Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[mine_phun]

Yep, ethermine stale shares went from 1-2% to 8-12% , at the moment i have 3 % staoe shares. Could we ask ethermine if there is any reason for that? will see how it will stay...

The reason for that is that the pool difficulty @ Ethermine is set to low. Then the chance of you finding a share someone else found are higher.

A simple raise of difficulty would help here. The difficulty @ nanopool has been set higher, so you see less, or no stales there.

[Viaggiatore]

Yep, ethermine stale shares went from 1-2% to 8-12% , at the moment i have 3 % staoe shares. Could we ask ethermine if there is any reason for that? will see how it will stay...

My stale shares are very low in these days (1%) but also effective and average had a steep decrease, like I'm not getting shares. Moved to SSL ethermine server just to see if there is a difference. Also put a rig on nanopool for comparison

[DeDeRa]

Its not ethermine, im on nanopool and its getting worse by the day, but the fault is from Claymore. I had almost same average hashrate like the reported, in many days even more, for weeks, with 10 to 10.6, but i was a fuckin idiot and changed to this shit 11.5 and i get 5 to 9 less mhs than reported... Its utterly and absolutly garbage. I will go back to 10.6...

[Ursul0]

I flashed my RX 570's back in April 2017.
Claymore's miner has been working stable in version 11.4, 11.3 and any previous version just as well.

I think you guys complaining about crashes must have dodgy memory straps or are just overclocking too far. Just check the log, identify the GPU going down and dial back that OC.

good for you. there's however indeed some instability of the v 11.4 version.
Never before the application had crashed on me, and I'm talking hundreds gpus( with 11.4 already two occasions on different workers) also on some of the cards I had to reduce the mem clocks to get back to stable operations

[big al]

So in a perfect world effective hash rate would be 2% lower than reported on ethermine?

[Teress]

So in a perfect world effective hash rate would be 2% lower than reported on ethermine?

I've got higher

[infectedmushi]

@Claymore

seem there's issues with 11.5 and nvidia cards. i am getting a terrible fluctuation on reported hashrate

https://preview.ibb.co/ij0KNx/reported.png

as you can see, it goes as low as 156MH/s | 175MH/s, etc ... the rig does 188MH/s with 6 nvidia 1070, on previous versions.

anyone experiencing the same?

No problem here...

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-09:44:43 - New job from eth.suprnova.cc:5000
ETH - Total Speed: 141.293 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2123, Rejected: 0, Time: 18:09
ETH: GPU0 26.806 Mh/s, GPU1 20.281 Mh/s, GPU2 26.661 Mh/s, GPU3 20.363 Mh/s, GPU4 20.389 Mh/s, GPU5 26.794 Mh/s

GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8113 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8114 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8114 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 7:0:0)
ETH - Total Speed: 141.374 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2123(400+304+385+316+334+384), Rejected: 0(0+0+0+0+0+0), Time: 18:09
ETH: GPU0 26.824 Mh/s, GPU1 20.355 Mh/s, GPU2 26.648 Mh/s, GPU3 20.352 Mh/s, GPU4 20.373 Mh/s, GPU5 26.823 Mh/s
Incorrect ETH shares: none
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 140.837 Mh/s

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-09:46:29 - New job from eth.suprnova.cc:5000
ETH - Total Speed: 141.418 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2127, Rejected: 0, Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.829 Mh/s, GPU1 20.381 Mh/s, GPU2 26.677 Mh/s, GPU3 20.347 Mh/s, GPU4 20.365 Mh/s, GPU5 26.819 Mh/s

GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8113 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8114 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8114 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 7:0:0)
ETH - Total Speed: 141.339 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2127(400+305+385+317+334+386), Rejected: 0(0+0+0+0+0+0), Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.782 Mh/s, GPU1 20.359 Mh/s, GPU2 26.648 Mh/s, GPU3 20.356 Mh/s, GPU4 20.387 Mh/s, GPU5 26.808 Mh/s
Incorrect ETH shares: none
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 140.881 Mh/s

Code:

ETH: 03/15/18-09:47:09 - New job from eth.suprnova.cc:5000
ETH - Total Speed: 139.801 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2128, Rejected: 0, Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.816 Mh/s, GPU1 19.637 Mh/s, GPU2 26.383 Mh/s, GPU3 19.762 Mh/s, GPU4 20.388 Mh/s, GPU5 26.816 Mh/s

GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8113 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 2:0:0)
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8114 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, 8114 MB available, 19 compute units, capability: 6.1 (pci bus 7:0:0)
ETH - Total Speed: 141.264 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2128(400+305+385+317+334+387), Rejected: 0(0+0+0+0+0+0), Time: 18:11
ETH: GPU0 26.794 Mh/s, GPU1 20.367 Mh/s, GPU2 26.674 Mh/s, GPU3 20.230 Mh/s, GPU4 20.383 Mh/s, GPU5 26.815 Mh/s
Incorrect ETH shares: none
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 140.940 Mh/s

My configuration:

Code:

MyUser@UbuntuRig:~$ nvidia-smi
Thu Mar 15 09:51:20 2018
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 387.26                 Driver Version: 387.26                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:01:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  4%   54C    P2   108W / 110W |   2614MiB /  8113MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 106...  On   | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   52C    P2    81W /  80W |   2570MiB /  6072MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  1%   53C    P2   104W / 110W |   2592MiB /  8114MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   3  GeForce GTX 106...  On   | 00000000:05:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 22%   54C    P2    81W /  80W |   2570MiB /  6072MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   4  GeForce GTX 106...  On   | 00000000:06:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 22%   54C    P2    81W /  80W |   2570MiB /  6072MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   5  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:07:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   53C    P2   113W / 110W |   2614MiB /  8114MiB |     97%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes:                                                       GPU Memory |
|  GPU       PID   Type   Process name                             Usage      |
|=============================================================================|
|    0     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2595MiB |
|    1     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2551MiB |
|    2     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2573MiB |
|    3     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2551MiB |
|    4     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2551MiB |
|    5     22119      C   ...MyUser/Claymore/v11.5/ethdcrminer64      2595MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

how can you possible compare? you are using Linux, my report was on Windows....

