Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 02:01:23 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 [725] 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3926321 times)
eoakland
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


★☆★Bitin.io★☆★


View Profile
January 26, 2014, 07:57:52 PM
 #14481

Hi guys, just quick question for people who do have some of those new 200+gh avalon units. I am not sure if I do have miner count set correctly it is at 16 right now. Second thing I do not know what HW means, number is sometimes equal, or higher, but mostly at one third of accepted number.



I don't know the miner count for these (check mining support threads, and https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon#Cgminer_status_page), however  HW should be the hardware error count.  A small percentage (say less than 5%) is probably ok, but if it is high than too many of your shares are not effective and you need to find out why (power supply issues? cooling? settings?).


It got even worse as I presume that HW count is what I am losing right now.
Can someone have look at this and tell me what may be wrong I noticed different temperature on both modules... I really do not know what can I change in settings.
I have set it to balance so it mined on both pools I set.
This is new 200Gh unit with 2 modules and 160 chips.




try a power cycle.  sometimes it's as simple as powering off, let the chips cool, and then reinitialize.  what type of PSU are you using to power your device ?  do you have proper cooling ?  did you overclock it ? 

1480773683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773683
Reply with quote  #2

1480773683
Report to moderator
1480773683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773683
Reply with quote  #2

1480773683
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480773683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773683
Reply with quote  #2

1480773683
Report to moderator
1480773683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773683
Reply with quote  #2

1480773683
Report to moderator
J_Dubbs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
January 26, 2014, 08:09:46 PM
 #14482

Hi guys, just quick question for people who do have some of those new 200+gh avalon units. I am not sure if I do have miner count set correctly it is at 16 right now. Second thing I do not know what HW means, number is sometimes equal, or higher, but mostly at one third of accepted number.



I don't know the miner count for these (check mining support threads, and https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon#Cgminer_status_page), however  HW should be the hardware error count.  A small percentage (say less than 5%) is probably ok, but if it is high than too many of your shares are not effective and you need to find out why (power supply issues? cooling? settings?).


It got even worse as I presume that HW count is what I am losing right now.
Can someone have look at this and tell me what may be wrong I noticed different temperature on both modules... I really do not know what can I change in settings.
I have set it to balance so it mined on both pools I set.
This is new 200Gh unit with 2 modules and 160 chips.




try a power cycle.  sometimes it's as simple as powering off, let the chips cool, and then reinitialize.  what type of PSU are you using to power your device ?  do you have proper cooling ?  did you overclock it ? 

Oh, and for the heck of it... turn off any cell phones or tablets. Don't know about this miner but with the blades there's a conflict with Android devices using WiFi. Certainly can't hurt to turn off anything non-essential.

"a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"
Learn something new?: 1hzpjSkWaxm7XaEMi5P2fL6hhxuj8gxyX
tom99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


View Profile
January 26, 2014, 08:35:40 PM
 #14483

why the reward is so low here : http://imgur.com/BIf0fw6

   I had problem too with hashrate dropped and I need to restart miners h/w but its happened this week.
Mentalfloss
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 01:24:40 AM
 #14484


Terribly expensive...
Typical "looking for the greater fool" sale (approx. less than 60% ROI)...

I think by now it's safe to say it's impossible not to get a "greater fool" sale on EBay, as well as any shipping-ready low-end/medium-end hardware from a manufacturer. The only people making money there are the resellers.
Nothing on the market (ready-to-ship) seems to be even remotely able to ROI.
Everything else (high-priced pre-order gear) is the usual gamble.

IMHO if you have 900 quid to spend, buy BTC directly at a price you deem attractive.

I agree. During the gold rush those making the most money were those selling the tools. With difficulty shooting for the moon the 10 GH/s blades I'm running will be obsolete soon. Anyone paying more than $10 a G/Hs is sure to loose money.
Icebjerg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 01:49:45 AM
 #14485

I've bee watching my shares according to the stats page.
I was wondering why my miner keeps switching from block to block?
Sometimes the miner stay's with a block for hours and sometimes it's just minutes even though there are still confirmations left.
Would someone be able to explain?
I was under the understanding the longer you stay the better the payout?

