Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:29:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 ... 500 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!  (Read 473054 times)
kken01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1009


View Profile
August 24, 2016, 11:46:41 PM
 #2921

you ignored my main point. i will accept your numbers to illustrate a point which is to say that its intellectually dishonest to say: you have bitcoin blockchain and ion blockchain... connect the dots people
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714202960
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714202960

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714202960
Reply with quote  #2

1714202960
Report to moderator
WildShark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2016, 12:29:00 AM
Last edit: August 25, 2016, 12:58:54 AM by WildShark
 #2922

you ignored my main point. i will accept your numbers to illustrate a point which is to say that its intellectually dishonest to say: you have bitcoin blockchain and ion blockchain... connect the dots people

I think you missed my point that the number can be produced from other data available to me other than addresses from the block chain... This number is only a very close approximation of the number derived from data taking weekly from the time of ICO. I'll add a disclaimer that there could be an error in my calculations...

The presentation of this data does not mean I would provide the addresses for ICO. You are barking up the wrong tree!!!

"Wild onION" Visit the depot using the following invitation @ http://invite.wildsdepot.com
ION Master Node[10K IONs] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets = 18 IONs Block Reward for WILD Innovative ION Network ownership (WIN concept)
Plan Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2016, 01:30:39 AM
 #2923

lol, bittrex doesn't like this, polo either, only yoshit likes your ion. How much fund you have raised from ico?


Total amount of BTC raised from ION ICO: 363.79 BTC



Just to give some context.

363 BTC x 500$ = 181500$
181500 / 0.225 avg ico price = ~800 000 ion bought on ICO

Currently ~135 masternodes x 20000 = 2 700 000 ion.
Let's add 10% for ions not fully in masternodes, very rough total: ~3 000 000 active ions.

I assume those ICO btc go into development. I think a week back it has been said ico btc were not touched yet.

Just to show you the risk besides the potentials of owning a masternode.

No investment advice.

Good point. There are also 1.25 million coins exchanged to XPY. Those went into stakers but 3-month stakers already expired, right? Were there 6- or 12-months ones?

In any case, without full accountability of every coin issued during the ICO it's impossible to prove anything. Three months into this clusterfuck I'm struggling to find any plausible reason for its ridiculous opacity other than intentional obfuscation.

you ignored my main point. i will accept your numbers to illustrate a point which is to say that its intellectually dishonest to say: you have bitcoin blockchain and ion blockchain... connect the dots people

I think you missed my point that the number can be produced from other data available to me other than addresses from the block chain... This number is only a very close approximation of the number derived from data taking weekly from the time of ICO. I'll add a disclaimer that there could be an error in my calculations...

The presentation of this data does not mean I would provide the addresses for ICO. You are barking up the wrong tree!!!

Let me guess, your "data" is what the nice guys told you and of course you trust them because... well, they're nice.

We've seen the numbers. They mean jack shit, in fact less than that because throwing such numbers around and blatantly refusing to show what should be a simple copy-paste of a Bitcoin address has only one logical explanation.
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 25, 2016, 01:51:35 AM
 #2924

well, midnight has come and gone in UTC so we are once again into that wonderful large portion of the day where the 24 hour volume listed on the ionomy exchange is inaccurate.

I wonder how long it will take for this error to get fixed. For reference, the typo I pointed out in the description of current "in development" game Urban Words in May still hasn't been corrected.

Wildshark, you seem to care about team ion. Have you pointed out these obvious errors to any members of the team? Any explanation as to why they can't fix a simple typo on their website or why there aren't enough attentive members of the ionomy to notice that typo and this obvious error and get it fixed?

Also, how is development of the other 2 games coming along? Urban Words and ionix have been in development just as long as Gravity, so I guess it will be easier to keep to the 1 game per month timeline after they get through this first one since they have been working on 3 games for so long and since it seems like the holdups are with tying the games into the ionomy, so it shouldn't be that hard to do that again for the future games.
Franz_Huber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1004


CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!


View Profile
August 25, 2016, 08:19:41 AM
 #2925

well, midnight has come and gone in UTC so we are once again into that wonderful large portion of the day where the 24 hour volume listed on the ionomy exchange is inaccurate.

I wonder how long it will take for this error to get fixed. For reference, the typo I pointed out in the description of current "in development" game Urban Words in May still hasn't been corrected.

