Bitcoin Forum
November 02, 2024, 11:04:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware  (Read 423268 times)
dmcdad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 302
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 01:24:52 AM
 #2281

I agree that SB needs to analyze all this and come up with a plan. Let's hope he does so as fast as possible though, both because of the Weds deadline and because it sounds like Yifu has started actually refunding already (SamGriffin). I'd prefer that we are near the front of the refund line given historically plays out with delays.
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 01:51:04 AM
 #2282

I agree that SB needs to analyze all this and come up with a plan. Let's hope he does so as fast as possible though, both because of the Weds deadline and because it sounds like Yifu has started actually refunding already (SamGriffin). I'd prefer that we are near the front of the refund line given historically plays out with delays.

SamGriffin confirmed that he received a refund on their 10k order.

We need to act fast before Yifu changes his mind.

Yifu is accepting refunds for batches up to 22 of June.

Edit: wrong month.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
markm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1121



View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 01:53:38 AM
 #2283

If it is true that chips will be available for shipping on wednesday, maybe the more batches people ask for refunds on the more chance there is that our batches will be able to be shipped on wednesday due to fewer and fewer batches actually ending up wanting to be shipped...

-MarkM-

Browser-launched Crossfire client now online (select CrossCiv server for Galactic  Milieu)
Free website hosting with PHP, MySQL etc: http://hosting.knotwork.com/
ScaryHash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 529
Merit: 501


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 01:59:44 AM
 #2284

If it is true that chips will be available for shipping on wednesday, maybe the more batches people ask for refunds on the more chance there is that our batches will be able to be shipped on wednesday due to fewer and fewer batches actually ending up wanting to be shipped...

-MarkM-


Good point.

Also, BTC is now roughly $143 ask price on gox, that ROI is looking better every day....

dmcdad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 302
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:14:15 AM
 #2285

SebastianJu has also now received refunds on 2 batches.
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:15:25 AM
 #2286

I've sent an email to SB just in case he is not monitoring the forum.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
alfabitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:20:13 AM
 #2287

If it is true that chips will be available for shipping on wednesday, maybe the more batches people ask for refunds on the more chance there is that our batches will be able to be shipped on wednesday due to fewer and fewer batches actually ending up wanting to be shipped...

-MarkM-


Good point.

Also, BTC is now roughly $143 ask price on gox, that ROI is looking better every day....


Roi is viable only in btc, otherwise we could buy btc and hold them.

Steve need to offer asambly refund, pcb and part can be kept and siping cost also should be refundable. We have paid two month ago to reserve parts, but other unspend charges should be refunded. That is lsd responsibility.
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 255



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:23:45 AM
 #2288

While I am not a member of a group buy of chips (I was an Avalon Batch 3 purchaser who opted for a refund), it still looks like the avalon chips are the best asic chip deal available (GH/BTC).

I don't know if BFL has delivered yet, but Bitfury chips are 2.5GH/1BTC (since they are pricing in 1 chip per btc).
Avalon chips are .3GH/.078BTC = 3.8GH/BTC (about 50% more performance than the bitfury chips).

Personally I love the bitfury chips and their customer service, but the numbers don't lie.  If Bitsyncom can actually ship out batches on Wednesday, it still be the best "available" option out there (if you can hold your nose long enough to wait for them to arrive).
alfabitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:34:05 AM
 #2289

While I am not a member of a group buy of chips (I was an Avalon Batch 3 purchaser who opted for a refund), it still looks like the avalon chips are the best asic chip deal available (GH/BTC).

I don't know if BFL has delivered yet, but Bitfury chips are 2.5GH/1BTC (since they are pricing in 1 chip per btc).
Avalon chips are .3GH/.078BTC = 3.8GH/BTC (about 50% more performance than the bitfury chips).

Personally I love the bitfury chips and their customer service, but the numbers don't lie.  If Bitsyncom can actually ship out batches on Wednesday, it still be the best "available" option out there (if you can hold your nose long enough to wait for them to arrive).

That is true but bitfury buyers for august delivery did not paid so much. And chip is only half of overall miner cost.
Thy paid starter kit for 1300 usd 16 chip h board, m board and rabs pi. Instead of 25gns they got 40 ghs
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 255



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:37:10 AM
 #2290

True... but if you want to buy a bitfury chip today... it will cost around 1 BTC (re-evaluated weekly... currently significantly lower than 1 BTC at $108, but the idea is to float to BTC value).  The big advantage to bitfury chips is you can buy just 1 if you wanted rather than train car full of avalon chips.
cardcomm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:40:14 AM
 #2291

I've sent an email to SB just in case he is not monitoring the forum.

Great, thanks.

The refunds seem to be very time sensitive. Hopefully Steamboat will have some ideas for us soon...

Easily see your cgminer status with my cgminerLCDStats app:  http://cardcomm.github.io/cgminerLCDStats/
Did my post help you or make you laugh? Let me know with Bitcoins at: 1CQfpMHQ5zVuZ5i9uxSHSSx4J8ZhehSjn3  Smiley
Xian01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067


Christian Antkow


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 04:09:15 AM
 #2292

FWIW, still looking forward to taking delivery of my 288 chips + assembly from Batch 5 when they are ready to ship out.
cp1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


Stop using branwallets


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 04:18:52 AM
 #2293

In his latest post Yifu said that he was working with some buyers on compensation that was other than a refund.  Perhaps we can get a % rebate off our chips.