All times are in UTC.
#          Block found at                  Duration   Total shares     Your shares   Your BTC reward Block #   Block value   Validity
21551    2014-01-27 01:17:54    0:56:44    633018888    41600    0.00169053    282635    25.14774250    98 confirmations left
21550    2014-01-27 00:21:10    4:14:43    2821235576    190874    0.00156324    282631    25.02511907    94 confirmations left
21549    2014-01-26 20:06:27    1:19:21    877146598    62015    0.00194748    282605    25.19078729    68 confirmations left
21548    2014-01-26 18:47:06    0:02:01    21876094            1320    0.00146207    282598    25.02195614    61 confirmations left
21547    2014-01-26 18:45:05    4:09:16    2712493846    189101    0.00167564    282597    25.09475048    60 confirmations left
21546    2014-01-26 14:35:49    3:27:45    2220629949    159487    0.00166515    282567    25.04965451    30 confirmations left
21545    2014-01-26 11:08:04    0:40:34    452879502    28531    0.00134326    282539    25.05338644    2 confirmations left
21544    2014-01-26 10:27:30    8:33:05    5735546676    398514    0.00190518    282534    25.00764282    confirmed
21543    2014-01-26 01:54:25    7:49:54    5122146689    364080    0.00176006    282487    25.05767828    confirmed
21542    2014-01-25 18:04:31    2:12:40    1402241422    100815    0.00155369    282429    25.09640344    confirmed
21541    2014-01-25 15:51:51    3:44:41    2363550548    173571    0.00165219    282416    25.10645252    confirmed
21540    2014-01-25 12:07:10    0:54:55    591558361    41783    0.00186171    282388    25.05837209    confirmed

Thanks,
J_Dubbs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 02:30:24 AM
 #14486


Terribly expensive...
Typical "looking for the greater fool" sale (approx. less than 60% ROI)...

I think by now it's safe to say it's impossible not to get a "greater fool" sale on EBay, as well as any shipping-ready low-end/medium-end hardware from a manufacturer. The only people making money there are the resellers.
Nothing on the market (ready-to-ship) seems to be even remotely able to ROI.
Everything else (high-priced pre-order gear) is the usual gamble.

IMHO if you have 900 quid to spend, buy BTC directly at a price you deem attractive.

I agree. During the gold rush those making the most money were those selling the tools. With difficulty shooting for the moon the 10 GH/s blades I'm running will be obsolete soon. Anyone paying more than $10 a G/Hs is sure to loose money.

You know this thinking is fundamentally flawed, right? "Anyone paying more than $10 a g/his is sure to lose money". Under-schooled message forum economists have been saying that for months now, but the truth is nobody knows the future value of BTC, which if trending upwards blows your entire theory out of the water. Buying in BTC is one thing, and mining versus trading carry opportunity costs as any decision does, but you put it in terms of dollar returns and it's entirely based on a future value unknown. The misinformation is so widespread here I know it's pointless to try to enlighten folks, but if BTC goes up in value a lot of people will find themselves wearing The Emporer's New Clothes, hope you like the fit.

"a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"
Learn something new?: 1hzpjSkWaxm7XaEMi5P2fL6hhxuj8gxyX
kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475



View Profile WWW
January 27, 2014, 05:35:08 AM
 #14487

I've bee watching my shares according to the stats page.
I was wondering why my miner keeps switching from block to block?
Sometimes the miner stay's with a block for hours and sometimes it's just minutes even though there are still confirmations left.
Would someone be able to explain?
I was under the understanding the longer you stay the better the payout?

All times are in UTC.
#          Block found at                  Duration   Total shares     Your shares   Your BTC reward Block #   Block value   Validity
21551    2014-01-27 01:17:54    0:56:44    633018888    41600    0.00169053    282635    25.14774250    98 confirmations left
21550    2014-01-27 00:21:10    4:14:43    2821235576    190874    0.00156324    282631    25.02511907    94 confirmations left
21549    2014-01-26 20:06:27    1:19:21    877146598    62015    0.00194748    282605    25.19078729    68 confirmations left
21548    2014-01-26 18:47:06    0:02:01    21876094            1320    0.00146207    282598    25.02195614    61 confirmations left
21547    2014-01-26 18:45:05    4:09:16    2712493846    189101    0.00167564    282597    25.09475048    60 confirmations left
21546    2014-01-26 14:35:49    3:27:45    2220629949    159487    0.00166515    282567    25.04965451    30 confirmations left
21545    2014-01-26 11:08:04    0:40:34    452879502    28531    0.00134326    282539    25.05338644    2 confirmations left
21544    2014-01-26 10:27:30    8:33:05    5735546676    398514    0.00190518    282534    25.00764282    confirmed
21543    2014-01-26 01:54:25    7:49:54    5122146689    364080    0.00176006    282487    25.05767828    confirmed
21542    2014-01-25 18:04:31    2:12:40    1402241422    100815    0.00155369    282429    25.09640344    confirmed
21541    2014-01-25 15:51:51    3:44:41    2363550548    173571    0.00165219    282416    25.10645252    confirmed
21540    2014-01-25 12:07:10    0:54:55    591558361    41783    0.00186171    282388    25.05837209    confirmed

