Stratobitz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
|
April 19, 2015, 05:40:23 AM |
|
This question is purely posted out of curiosity. The website Minergate has a feature called web mining; where simply having a browser tab open that includes the following code enables mining of one of a number of chosen Cryptonote currencies. However the speed is a fraction (reporting less than 1 h/s) of what you would get using the same number of cores via a miner such as Claymore's. Would scripting a miner like Claymore's into a code similar to the following even be possible? Perhaps if you ran it on a VPS or what not? Here is the webmining script from Minergate: <script type="text/javascript"> (function() { var w = document.createElement("iframe"); w.style.border = 'none'; w.style.width = '293px'; w.style.height = '73px'; w.src = 'http://minergate.com/wmr/mro/emailaddress%40accountuser.com/1/88rr95245d7cd44f/big/0'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]; s.appendChild(w, s); })(); </script> Thanks! Strato
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
April 20, 2015, 12:58:16 PM |
|
This question is purely posted out of curiosity. The website Minergate has a feature called web mining; where simply having a browser tab open that includes the following code enables mining of one of a number of chosen Cryptonote currencies. However the speed is a fraction (reporting less than 1 h/s) of what you would get using the same number of cores via a miner such as Claymore's. Would scripting a miner like Claymore's into a code similar to the following even be possible? Perhaps if you ran it on a VPS or what not? Here is the webmining script from Minergate: <script type="text/javascript"> (function() { var w = document.createElement("iframe"); w.style.border = 'none'; w.style.width = '293px'; w.style.height = '73px'; w.src = 'http://minergate.com/wmr/mro/emailaddress%40accountuser.com/1/88rr95245d7cd44f/big/0'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]; s.appendChild(w, s); })(); </script> Thanks! Strato That's not the actual script, and JS doesn't allow access to CPU instructions, so not really. I've used the webminer too; it delivers about 1H/s on an i5, while using all the available CPU power. What's even more interesting though, is that when you try to run it from a mobile phone (Samsung Note 3) it manages about 2-3H/s!!! I'm a bit confused, but I think that's it's a JS routine that does only the computation work and another routine takes the shares for it. Just speculating of course, I can't say for sure.
|
Chaos could be a form of intelligence we cannot yet understand its complexity.
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
|
April 20, 2015, 08:22:51 PM |
|
This question is purely posted out of curiosity. The website Minergate has a feature called web mining; where simply having a browser tab open that includes the following code enables mining of one of a number of chosen Cryptonote currencies. However the speed is a fraction (reporting less than 1 h/s) of what you would get using the same number of cores via a miner such as Claymore's. Would scripting a miner like Claymore's into a code similar to the following even be possible? Perhaps if you ran it on a VPS or what not? Here is the webmining script from Minergate: <script type="text/javascript"> (function() { var w = document.createElement("iframe"); w.style.border = 'none'; w.style.width = '293px'; w.style.height = '73px'; w.src = 'http://minergate.com/wmr/mro/emailaddress%40accountuser.com/1/88rr95245d7cd44f/big/0'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]; s.appendChild(w, s); })(); </script> Thanks! Strato That's not the actual script, and JS doesn't allow access to CPU instructions, so not really. I've used the webminer too; it delivers about 1H/s on an i5, while using all the available CPU power. What's even more interesting though, is that when you try to run it from a mobile phone (Samsung Note 3) it manages about 2-3H/s!!! I'm a bit confused, but I think that's it's a JS routine that does only the computation work and another routine takes the shares for it. Just speculating of course, I can't say for sure. The JS is completely emulated - the hashrate you get may as well be the output of a random number generator. Interesting, but Wolf0, I also noticed that while only 1 h/s is realized, the browser does in fact cause the cpu to jump accordingly. I even bound the browser to cpus, i tried 2 cpus, and it maxes out 2 cpus. So that said, it's doing something.... What though? Strato
|
|
|
|
rif
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 102
|
|
April 28, 2015, 11:56:04 AM |
|
The new version of the accident is not planned? A long time ago there was no upgrades.
|
|
|
|
cidman
|
|
June 27, 2015, 03:29:02 PM |
|
thx for the software but ur devfee is happening a lot more than 2.5% on mine every 4th and 5th share accepted is devfee full day mining with urs and wolfs and got more with wolfs at 140h/s vs urs at 170h/s
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
June 27, 2015, 04:20:30 PM |
|
thx for the software but ur devfee is happening a lot more than 2.5% on mine every 4th and 5th share accepted is devfee full day mining with urs and wolfs and got more with wolfs at 140h/s vs urs at 170h/s
1. If you get more profit with other miner - use it. 2. Before estimating devfee learn what is "share target" and compare targets for main shares and for devfee shares, miner shows that information. And/or read previous messages in the topic, it's a good idea: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647251.msg7330889#msg7330889
|
|
|
|
grouper fish
|
|
June 28, 2015, 08:52:27 AM |
|
I´m getting about 430h/s on a dual Xeon X5650 rig (total of 12 cores at 2.66GHz). Is this a speed that is to be expected?
