Um what?  I'm also shocked that PD advertisement finally appear . Maybe PD doesn't to launch signature campaign anymore since they have enough exposure. No more wasting BTC 30 anymore I think marcotheminer posted that, not because PD has finally launched their ads, but rather because of the content of the ad - read what it says on the right side.  |
|
|
|
Today's payments have been sent. u9y42 - 0.125 BTC - 7698855717b3d349fcd7410e95c79cc68d5dc8d126dfa8c6ebd8f64e049ed29a Gronthaing - 0.075 BTC - 15fa37ca88217ab257a52672c9a624153f58bf6372e1f68868299d37c65fd0a1 Registered. Thank you stingleword. |
|
|
|
I'm looking to get into signature campeign
Next Tuesday, March the 3 rd, you will be a Full Member, so it should be far easier to get into a good signature campaign. I recommend the LuckyBit campaign - though I may not be completely impartial.  |
|
|
|
is a spot available?
I think so; there seem to be 3 spots available for Full Members, at the moment. |
|
|
|
last time i saw this thread, Bitcoininformation was OP now it seems mitchell manage this thread thanks for updating this overview, finally i find out a good campaign for me Plot twist: Mitchełł is Bitcoininformation.  |
|
|
|
Off-topic forum will have lot of sub board pretty soon - if this suggestion were to be accepted. However, I agree.. we should have a programming section. Not every programmer is programming games.. so a Programming section would do. There's no need for 'Gaming and'.
Or maybe we could have a prefix for programing in the off-topic section? Will the new forums software support prefix?
think we should move this to services cuz this should be for offering programming services I think those are two different things, and each should have its area in the forum; that is: one is a section for offering programming services, which falls under the Services section; and the other is a Programming section. In this section, people can discuss about anything related to programming, like: learning how to start with it; commenting on each others' code; asking for help solving problems and bugs; and maybe even organizing to accomplish some projects, not necessarily related to Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
I would also like to see a general Programming section in this forum; I feel sad every time I see a programming thread relegated to the Off-Topic section.  Personally, I wouldn't be as interested in a Gaming section, but by no means would I be against it either; we could use it to organize "Bitcoin teams" in every major game out there, to help spread the word. As an added benefit, if the section turns out to be popular by itself, it could help bring in more users directly to the forum. Voted. |
|
|
|
Interesting, I've never seen anything like that, but I've seen paralyzed people and It's the worst thing you can experience. Worse than death IMO.
I hope this condition of yours won't get more severe.
It's not an illness, it's just an unlink between body and mind. From what I know, the body is unleashed after 5 minutes max, 30 minutes would be too much even for a body, if your brain is working, that means it will tell to the body, "hey come on, he needs to wake up".
Well, I'm mostly going by what joshv06 said, as well as by the second video he posted; but in that video, the guy clearly states she could remain in that state for over an hour. Now, I don't know how reliable that information is, but as far as I can tell, these aren't the usual sleep paralysis episodes most people experience; rather, they are probably linked to specific conditions: supposedly Cataplexy Induced Sleep Paralysis in that second video. Then, there are also other conditions that could be related, like Recurrent Isolated Sleep Paralysis for example - the following is a brief excerpt from a site on the subject: Although the occurrence of ISP [Isolated Sleep Paralysis] is relatively common, recurrent ISP (RISP) is a rarer variant of sleep paralysis characterized by frequent episodes or a complex of sequential episodes whose total duration may exceed 1 hour, and particularly by the range and sense of perceived reality of the subjective phenomena experienced during episodes.
|
|
|
|
If you edit same post, then we(alteast non-staff) won't know whether a dotted line appear when you edit after 5 minutes. Let me try with this post.
Edit : Verified the grace period isn't 5 minutes.
Edit : Verified the grace period is around 10 minutes.
-MZ
Thanks for the vote of (no)confidence, Muhammed Zakir. |
|
|
|
bem vou ter de ver o site e registrar me nele para poder falar mas parece que gold se torna em euros ok isto serve para portugal vou ver os metodos de pagamento e ect funcionamento do site e se e de investir ou se e free e se pode tirar alguns euros para paypal oub bitcoin.
