Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[Saeglopur]

Hi!
Ethermine just paid me too early and under minimum level, why?
Over two years of perfectly even payouts at 0,1 ETH just got distracted :/ But why? They paid me even less than minimum level of 0,05 ETH. I've switched after years from Nanopool and this just happened.

[adaseb]

Hi!
Ethermine just paid me too early and under minimum level, why?
Over two years of perfectly even payouts at 0,1 ETH just got distracted :/ But why? They paid me even less than minimum level of 0,05 ETH. I've switched after years from Nanopool and this just happened.

I don't see what the issue is here exactly, they paid you, why is that a problem?

From what I recall, Ethermine I think has a min payout of 0.01 ETH and they automatically pay out any balances that reach >0.01 ETH if no payouts were made in the past 7 days.

Over the years the payouts change from time to time depending on the price of ETH. I think the payout back in 2016 for ETH was like 0.10 ETH because ETH back then was like $5. And maybe during the peak at Q1 2018 the payout was even less than 0.01 ETH however I am not sure.

[siskon]

Just started getting this error on my miners, using ethermine.org as pool.

ETH: Received error: {"id":16,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":27,"message":"Illegalparams"}}

Anyone know what that is?

solved:
just change from eu1.ethermine.org to us1.ethermine.org

[0xcosmos]

I can't use Phoenix 4.8c/Claymore 15 with 441.87 at all, it will crash before hashing on Phoenix sometimes, and in Claymore after about two/three rounds; removed all overclocks and the same.

Pissed me off cuz I'm stable for days on Equihash192,7 and Neoscrypt (much hotter algos)

i am sure downgrading the drivers will fix the issue
but i want to say that when i was mining and had amd rigs
i always installed blockchain drivers and nothing else
never updated from it
and disabled nearly all kind of windows updates
sometimes when we update to a new software version
something or the other always breaks

[Saeglopur]

Hi!
Ethermine just paid me too early and under minimum level, why?
Over two years of perfectly even payouts at 0,1 ETH just got distracted :/ But why? They paid me even less than minimum level of 0,05 ETH. I've switched after years from Nanopool and this just happened.

I don't see what the issue is here exactly, they paid you, why is that a problem?

For years payments were at every 0.1 ETH, minimum level for payout is 0.05 ETH. It always worked perfectly, I've moved to Ethermine, it's all set the same, rules are also the same (0.05 minimum) ...but they paid me 0.034.. so it's even below that 0.05 limit and now balance is going up again. I don't see any reasons for that, just curious and bit angry that that switch to Ethermine and glitch ruined my perfectly even 0.1 payout system

Which pool are you using? Switching from Nanopool to Ethermine was a good decision? It seems like it's mining way faster, I'm still waiting for more days/weeks to compare results to Nanopool.

[waywoos]

ethermine pays out after a week if the payment is .01 or greater i believe.

[zsoca72]

It is strange, but your miner makes wrong shares while mining UBIQ. Is there compatibility issue after hardfork in 2018 and switching to Ubqhash (modernised Ethash)? PhoenixMiner is working pretty well with UBIQ now.

Didnt see any answer. Can we mine Ubiq with Claymore? If yes, how?

[prostor]

It is strange, but your miner makes wrong shares while mining UBIQ. Is there compatibility issue after hardfork in 2018 and switching to Ubqhash (modernised Ethash)? PhoenixMiner is working pretty well with UBIQ now.

Didnt see any answer. Can we mine Ubiq with Claymore? If yes, how?

Claymore miner not support Ubqhash algos. use Phoenix or other.

[zsoca72]

It is strange, but your miner makes wrong shares while mining UBIQ. Is there compatibility issue after hardfork in 2018 and switching to Ubqhash (modernised Ethash)? PhoenixMiner is working pretty well with UBIQ now.

Didnt see any answer. Can we mine Ubiq with Claymore? If yes, how?

Claymore miner not support Ubqhash algos. use Phoenix or other.

