Why I'm an atheist

[af_newbie]

How do you know that Jesus is posting through you not that you are posting whatever you want?

Do you hear him telling you stuff?  

Now, for the real test:  Jesus, please stop posting through BADecker, post by yourself.  

PS.  That is the problem with imaginary characters, sometimes they listen, sometimes they don't, but they can never do stuff in the real world by themselves.  LOL.

I am not trying to say that everything I post is something that God directs me to post. I'm not even saying that He is always pleased with what I post.

When I post the things He says, His word in the quotes from the Bible, He is posting through me. Some of the time He is posting through me when I express His ideals in my own wording.

When you ask Him to post Himself, you are teasing Him. But He does through me when you see the quoted owrds that I quote from the Bible.

You are making it very hard for Him to save you. Your choice, however. Please remind me that I told you so, in the Judgment.

So he cannot post by himself, right?

[BADecker]

How do you know that Jesus is posting through you not that you are posting whatever you want?

Do you hear him telling you stuff?  

Now, for the real test:  Jesus, please stop posting through BADecker, post by yourself.  

PS.  That is the problem with imaginary characters, sometimes they listen, sometimes they don't, but they can never do stuff in the real world by themselves.  LOL.

I am not trying to say that everything I post is something that God directs me to post. I'm not even saying that He is always pleased with what I post.

When I post the things He says, His word in the quotes from the Bible, He is posting through me. Some of the time He is posting through me when I express His ideals in my own wording.

When you ask Him to post Himself, you are teasing Him. But He does through me when you see the quoted owrds that I quote from the Bible.

You are making it very hard for Him to save you. Your choice, however. Please remind me that I told you so, in the Judgment.

So he cannot post by himself, right?

Wrong.     

[af_newbie]

How do you know that Jesus is posting through you not that you are posting whatever you want?

Do you hear him telling you stuff?  

Now, for the real test:  Jesus, please stop posting through BADecker, post by yourself.  

PS.  That is the problem with imaginary characters, sometimes they listen, sometimes they don't, but they can never do stuff in the real world by themselves.  LOL.

I am not trying to say that everything I post is something that God directs me to post. I'm not even saying that He is always pleased with what I post.

When I post the things He says, His word in the quotes from the Bible, He is posting through me. Some of the time He is posting through me when I express His ideals in my own wording.

When you ask Him to post Himself, you are teasing Him. But He does through me when you see the quoted owrds that I quote from the Bible.

You are making it very hard for Him to save you. Your choice, however. Please remind me that I told you so, in the Judgment.

So he cannot post by himself, right?

Wrong.     

Let's see it.  Pray to your God to post here, or take your God and shove it up yours.

How about this?  No post by God = no God.

Fair?

[BADecker]

Let's see it.  Pray to your God to post here, or take your God and shove it up yours.

How about this?  No post by God = no God.

Fair?

God can't deny Himself. But is isn't necessarily going to play your game. You have all the evidence for Him that you need, to know that He exists, right in nature.

[af_newbie]

Let's see it.  Pray to your God to post here, or take your God and shove it up yours.

How about this?  No post by God = no God.

Fair?

God can't deny Himself. But is isn't necessarily going to play your game. You have all the evidence for Him that you need, to know that He exists, right in nature.

In other words, he is imaginary and he can do squat in the real world.

Anywho, carry on.

[BADecker]

Let's see it.  Pray to your God to post here, or take your God and shove it up yours.

How about this?  No post by God = no God.

Fair?

God can't deny Himself. But is isn't necessarily going to play your game. You have all the evidence for Him that you need, to know that He exists, right in nature.

In other words, he is imaginary and he can do squat in the real world.

Anywho, carry on.

In other words, He isn't going to let you and your foolishness dictate to His holiness.

[notbatman]

.

[styca]

-snip-

Yep, that's basically it. Well, apart from the images.
Timescale is the thing that throws most people. Billions of years is not something that humans can comprehend. I know you don't believe in gravity, but all you need for the universe around you is the laws of physics, plus a load of energy, then watch it expand into space and time.