Wildshark, you seem to care about team ion. Have you pointed out these obvious errors to any members of the team? Any explanation as to why they can't fix a simple typo on their website or why there aren't enough attentive members of the ionomy to notice that typo and this obvious error and get it fixed?

Also, how is development of the other 2 games coming along? Urban Words and ionix have been in development just as long as Gravity, so I guess it will be easier to keep to the 1 game per month timeline after they get through this first one since they have been working on 3 games for so long and since it seems like the holdups are with tying the games into the ionomy, so it shouldn't be that hard to do that again for the future games.

One game per month floor will establish soon!

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.CryptoTalk.org.|.MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!.🏆
rdewilde
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 925
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 25, 2016, 01:48:54 PM
 #2926

well, midnight has come and gone in UTC so we are once again into that wonderful large portion of the day where the 24 hour volume listed on the ionomy exchange is inaccurate.

I wonder how long it will take for this error to get fixed. For reference, the typo I pointed out in the description of current "in development" game Urban Words in May still hasn't been corrected.

Wildshark, you seem to care about team ion. Have you pointed out these obvious errors to any members of the team? Any explanation as to why they can't fix a simple typo on their website or why there aren't enough attentive members of the ionomy to notice that typo and this obvious error and get it fixed?

Also, how is development of the other 2 games coming along? Urban Words and ionix have been in development just as long as Gravity, so I guess it will be easier to keep to the 1 game per month timeline after they get through this first one since they have been working on 3 games for so long and since it seems like the holdups are with tying the games into the ionomy, so it shouldn't be that hard to do that again for the future games.

Just to start the rumor. I heard those are done or almost done. It was said a "bunch of games" were ready after gravity to be released monthly. Possibly some less development-intensive games.

To kill the rumor, it was said, and is my personal vision, that Gravity is a proof of concept, and this project should not be about game development itself.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2016, 03:30:30 PM
 #2927

Just to start the rumor. I heard those are done or almost done. It was said a "bunch of games" were ready after gravity to be released monthly. Possibly some less development-intensive games.

To kill the rumor, it was said, and is my personal vision, that Gravity is a proof of concept, and this project should not be about game development itself.

LOL what?  Grin

Ridiculous backpedaling aside, what is it about then? Are third party games planning to take ION? I don't think they will be able to convince anyone to use their "platform" unless they do it all themselves.

Seriously, did someone actually say on slack "proof of concept"? Can't stop laughing about that one.
CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1042


HODL


View Profile
August 25, 2016, 04:04:00 PM
 #2928

Stop fudding Gravity, you're ruining my MN payouts and you're causing the dev team to be late.

rdewilde
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 925
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 26, 2016, 08:13:53 AM
 #2929

Just to start the rumor. I heard those are done or almost done. It was said a "bunch of games" were ready after gravity to be released monthly. Possibly some less development-intensive games.

To kill the rumor, it was said, and is my personal vision, that Gravity is a proof of concept, and this project should not be about game development itself.

LOL what?  Grin

Ridiculous backpedaling aside, what is it about then? Are third party games planning to take ION? I don't think they will be able to convince anyone to use their "platform" unless they do it all themselves.

Seriously, did someone actually say on slack "proof of concept"? Can't stop laughing about that one.

"Personal vision"

And if you go by the roadmap and website you'll end up similair.

But let's continue the search for prove of scam. Why are they still here?

CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1042


HODL


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 10:49:45 AM
 #2930

Honest question. What is the reasoning for the ION team to refuse to post the premine addresses? They posted the bounty addresses. Why are they making his a big deal? There would be many more invested if they would just be transparent. It baffles me why they won't do a simple copy and paste to silence the naysayers.

Leads me to infer something nefarious is going on if they don't want to release the addresses. If they are on the up and up, which they and several other claim, why won't they post them? Simple question.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
August 26, 2016, 11:20:50 AM
 #2931

Just to start the rumor. I heard those are done or almost done. It was said a "bunch of games" were ready after gravity to be released monthly. Possibly some less development-intensive games.

To kill the rumor, it was said, and is my personal vision, that Gravity is a proof of concept, and this project should not be about game development itself.

