Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 06:57:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [UPDATE] RX480 (Ref) 31+Mh, Custom Rom - VDDC OFFSET + Custom timing  (Read 230966 times)
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
September 12, 2016, 06:30:31 PM
 #461

yeah.. well, already changed my post a little bit.. should count to 10 before i reply.. that's that little child in me i guess..

My apologies!

1714244234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714244234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714244234
Reply with quote  #2

1714244234
Report to moderator
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714244234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714244234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714244234
Reply with quote  #2

1714244234
Report to moderator
1714244234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714244234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714244234
Reply with quote  #2

1714244234
Report to moderator
1714244234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714244234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714244234
Reply with quote  #2

1714244234
Report to moderator
Dum3
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 12, 2016, 06:34:04 PM
 #462


Now yes,all 4 do now 30 MH at nicely 77W in GPU-Z.

GPU-Z 77W is bs if you ask me, check a real power consumption.

Agree,real it is probably a lot higher but at least i can see improvement ,i mean i can count the improvement with lowering the volts.

citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
September 12, 2016, 07:03:54 PM
 #463

yeah.. well, already changed my post a little bit.. should count to 10 before i reply.. that's that little child in me i guess..

My apologies!

on another topic...

question:

this crimson 16.9.1 seems to ignore device sigs for modded roms.... so your 480lowenergyOK.rom was a breeze with this driver. Very stable now at 29MHs and watts under 100w per card.

Now.... using the same 16.9.1, do you think I could use your old Nano roms still with the 16.9.1 and achieve 29-30MHs without messing with Afterburner or Wattman?

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
September 12, 2016, 08:57:30 PM
 #464

yeah.. well, already changed my post a little bit.. should count to 10 before i reply.. that's that little child in me i guess..

My apologies!

on another topic...

question:

this crimson 16.9.1 seems to ignore device sigs for modded roms.... so your 480lowenergyOK.rom was a breeze with this driver. Very stable now at 29MHs and watts under 100w per card.

Now.... using the same 16.9.1, do you think I could use your old Nano roms still with the 16.9.1 and achieve 29-30MHs without messing with Afterburner or Wattman?

Hey Citronick,

I have bad experience with the 16.9.1, so i'm staying with 16.8.2 for now.

I should test that, i still have a few nano's left.
And if the drivers are ok, you should be perfectly able to set the rom so you won't need to touch anything.

Greetings

akaloith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 01:39:56 AM
Last edit: September 13, 2016, 02:04:52 AM by akaloith
 #465

I have reference rx480 8gb & win 10 64bit
I flashed it with 480LowEnergyOK.rom using "atiflash -p -f 0 480lowenergyOK.rom" (cmd.exe with Admin rights)
I have latest 16.9.1 to avoid signing etc
I get these:
https://s18.postimg.org/q6k8h148p/2016_09_13_043314.jpg
https://s12.postimg.org/5qufv4el9/2016_09_13_044108.jpg

Temp 80 C ? A bit hot?
gpu-z Watt 85W ?
should i mess with anything or its ok?
ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 02:01:08 AM
 #466

I have reference rx480 8gb & win 10 64bit
I flashed it with 480LowEnergyOK.rom using "atiflash -p -f 0 480lowenergyOK.rom" (cmd.exe with Admin rights)
I have latest 16.9.1 to avoid signing etc
I get these:



Temp 80 C ? A bit hot?
gpu-z Watt 85W ?
should i mess with anything or its ok?

Are these hashrates stable over a couple of hours?
akaloith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 02:05:19 AM
 #467

I have found these:
480LowEnergyOK.rom
RX480-30MhOTBLowEnergy.rom
RX480-31.8HighPower.rom
RX480Mod.rom

Am i using the correct one for low power 480LowEnergyOK.rom? Can you tell me hashrate & gpu-z watt of the other?
From my measurements 480LowEnergyOK.rom should be called 480_29mhash_85watt.rom
I have not yet tested for hours so is this the correct rom for low power?
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 02:53:36 AM
 #468

I have reference rx480 8gb & win 10 64bit
I flashed it with 480LowEnergyOK.rom using "atiflash -p -f 0 480lowenergyOK.rom" (cmd.exe with Admin rights)
I have latest 16.9.1 to avoid signing etc
I get these:



Temp 80 C ? A bit hot?
gpu-z Watt 85W ?
should i mess with anything or its ok?

Are these hashrates stable over a couple of hours?

using 480LowEnergyOK.rom with 16.9.1 and CDM 7.0 mining at ethpool.org, running approx 2 days now - very stable holding 29MHs per GPU.

This 16.9.1 seems to be the life saver....

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 02:55:55 AM
 #469

yeah.. well, already changed my post a little bit.. should count to 10 before i reply.. that's that little child in me i guess..

My apologies!

on another topic...

question:

this crimson 16.9.1 seems to ignore device sigs for modded roms.... so your 480lowenergyOK.rom was a breeze with this driver. Very stable now at 29MHs and watts under 100w per card.