[atecubanoS]

@Claymore

seem there's issues with 11.5 and nvidia cards. i am getting a terrible fluctuation on reported hashrate

https://preview.ibb.co/ij0KNx/reported.png

as you can see, it goes as low as 156MH/s | 175MH/s, etc ... the rig does 188MH/s with 6 nvidia 1070, on previous versions.

anyone experiencing the same?

No problem here...

how can you possible compare? you are using Linux, my report was on Windows....

Was? Where do you specify Windows at your report?  

Sorry, but I didn't find that information... 

[tg88]

@Claymore

seem there's issues with 11.5 and nvidia cards. i am getting a terrible fluctuation on reported hashrate



as you can see, it goes as low as 156MH/s | 175MH/s, etc ... the rig does 188MH/s with 6 nvidia 1070, on previous versions.

anyone experiencing the same?

I use AMD cards and I'm also having fluctuation on reported hashrate with 11.5 version.

[criptooo]

Which version is best for my nvidia 1050 ti cards, can also share the bat file thanks

[j2james]

Which version is best for my nvidia 1050 ti cards, can also share the bat file thanks

Looks like for all NVIDIA cards 10.6 is the best

[NathanJackson]

Highly optimized 13x RX480 rigs, custom per card bios, etc. 0 invalid shares, 24ms accept time, on eth1.ethermine.org
Was running perfeclty stable for weeks with 11.1

Witih 11.2, 11.3 and 11.4 crashes all the time.
Hash rate increases but there is no point in it if I have to lower the memclocks to keep the cards from crashing.

Back to 11.1 and stable again, relatively high stale rate (5-15%). 0 invalid shares. 24ms accept time.
Back to 10.6 and lowered stale rate even more (2%).

For me, I'll stay with 10.6
Or can you think of any cons?

[Vann]

You should be able to rename the folder with the current version in the miner folder on ethOS. Then create a new folder with the same name, add the v11.2 files and run sudo chmod +x on ethdcrminer64 to make it executable.

[Viaggiatore]

Highly optimized 13x RX480 rigs, custom per card bios, etc. 0 invalid shares, 24ms accept time, on eth1.ethermine.org
Was running perfeclty stable for weeks with 11.1

Witih 11.2, 11.3 and 11.4 crashes all the time.
Hash rate increases but there is no point in it if I have to lower the memclocks to keep the cards from crashing.

Back to 11.1 and stable again, relatively high stale rate (5-15%). 0 invalid shares. 24ms accept time.
Back to 10.6 and lowered stale rate even more (2%).

For me, I'll stay with 10.6
Or can you think of any cons?

I'm doing same thing, back to 10.6! Average hashrate is shit starting from 11.x, going up and down like crazy, more down than up actually. The only cons I see is that it has higher devfee that 11.x

[starcat102]

Highly optimized 13x RX480 rigs, custom per card bios, etc. 0 invalid shares, 24ms accept time, on eth1.ethermine.org
Was running perfeclty stable for weeks with 11.1

Witih 11.2, 11.3 and 11.4 crashes all the time.
Hash rate increases but there is no point in it if I have to lower the memclocks to keep the cards from crashing.

Back to 11.1 and stable again, relatively high stale rate (5-15%). 0 invalid shares. 24ms accept time.
Back to 10.6 and lowered stale rate even more (2%).

For me, I'll stay with 10.6
Or can you think of any cons?

Why are you copying my text (posted on: March 14, 2018, 08:29:12 AM)  1:1 without any comment?

[Vann]

You should be able to rename the folder with the current version in the miner folder on ethOS. Then create a new folder with the same name, add the v11.2 files and run sudo chmod +x on ethdcrminer64 to make it executable.

Can you tell me location ?

The Claymore ETH miner should be in /opt/miners/claymore.

[sandrodz]

Is there a way to let claymore control fan with -tt flag (linux amd-pro drivers) without giving it root permissions?

I feel dirty running it as root.

[Raja_MBZ]

Is there a way to let claymore control fan with -tt flag (linux amd-pro drivers) without giving it root permissions?

I feel dirty running it as root.

Once you apply that -tt, fans will be controlled by claymore miner to keep the temperature within your specified limits. It has to get all those root permissions else it can't control those deep functions of your GPU for mining.

[criptooo]

Which version is best for my nvidia 1050 ti cards, can also share the bat file thanks

Looks like for all NVIDIA cards 10.6 is the best

thank you cuda and i have a suggestion in direver

[UnixBird]

Bug report:
Somewhere around...

Please, ignore post #22375 on page 1119.

I'm sorry. I've made a mistake in my scripts that control the miner. A flag was wrong. Everything should be OK now that my script is restored. Will be sure when the miner encounters a hung GPU.