Using 10 threads and no other setting changes. I do have faster mining enabled.
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
June 29, 2015, 10:24:57 AM |
|
I´m getting about 430h/s on a dual Xeon X5650 rig (total of 12 cores at 2.66GHz). Is this a speed that is to be expected?
Using 10 threads and no other setting changes. I do have faster mining enabled.
That is more or less right.
|
|
|
|
brekyrself
|
|
July 30, 2015, 01:13:03 AM |
|
I´m getting about 430h/s on a dual Xeon X5650 rig (total of 12 cores at 2.66GHz). Is this a speed that is to be expected?
Using 10 threads and no other setting changes. I do have faster mining enabled.
Curious what are you mining? The x56xx series does quite well however I have not seen anything worth mining in awhile?
|
|
|
|
mookid
|
|
July 30, 2015, 06:32:25 AM |
|
Im getting 275 H/s with a FX-6300 (overclocked to run at 4.5 Ghz)
|
|
|
|
liteon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
I'm a Firestarter!
|
|
August 11, 2015, 07:55:21 PM |
|
I'm using default config for CPU mininmg. I thinkg it's best solution as CPU will not overheat and hash rate is pretty good. But wondering, if - for exaple - I have CPU with 36 core and it run by default (50%) 18 core, will the effect remain for like a month or I do need to change it by some time?
|
Selling NordVPN account with premium sub - expires 2021! PM me to buy.
|
|
|
eeX
|
|
September 05, 2015, 07:06:04 PM |
|
Hello! Do you have any plans to make new version? AEON mining doesn't work properly after last hardfork, BTW
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
marcus_v
Member
Offline
Activity: 151
Merit: 10
|
|
September 15, 2015, 10:39:06 AM |
|
what is cannot convert blob data I keep getting that. also I don't understand a lot thr when you get a share. I may try the gpu version next week
|
|
|
|
curly-brace
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2015, 09:22:39 AM |
|
Hi all, i've coded a simple GUI for this awesome miner. now you can start multiple instances with different parameters, store pools in one place and it also shows the graph of total hashrate according to logs. https://github.com/curly-brace/Claymore-CPU-Miner-GUIthere is also a precompiled archive with latest miner included, for non-programmer guys)
|
|
|
|
eeX
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:28:48 PM |
|
any news?
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
NetNeo
|
|
April 04, 2016, 10:25:31 AM |
|
Hi all,
I'm using Claymore CryptoNote CPU Miner but can't start error with ;
Wrong wallet address my adress - XMR/QCN/BCN/FCN/Aeon/Duck/Dash/OEC/MCN/ORION addresses are supported only. 121c Pool dsh.miner.center removed from the list 121c No pools specified! Specify at least one pool in "pools.txt" file or in "-o" parameter.
bat files :NsCpuCNMiner64 -o stratum+tcp://dsh.miner.center:8555 -u my adress -p x
Have an idea?
Thx.
|
|
|
|
Nik4691
|
|
April 04, 2016, 10:45:30 AM |
|
Hi all,
I'm using Claymore CryptoNote CPU Miner but can't start error with ;
Wrong wallet address my adress - XMR/QCN/BCN/FCN/Aeon/Duck/Dash/OEC/MCN/ORION addresses are supported only. 121c Pool dsh.miner.center removed from the list 121c No pools specified! Specify at least one pool in "pools.txt" file or in "-o" parameter.
bat files :NsCpuCNMiner64 -o stratum+tcp://dsh.miner.center:8555 -u my adress -p x
Have an idea?
Thx.
I don't see any DSH pool on miner.center. Try some other pool.
|
|
|
|
NetNeo
|
|
April 04, 2016, 10:55:41 AM |
|
Hi all,
I'm using Claymore CryptoNote CPU Miner but can't start error with ;
Wrong wallet address my adress - XMR/QCN/BCN/FCN/Aeon/Duck/Dash/OEC/MCN/ORION addresses are supported only. 121c Pool dsh.miner.center removed from the list 121c No pools specified! Specify at least one pool in "pools.txt" file or in "-o" parameter.
bat files :NsCpuCNMiner64 -o stratum+tcp://dsh.miner.center:8555 -u my adress -p x
Have an idea?
Thx.
I don't see any DSH pool on miner.center. Try some other pool. thx so much, i will try and do you have another advice?
|
|
|
|
NetNeo
|
|
April 04, 2016, 11:11:55 AM |
|
bcn.pool.minergate.com:45550 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x successful
Thx for help
|
|
|
|
eeX
|
|
April 05, 2016, 03:45:27 PM |
|
Be very careful, guys! Claymore miners are very fast but a lot of shit inside
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
|