O jogo é free; isto é, podes juntar-te e nunca pagar para jogar - mas tens vantagens se investires no jogo: mais rapidamente evoluis, mais rapidamente podes investir em shares, e assim. Depois tens várias formas de levantar dinheiro do jogo; entre elas, Bitcoin, e acho que também Paypal. Já agora, se calhar não era má ideia juntares-te com o link de alguém daqui; de preferência alguém do mesmo país, de forma a que essa pessoa ganha um novo ref, e mais facilmente podem depois combinar algumas coisas, como por exemplo: passar leis no país, defesa mútua, e assim.
O ouro está muito barato, não acham? 1 gold = 2.5 euros (metade do que já valeu). Devo fazer minha primeira compra de bitcoins em breve: tenho 4.95 euros, esperando fechar 5 euros pra isso.
Hmm, tenho ideia que esse era o valor que o ouro tinha quando parei de jogar - mais ou menos por volta da altura em que implementaram os veuros (virtual Euros), para aí há meio ano. Já teve um valor maior desde então? |
|
|
|
Total time logged in: 29 days, 19 hours and 34 minutes.
Total Time Spent Online: 3 days, 20 hours and 37 minutes.
Um, Hero are higher than Senior, right? It is indeed; but the "total time logged in" has no relation to your rank - only activity, limited in some cases by post count, has. On the other hand, if it was related, I would be a Legendary Member by now with my 78 days online; so, I'm all for that change. |
|
|
|
The dots you see will come if the thread is edited. Anybody know how much time does the editing and posting be apart for showing the dotted line? I have made changes within a few minutes but it didn't appear. So edits after x hours or edits after 1 day make the dotted line show? P.S. Sorry for bad english. Don't know how to ask this question correctly.  ~~MZ~~ There is a grace period of around 5 minutes I believe. If you edit your post in this interval it won't appear as edited(so no dotted line).
This is probably coming a bit late, but if neither of you have further looked into it this, this last month, here it is: the grace period is probably closer to 10 minutes - I frequently edit my own posts, and I'm often not that quick in doing so.  At any rate, I'm pretty sure the dotted line doesn't appear before then, though the limit may be longer than the 10 minutes. EDIT: after 5 minutes... EDIT: after 9 minutes... EDIT: after 10 minutes... |
|
|
|
Paralysis ? I only see a person sleeping and being woken up here.
It's a video of me. I am completely awake but I can't move. The whole time, I am seeing the room in strange colors and hearing weird noises. My heart rate is beating really quickly. I am paralyzed. I can only make movements some times, I can't talk, I can't move my face and sometimes it is heard to breathe. If my brother had not heard me, I would have been stuck for at least 30 mins. I have only experienced sleep paralyses some three or four times so far. The first time was the worst, as I had never heard of it before, and had no idea of what was going on - it involved all the usual stuff: me being unable to move; awake, but still seeing dream imagery; and thinking someone, or something, might be in the room with me. The following experiences were much less problematic: other than not being able to move for a little while, I had practically none of the other effects, fortunately. However, none of my experiences with sleep paralyses lasted very long at all, at least as far as I'm aware: the first time, it may have lasted a couple of minutes at most; and the others almost certainly lasted less than a minute - I can't imagine what it must be like to be in that state for half an hour, and much less for over an hour, like the person in the second video you previously posted. |
|
|
|
You are not forced to play the hand.
If you think you can win a poker tournament with luck, 'gonna have a bad time'...
That may well be the case but, technically, poker is still considered gambling - and whether or not you are forced to play all the hands you receive has little relevance here, I think. Gambling is the wagering of money or something of material value (referred to as "the stakes") on an event with an uncertain outcome with the primary intent of winning additional money and/or material goods. Gambling thus requires three elements be present: consideration, chance and prize.
Now, I guess someone could argue that, going by this definition alone, perhaps a lot of other activities should fall under gambling as well. |
|
|
|
Can you show the portfolio please? 1st post wanting money.
Not like others who ask for money but this is more like offering his service! -MZ As he said, he doesn't have a portfolio - though, after a year of working on web design, you can probably come up with a few simple examples you've worked on, LeDesigner; I'm sure that will attract more attention, and may even serve as a base for future work.
