|
Ursul0
|
 |
April 25, 2017, 04:54:44 PM |
|
Claymore only display GPU temperatur for GPU 0. I want to see or log temperature for all GPU
How to do so?
Do you have crossfire activated? Make sure you are NOT using RDP, use teamviewer instead for example Why not use RDP? Because bugs exist! It's in the readme , make sure you read it: It seems RDP uses a virtual display adapter that makes claymore only detect one card for the temp readings " I see only one card via Remote Desktop Connection. It's a problem of RDC, use TeamViewer or some other remote access software. " -> From the readme I see all cards and all cards are mining great. Only Claymore show temperature of first GPU0 only. GPUZ, OpenHWmonitor.. read correct info from all cards. When using VNC I would need to manualy configure resolution, default with no display connected is 640x480. That's why I used RDP where you set resolution only once. On VNC you have to set it each reboot. Yes I know, they mine great, everything works just fine, only the temps will come for the first card. Like I said, just use teamviewer, it just works, VNC is veeery slow I once had problems with temps not displayed for rx400 on claymore XMR 9.6 - try to use -mclock and -cclock params setting for a single cards at least, you may put 0 for the others, there's a chance it will "initialize something" and will start giving the numbers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tperalta82
|
|
April 25, 2017, 05:20:47 PM |
|
With Claymore 9.2 I had not trouble for like 72 hours with dualmining ETH/DCR Now this starts to appear more and more often :/ (Already had this in 9.1 and 9.0 I think)  Can you check your logs for any kind of opencl hang or something? |
|
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 05:23:39 PM |
|
9.2(288 CU) doing fine on 15*470 ~1mh less than v9.1 and a bit less jittery reported rate:  |
|
|
|
|
xanx
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 05:33:41 PM |
|
So i guess these fluctuation are normal? I haven't been regularly checking, only on my cmd so I guess I will keep an eye on it...
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3868
|
|
April 25, 2017, 05:37:45 PM |
|
what's with a sudden ferocity of mcafee AV objections to OP's program?
maybe mcafee does it to promote btc vs altcoins?
think about it...
|
|
|
|
|
Wicard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 06:27:37 PM |
|
Hey ,guys!
I'm new to the forum.I wish you everyone good luck with mining and everything else.
I'm kinda new to Etherium mining too and maybe asking newbie questions but i can't find the answers on my own for now.
I do only Etherium mining at ethermine pool
Here is my problem:
Everything was fine on 8.1 Claymore miner.After installing Claymore dual miner 9.2 it started to crash on start right after it shows the green title for my 6 cards.I have a 6 x RX 470 8 GB (Micron memory) Sapphire Nitro on Asrock Pro BTC v2.0 with dual PSU Fortron Hyper 700M (add2psu).OS Windows 10 Pro.Crimson 16.9.2 drivers.Cards are bios moded and making 168.5 MH/s (miner's statistic) .940W power consumption total.I'm using MSI afterburner with synchronized settings for all cards.I found they are working fine on -84 down voltage 1150/2000.Temps-below 60.
For now i tried to play with voltages with no luck and switched back to 8.1.
What do you think might be the problem?Drivers?Overclocking?Or something else?
Thanks in advance!
PS.Windows is crashing with blue screen and start to restart.After restart ,same thing over and over again since i have make my miner to restart auto in shell:startup.
I'm using 16.9.2 as people says 15.2 are not for RX 4xx series...
Hi, I had some sort of the same issue, only when I used -84 undervolt , I'm using -48 now and seems to be working for me, also try to install Crimson 16.11.15 , it works better. ( I do have RX480's 8Gb ) Hope it helps.. You mean probably Crimson 16.11.5, not Crimson 16.11.15... YES!! sorry!!! finger vaults are common with me... still not learning to double check  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
spaolo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 08:21:13 PM |
|
Hi Claymore, thanks for your work. I believe I found a bug on Ethman I would like to use the http address of a PC instead of the IP address when adding the miner to ETHman Now, on the "Add Miner" window, when I write the http address as in " http://subdomain.domainname.com" the software strips out the "http://" part and add "http//" without the colon, hence is not working (I see that if I click on "view miner console"). Even if I input the http address without the http:// bit, as in "subdomain.domainname.com" it still doesn't work/update but if I right click and choose "view miner console" it direct the browser to the correct subdomain and the stats shows fine on the website but on the Ethman windows it shows nothing and the miner is shown in red. Could you please shed some light on why this is happening? Is it a bug or is http not meant to be used / not working straight into ETHman? :/ |
|
|
|
|
skingun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 08:46:12 PM |
|
I have set up Claymore and have made a Coinomi Ethereum wallet. I have entered my Coinomi Ethereum wallet hex key into Claymore .bat file behind -ewal.
Is this OK or should I be using Ethereum Mist wallet? I'm new so please forgive my noobish tendencies.
|
|
|
|
|
PetrMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 08:51:52 PM |
|
Zou cant use 17.4.3 driver. Use 16.* .With 17.4.3 miner does not recogniye zour cards |
|
|
|
|
amfofo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 08:58:34 PM |
|
Help!
already updated miner version but still i got this 100% reject on DCR
set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool musicoin.nomnom.technology:9999 -ewal 0x2686cf6f58sdf465dfgsc9df1abcae99d0290d -epsw x -dpool dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal DsZ4Auasd87htdhfdxPz.480 -dpsw x -dcoin dcr -dcri 15 -allpools 1 -asm 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
rawbot
|
|
April 25, 2017, 09:00:06 PM |
|
I'm sick to death of my miner crashing. I have six rx 470 8gb sapphire cards and it can run ok for days, then locks up. Then I have to restart it about 10-20 times because I constantly get the message "Ethdcrminer64.exe has stopped working". Then I go into GPUZ and see that one of the cards is not reporting data fully. After 10 restart or so it starts working again, and I get a few more days mining, sometimes less.
