Multipliers: (center to extreme)
---------------------------------------------------
0.2 0.6 0.9 1 1 1 1 1 9999
---------------------------------------------------
Max amount playable: 0.005
--
Odds: 98.392%
Max win: 49.995000000000005 BTC
Name: Extreme
Bitcoin Address: 1Pk5n8mSBDXhUMcPVDx5h2oiXvAqrfE5dm
|
|
|
|
I'm in the Coinut campaign now.
You guys realy run a cool game, I think everyone should give it a go!
Maybe you should make a double or nothing one ( | 2x | 0 | 2x | 0 | 2x | 0 | 2x | 0 | 2x | 0 | 2x | 0 | 2x | 0 | )
Cheers
Actually, Lucky Bit has a "Make Your Own Game" promotion running in another thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873587 - if your line gets selected, you can win 2% of the profits it generates (I haven't followed that thread very closely, but I don't think anyone has made a suggestion similar to yours yet). EDIT: Oh, it seems the multipliers must always be above 0.2, so that wouldn't work. |
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure the holes they show in the beginning of the video were actually created by the rover's drill - the following is an image from the NASA's JPL website:  [...] This image shows the first holes drilled by NASA's Mars rover Curiosity at Mount Sharp. The loose material near the drill holes is drill tailings and an accumulation of dust that slid down the rock during drilling. [...]
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=6718The rest of the formations they show in the video look interesting, but I'd wait before claiming aliens did them, and look at more natural explanations first.  |
|
|
|
I checked out Market Glory, it's a bit of a joke, with a lot of these things people who put money in will have a huge advantage over people who don't, might as well save up some money and invest in altcoins frankly.
Yes, it's a pay to win game; but as (Lithium) said, that's just part of the deal, I'm afraid. Still, with some luck, skill, money and a lot of patience, new players might still find their niche in the game - especially now that the "recent" changes seem to not have been very well received by some of the older, more established players. |
|
|
|
What are the best games you know you can play for real money or make money for free? (no casino games)
Games with RME (real-money-economy) often MMO's. Skillgames where you can win prizes, contests, etc.
I've played Entropia (planet Calypso), Eve Online, Second Life, Diablo3 and small games like offered on Gambit (domino, monopoly etc.)
SL was the best income and the first 2 I mentioned only have cost me money but I know it's possible to earn if you are conservative, dedicated trader.
Diablo3 was good until the auctionhouse went down so I left.
You could also try MarketGlory, a massively multi player online role playing game with a virtual economy that allows you to withdraw the money you make in-game. The game is rather slow paced at the beginning however - unless you're willing to deposit some of your own money to speed things up, that is. |
|
|
|
Are you sure that is the best way to go about it? I'd say the site isn't that well known at the moment, and in a sense, that will just send more people its way - bad publicity is still publicity. |
|
|
|
Haven't you heard all that bible stuff came out of Sumerian, it's not even Hebrew. The books of Moses are the Sumerian version of the book of the dead stored with ancient Hebrew letters of Sumerian words. Then the New Testament was created to explain the code.
So you can throw out the Bible, new testament and Qu'ran, it's all nonsense.
1 Corinthians 8:2 Anyone who claims to know all the answers doesn't really know very much And yet, in a sense, isn't that what holy books typically do - claim to know all the answers? At least he's putting forward an historical perspective, not claiming to hold the ultimate truth. |
|
|
|
That video starts off with a great example of pareidolia: in this case, seeing a meaningful connection between the distribution of clusters of galaxies, and the structure of a neuron. The truth is, if you look for patterns long enough, you will eventually find them, whether or not they are meaningful. |
|
|
|
"uploading our consciousnesses (whatever they are) to the net"
is this possible theoretically? sounds like it's from a movie.
It's certainly more science fiction than anything else at this point, but I wouldn't say it's that far fetched - depending on the conception of consciousness you're using. If you lean more towards a materialistic view, that is, that consciousness arises from our biology, or at least that our biology is sufficient to give access to whatever consciousness is, then it seems natural that once we can understand the biological mechanisms involved, we'll be able to replicate them in other forms. |
|
|
|
[...] I always wondered how that would work for believers..enjoying heaven while your brothers and sisters burn in hell  The relationship between souls is different than ours. The earthly relationships might reflect the former, but not necessarily so. Good souls are not likely to have bad souls as friends. So, what you're saying is that souls are indifferent to the suffering of others? |
|
|
|
This reminded me of the Reincarnation Bank: Afterlife Financial Planning ( http://www.euromoney.com/Article/2626650/Reincarnation-Bank-Afterlife-financial-planning.html).  "Reincarnation Bank offers a safe-keeping for any asset you wish to deposit through your transition into the next life," its website trumpets. "If you leave nothing purposely behind when you die, then what is there here for you when you return?"
