Let's not start throwing unnecessary accusations towards anyone. I know you're frustrated and understandably irritated, but shasan is one of the reputable members and a good scam busters of the forum. If a platform cheated their users, and proven by evidences, he'll agreed and said so instead of defending them, any of them.

What he tried to say is that your winning is arguably low compared to their daily cash flow and for them to risk their hard-earned reputation just to "earn" from the amount cheated, and thus, it's quite likely they're trying to figure out your case.

Razer was online again some time yesterday, and quite likely see the tag left on their account. I hope you'll hear from them soon.

The so-called kiddie pool you're looking for is within the forum itself, we literally has a board dedicated for these "kiddies" to swarm around and learn how to "swim". It's in the name, Beginners & Help. Emphasize on the word "beginners" which can be used interchangably with "newbies".

There's even a swimming instructor giving helps and pointers on how to roam around the other boards, called Newbies - Read before posting . It's pinned, it's at the top of the page once you opened the board. Not sure how you missed it, or if you ever even looked at that board.

Moving to lending topic, there's also a pointer for beginner lenders and borrowers, with another "swimming instructor" on it, [EDU] The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" - IGNORE AT YOUR OWN RISK! and [EDU] EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN LENDING TO USERS! Enjoy! You can use these piece of information as you deemed fit.

Oh, here's another pointer: the mods frowned greatly against consecutive posts. Expect your post to be merged by mods. Try to not taking it too personally, almost everybody who made multiple posts at once insted of replying in one long post faced the same situation. It's not you, it's the rule.

Even if OP see the red flags, it'll be already too late for them. I have never used exodus and all of their services before, so I can't be sure, but if OP's case is just like the one I said above with N.exchange, the users were not let know which third party exodus is using.

---

OP, perhaps you want to try an approach suggested by Potato Chips on the other thread,


or try to get in touch with bvg96634, you both has a quite identical situation, just a different 3rd party. Maybe he can give you a suggestions on how he got out of the situation.

For now? I think the best you can do is wait patiently. There's no ADR platform that could help intermediating your case --that we know of-- so your best chance is probably wait for their reply here on the forum. I have left a negative feedback on both of their official accounts for a neighboring case in hope to persuade them solving cases against them that started to form a pile, and bitcoingirl has also left a neutral tag, albeit for different purpose. I suggest you to wait until they're back online and see if they'll respond to your case

I understand correctly that you completed all the requirement asked by criptointercambio and they asked you to wait while they reviewed your case? Do they give any estimation about how long will it be?

Meanwhile, you might want to familiarize yourself with a quite similar case of yours regarding a third party swap and exodus, EXODUS + N.Exchange = SCAM | STAY AWAY

Scammer's account pretty much rendered useless due to the negative feedback left by DTs, once it is proven by strong evidences. I don't think being banned or not would make much difference after that.


It was the expression of a muffled scream from the darkest corner of his heart, the pain of getting 96 posts deleted by mods that finally channeled out through a seemingly criticizing statement, though truly just plain typical nonsensical rant of a clueless poet.

I haven't try their tipping platform so I can't be sure what's been happening on it, but it seems the problem can be traced back to as far --and probably even further back-- as February this year where people start to complaining that they can't withdraw. It seems due to their hot wallet being dried, which quite concerning as it could means they uses their users' fund elsewhere, so yeah, definitely a ticking bomb waiting to explode.

I didn't know for exact how accurate my knowledge and the following sentence is, but if I'm not mistaken Steve is quite on a higher-ups on sportsbet's chain of command, so it's understandably he has a lot on his plate, where yours is one amongst them. I'm quite sure he'll respond to you once he get to the bottom of your case, but if it'll help to give you some assurance, I'll wait until Wednesday forum time, if there's no development for your case, I'll try to get in touch with sportsbet, just in case your case is slipped in between Steve's hectic schedule.

May I add the fact that in that span of two years, there's a huge gap between 10 June 2022 to 30 April 2023,



which was a prelude to a huge wave of enrollment on the next day. 49 bounties in one day. Did he just break a record or there's already someone else enrolling much more than him in one day?

I am not saying that the hiatus and the huge wave that follows was due to the account changing hand, OP's grammatical preference seems to be the same as with his earlier posts and there's no record of password changing.

However, the slips of 4 years instead of 2 and the lack of record of account waking up could indicate that the account with username "swiftxi" kept being active from time to time, only remain silent, and when it suddenly became very very... very... active, those factors lead to a possibility that he indeed has an older account. Not against the forum rule, but it might be wise to brought it up to the table.

Jesus H Christ, thank you for this info. I am not aware DireWolf has that kind of thread. I personally thought it could be a waste of time as --just like several others pointed out on that thread already-- the accounts are mostly newbies and disposable, but it certainly can be helpful for lender if they need reference. Thank you once again, without you pointing it out by creating this thread, that thread will probably never come to my attention... and appreciation. Gonna leave a tiny amount of merit on that thread [my sMerit are mostly reserved for lower rank, to help them rank up, so I tend to be a bit frugal on those who already on legendary].

