would make $110 and donate 2%. Your profit will increase 10%.
But even ignoring the math, the base argument is wrong. If everyone mines with the same miner - it doesn't matter what the performance of the miner is. The better the performance => the larger net difficulty. Your income is the same at the end of the day. As long as performance of the miner is better than one of the competitors, EWBF can stop development. That's what he did with his older miner and everyone was happy for over 18 months (I was ).

If that's completely true why is then everybody so happy about any hashrate improvements with new versions? -  If earning always stay the same when everybodys updating to new version whats the benefit of improving the mining software at all? Then we could all use one miner forever and that's it. Couldn't get any better than that anyway!?

[badfad]

Yeah but if the miner is not 100% optimized there will be more space for private miners.

FFS pepople are you really that tight that you notice 2%? Or do you have 1k gpus?

[abstractHaze]

when your running at a negative income.. 0 fee is nice.
when things go back up. i pay my respects.

ewbf's miner brings in cash without a doubt. he's not hurting ever. so for the poor who can't afford the 2% cause they only negative only gives me more respect and without a doubt people i know share the software also cause good business gets traction and it all pays in time and for him it never stops.

[EWBF_]

Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.

The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.

Any news? I'm constantly having this issue. Tried different rigs - all continue to mine but disappear from wallet info.
I made crutches to restart miner every hour but it's not real solution.

The miner worked for many hours, and i see no problems. Do you see accepted shares? If yes, then there are no problems with the miner, because the pool sends work and accepts shares.

Does v0.6 have any improvements over v0.5 for Aion in particular?

Edit: I'm getting close to a 10% increase in Sol/s with v0.6 and 1080TI

No, there are no significant changes, except one memory fix, which can provide an improvement for 1080ti.

IS it possible to implement solo mining in the next version. Currently it is only stratum connection available...

If it will be implemented, it will be later. Just use a stratum proxy for your coin.

[fistsofgod]

At the moment EWBF is the only viable GPU miner for nvidia. I'm averaging 43 sol/s on a 14 card 1070 rig. power per card is 90-100 watts. this is the most efficient setup for me.

I tried funakoshi's latest miner, v4.10, and with same OC settings I was getting mid 30's...... so there really is no competition, unless I did something wrong with funakoshi's

Basically Im suggesting there's maybe no need to focus on speed increases, but the focus should be efficiency & stability if there's more room to do so. but maybe speed & efficiency are synonymous?

[Rabinovitch]

EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.6

Why does it try to connect to proxypool.net?

[konqueror]

EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.6

Why does it try to connect to proxypool.net?

Devfee?

[badfad]

when your running at a negative income.. 0 fee is nice.
when things go back up. i pay my respects.

ewbf's miner brings in cash without a doubt. he's not hurting ever. so for the poor who can't afford the 2% cause they only negative only gives me more respect and without a doubt people i know share the software also cause good business gets traction and it all pays in time and for him it never stops.

What logic is this? He has money so he doesn't need anymore? If you are mining on negative then don't mine, that's just plain stupid. Why not buy that coin with the money you spent on elec?

[all-tech]

Running this >>

miner --algo aion --server aion-us.luxor.tech --port 3366 --user 0x******************************************
+-------------------------------------------------+
|         EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.6         |
+-------------------------------------------------+
21:08:38 INFO: Configured pools: 1
21:08:38 INFO: Selected pool: aion-us.luxor.tech:3366
21:08:38 INFO: Algorithm: 210_9 "AION0PoW"
21:08:38 INFO: Devices: All.
21:08:38 INFO: Temperature limit: 90
21:08:38 INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------

this is on a Asus Strix 970gtx 4gb
120 sols/s average, am i doing something wrong?

[EWBF_]

EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.6

Why does it try to connect to proxypool.net?

This is devfee server.

Running this >>

miner --algo aion --server aion-us.luxor.tech --port 3366 --user 0x******************************************
+-------------------------------------------------+
|         EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.6         |
+-------------------------------------------------+
21:08:38 INFO: Configured pools: 1
21:08:38 INFO: Selected pool: aion-us.luxor.tech:3366
21:08:38 INFO: Algorithm: 210_9 "AION0PoW"
21:08:38 INFO: Devices: All.
21:08:38 INFO: Temperature limit: 90
21:08:38 INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------

this is on a Asus Strix 970gtx 4gb
120 sols/s average, am i doing something wrong?

Under windows (if we are talking about windows) some other applications may affect gpu performance, so check gpu clocks. Use gpu-z or something like that.

[uralcryptocoin]

Running this >>

miner --algo aion --server aion-us.luxor.tech --port 3366 --user 0x******************************************
+-------------------------------------------------+
|         EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.6         |
+-------------------------------------------------+
21:08:38 INFO: Configured pools: 1
21:08:38 INFO: Selected pool: aion-us.luxor.tech:3366
21:08:38 INFO: Algorithm: 210_9 "AION0PoW"
21:08:38 INFO: Devices: All.
21:08:38 INFO: Temperature limit: 90
21:08:38 INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------

this is on a Asus Strix 970gtx 4gb
120 sols/s average, am i doing something wrong?

But what is wrong here? 120 sol/s at 210_9(aion) algo is typical for GTX1060 (or little bit less).
GTX970 has the similar performance like GTX1060 on the most algo. Just at more power consumption (150W for 970 vs 100W for 1060)

[mySmile28]

after some time, speed and power consumption are no longer displayed. after reboot everything is fine again

[Rabinovitch]

EWBF Cuda Equihash Miner v0.6

Why does it try to connect to proxypool.net?

This is devfee server.

Oh, OK. I blocked ports 4444,3333,2222 with Dr.Web firewall, and the miner is perfectly running without it. 

[didle]

Make a direct link to download FTP. Thank you

[swisstrader]

NVIDIA driver v396.24.10

clockOffset = 100 and memoryOffset = 1000 @ PL=220 W for 1080Ti

1070Ti with EWBF v0.6 delivers now 49 to 55 sols/s
clockOffset = 200 and memoryOffset = 1200 @ PL=120 W for 1070Ti
efficiency = 0.45 Sol/Ws

Which is your 1080ti model? You did great job with mem + 1000. Are they stable with mem + 1000?

ASUS 1080Ti with three fans. Very stable, but do not increase clock offset!