So sad..
I already use Phoenix, but Claymore15 work about 7-8% faster for me on other Ethash. Thats why I wanted to use Claymore to mine Ubiq too.
But if so, I must keep using Phoenix.
Thank You for answer.

[prostor]

But if so, I must keep using Phoenix.

try clay, after apply timing pause device pressing 0 or other. run Phoenix

[zsoca72]

But if so, I must keep using Phoenix.

try clay, after apply timing pause device pressing 0 or other. run Phoenix

Hehe... Tricki... I tried this and I got about +2%, but the Phoenix started very-very slowly and comp frozed couple times for 2-3 seconds.
After about 2 minutes everything worked fine, and got this +2%, but looks like to me, that comp doesnt like this trick so much, and 2% not worth it.
But thanks anyway.

[Blisk]

can anyone help me.
how to use this from bat file in epools.txt
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu2.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d -esm 2 -epsw x -allpools 1 -ttli 88 -tstop 92 -tstart 50 -ethi 1 -li 15 -mport 0 -mode 1 -logfile logfile.txt

epools.txt, this but doesn't work
POOL: eu2.nanopool.org:9999, WALLET: 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d, WORKER: workername, PSW: x, ESM: 2, ALLPOOLS: 1, TTLI: 88, TSOP: 92, TSTART: 50, ETHI: 1, LI: 15, MODE: 1, LOGFILE: logfile.txt

[shehateme]

Hello all

New to the game and need some further input. I've done a few days (in hours) research on ethereum, blockchain ect and I want to get into it. Had some spare sapphire 4gb 470's laying around and got claymore up any running with no errors. I just find i am getting rather low hash rate. My main machine has an overclocked 1080 (Roughly speeds of a stock 1080 ti) and im getting about 25 mh/s with it which I think is still considered low for what I should be getting. The 2 470's are only getting 10 mh/s each which means I know I have something configured incorrectly. My 1080 machine can run for hours with no rejects or errors, just seems slow. Is there anything such as specific driver versions for AMD or Page File values i should be using? It also shows the power usage for not only my 1080 but the two 470's are at roughly half of what it should be (Claymore and AMD confirms only ~60w  usage on the 470's, ~130w on the 1080). I know it's a simple setting im missing, heres my config file....

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-us.dwarfpool.com:8008 -epsw x -strap 0@1850 -rxboost 1 -etha 0 -ethi 9

pause

Slowing gaining it, just from what I've been reading through further research suggests I should be getting much more. I've played with different strap settings 0-5, setting memory timings, different -etha -ethi settings and it all results in the same speed and power usage. Any and all suggestions are appreciated.

All the best!

[AzzAz]

Hello all

New to the game and need some further input. I've done a few days (in hours) research on ethereum, blockchain ect and I want to get into it. Had some spare sapphire 4gb 470's laying around and got claymore up any running with no errors. I just find i am getting rather low hash rate. My main machine has an overclocked 1080 (Roughly speeds of a stock 1080 ti) and im getting about 25 mh/s with it which I think is still considered low for what I should be getting. The 2 470's are only getting 10 mh/s each which means I know I have something configured incorrectly. My 1080 machine can run for hours with no rejects or errors, just seems slow. Is there anything such as specific driver versions for AMD or Page File values i should be using? It also shows the power usage for not only my 1080 but the two 470's are at roughly half of what it should be (Claymore and AMD confirms only ~60w  usage on the 470's, ~130w on the 1080). I know it's a simple setting im missing, heres my config file....

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-us.dwarfpool.com:8008 -epsw x -strap 0@1850 -rxboost 1 -etha 0 -ethi 9

pause

Slowing gaining it, just from what I've been reading through further research suggests I should be getting much more. I've played with different strap settings 0-5, setting memory timings, different -etha -ethi settings and it all results in the same speed and power usage. Any and all suggestions are appreciated.

