Harris Vs Trump - Bitcoin betting on the 2024 US Presidential Election

[FanEagle]

Trying to understand the difference between getting government support and getting political. If you put bitcoin into government discussion that's fine, you can definitely go ask the entire congress and that would be a bipartizan question and hopefully they will accept it.

But trying to put it in elections is different, and not the same thing at all. If you make bitcoin an election thing, then it is going to hurt a lot and I would suggest not doing that at all, it would not benefit anyone and I think it is going to be a big cause of loss.

We need to make sure that we are dealing with something that is actually profitable and for that to reach 8 billion people we need to consider governments and not consider elections. If you consider elections, you are taking sides and taking sides will not make 8 billion people accept it. If you make this a right vs left type of thing, you will win one of them and lose the other and that is why I think it is not going to be good at all.

[dzungmobile]

"She laughs so expressively and infectiously that it means that everything is fine with her,"

Do you mean Kamala Harris and her crazy smiles?

I truly don't understand why in many speeches that shared on X, why Kamala Harris smiled like a psycho, and lost control. I don't like this style and it shows she is not serious with her speech as well as her main job. I am more surprised and don't understand people who can support her if they are not illegal undocumented immigrants who went through the USA. recent years with terrible open border from Kamala.

Never underestimate the benefits of Trumps most loyal followers also be the least educated.

Trump has good abibility to convert disadvantage to advantage and he should not be underestimated especially when the USA. societies have many hot problems from poor policies of Biden and Harris last fiur years.

They will have a debate tomorrow without audience, and honestly it is a dead debate. Is there any non-audience debate in USA. President Election history?

[sompitonov]

In a recent interview, when asked by a reporter about the US election, Mr. Putin stated that he supported Harris over Trump. According to you, if Trump wins, Putin will win, but why does he publicly support Harris?

I agree with you that if Trump wins, NATO will be weaker if it doesn't meet his demands and Ukraine will be in more trouble if he stops aid. But don't forget Trump's goal is to make America great again, so if anyone tries to oppose or influence America's position, he will not tolerate it and that is something Putin does not like.
We all know that in Trump's previous term, he was very tough on foreign policy with countries that were considered to be America's rivals, which is why I think many politicians in other countries did not want Trump to win.

Donald Trump is an admirer of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Both of them have the same ideologies in many areas. If given the opportunity Trump would have wanted to enjoy a long tenure like Putin. That was why he encouraged his supporters to invade the Capitol. Both leaders don't support the  LGBTQIA+ community. Both of them are religious and conservative so both LGBT abortion laws will be strict.

Trump once boasted that he would have needed the war in Russia/Ukraine in one day. Maybe his strategy is to withdraw support for Ukraine and make them lose some part of their territories. Maybe he would have spoken with his friend Vladimir persuading him to withdraw. But one thing I know is that NATO will suffer if Trump wins and Putin will be pleased with that. So if you ask, I will say that Putin fully supports Trump.   

Maybe it is as you say, at least it looks like that, I even noticed it myself, but despite this I have some doubts that everything is so superficial. I still remember how I saw their handshake on TV when Trump was in his last presidential term, it meant that the relations between the countries would probably become warmer, but after a while with the arrival of the Democrats and Biden, the relations became colder than ever. Of course, I wonder who will win and whether it will be reflected as we think, but if Trump wins, then I also think that he will cut aid to Ukraine, after all, some taxpayers would not like their money to be spent like that, although also not everything is so clear and much more complicated than it may seem to many.

[karabiber]

I was very surprised by Putin's answer that he was more rooting for Harris to win. This is very strange, and Trump, like me, was disappointed.
After all, everyone knows that Harris is not going to end the conflict in Ukraine, on the contrary, she is ready to support them, as Biden does. And before that, I thought that Putin was for Trump, because he even expressed respect for the President of Russia.

