marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2380
|
 |
April 22, 2015, 07:46:14 PM |
|
... it reads like he went to the SR and it blew his mind.
I'm liking all this angst again coming out of the mainstream exactly "wtf? is bitcoin", is it this? is it that? ... they realise it is not going to die or be coopted and so they must grapple with getting a strategy together to conceptualise/deal with it. The "blockchain not bitcoin" soundbite myth dissolved on them.
Marcus, OT question. What is the algorithm you have as your sig picture? It is an equation, not an algorithm. It is the piece of a puzzle to a very old, hard problem, PM me if you want to know anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
Bassica
|
|
April 22, 2015, 08:00:18 PM |
|
Now who's ready for a good ol' correction on the s&p favo o?!
<-- this guy!
|
|
|
|
|
thezerg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
|
|
April 22, 2015, 08:11:24 PM |
|
Rather then actually fix the problem (say by requiring a 5 minute minimum time for placed orders) they simply make money on the traders and then when the market goes down find a scapegoat to arrest for doing what their system explicitly allowed. |
|
|
|
|
Trolfi
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Learning from Jorge
|
|
April 22, 2015, 08:56:28 PM |
|
... it reads like he went to the SR and it blew his mind.
I'm liking all this angst again coming out of the mainstream exactly "wtf? is bitcoin", is it this? is it that? ... they realise it is not going to die or be coopted and so they must grapple with getting a strategy together to conceptualise/deal with it. The "blockchain not bitcoin" soundbite myth dissolved on them.
Marcus, OT question. What is the algorithm you have as your sig picture? It is an equation, not an algorithm. It is the piece of a puzzle to a very old, hard problem, PM me if you want to know anymore. I thought Stolfi had some insights. Too bad you couldn't steer his obsession to solving that. |
|
|
|
|
Trolfi
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Learning from Jorge
|
|
April 22, 2015, 08:59:05 PM |
|
Apparently he was putting up fake sell "walls" to drive the price down! Who even knew that was illegal, let alone 20 years worth. I put something up for sale, then flake out at the last second ... how is that illegal? |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
|
|
April 22, 2015, 09:53:32 PM |
|
Apparently he was putting up fake sell "walls" to drive the price down! Who even knew that was illegal, let alone 20 years worth. I put something up for sale, then flake out at the last second ... how is that illegal? Its ludicrous. Anyone who's stared at a level 2 trading screen sees HFT 100 lot orders constantly flashing in and out within milliseconds continuously baiting you . |
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
|
|
April 22, 2015, 09:54:30 PM |
|
... it reads like he went to the SR and it blew his mind.
I'm liking all this angst again coming out of the mainstream exactly "wtf? is bitcoin", is it this? is it that? ... they realise it is not going to die or be coopted and so they must grapple with getting a strategy together to conceptualise/deal with it. The "blockchain not bitcoin" soundbite myth dissolved on them.
Marcus, OT question. What is the algorithm you have as your sig picture? It is an equation, not an algorithm. It is the piece of a puzzle to a very old, hard problem, PM me if you want to know anymore. I thought Stolfi had some insights. Too bad you couldn't steer his obsession to solving that. Yes, he did. And I know, but it is likely one of these things where curious minds like to start at the beginning to be fully invested instead of coming along after someone else has done all the heavy lifting, like bitcoin. Then it's easier to just throw rocks and hope for some reflected glory. |
|
|
|
|
Grafzep
|
|
April 22, 2015, 10:16:49 PM |
|
Apparently he was putting up fake sell "walls" to drive the price down! Who even knew that was illegal, let alone 20 years worth. I put something up for sale, then flake out at the last second ... how is that illegal? Its ludicrous. Anyone who's stared at a level 2 trading screen sees HFT 100 lot orders constantly flashing in and out within milliseconds continuously baiting you . And that the state thinks it should take a view on trading tactics between grown adults in the totemic heart of the free world. I think it's indicative of their weakness. Would they have spent 5 years hunting someone who caused a spike up? |
|
|
|
|
ErisDiscordia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 996
Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos
|
|
April 22, 2015, 10:25:43 PM |
|
thank god the internet is here so these idiots' opinions can be recorded for posterity so...let's take the blockchain, brush off all the lunatic anarchists, centralize it and let JP Morgan run it...oh wait isn't that what we have today and it's working out just great for everyone? why call it a blockchain then, want to use a buzzword to look cool in front of the young kids, geezer? Ah Bitcoin, thank you for being so interesting that in order to fully understand you, one has to educate oneself ceaselessly until ones bullshit-radar makes your explode with laughter when you hear a guy like this talking  |
It's all bullshit. But bullshit makes the flowers grow and that's beautiful.