All the best!

first put AMDs to COMPUTE in radeon "settings". Then lower cclock ( 1131?) and try more memory clock (some go to 2100 ) and set cvddc (860 ish) and mvddc (870ish)...

[0xcosmos]

~snip~

use gpuz to find out the asic quality of the card you are using
then use overdriventool to oc the clocks and uv the voltages to reduce the current consumption
figure out the memory vendor of the card as it will be different  for every card and it will oc accordingly

[shehateme]

Been a long time since I've played with AMD cards and switching it to the compute mode solved it. I'm glad that they have a good UI and the drivers work flawlessly now (crossfired 6970's was the last true AMD build i did). Either way once I switched the 2 cards to compute, made some small changes to the clock settings (1950mhz mem @ .950v both cards, can go down on voltage but will keep it up till I know the cards are stable at this frequency voltage) and both cards are sitting happily around 29-30mh/s. Now to continue building a few more machines for the other 10 570's I have. Thank you for the help guys, happy mining!

[AzzAz]

Been a long time since I've played with AMD cards and switching it to the compute mode solved it. I'm glad that they have a good UI and the drivers work flawlessly now (crossfired 6970's was the last true AMD build i did). Either way once I switched the 2 cards to compute, made some small changes to the clock settings (1950mhz mem @ .950v both cards, can go down on voltage but will keep it up till I know the cards are stable at this frequency voltage) and both cards are sitting happily around 29-30mh/s. Now to continue building a few more machines for the other 10 570's I have. Thank you for the help guys, happy mining!

NP...merit 'd be nice

[Blisk]

Any help here please??

can anyone help me.
how to use this from bat file in epools.txt
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu2.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d -esm 2 -epsw x -allpools 1 -ttli 88 -tstop 92 -tstart 50 -ethi 1 -li 15 -mport 0 -mode 1 -logfile logfile.txt

epools.txt, this but doesn't work
POOL: eu2.nanopool.org:9999, WALLET: 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d, WORKER: workername, PSW: x, ESM: 2, ALLPOOLS: 1, TTLI: 88, TSOP: 92, TSTART: 50, ETHI: 1, LI: 15, MODE: 1, LOGFILE: logfile.txt

[fredeq]

Any help here please??

can anyone help me.
how to use this from bat file in epools.txt
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu2.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d -esm 2 -epsw x -allpools 1 -ttli 88 -tstop 92 -tstart 50 -ethi 1 -li 15 -mport 0 -mode 1 -logfile logfile.txt

epools.txt, this but doesn't work
POOL: eu2.nanopool.org:9999, WALLET: 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d, WORKER: workername, PSW: x, ESM: 2, ALLPOOLS: 1, TTLI: 88, TSOP: 92, TSTART: 50, ETHI: 1, LI: 15, MODE: 1, LOGFILE: logfile.txt

Can you share what the actual problem is while using epools.txt?
The only difference I can see is the addition of the worker:, try to remove that

[Blisk]

Any help here please??

can anyone help me.
how to use this from bat file in epools.txt
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu2.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d -esm 2 -epsw x -allpools 1 -ttli 88 -tstop 92 -tstart 50 -ethi 1 -li 15 -mport 0 -mode 1 -logfile logfile.txt

epools.txt, this but doesn't work
POOL: eu2.nanopool.org:9999, WALLET: 0x360d6f9efea21c82d341504366fd1c2eeea8fa9d, WORKER: workername, PSW: x, ESM: 2, ALLPOOLS: 1, TTLI: 88, TSOP: 92, TSTART: 50, ETHI: 1, LI: 15, MODE: 1, LOGFILE: logfile.txt

Can you share what the actual problem is while using epools.txt?
The only difference I can see is the addition of the worker:, try to remove that

Problem is because epool.txt doesn't recognise this and there is no logfile and no mining limit and other things.
TTLI: 88, TSOP: 92, TSTART: 50, ETHI: 1, LI: 15, MODE: 1, LOGFILE: logfile.txt