That's no brainer. Putin knows that his endorsement will have a negative effect on voting results, so he said he prefers Kamala. Obviously he truly prefers whoever is more likely to end the war and support the peace agreement, which is probably Trump, although I wouldn't be so sure.
I'm not sure what's the average American's sentiment towards the war in Ukraine though. Since the US is not directly involved, I imagine people are probably not bothered too much.

Putin is doing this on purpose and his aim is not to support anyone. Putin, of course, anticipates the consequences of expressing his opinion on the elections in the US, the world's biggest power. What Putin really wants is for Trump to win and he says this in a cynical way. Trump has said that if elected he will cut military support and money flow to Ukraine. Putin would welcome this very much. The war in Ukraine has dragged on too long and we can see that both sides are struggling economically every day. Trump winning the election would favor Russia in the war. Because then Ukraine will lose the support it receives from the US.

[Sithara007]

Putin is doing this on purpose and his aim is not to support anyone. Putin, of course, anticipates the consequences of expressing his opinion on the elections in the US, the world's biggest power. What Putin really wants is for Trump to win and he says this in a cynical way. Trump has said that if elected he will cut military support and money flow to Ukraine. Putin would welcome this very much. The war in Ukraine has dragged on too long and we can see that both sides are struggling economically every day. Trump winning the election would favor Russia in the war. Because then Ukraine will lose the support it receives from the US.

This is completely wrong. Given the raw hate Russians have for the Americans, they would welcome Kamala as the president of the United States. Kamala with her crazy policies such as giving citizenship to 15 million illegals, 25% tax on unrealized capital gains, 45% tax on realized capital gains.etc will ruin the American economy. Within a few years, the Americans will be unable to fund their massive military apparatus and it will start to disintegrate. And this will make the US vulnerable to a combined attack from the Russia-China axis.

[jossiel]

But trying to put it in elections is different, and not the same thing at all. If you make bitcoin an election thing, then it is going to hurt a lot and I would suggest not doing that at all, it would not benefit anyone and I think it is going to be a big cause of loss.

This is what others don't understand. They've just heard that Trump said something about Bitcoin or let's say Harris talks about it, they're already thinking that the person speaks about it is on grandstanding.

That's how it goes when it's being used for election because for obvious reasons, it's only about the election and that's true that it will hurt a lot of people that has expected something about their moves towards it when elected.

[Hispo]

....

This is completely wrong. Given the raw hate Russians have for the Americans, they would welcome Kamala as the president of the United States. Kamala with her crazy policies such as giving citizenship to 15 million illegals, 25% tax on unrealized capital gains, 45% tax on realized capital gains.etc will ruin the American economy. Within a few years, the Americans will be unable to fund their massive military apparatus and it will start to disintegrate. And this will make the US vulnerable to a combined attack from the Russia-China axis.

You forget the United States is governed by politicians while are at the same time funded by big corporations, those corporations would not want the country to become vulnerable to foreign attacks coming from both China and Russia. Not even mentioning the fact China depends much on their production to be bought by American consumerism.
Kamala Harris can say whatever she wants during the campaign to try to grab as many votes as possible from gullible people, but in the end, in order to pass a law, you need to defeat both the house of representatives and the Senate, unlikely to happen.
People will never see that tax on unrealized gains with good eyes, regardless whether they are from the Republican or democrat party. People forget there is a lot of capitalists within the blue party as well.

[bbc.reporter]

I am presently watching the debate of Trump vs. Harris on this channel live!

https://m.youtube.com/live/kRh6598RmHM?si=KPavDfy-iC_qG0R6

It appears that the Donald Trump is losing this. This is very much different from his debate against Hillary where he has done his research and has said many of the correct facts together with his exaggerations hehehe. On this debate, he does not have much facts, only exaggerations. I will not be shocked if Kamala's ratings in Polymarket will pump to 60% after this.

[TwitchySeal]

I am presently watching the debate of Trump vs. Harris on this channel live!

https://m.youtube.com/live/kRh6598RmHM?si=KPavDfy-iC_qG0R6

It appears that the Donald Trump is losing this. This is very much different from his debate against Hillary where he has done his research and has said many of the correct facts together with his exaggerations hehehe. On this debate, he does not have much facts, only exaggerations. I will not be shocked if Kamala's ratings in Polymarket will pump to 60% after this.