Thanks,



  you poor n00b, I suggest you do a little reading on bitcoin mining

your stats look like everything is running normal

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
styggson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 06:19:46 AM
 #14488

I've bee watching my shares according to the stats page.
I was wondering why my miner keeps switching from block to block?
Sometimes the miner stay's with a block for hours and sometimes it's just minutes even though there are still confirmations left.
Would someone be able to explain?
I was under the understanding the longer you stay the better the payout?

All times are in UTC.
#          Block found at                  Duration   Total shares     Your shares   Your BTC reward Block #   Block value   Validity
21551    2014-01-27 01:17:54    0:56:44    633018888    41600    0.00169053    282635    25.14774250    98 confirmations left
21550    2014-01-27 00:21:10    4:14:43    2821235576    190874    0.00156324    282631    25.02511907    94 confirmations left
21549    2014-01-26 20:06:27    1:19:21    877146598    62015    0.00194748    282605    25.19078729    68 confirmations left
21548    2014-01-26 18:47:06    0:02:01    21876094            1320    0.00146207    282598    25.02195614    61 confirmations left
21547    2014-01-26 18:45:05    4:09:16    2712493846    189101    0.00167564    282597    25.09475048    60 confirmations left
21546    2014-01-26 14:35:49    3:27:45    2220629949    159487    0.00166515    282567    25.04965451    30 confirmations left
21545    2014-01-26 11:08:04    0:40:34    452879502    28531    0.00134326    282539    25.05338644    2 confirmations left
21544    2014-01-26 10:27:30    8:33:05    5735546676    398514    0.00190518    282534    25.00764282    confirmed
21543    2014-01-26 01:54:25    7:49:54    5122146689    364080    0.00176006    282487    25.05767828    confirmed
21542    2014-01-25 18:04:31    2:12:40    1402241422    100815    0.00155369    282429    25.09640344    confirmed
21541    2014-01-25 15:51:51    3:44:41    2363550548    173571    0.00165219    282416    25.10645252    confirmed
21540    2014-01-25 12:07:10    0:54:55    591558361    41783    0.00186171    282388    25.05837209    confirmed

Thanks,


When a block is found, why continue looking for it? Thats why your miner "keeps switching from block to block"
Dont worry about the confirmations, that number will decline as new blocks are found by the network.

Longer runs doesn't give you better payout per hour, as you can see above. (shorter is better) but on Slush's pool you are "punished" if you don´t finish the round (pool hopping)

Excuse my poor english and i hope i make some sense
easypcrepair
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 08:54:30 AM
 #14489

where i can buy internet controller for block eruptor blade ?
Sir Alan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 09:57:10 AM
 #14490

I've bee watching my shares according to the stats page.
I was wondering why my miner keeps switching from block to block?
...
#          Block found at                  Duration   Total shares     Your shares   Your BTC reward Block #   Block value   Validity
21551    2014-01-27 01:17:54    0:56:44    633018888    41600    0.00169053    282635    25.14774250    98 confirmations left
21550    2014-01-27 00:21:10    4:14:43    2821235576    190874    0.00156324    282631    25.02511907    94 confirmations left
21549    2014-01-26 20:06:27    1:19:21    877146598    62015    0.00194748    282605    25.19078729    68 confirmations left
...
Your miner is trying to solve a block.  Every other miner is also trying to solve the same block.  When somebody succeeds (which can take anything from a few seconds to half an hour or more, but is on average every ten minutes) they are credited with finding that block, and everybody starts to work on the next.  Miners who are members of a pool such as bitcoin.cz each send partial results (shares) to the pool, and if a pool member happens to solve the block, then all pool members receive a proportion of the value of the block according to how much effort they contributed, and when.