Not sure what your problem with 'mass' is. Mass is just a manifestation of energy. E=mc².

[notbatman]

...Book of Gravity 33:13...

...Yep, that's basically it...

.

[styca]

Science is awe-inspiring once you understand it. Go on, give it a go.

[notbatman]

^^^ You confuse unproven theory with the scientific method of observable, testable, measurable facts. What you have is a belief system and you sir, are a jackass.

There's no scientific proof for gravity, the big bang, outer space, planets, the globe, time-spans of billions of years, or evolution.

You're Hillary Clinton accusing Trump of Russian collusion while selling the majority of the country's supply of uranium to Russia. You're the Jew crying out in pain as he strikes. It's you that can't science!

[styca]

There's no scientific proof for gravity, the big bang, outer space, planets, the globe, time-spans of billions of years, or evolution.

Do you think there is scientific proof for anything? I'm not trying to be rude. I know what science you don't believe in, I just want to understand what science you do believe in.

[notbatman]

^^^ Science isn't a belief system! The scientific method employs observable, testable, measurable facts; it's empirical not faith based.

[styca]

^^^ Science isn't a belief system! The scientific method employs observable, testable, measurable facts; it's empirical not faith based.

Yes, I know, my background is in physics, I understand what science is. It should be me spouting definitions at you, not the other way around! Aaaargh! My fault for not being clear enough; I take full blame.

Yes, science is based on exactly that: cold hard verifiable facts. However, as a person you can either believe in the facts of science, or not believe. Belief is the human bit. You can accept something as valid, or not. You can believe that the results are flawed or faked, or you can believe that the results are valid but the conclusions drawn from them invalid, etc etc.

I am genuinely interested in understanding which established scientific facts you believe are genuine scientific facts, that's all. It can't all be conspiracy.

[notbatman]

^^^ Not gravity, it's the theoretical glue that holds all the ballshit together and it's not a scientific fact.

[styca]

I am genuinely interested in understanding which established scientific facts you believe are genuine scientific facts, that's all. It can't all be conspiracy.

^^^ Not gravity, it's the theoretical glue that holds all the ballshit together and it's not a scientific fact.

Do you believe in any established science though? Electricity? Atoms? Magnetism? Thermodynamics?
I just want to establish a common base point, and we can proceed from there.

[notbatman]

^^^ The Coulomb force and Coulomb's Law is testable, observable, measurable and reproducible science.

There's one for you!

[styca]

^^^ The Coulomb force and Coulomb's Law is testable, observable, measurable and reproducible science.

There's one for you!

Thanks, that's great! So you believe in Coulomb's Law, but not the Law of Universal Gravitation...

Coulomb's Law:
The electrical force between two charges is directly proportional to the product of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

F = k * q₁q₂ / r²

where:
F = force
k = Coulomb constant
q₁, q₂   = charges
r = distance of separation

Gravity:
The gravitational force between two masses is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

F = G * m₁m₂ / r²

where:
F = force
G = gravitational constant
m₁, m₂ = masses
r = distance of separation

You can see how similar these are, both based on fundamental and observable physical properties, both verified and verifiable laws.

[BADecker]

^^^ The Coulomb force and Coulomb's Law is testable, observable, measurable and reproducible science.

There's one for you!

Not in FE science. The physics of FE science hasn't even been described. So haw can anyone know that Coulomb's Law is a thing that works with FE science? The testing of it that seems to prove it exists, might simply be some other phenomenon altogether. After all, you say similar about gravity, constantly trying to apply gravity theory to gravity fact, so you can say that gravity doesn't exist.

What does any of your posting here have to do with atheism? The process known as Coulomb's Law is something that God placed into the universe so that man could find it and give it the name Coulomb's Law.

[notbatman]

@styca that's where you're wrong buckko, one is scientific fact and one is unproven theory.

Objects fall/sink due density and buoyancy with the underlying mechanism being the Coulomb force, gravity is just bullshit that hijacks Coulombs Law.

Gravity is a lie.