LOL what?  Grin

Ridiculous backpedaling aside, what is it about then? Are third party games planning to take ION? I don't think they will be able to convince anyone to use their "platform" unless they do it all themselves.

Seriously, did someone actually say on slack "proof of concept"? Can't stop laughing about that one.

"Personal vision"

And if you go by the roadmap and website you'll end up similair.

But let's continue the search for prove of scam. Why are they still here?

Stop giving them ideas!

I don't care much if it's a scam or some other sort of clusterfuck. They created nothing of value in 12+ months for XPY, and the excuse at the end of it all was along the lines of "FUD" that they were denying at the beginning. They created nothing of value in 3+ months for ION and don't appear to have learned anything. You can be very generous and assume mere incompetence, or you can be very mean and assume heinous malevolence - the result is going to be the same.

I'm pretty sure I said the same thing about Garza two years ago, so this is like Hashlets 5.0 or something. Speaking of which, still waiting for Gravity 0.1b.
GarethBaleRM
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 11:26:28 AM
 #2932

You have everything. You got the Genesis block and every address created since then. You can follow every transaction before ION was issued to investors using the two coin explorers. You should be able to figure it out for your selves without the help from the ION Team or Sharky...

I give U a D+ for the effort

I still don't see where I promised to provide the address of the ICO Fund?

even if the number you say is correct for the ICO which i doubt it is, there is zero sense to say here is the whole bitcoin and ion blockchains. figure it out

it feels more like you are trying to create legitimacy by obfuscation. classic trick

No tricks... here is my calculations again to support my claim...

Total amount of BTC raised from ION ICO: ​363.79​ BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,261,871 / 5,000,000 for Week 1 = 261,871 IONs @  $422.00 =   124.1094786729858 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,310,010 / 5,000,000 for week 2 =     48,139 IONs @  $452.7     =     22.33088137839629 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,565,127 / 5,000,000  for week 3 = 255,117 IONs @  $450.8     =   124.502528837622 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,621,139 / 5,000,000 for week 4 =     56,012 IONs @  $442.5     =      29.11358192090395 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,656,784 / 5,000,000 for week 5 =     35,645 IONs @  $450.9     =      18.97272122421823 BTC
TOTAL SOLD 2,738,599 / 5,000,000 for week 6 =     81,815 IONs  @ $457          =     44.75656455142232 BTC

The first 2M IONs sold are from the XPY and Atoms exchange and not included in this BTC total...

This shit scam ico is a shame, got 300 btc funding, but is incompetent to list on bittrex, with no development progress, this coin is almost dead.
CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1042


HODL


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 11:46:43 AM
 #2933

And they could eliminate all the scam talk by releasing their addresses. Why won't they release the addresses?

casinobonusgiveaway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 12:00:49 PM
 #2934

And they could eliminate all the scam talk by releasing their addresses. Why won't they release the addresses?

 Grin  Yes, why they don't release it? I think there is very possible scam in this project. A bit shady, we need to trade solid coins like doge , ltc.  Grin
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 26, 2016, 12:15:12 PM
 #2935

Just to start the rumor. I heard those are done or almost done. It was said a "bunch of games" were ready after gravity to be released monthly. Possibly some less development-intensive games.

To kill the rumor, it was said, and is my personal vision, that Gravity is a proof of concept, and this project should not be about game development itself.

LOL what?  Grin

Ridiculous backpedaling aside, what is it about then? Are third party games planning to take ION? I don't think they will be able to convince anyone to use their "platform" unless they do it all themselves.

Seriously, did someone actually say on slack "proof of concept"? Can't stop laughing about that one.

"Personal vision"

And if you go by the roadmap and website you'll end up similair.

But let's continue the search for prove of scam. Why are they still here?

They are still here because they have been able to collect money for doing nothing but failing for over a year now. Where are they going to go?
CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1042


HODL


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 12:57:36 PM
 #2936

they are still around cause they have a group of people that line up to throw BTC at them, regardless of how successful their projects are. All because they are nice. I guess it does pay to be nice.

boki15
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 02:48:06 PM
 #2937

They got aroung 500K, for delivering nothing and live without any legal troubles looks like if they are bunch of genious capitalists. Now it is unknown if you threat them as genious for keeping up on water and not going to dive. They must be really clever not to give again all their coins to someone else, like our biggy friend who left craptsy to join bittrex.

