Bitcoin Forum
July 17, 2018, 02:36:14 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3235 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 415 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 4019

Pages: « 1 ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 ... 1144 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4328403 times)
Sargasm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 02:38:34 PM
 #4321

Can anyone explain this?

.worker3   xxxxxx   0   232   14562.1340   2011-11-02 14:34:19    on   Edit | 
.worker4   xxxxxx   0   53   10157.6513   2011-11-02 14:34:28    on   Edit | 
.worker5   xxxxxx   0   65   23615.0395   2011-11-02 14:34:28    on   Edit | 
.worker6   xxxxxx   0   88   30060.8852   2011-11-02 14:34:32    on   Edit | 

One of my workers has finished 3 times the work of another and yet has half the score.  It generally has lower latency (only a single gpu on a quad core processor vs. 4 gpus on a quad core hyperthreaded processor).  I do not understand why the score is so abysmal in comparison.
1531838174
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531838174

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531838174
Reply with quote  #2

1531838174
Report to moderator
The World's Betting Exchange

Bet with play money. Win real Bitcoin. 5BTC Prize Fund for World Cup 2018.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1531838174
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531838174

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531838174
Reply with quote  #2

1531838174
Report to moderator
1531838174
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531838174

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531838174
Reply with quote  #2

1531838174
Report to moderator
1531838174
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531838174

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531838174
Reply with quote  #2

1531838174
Report to moderator
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 02:41:49 PM
 #4322

Sargasm: Didn't they lock up during pool outage for some time? It happen sometimes on my miners. However i'm pretty sure they were affected by recent pool instability, which should be OK now.

Btw calculated shares are not (directly) related to score, so this means those workers really didn't sent accceptable shares to pool.

Sargasm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 02:43:32 PM
 #4323

Sooo... this could potentially be a bad flag or something weird with the gpu?  (driver/unstable OC etc...)
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 02:45:35 PM
 #4324

I think that my miners have some driver issues, but there might be more reasons.  Yesterday one my poclbm stopped working and told me somethign about hardware issue, but I know that trigger was shutting down of the pool. So miners can be sometimes really weid :-)

allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1050



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 02:58:56 PM
 #4325

*Sigh* pool is down again  Sad...back to the deepest bit I go...

DutchBrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 02:59:14 PM
 #4326

Pool down again, or is it another long-polling issue ?
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 03:16:00 PM
 #4327

I think pool is down again Sad
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 03:19:16 PM
 #4328

Hm, it looks like serious issue with linux kernel and vmware. Pool is down, I need to find a solution. I'll probably try older kernels, which are reported as working.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 03:57:38 PM
 #4329

Ok, now is on all backends kernel compiled directly for virtualization. Give it a try!

sd
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 730
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 04:43:05 PM
 #4330

I'm also surprised by low latency on Tor network. I remember than few years ago it was nearly impossible to browse onion sites, but now it's pretty comfortable. Of course building circuit take some time, but then I'm usually having responses under one second, which is excellent.

New Tor address for pool is: poolziyzjb25aa4e.onion

That actually works? Impressive.

I might put a miner on it for a while just to see if TOR is up to low latency connections. I assumed it wasn't.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 04:46:29 PM
 #4331

I don't know if other miners will work without any modifications, but poclbm have some problems with DNS resolving, so it don't work yet. But I'll try to fix it as soon as I find some time when pool will be stable enough :-)

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 04:48:00 PM
 #4332

OK, I misused recent pool instability to some software updates, so there were few more backend restarts not related to kernel issues. But now I'm leaving it 'as is' and will see if another kernel fixed the issue (it should, but I told it about that kernel options, too).

FoxMURDER
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 05:11:22 PM
 #4333

oh man and i always though the reason to use vmware is, that its working out of the box without problems ... now i'm glad i use kvm Smiley
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 05:13:12 PM
 #4334

oh man and i always though the reason to use vmware is, that its working out of the box without problems ... now i'm glad i use kvm Smiley

I has been using Xen everytime for many years (on Linode as a customer, but also on my own boxes) and once it was running, I never had any issue with it. I'm also surprised that it don't work  out of the box.

disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 05:34:57 PM
 #4335

I'm also surprised by low latency on Tor network. I remember than few years ago it was nearly impossible to browse onion sites, but now it's pretty comfortable. Of course building circuit take some time, but then I'm usually having responses under one second, which is excellent.

New Tor address for pool is: poolziyzjb25aa4e.onion

That actually works? Impressive.

I might put a miner on it for a while just to see if TOR is up to low latency connections. I assumed it wasn't.


Hypothetically, say everyone would switch to Tor, would it still work on a large scale?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 05:36:57 PM
 #4336

All miners over Tor? Yes. See http://torstatus.blutmagie.de for Tor routers and their bandwith... Actually *internal* speed should be pretty good (capacity of exit nodes is different story).

Pool traffic is currently around 1MB/s and it's roughly 10% of Bitcoin hashrate. So all miners over Tor would take about 10MB/s, which is still pretty acceptable.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I cannot finish processing payments, have some important meeting now. But no coins are lost, I just need some time to recalculate crippled rounds from time out pool outages.

Iyeman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 07:05:21 PM
 #4337

All miners over Tor? Yes. See http://torstatus.blutmagie.de for Tor routers and their bandwith... Actually *internal* speed should be pretty good (capacity of exit nodes is different story).

Pool traffic is currently around 1MB/s and it's roughly 10% of Bitcoin hashrate. So all miners over Tor would take about 10MB/s, which is still pretty acceptable.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I cannot finish processing payments, have some important meeting now. But no coins are lost, I just need some time to recalculate crippled rounds from time out pool outages.

8653   2011-11-02 17:05:54   0:00:11

wow, i hope i was lucky enough to get some shares in on that 11 second block lol


         %%%%%%%%%%(        
      %%%%%%%%%%%%%  %%     
    %%%%%%%%%%%%%%  .%%%%   
   %%%%%%%%        %%%%%%%  
  /%%%%%%           %%%%%%/ 
  %%%%%%(           (%%%%%% 
  %%%%%%(           (%%%%%% 
  ,%%%%%%           %%%%%%, 
   %%%%%%%%       %%%%%%%%  
    %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   
      %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%     
         %%%%%%%%%%%       
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
. OPEN MONEY PLATFORM .
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
{}
>
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 07:18:04 PM
 #4338

All miners over Tor? Yes. See http://torstatus.blutmagie.de for Tor routers and their bandwith... Actually *internal* speed should be pretty good (capacity of exit nodes is different story).

Pool traffic is currently around 1MB/s and it's roughly 10% of Bitcoin hashrate. So all miners over Tor would take about 10MB/s, which is still pretty acceptable.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I cannot finish processing payments, have some important meeting now. But no coins are lost, I just need some time to recalculate crippled rounds from time out pool outages.

8653   2011-11-02 17:05:54   0:00:11

wow, i hope i was lucky enough to get some shares in on that 11 second block lol

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 07:23:06 PM
 #4339

OK. Hope all can be sorted by tomorrow. Thank you for the effort you are putting.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 07:26:10 PM
 #4340

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

I'm here for a moment Smiley. No, this block is perfectly valid, you can click to blocknumber and see details on block explorer.

Pages: « 1 ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 ... 1144 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!