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
|
|
April 22, 2015, 10:34:01 PM |
|
Apparently he was putting up fake sell "walls" to drive the price down! Who even knew that was illegal, let alone 20 years worth. I put something up for sale, then flake out at the last second ... how is that illegal? Its ludicrous. Anyone who's stared at a level 2 trading screen sees HFT 100 lot orders constantly flashing in and out within milliseconds continuously baiting you . And that the state thinks it should take a view on trading tactics between grown adults in the totemic heart of the free world. I think it's indicative of their weakness. Would they have spent 5 years hunting someone who caused a spike up? That reminded me of 2008 when Wall Street got all pissed off at the shorts and actually succeeded in banning all shorts on financial institutions. What a crooked game they run: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/here-what-happened-when-sec-banned-shorting-financial-companies-2008https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-211.htm |
|
|
|
|
solex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
100 satoshis -> ISO code
|
|
April 22, 2015, 10:36:07 PM |
|
Rather then actually fix the problem (say by requiring a 5 minute minimum time for placed orders) they simply make money on the traders and then when the market goes down find a scapegoat to arrest for doing what their system explicitly allowed. A two second minimum life-span for orders on all exchanges would be the simplest and most effective action regulators could take to stabilize markets. That UK trader should get a medal for highlighting how broken the HFT-abused markets are. |
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
|
|
April 22, 2015, 11:37:10 PM |
|
sheez, why does this guy even feel qualified to comment in such detail about the technology? does he know about the code, complex systems behaviour, distributed networks? seems like he's got an unarticulated "political" problem with decentralisation (which in itself is a huge red flag since it is a apolitical technical feature) and if he has better ideas like he believes with his "centralised blockchain" he could submit them to github or pay someone to write some code that has his architectural brilliance embedded. these guys are still in denial. the game's moved on old chaps. sometimes the clever thing to do when outgunned is stfu before looking stupid. |
|
|
|
thezerg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
|
|
April 23, 2015, 01:14:47 AM |
|
Rather then actually fix the problem (say by requiring a 5 minute minimum time for placed orders) they simply make money on the traders and then when the market goes down find a scapegoat to arrest for doing what their system explicitly allowed. A two second minimum life-span for orders on all exchanges would be the simplest and most effective action regulators could take to stabilize markets. That UK trader should get a medal for highlighting how broken the HFT-abused markets are. Personally, I think that if you publish an API and someone uses that API they should by definition not be doing anything illegal (within the context of that system). Your API should not allow illegality. Now let's split hairs; if a hacker pushes executable code through a bug in your API its not illegal yet. But that executable code then runs on the server and probably does something illegal (opens a backdoor that wasn't part of the API, transfers $, etc). Similarly, if a hacker steals your password, logs in and steals your bitcoin, his use of the system wasn't illegal but stealing your password and subsequent use of your $ sure is... You can call me an engineer but actually I think that the perspective above is what Bitcoin tries to do and one of the reasons why it is so appealing... the above is essentially an emergent property of a zero trust protocol. |
|
|
|
|
STT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
April 23, 2015, 01:34:59 AM |
|
Rather then actually fix the problem (say by requiring a 5 minute minimum time for placed orders) they simply make money on the traders and then when the market goes down find a scapegoat to arrest for doing what their system explicitly allowed. A two second minimum life-span for orders on all exchanges would be the simplest and most effective action regulators could take to stabilize markets. That UK trader should get a medal for highlighting how broken the HFT-abused markets are. I thought the main problem was still naked short selling or orders that appear but are never completed. They cant really enforce times on orders due to a large industry of very computerised trades, legitimate and paid by the exchanges to provide liquidity. If they interfere with that it would reveal how low real trading volume has fallen since 2000 and cause all sorts of problems. So they outlaw tricking computers which I think is basically what happened, I thought they'd already taken measures like the really basic one of suspending to an auction if the market moves too far too quickly. I think its happened since a few times that a major market has stopped mid day a couple times just not recently |