The bank kindly offers to look after deeds, bonds and tangible assets such as fine art, jewellery and real estate. In the next life, all claims "may be subject to verification through regression", which means you will have to prove under hypnosis that you are who you say you are.
|
|
|
|
So, when someone says "totally empty", does that mean 0% of 100%, or 100% of 0%, or what?
Isn't that like asking if the glass is half-full or half-empty? |
|
|
|
At least it was a minimum bet, so nothing really lost. I like to play big on blue and haven't been bitten - yet.
Registered! You quick like ninja!
I very rarely win, no matter how much the odds might be in my favor - come to think of it, I might not be the best person to promote games of chance.  |
|
|
|
In short I don't I want to die. I want to achieve Immortality. I'm hoping they discover the cure of aging within my lifetime.
+1 Implying it's biologically possible though. I don't think it's biologically impossible to achieve immortality - just beyond our current knowledge. After all, for the most part our bodies are just biological machines; so it seems likely that, as our understanding of them increases, we will reach a point where we can easily repair and rejuvenate them. Another possibility would be uploading our consciousnesses (whatever they are) to the net - and let's face it, most of us already spend much of our time here anyway. Of course you can then make the case that we might never/not any time soon reach either of those stages. |
|
|
|
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
Hmm, I'm sensing there might be a pattern here... couldn't you at least have come up with more diverse names? Or are you really that much into LoL? |
|
|
|
And is also commonly used when referring to Homo Sapiens (or Homo Sapiens Sapiens, if you want), for obvious reasons - or is that your way of saying that I've betrayed my cover, and that in reality, I'm an alien? Previous posts commanded an intellectual authority that would amount to greater nonmenclatual accuracy than that. I apologize if I did not live up to your expectations. |
|
|
|
Humans are indeed an extremely aggressive species in a number of respects; but I don't believe there is a conspiracy to keep alien visitors hidden from the public. Rather, I think it's more likely that this whole subject (and a few controversial others) are exploited to keep the population distracted - so, a form of population control, if you will.
EDIT: Just noticed you added something else to your answer, and updated accordingly.
You betray yourself: “humans” refers to member s of the genus Homo. And is also commonly used when referring to Homo Sapiens (or Homo Sapiens Sapiens, if you want), for obvious reasons - or is that your way of saying that I've betrayed my cover, and that in reality, I'm an alien? |
|
|
|
The impressive planet inventory take by NASA’s Kepler space observatory, combined with other research, has taken us down the road to concluding that, on average, every star in the Milky Way galaxy has at least one planet. What’s more, Earth-sized planets are far more common than giant Jupiters.
Planets exist there, and we do not have the ability to observe planets of our size; therefore, it is entirely possible that the civilizations described above do, indeed, occupy planets akin to our own both in size and and orbital zone. As well, considering the close proximity of some of these stars (“ α Centauri” is our nearest solar neighbor), it is entirely reasonable to expect them to have found or heard of us in exploring their most immediate, solar surroundings (upon, of course, acquiring the ability and desire to do so). Absolutely; as I've said a number of times now, I do believe life exists elsewhere in the universe - in fact, I would be surprised if it didn't come from more varied environments than just worlds with Earth-like conditions, meaning that, to me, the existence of extraterrestrial life seems almost certain. That said, we still need proof. Anyone can come up with a reasonably convincing story of something that can't be disproved with current knowledge, and try to pass it of as truth. Nevertheless, It’s not too early to think about the a millennium-long project to visit and colonize the star system. I cannot imagine a bolder step for the evolution of mankind. The project will cost untold trillions of dollars spent across many generations. But it will establish us as an interstellar species, that is for all practical purposes, immortal. This would be an evolutionary step as profound as when Earth’s first sea creatures ventured onto land.
However, it should not come as any surprise that the people, Homo sapiens, that exterminated Homo erectus and the Neanderthals would instill certain reservations within prospective visitors and motivate them to maintain a general ignorance about their existence among that people. Could intelligent life be there too? Unfortunately, in a lousy coincidence, the star system is too far south to be observed by the powerful Arecibo radio antenna in Puerto Rico, or the new Allen Telescope Array in northern California, that can easily look for any artificial radio transmissions.
Humans are indeed an extremely aggressive species in a number of respects; but I don't believe there is a conspiracy to keep alien visitors hidden from the public. Rather, I think it's more likely that this whole subject (and a few controversial others) are exploited to keep the population distracted - so, a form of population control, if you will. EDIT: Just noticed you added something else to your answer, and updated accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