---

DireWolfM14, good job on that thread.

---

Shasan, it might be out of my place, but would you probably reconsider your second feedback to our dearest OP? The first one is justified, but the second one seems arguably out of place and weak-based. I think the first one is sufficient enough.

I find myself in a situation where I have quite a lack of interest jumping into a channel with 557 pinned messages and only-god-knows how many millions of chats were exchanged ever since its creation, but if you could help me better understand --I assume you've been on the channel for quite a while and familiar with their development-- the delay and new date was due to the community's demand?

Moderators of the forum are not handling or intervening scam accusations, it is up to the community to detect and report scam accusations to warn each other.

I gave a look at your case, just some preliminary DD so it is not conclusive whether the project is legit, scam, or has a tendency of rug-pulling, but some elements of the project is verifiable. Their WP is not found to be plagiarizing from other sources, their team can also be traced back to each other's LinkedIn profile, all except one that's probably due to a broken link.

One thing that I'd like to be able to verify is their company license. According to google play their app is developed by "SBG Tech PTE Ltd.", however I can't check the registration of this company as Vietnam's Registry checker website is loading at a comatose-snail pace.

I am leaving a negative feedback for both Rollbitcom and Rollbit Razer for now, in hope that it can persuade them to expedite the video verification.

Please note that the feedback does not means I am thinking that Rollbit is the wrong one here, nor OP. The tag simply served as an attempt to get them back on track. And as such, OP, please update us here if you got any development from them.

As I am sure this thread will sooner or later be buried by other accusation threads unless you bumped it up every day --which I am quite sure you will not-- may I interest you with the proposal of filling your "other contact info" field with "telegram: I am not on telegram"?

A  smart human being will at least try to check your forum profile before engaging to whatever the impostor asked, and there it is, the info is readily available for them right on your profile page.

I tested it on mine, it allows you to write such message:

I will generosly giving you a benefit of doubt that you're engaging on the topic and the metaphor given instead of replying out of topic. The situation that should be emphasized is not the 100kmh, speed limit, or red light, it's the giving a 20$ fine versus revoking your license.

If he gained profit, caught breaking the rules, and got his money confiscated, and then if he lose them he'll get refunded, it's like giving a slap on the wrist, or a 20$ fine by the analogy. Hell, I personally think it's giving him free candy for having an audacity. What you suggested, returning what's lost from his cheating, is like giving him encouragement to repeat the abusive behavior. What does he has to lose? He caught cheating and his lost money is being refunded. Treat him like that and he'll repeat it. Hence the license being revoked.

You understand now?

OP, has you got any reply or follow ups from SmokeyLisa or whoever representative they assigned to handle your case? I see that Rollbit Razer was online three days ago, they should have been aware of my message, if they haven't before. As I've exhausted all of the possible efforts I can do to reach them, and from the three --that I know-- current open cases against Rollbit, I think yours is the one most justified to say you're being treated unfairly, I have no other option but to leave a tag if they're yet to have that video call with you, in hope that it'll persuade them to expedite this resolution process.

This these started to looks not so good. BitcoinGirl.Club, has you got any reply from Razer? Their last online activity was on 2nd of May, means they should have been aware and reading your PM. If they didn't reply you, you'll be the third user they deliberately ignore.

Pmalek was attending another thread and sent them a PM for rollbit scam (255 USDT), although the point of Pmalek's PM was asking for an ADR they're on and their silence could simply means there were none. I was waiting for their reply for Rollbit hold funds and ignore in chat, which I began to feel rather unjust for the player because they were left hanging for a situation that could be cleared with just a little bit of effort or extra work from Rollbit's team.

This is, was, and will not be a good decision. Whoever that user you deemed trustworthy enough to review your evidences, you'll just put them into a tight spot. If they see the evidences and favored into your side, the OP will get triggered and accuses that user as part of your team, a liar, or the likes. If they favored OP and deemed your evidences is not strong enough, you'll say the user is not trustworthy.

Are you registered on any ADR? CasinoGuru? AskGamblers? Or --only-- if you're confident that the evidences will not be detrimental to your security system, you can share it here in the open for everybody to review.

You managed to read his wall of text? All of it? I need to give it three tries before giving up and choose to skim through it instead.

---

OP, as I said above, your wall of text is too much for me to digest, but I understand the gist of it correctly that you accuse sportsbet as a scammer because they cater a rigged game on their platform? Like you're hoping they know the mafia or cartel or whoever behind certain matches by name, is on their contact list, and they'll get a heads up, "yo, Steve, I am paying this club to win against that club. Just to let you know the game is rigged," and then Steve, fully knowing that it is rigged because Castor have already told him, decided to keep the bets open for that match?

The extortion also came in form of fake review.

They're giving OP a preview of the draft they'll publish in case OP refused to pay. I peeked at their review page and see that there's no article yet about BKS, so I think the screenshot given by them --and from them, posted by OP here-- is indeed the draft.



Given its a false information which will be published if OP refuse to pay, I think that can be considered as an extortion and not how most --honest-- rating website works.