Guide to armory offline install on USB key:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241730.0
cardcomm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 05:08:27 AM
Last edit: September 01, 2013, 05:09:52 PM by cardcomm
 #2294

Has anyone here considered the idea that refunds for batches before the cutoff date are NOT "optional"? Remember, Yofui hasn't explicitly said he WILL ship earlier batches if refunds aren't requested.

Think about it. He's offering refunds for those orders he missed delivery on. But he's NOT refunding later orders, because he thinks he can fill them. He may well have been advised by legal counsel that this is his best course of action - to refund orders he's missed, and ship the orders he can produce on time.

The problem is if he fills earlier orders that don't want refunds, then he risks pushing later orders into "past due" status. BitSynCom has been anything but predictable, but I doubt they will fill earlier "refund eligible" orders before filling the orders they can still manage to deliver on time. It seems like they are FINALLY in risk management mode, and I'm betting their focus is going to be on filling the later batches. They may well wait to ship "refund eligible" orders till the chips are plentiful, thinking "Hey, we offered them a refund…"

Just thinking out loud here… as we have seen, anything is possible.

Edit: spelling/grammar

Easily see your cgminer status with my cgminerLCDStats app:  http://cardcomm.github.io/cgminerLCDStats/
Did my post help you or make you laugh? Let me know with Bitcoins at: 1CQfpMHQ5zVuZ5i9uxSHSSx4J8ZhehSjn3  Smiley
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 05:49:20 AM
 #2295

Someone earlier asked what would happen if a later batch order would arrive before the early batches and it was argued that the assembly should happen in the order regardless of what batch number was delivered.

With the latest developments I believe that there is a likely possibility of a later batch arriving before the early ones,  and it would be good to know what would happen in that case. Especially now when there is an offer for a refund for the early batches with a possibility of them not being delivered.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
ik2013
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 06:23:01 AM
 #2296

FWIW still in for my 32 assembled chips in B3. It's academic at this point...I want to support Bkk by running his hardware in the wild. Still excited for this project even after all the noise

Single board ATX power supply interface for Raspberry Pi: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263567.msg2815917#msg2815917    Like my work? Donations accepted here: 1FXYreNr35PzZVimEQkSzR68EdNutqefYh   I sell on Tindie: https://www.tindie.com/stores/KD8SSF/     Reputation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264089.0
alfabitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 12:08:34 PM
 #2297

I wojld like to know about board preforrmance and overlocking. Burnin bitburner can run at 450 mhz, 9hhs for 20 avalon board, that is awesome result. I think that bkk has run 4 chip populated board at 370mhz with low hw errors.

Steve need to update us the same way sebastianju and zefir with their gb buyers.
If anybody want to have my 5 k16 pm so we can arrange something. At this point i would be happy with 1200$ paid in btc.
Iam in eu so shipping and 25% vat what i need to pay when order arrive in my country pose additional expense what i think is not worth.
Bicknellski
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 12:14:15 PM
 #2298


As anyone here considered the idea that refunds for batches before the cutoff date are NOT "optional"? Remember, Yofui hasn't explicitly said he WILL ship earlier batches if refunds aren't requested.

Think about it. He's offering refunds for those orders he missed delivery on. But he's NOT refunding later orders, because he thinks he can fill them. He may well have been advised by legal counsel that this is his best course of action - to refund orders he's missed, and ship the orders he can produce on time.

The problem is if he fills earlier orders that don't want refunds, then he risks pushing later orders into "past due" status. BitSynCom has been anything but predictable, but I doubt they will fill earlier "refund eligible" orders before filling the orders they can still manage to deliver on time. It seems like they are FINALLY in risk management mode, and I'm betting their focus is going to be on filling the later batches. They may well wait to ship "refund eligible" orders till the chips are plentiful, thinking "Hey, we offered them a refund…"

Just thinking out loud here… as we have seen, anything is possible.


Unfortunately we are often left to guess for our specific situations, would it not be better to have direct communications? Whatever happened to emailing people individually about their orders especially when they cost 80K.

Dogie trust abuse, spam, bullying, conspiracy posts & insults to forum members. Ask the mods or admins to move Dogie's spam or off topic stalking posts to the link above.
mastahofdesastah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 12:44:08 PM
 #2299

I want a refund if its possible. I am in with 320 chips in batch 5, without assembly.

If someone Wanna have it plz pm.
Lollaskates
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 03:33:56 PM
Last edit: September 01, 2013, 03:52:31 PM by Lollaskates
 #2300

Im at an impasse personally. I could pay the extra ~$500 and get the heatsink / fans for my klondikes and stick with assembly in batch #4, OR I can try to get a refund for my 256 chips, refund assembly that didn't happen (which isn't confirmed, but best business practice), and eat the cost of the BOM materials. Im not sure which would leave me with more money. Time to math.

EDIT: We need compensation, discount on the chips, partial refund, whatever if this is going to even remotely be better than a full refund. I've chosen full chip refund pending confirmation of refund of assembly cost (not parts).
Pages: « 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!