|
|
|
rocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1153
|
|
April 23, 2015, 05:35:40 AM |
|
sheez, why does this guy even feel qualified to comment in such detail about the technology? does he know about the code, complex systems behaviour, distributed networks? seems like he's got an unarticulated "political" problem with decentralisation (which in itself is a huge red flag since it is a apolitical technical feature) and if he has better ideas like he believes with his "centralised blockchain" he could submit them to github or pay someone to write some code that has his architectural brilliance embedded. these guys are still in denial. the game's moved on old chaps. sometimes the clever thing to do when outgunned is stfu before looking stupid. To emphasize how ignorant these people are, a "centralized blockchain" is simply a chained data structure. It is not new or novel. A centralized blockchain is simply a digital API for money. It is the same as if the FED published an open API spec that enabled transferring money between accounts. Yes that would be new for a central bank, but it would not be new from a technology perspective. What was novel about bitcoin was the "distributed security mechanism". Bitcoin was the very first to create this and there was nothing even remotely like it at the time. This is the reason bitcoin has taken off as it has. It is very simply a fundamentally new construct for humanity that we have never had access to before. Every single person who claims "blockchain not bitcoin" or "centralized blockchain", at a very fundamental level does not understand what Bitcoin is. |
|
|
|
|
|
8up
|
|
April 23, 2015, 12:47:15 PM |
|
sheez, why does this guy even feel qualified to comment in such detail about the technology? does he know about the code, complex systems behaviour, distributed networks? seems like he's got an unarticulated "political" problem with decentralisation (which in itself is a huge red flag since it is a apolitical technical feature) and if he has better ideas like he believes with his "centralised blockchain" he could submit them to github or pay someone to write some code that has his architectural brilliance embedded. these guys are still in denial. the game's moved on old chaps. sometimes the clever thing to do when outgunned is stfu before looking stupid. To emphasize how ignorant these people are, a "centralized blockchain" is simply a chained data structure. It is not new or novel. A centralized blockchain is simply a digital API for money. It is the same as if the FED published an open API spec that enabled transferring money between accounts. Yes that would be new for a central bank, but it would not be new from a technology perspective. What was novel about bitcoin was the "distributed security mechanism". Bitcoin was the very first to create this and there was nothing even remotely like it at the time. This is the reason bitcoin has taken off as it has. It is very simply a fundamentally new construct for humanity that we have never had access to before. Every single person who claims "blockchain not bitcoin" or "centralized blockchain", at a very fundamental level does not understand what Bitcoin is. This is the perfect explanation of what "retarded" is. He is simply stuck in 20th century centralism. |
Always wrong until not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bagatell
|
|
April 23, 2015, 02:04:00 PM |
|
Generational warfare:
Did your parents mistreat you? If so I can see why you have such a simplistic attitude. |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
|
|
April 23, 2015, 02:38:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
|
|
April 23, 2015, 02:42:03 PM |
|
How The Second Tech Bubble Will Burst, In The Words Of Silicon Valley's "Poster Child" And World's Youngest Billionaire: Total internet advertising spend cannot justify outsized valuations of social media products that derive revenue from advertising. Feed-based advertising units will plummet in value (in the case of Twitter, advertising spend may not move beyond experimental dollars) similar to earlier devaluing of Internet display advertising. Fed has created abnormal market conditions by printing money and keeping interest rates low. Investors are looking for growth anywhere they can find it and tech companies are good targets - at these values, however, all tech stocks are expensive - even looking at 5+ years of revenue growth down the road. This means that most value-driven investors have left the market and the remaining 5-10%+ increase in market value will be driven by momentum investors. At some point there won't be any momentum investors left buying at higher prices, and the market begins to tumble. May be 10-20% correction or something more significant, especially in tech stocks. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-23/how-tech-bubble-will-burst-words-silicon-valleys-poster-child-and-worlds-youngest-bibring it on!  |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