If, however, the block was solved by somebody who was not a member of that pool, then nobody in the pool gets anything for it.

You will notice that the first column in your stats shows an incrementing number under the heading # : this is the round number, and counts the number of blocks the pool has solved.  The round is the interval between blocks solved by the pool, and the time in the Duration column is the length of that round.  Further along is Block # : this is the actual number of the block which was solved by a pool member; note that they are not usually consecutive, because the blocks in between were solved by somebody else.  In your stats, round 21550 ended when block 282631 was solved.  The next round, 21551, ended when block 282635 was solved some 56 minutes later.  The intervening blocks 282632-282634 were solved by miners who were not part of this pool. 

In the short term, you can expect your BTC reward to be roughly the same for each round, no matter how long it lasts, because however many shares were actually credited, your proportion of the total effort will be similar.  In the long term it will slowly decrease as more miners join the pool and your contribution gets diluted.


1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc

1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
twindragon6
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 06:29:35 PM
 #14491

Is it just me or is the hash rate from the server way down? Is this due to the DDOS and move to Amazon's EC2? It's about 25% slower than it should be. Is this being addressed? Also the latency is really high. I'm using Bfgminer. Are there any tweaks I should be making to the command line like a higher or lower queue length that will help? I'm already using these switches --no-submit-stale and the --queue (or -Q) is 1 by default.
 Huh
philipk999
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 06:34:35 PM
 #14492

Is it just me or is the hash rate from the server way down? Is this due to the DDOS and move to Amazon's EC2? It's about 25% slower than it should be. Is this being addressed? Also the latency is really high. I'm using Bfgminer. Are there any tweaks I should be making to the command line like a higher or lower queue length that will help? I'm already using these switches --no-submit-stale and the --queue (or -Q) is 1 by default.
 Huh
Don't know if it's a similar problem, but I had a network restart here recently and the usual block difficulty I get is 50-60, but now 3-15 and not all the ASICs in my cubes are even active - I suspect the server is allocating work too slowly - I'll try a ticket to the pool.
Icebjerg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 06:47:46 PM
 #14493

Thank you for your replies,
I understand the stat info now much better than before.
I appreciate the explanation in detail.
I do read quite a bit, but this fourm gets so many posts to read everything or even try to skip the spam.
twindragon6
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 07:46:40 PM
 #14494

Is it just me or is the hash rate from the server way down? Is this due to the DDOS and move to Amazon's EC2? It's about 25% slower than it should be. Is this being addressed? Also the latency is really high. I'm using Bfgminer. Are there any tweaks I should be making to the command line like a higher or lower queue length that will help? I'm already using these switches --no-submit-stale and the --queue (or -Q) is 1 by default.
 Huh
Don't know if it's a similar problem, but I had a network restart here recently and the usual block difficulty I get is 50-60, but now 3-15 and not all the ASICs in my cubes are even active - I suspect the server is allocating work too slowly - I'll try a ticket to the pool.

I have filed a ticket as well. It looks like the problem is that the Amazon EC2 server itself is located in Tokyo, Japan. This would explain a lot. I'm loosing hashes to horrible, horrible latency. Any word on a US deployed Amazon EC2 server? I'd hate to have to switch pools because of lag...
Sir Alan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 08:40:24 PM
 #14495

I'm in the UK, and everything looks normal on my setup.  If anything, my hashrate is marginally higher than usual for this time of the evening (20h40).  It usually slows down significantly from around 17h00 when all the children get home from school and their online activity gobbles up the ISP's bandwidth.

1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
philipk999
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 10:38:54 PM
 #14496

Is it just me or is the hash rate from the server way down? Is this due to the DDOS and move to Amazon's EC2? It's about 25% slower than it should be. Is this being addressed? Also the latency is really high. I'm using Bfgminer. Are there any tweaks I should be making to the command line like a higher or lower queue length that will help? I'm already using these switches --no-submit-stale and the --queue (or -Q) is 1 by default.
 Huh
Don't know if it's a similar problem, but I had a network restart here recently and the usual block difficulty I get is 50-60, but now 3-15 and not all the ASICs in my cubes are even active - I suspect the server is allocating work too slowly - I'll try a ticket to the pool.