Respect for being able to keep your opinions separate from facts.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

It appears that the Donald Trump is losing this.

That's what I've read, that as it seems Trump has slacked in the debate, or that Kamala has clearly won it, if we prefer to put it that way. I even saw a Fox commentator say in a short Youtube clip that Trump had a bad night.

https://youtube.com/shorts/5vB_Y7HeE1E?si=51sySyB_g35QBvWv

It's from another channel that brings up the debate that was on Fox, I'm not sure if Fox itself is going to make a big deal out of it.

[Webetcoins]

This thinking needs to change if you ask me. Why does a megaforce like BTC need political support all of a sudden? It has proven time and time again that government support isn't necessary for the crypto world to keep surging forward and going mainstream.

The whole point of crypto was to reduce the dependence on politicians and world governments to a certain extent and not the opposite.

This world is a centralized and government controlled world and bitcoin is a part of this world, you need to accept this fact. Bitcoin has been able to survive and thrive so far thanks to government support, don't deny that. Do you use a bank to invest in bitcoin? Do you use the internet?...all of these are controlled by the government. Or can exchanges operate without government permission? Or most recently, how can bitcoin ETFs be approved without government permission? What if the government bans bitcoin? Of course, it won't die but do you think it will become popular and thrive with government bans? Governments are present everywhere in this world.

In the past, Bitcoin was small and governments didn't want to pay attention to it, but as it became more mature, it was inevitable that they would pay more attention to it. They care about it and will see if it benefits them or poses a threat to their world, these things are inevitable, it's just a matter of time, mate.

Do you want bitcoin to become a global currency, payment method or 8 billion people in the world using bitcoin? Or will bitcoin's market capitalization surpass gold and play a role in the world economy? How will all this happen without government support?

You are not a newbie here, you have been around for a while and you should be remembering the time when we weren't getting any political support and there weren't any regulations and bitcoin was doing awesome, there isn't really anything that has ever upset anyone before that, and I think it should be important to keep that in mind as well. I believe that the best thing to do in this case would be just getting rid of politics in bitcoin, bitcoin can't be political.

People like Trump and El Salvador president could use bitcoin for their political agenda, there is nothing wrong with that, it's the people who support these politicians who shouldn't really make it political. Meaning that Kamala supporters should love bitcoin too, trump supports should love it to, everyone should love it. If you make it just one side story, then other side may start to dislike it and we can't afford to make people dislike it, there is no reason for it and we need to cover all bases.

[TwitchySeal]

It appears that the Donald Trump is losing this.

That's what I've read, that as it seems Trump has slacked in the debate, or that Kamala has clearly won it, if we prefer to put it that way. I even saw a Fox commentator say in a short Youtube clip that Trump had a bad night.

https://youtube.com/shorts/5vB_Y7HeE1E?si=51sySyB_g35QBvWv

It's from another channel that brings up the debate that was on Fox, I'm not sure if Fox itself is going to make a big deal out of it.

there was never any agreement for a debate on Fox. Trump lied about it, and the media repeated it. 

[bitgolden]

Taking a look at polymarket to decide who will win is a very stupid way of making this decision. Kamala wasn't the candidate for the longest time and she didn't get the money for it, whereas Trump has been around for far longer than Kamala, for months and months longer, and he even had a debate against Biden as well, and yet we are talking about them having equal chances there? The system at polymarket works like this; whoever gets more money bet on them, has the higher chance. So that means, if I bet 150 million dollars on Kanye today, that means Kanye will have bigger chance of winning over both candidates, it's literally made that way.

Do not go with market maker betting places if you want to see what is going to happen in this election. All the polls and all the oddmakers are showing Kamala ahead right now, and with the debate, we are going to definitely see this happening very differently, we are going to see Kamala get a lot further ahead after this one for sure.