It is highly unusual, though, to offer services in an account's first post. You'd think to offer services for Bitcoin the account owner would have been around this forum longer... and had another account longer...
I also suspect this is someone's alt account for that reason, but I don't think it is unprecedented for people to have accounts dedicated to work projects, alongside more regular accounts. As such, and considering he is just offering a service, I don't think there is any issue here. EDIT: Or, as Muhammed Zakir mentioned above, it could simply be someone coming from Reddit or elsewhere.
[...] I currently do not have a portfolio or anything to show of my work as I have only been doing web design for a year and haven't made a website for anyone, only myself for practice. So because of that I will do your order completely as you ask and if you do not like it or it turned out poorly, you will not have to pay me and you can take it all free of charge. [...]
Instead of offering the work free of charge if it doesn't turn out the way the buyer wants it, it might be a good idea to approach that differently - for example: by having very clearly defined ideas of what the buyer wants, preferably with examples he can point to; by creating simple conceptual art/whatever showing how the site will look and function; and by regularly showing the progress of your work to the buyer, and seeking feedback for it. By involving the buyer as much as possible in the process, it becomes harder for him not to be satisfied with the outcome, I think. |
|
|
|
I am using Payza too, but their rule is that if I deposit money I can't not purchase BTC directly.
Oh? That's odd: to be honest, I've only added funds to my account via Bitcoin so far, but I saw no mention of such a limitation when withdrawing. Is your Payza account verified? I imagine that must be a prerequisite for withdrawing with Bitcoin. EDIT: Ah, you're right - I've just spotted it: Important: It is strictly forbidden to buy Bitcoins using funds directly deposited via credit card.
|
|
|
|
Rates on VirWox is just extremely ridiculous, they are totally rip off and I am paying their shitty rates.
It might not help much at the moment, since you want to use PayPal, but in the future you can try using Payza ( https://www.payza.com) instead; they allow you to add or withdraw funds directly via Bitcoin, and the fees aren't that bad ( https://www.payza.com/fees). Other than that, with PayPal involved, finding someone to trade with is going to be difficult, and the rates are likely not going to be good - but don't forget to ask for escrow anyway. |
|
|
|
Arab nations said deeply worried by Iran nuke dealLeaders of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and UAE join Israel in conveying concerns to US over emerging accord with Tehran, Wall Street Journal reportsArab nations have joined Israel in expressing concern over the emerging details of a US-led international nuclear deal with Iran, indicating in private talks with US officials that they are worried about the apparent terms of the agreement, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday.
Though Arab officials have been careful not to side with Israel in their stated positions, their worries over the possibility of a nuclear-armed Tehran are in fact similar to those of Jerusalem, and their attitudes towards the current state of nuclear talks between Tehran and Western powers are similarly pessimistic, according to the report.
Leaders of Sunni states such as Egypt, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia fear a bad deal with Tehran would allow it, with the removal of sanctions, to become a nuclear threshold state, the WSJ reported. They say it could also lead to a nuclear arms race in the region.
“At this stage, we prefer a collapse of the diplomatic process to a bad deal,” an official from an unnamed Arab nation told the paper. More... http://www.timesofisrael.com/arab-nations-said-deeply-concerned-over-nuclear-agreement/ It's probably relevant to point out that "Arab nations" here mostly means the leaders/western backed dictators. So, it's no surprise they might hold such a position, though as we know from Wikileaks, polls in the region, and other sources, the public opinion is quite different - to a lot of them, the US and Israel are the most threatening, not Iran, and not even a nuclear armed Iran. Also might be worthy of mention that, if they are really concerned about a nuclear arms race occurring in the region, one way would be to institute a "nuclear weapons free zone" on the whole area - needless to say they'll never go that far, since that goes against their actual interests and US interests in the region. |
|
|
|
Alguém saberia dizer o que rende mais: Town Shares, Bonds ou Game Shares ?
Se não estou enganado, o que rendia mais eram as Town Shares, especialmente se apanhasses as Shares mais baratas dos novos jogadores - mas eram também o investimento mais arriscado porque, na maioria dos casos, não tinhas garantia que o jogador fosse continuar a jogar por muito mais tempo - ou seja, requerem muito mais atenção do que investimentos nos países, ou no jogo em si. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