I have filed a ticket as well. It looks like the problem is that the Amazon EC2 server itself is located in Tokyo, Japan. This would explain a lot. I'm loosing hashes to horrible, horrible latency. Any word on a US deployed Amazon EC2 server? I'd hate to have to switch pools because of lag...
Rebooted proxy machine & restarted proxy and magically back on track could have been a windows update problem - was very slow to reboot machine after updates applied.
Sonya
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
January 28, 2014, 01:09:12 AM
 #14497

Ok, so I just ordered a few block erupters, and plan on adding more. But I was wondering if anyone has suggestions for the best mining software/client to pair with these? I'm currently using GUIMiner, with 2 gpus, will GUIMiner work with the erupters?
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
January 28, 2014, 05:30:49 AM
 #14498

Ok, so I just ordered a few block erupters, and plan on adding more. But I was wondering if anyone has suggestions for the best mining software/client to pair with these? I'm currently using GUIMiner, with 2 gpus, will GUIMiner work with the erupters?
You'll probably do better with bfgminer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=168174.0 or cgminerhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.0. Using bfgminer 3.10 now with BE's.

Cheers
aurel57
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050



View Profile
January 28, 2014, 11:52:06 AM
 #14499

Ok, so I just ordered a few block erupters, and plan on adding more. But I was wondering if anyone has suggestions for the best mining software/client to pair with these? I'm currently using GUIMiner, with 2 gpus, will GUIMiner work with the erupters?
You'll probably do better with bfgminer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=168174.0 or cgminerhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.0. Using bfgminer 3.10 now with BE's.

Cheers
I had 70 erupters running and used bfgminer and it worked great. If your interested click on the blog link on my signature and you will see my old setup. I have since sold all the BE on EBay and just run 2 BFL 60 GH singles.
Mentalfloss
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43


View Profile
January 29, 2014, 02:04:29 AM
 #14500


Terribly expensive...
Typical "looking for the greater fool" sale (approx. less than 60% ROI)...

I think by now it's safe to say it's impossible not to get a "greater fool" sale on EBay, as well as any shipping-ready low-end/medium-end hardware from a manufacturer. The only people making money there are the resellers.
Nothing on the market (ready-to-ship) seems to be even remotely able to ROI.
Everything else (high-priced pre-order gear) is the usual gamble.

IMHO if you have 900 quid to spend, buy BTC directly at a price you deem attractive.

I agree. During the gold rush those making the most money were those selling the tools. With difficulty shooting for the moon the 10 GH/s blades I'm running will be obsolete soon. Anyone paying more than $10 a G/Hs is sure to loose money.

You know this thinking is fundamentally flawed, right? "Anyone paying more than $10 a g/his is sure to lose money". Under-schooled message forum economists have been saying that for months now, but the truth is nobody knows the future value of BTC, which if trending upwards blows your entire theory out of the water. Buying in BTC is one thing, and mining versus trading carry opportunity costs as any decision does, but you put it in terms of dollar returns and it's entirely based on a future value unknown. The misinformation is so widespread here I know it's pointless to try to enlighten folks, but if BTC goes up in value a lot of people will find themselves wearing The Emporer's New Clothes, hope you like the fit.

I'll concede that you may be correct. But only as far as wishing for a miracle. Even if BTC starts trading at $10,000 there is so much hashing power being added any ASIC we can buy will never reach ROI. Do you think the >20% increase in difficulty every 2k blocks is from people buying ASIC's on eBay? There are one or more entities out there pumping up some serious data centers full of ASICs. My theory is it is the outfit that was selling the ASICMiner Erupter Blades and Cubes. I can't remember who that was, one name leading the group was Friedkat or something, supposedly they started selling these units because they reached 30% of hashing power and for the health of the network stopped building and sold units instead. Supposedly they stopped selling them now because they "are working on a new model" Yeah, right, stop selling a profitable unit...my arse. GHash.IO exploded on the scene, so these guys stopped selling chips and resumed building. The two of them and probably others are in an arms race for the most coin, squashing us with these rises in difficulty, whatever the cause is I am far from being fundamentally flawed.
Pages: « 1 ... 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 [725] 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!