Now.... using the same 16.9.1, do you think I could use your old Nano roms still with the 16.9.1 and achieve 29-30MHs without messing with Afterburner or Wattman?

Hey Citronick,

I have bad experience with the 16.9.1, so i'm staying with 16.8.2 for now.

I should test that, i still have a few nano's left.
And if the drivers are ok, you should be perfectly able to set the rom so you won't need to touch anything.

Greetings

super!

The 16.9.1 is good for me on the 480s.

I hope I can get the Nano finally fully running all cylinders under 100w like 480s.

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 02:58:02 AM
 #470

using 480LowEnergyOK.rom with 16.9.1 and CDM 7.0 mining at ethpool.org, running approx 2 days now - very stable holding 29MHs per GPU.

This 16.9.1 seems to be the life saver....

Your cards (I think you have Sapphires) held it well even with previous drivers. I'm trying to understand what causes the drop in hashrate of my XFX.

This is why I asked akaloith about stability of hashing

akaloith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 03:04:08 AM
 #471

Temp 80 C ? A bit hot?
gpu-z Watt 85W ?
should i mess with fan or anything or its ok?
gold368
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 03:10:43 AM
 #472

30.3m gpu 60w
ps_jb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 03:16:10 AM
 #473

30.3m gpu 60w

What are your cards brand? Drivers? What is the ROM?
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 03:20:09 AM
 #474

using 480LowEnergyOK.rom with 16.9.1 and CDM 7.0 mining at ethpool.org, running approx 2 days now - very stable holding 29MHs per GPU.

This 16.9.1 seems to be the life saver....

Your cards (I think you have Sapphires) held it well even with previous drivers. I'm trying to understand what causes the drop in hashrate of my XFX.

This is why I asked akaloith about stability of hashing



Yes, I use Sapphires. It could be brand related but I doubt it since its reference version - all brands should use the same supply from AMD.

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
gold368
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 03:21:25 AM
 #475

30.3m gpu 60w

What are your cards brand? Drivers? What is the ROM?
HIS custom 2 fan, rom mod do it yourself
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2016, 04:40:31 AM
 #476


Got to love those unclear images, accidently leaving out the vddc part as well as the clocks..
Mining to Localhost "127.0.0.1"..

 Roll Eyes


melsell1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 05:10:12 AM
 #477

i get 29,7mhs eth and 327mhs sia, gpu-z showing 96w. -dcri 22. sapphire rx 480 nitro+ OC. with new drivers 16.9.1 you can adjust power limit in MSI AB... using win10..
claymore dualminer 6.4
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2016, 05:28:14 AM
 #478

i get 29,7mhs eth and 327mhs sia, gpu-z showing 96w. -dcri 22. sapphire rx 480 nitro+ OC. with new drivers 16.9.1 you can adjust power limit in MSI AB... using win10..
claymore dualminer 6.4

Mm, i tried them, from the moment i started mining with my lowered rom that i'm using now the system froze, even after i raised the voltage a bit it still froze, only after raising it with almost 62mV it stayed stable.. so i quickly reverted back to 16.8.

Although, have to say, i tested on a win7 machine, i'm not sure, but it could be so that on win10 those drivers perform better. I'll definitely need to check that out!

Thx!

Masked_Immortal
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 13, 2016, 05:35:21 AM
 #479

Thanks again Heliox
now i am using your low power rom, i replaced main parameters in my original roms with your settings and left other (like subvendor ID and .. ) unchanged also i left memory at 8 gb.
now my cards (3 asus and 3 gigabyte) hash around 30.5,  work around 70-80 C at 65% fan speed , gpuz shows between 90-100 watt.
other parts
asrock h81 btc
16 gb ram
g 3220
1200 oc power

whole system drawn out 1150 at wall , i think i have should missed something because other report better power consumption.
also wattman doesn't accept changes for power limit and or core freq.

I appropriate any help

SCAVO  Technologies
SELF-SUSTAINING CRYPTO MINING FARM  BY USING RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES - LIFETIME CONTRACT
────────  Whitepaper ⬝  Twitter ⬝  Telegram ⬝   Facebook ⬝  Ann Thread     ───────  Join our ICO:  July. 15- Oct. 31
Eliovp (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2016, 09:00:11 AM
 #480

Thanks again Heliox
now i am using your low power rom, i replaced main parameters in my original roms with your settings and left other (like subvendor ID and .. ) unchanged also i left memory at 8 gb.
now my cards (3 asus and 3 gigabyte) hash around 30.5,  work around 70-80 C at 65% fan speed , gpuz shows between 90-100 watt.
other parts
asrock h81 btc
16 gb ram
g 3220
1200 oc power

whole system drawn out 1150 at wall , i think i have should missed something because other report better power consumption.
also wattman doesn't accept changes for power limit and or core freq.

I appropriate any help

Sure thing and you're very welcome.

Try latest drivers, heard that they aren't that bad when on Windows 10 (i cannot confirm this "yet" though..)

Greetings

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!