What could be causing this? All cards are cool, well ventilated running at 74 degrees contant. this issue is really pissing me off now. All parts are relatively high quality, EVGA power supply etc.
I am running win 10 64 bit
remove and reseat everything. run memtest86 overnight. all vbios stock? No I modded them for extra mining capabilities and it worked well for a while but now it's crashing a lot. I am sick to death of the "Dcrethminer64.exe has stopped working" error. Check gpu-z for cards with Hynix ram lol. GPUZ reports the ram as 8gb samsung. But sometimes certain bits of data are missing from the gpuz report on one card or another. Can't remember exactly which bits of data, they are usually blank. When you see that you know without doubt claymore is going to crash. But sometimes it still crashes when GPU is reporting everything is OK on all cards. It's a shame because if this carries on I will have to sell up. I just ROI'd thanks to the ethereum price shooting up but I wanted to run it for a year or so. It is taking up so much time now and I cannot nail down the issue(s). Do you check the PCIE riser? GPU also draw power from motherboard through PCIE. Well I have unplugged the power connector then plugged it back in, I don't know how else I can check it. What I can't understand is how can the risers be malfunctioning all of a sudden after days of mining? The miner doesn't move, the GPU's are secure. How can they work for days, then fail, then after a few restarts begin working again. There is no logic there unless I am missing something. |
|
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
April 25, 2017, 09:23:02 PM |
|
Whatever improvements Claymore has made, whatever bugs fixed.
My miner use to crash like twice in an hour and sometimes 6 times in an hour.
I even ordered new pci powered risers instead of molex ones. But
Now running stable for more than 2 hours with v9.2! No hardware changes at all.
There is definitely some big fix, atleast for me.
Hashrate has gone stable, no big fluctuations at all on asm mode with dual mining eth+dcr
I am loving this version.
Thank you Claymore once again for such a quick update.
100% agree! Prior to release of 9.2, I had 3 6x470 rigs trying to mine ETH+DRC. 2 ran fine with very few crashes but hashrate flux was all over the place. the 3rd rig would only run for maybe 2-3 hours tops, and that was with -dcri 16! Now, since installing 9.2, that 3rd rig has been up 24 hours straight and all 3 rigs are actually getting better overall actual average hashrate because the fluxing issue has been resolved. On this note, I would urge those that are complaining about a 2-3% PERCEIVED drop with 9.2 to look at your ACTUAL results in your pool vs 9.1 or 9.2. My ETH trend line is at or above what it was before and my DCR payout frequency is better as well because there appear to be a lot fewer bad DCR shares when digging into the log files. My next test will be to start moving up -dcri a bit on all 3 rigs but the BIG test is going to be trying 9.2 on my 4th rig (4x470). That one has not been able to dual mine ETH+DCR for some unknown reason for several weeks, despite plenty of headroom wattage wise. My suspicion is that one of the GPUs is more sensitive to the harder work of dual mining than the other 3 (this has been a problem GPU that can only be OC'd to 1850 max). However, I think the issue with the 3rd rig was similar because that ran dual for 24+ hours when i only had 4 GPUs hooked up to it. Hoping 9.2 will do its magic on that 4 card rig as well! Thanks again Claymore! Great job on this update! |
|
|
|
|
tarnum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 11:01:24 PM |
|
Did you re-sign driver after updated it? Each time you update drivers, you will need to re-sign driver. (whole proccess again) |
|
|
|
|
kors
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2017, 11:05:42 PM |
|
Hey guys,
hopping is the right place to ask
one question please ...
found a few articles where is saying that Sapphire Radeon NITRO+ RX 480 4GB or 8GB - is the best option for Ethereum mining.
Is that correct?
lets suppose I have electricity for 0$.
thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
jenifive
|
|
April 25, 2017, 11:21:43 PM |
|
Is last version of Claymore miner have any viruses?
|
|
|
|
|
jenifive
|
|
April 25, 2017, 11:22:01 PM |
|
Help!
already updated miner version but still i got this 100% reject on DCR
set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool musicoin.nomnom.technology:9999 -ewal 0x2686cf6f58sdf465dfgsc9df1abcae99d0290d -epsw x -dpool dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal DsZ4Auasd87htdhfdxPz.480 -dpsw x -dcoin dcr -dcri 15 -allpools 1 -asm 1
the same on v7.4! |
|
|
|
|
ilostmyface
|
|
April 26, 2017, 12:03:42 AM |
|
Couple questions on my first RX 470 series build. What is the recommend driver people are finding most stable for this miner?
I installed 16.9.2 but W10 did it's auto install of 16.6. Since their installed I'm gonna to do some testing anyway. I've had one TDR VIDEO BSOD with these drivers. I was playing with afterburner alot while mining, so who knows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 02:37:50 AM |
|
Hey Guys,
Need help on Dual mining.
I want to dedicate my miner as 75% for Ether and 25% for other alts. Please guide how to do the same.
Everything you need to know about Dual mining is covered in the first post of this thread. Go to Page 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 02:47:39 AM |
|
I've tested v9.2 about 12 hours. My accepted hashrate on pool (ETH mining only, asm 1) dropped about 15 MHs  So I switched back to v9.0 and voila, I'm back on my hashrate... What about 9.1? Is 9.0 better hashrate than 9.1 also? v9.0 seems to be the best for me at the moment. 9.1 and 9.2 with ASM -1 suppose to use less power. What are your observations in that regard? I did notice about 1-2% reduction. |
|
|
|
|
|