Sure, transparency, they should blame themself in answering some stupid questions which purpose is only to harm their business (or whatever you call it). It is funny to see you, bitcointalk staff and others stealing identities, opening threads with lies, break law in public including forum rules, total transparency by not answering and showing any proof of your broken repeating scambuster tape. According to your usage of this forum, you are loosing your life here, you will recognise it when you get over 40, you will remember me Smiley, thats why I would advice you to get some life, maybe then you will come back less frustrated then you currently are and maybe this would even do some magic to you to prove your words, help them in achieving points that through cooperation not denouncement or leave them at all.

To answer some questions:

1. Why do you think it would be wise decision by the management to come here and have any conversation (no matter which) with people whoes only intention is to harm their business.
2. Many coins entered through bitcointalk, many are scams. You say you are not ION investor but you are fixed on the idea that they are scam. Which clever head of some management would talk to you.
3. Why should they loose their energy/money on users like you, who have only one intention => to harm tham.
4. Other users like me who wished to have normal conversation here to give them chance to come over and explain what "They" think that they want to do, not what "You" think that they want to do. This thread is only for verbal harrasment and damaging ION project.
5. Adam told once that you bunch of trolls are always the same, you will always play supermarket theory because you dont know any other.
6. Go and start showing us transparency, start in this thread with publishing txid's of sources of coins that you used for giveaway, of all, XPY as well as BTC. Until then, you should be silent about any transparency.
7. Go and buy some IONs, then go to their slack and present them your issues. You are so unimportant, as well as your opinion that they even do not read here.
8. Point 7 makes you to Nr.1 promoter of this thread, you and your buddies push it to Nr1 all the time.
9. Point 8 could bring a lot new users to invest, just because it is always in the tops.
10. Through point 10, you do promote ION and you say that they are scam. This means you and your buddies promote scam.
11. Point 10 is already a reason to ban you. There are some other points too Smiley, it would be boring to present you all of them.

Suchmoon, does team ION pay you to make promotion for them, it looks like that and you would be really silly person if you would make it for free. Do they pay you for your bad behaviour here? => bad promotion is promotion too, sometimes even better than good promotion

Just to start the rumor. I heard those are done or almost done. It was said a "bunch of games" were ready after gravity to be released monthly. Possibly some less development-intensive games.

To kill the rumor, it was said, and is my personal vision, that Gravity is a proof of concept, and this project should not be about game development itself.

LOL what?  Grin

Ridiculous backpedaling aside, what is it about then? Are third party games planning to take ION? I don't think they will be able to convince anyone to use their "platform" unless they do it all themselves.

Seriously, did someone actually say on slack "proof of concept"? Can't stop laughing about that one.

"Personal vision"

And if you go by the roadmap and website you'll end up similair.

But let's continue the search for prove of scam. Why are they still here?

Stop giving them ideas!

I don't care much if it's a scam or some other sort of clusterfuck. They created nothing of value in 12+ months for XPY, and the excuse at the end of it all was along the lines of "FUD" that they were denying at the beginning. They created nothing of value in 3+ months for ION and don't appear to have learned anything. You can be very generous and assume mere incompetence, or you can be very mean and assume heinous malevolence - the result is going to be the same.

I'm pretty sure I said the same thing about Garza two years ago, so this is like Hashlets 5.0 or something. Speaking of which, still waiting for Gravity 0.1b.
CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1042


HODL


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 04:06:48 PM
 #2938

I'll ask again. What is the reasoning for not posting all of the addresses? No one can ruin a business or project with blockchain addresses unless something nefarious is going on behind the scenes. It's just a simple copy and paste.

clownius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 26, 2016, 07:03:37 PM
 #2939

Is it just me or do bokis rambling justifications of why the ION devs should not be transparent sounds remarkably similar to GAWs?
korvas128
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 583



View Profile
August 26, 2016, 07:05:21 PM
 #2940

Is it just me or do bokis rambling justifications of why the ION devs should not be transparent sounds remarkably similar to GAWs?


It's you...

Ionomy V3 for Wallets - Masternodes - Trading - Games
https://ionomy.com/en/aff/46cbe5fa1d262e23665191a7c7864072


For the few TROLLS left some inconvenient statements of FACT
https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
Pages: « 1 ... 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 [147] 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 ... 500 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!