[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[CraigWrightBTC]

Looking out for more information about this on the blogs!

The information about digital coins always change every time include the information about dashcoin, the best way to get more information about dashcoin, you can subscribe via email on the official website of dashcoin, usually they send the new information about dashcoin via email or you can stay on here to get more information. The new information related with dashcoin on media is CoinDash ICO Hacker Returns 10,000 Ether Without Any Demands https://themerkle.com/coindash-ico-hacker-returns-10000-ether-without-any-demands/ hope it give you enough of information for your blog.

[sdef2]

Looking out for more information about this on the blogs!

The information about digital coins always change every time include the information about dashcoin, the best way to get more information about dashcoin, you can subscribe via email on the official website of dashcoin, usually they send the new information about dashcoin via email or you can stay on here to get more information. The new information related with dashcoin on media is CoinDash ICO Hacker Returns 10,000 Ether Without Any Demands https://themerkle.com/coindash-ico-hacker-returns-10000-ether-without-any-demands/ hope it give you enough of information for your blog.

You're mixing up some terms i think.
You're using "Dashcoin" while this is the "Dash" thread.
CoinDash ico has nothing to do with Dash.
Dash has nothing to do with Ether.
So most of your post does not make sense.

Edit: for updates on Dash i have found https://www.dashforcenews.com/ to be very helpful.

[Diego24]

Legit projects like ETC ...

You sir, are a fool 

[Diego24]

The Monero blockchain can NOT be verified with a pubkey.  A Monero Transaction Can be verified,  That is a BIG difference. 

Just ignore the troll. He doesn't know what he is talking about. He studied economics and knows nothing about economics. So how do you expect he knows something about privacy in crypto ? Let him continue his own bullshit and just ignore his presence.

[solowhizkid]

Dash Price Swims Against the Current

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-price-dips-below-3900-but-market-treads-water/

#dash_force

[solowhizkid]

Dash price outperforms rivals, as privacy-focused cryptocoin overtakes Litecoin

http://invezz.com/news/crypto/27326-Dash-price-outperforms-rivals-as-privacy-focused-cryptocoin-overtakes-Litecoin

#dash_force

[alevlaslo]

LTC and Dash are the same in terms of capitalization, however, LTC 8% of the vote, and Dash is only 3% (of which 1 my voice), so the LTC is undervalued and interesting for investments https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2116436.0

[Diego24]

LTC and Dash are the same in terms of capitalization, however, LTC 8% of the vote, and Dash is only 3% (of which 1 my voice), so the LTC is undervalued and interesting for investments https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2116436.0

LTC is overvalued. It has no use. It is just a cheap copy paste from Bitcoin. Having Bitcoin Cash around LTC has become even less valuable. Who cares about the % votes you have in a shit network ?

[solowhizkid]

Dash is Making a Splash: Displacing Litecoin, "Digital Cash" is on the Warpath

https://cryptovest.com/news/dash-is-making-a-splash/

#dash_force

[toknormal]

...You either have fungibility or not. You can't pretend to have fungibility while actually not having it. it has some tiny flaws first.

You're clinging to a slightly desperate philosophical angle here. Dash is a transparent blockchain for a reason - that we are dealing with an unbacked digital monetary asset which relies on public endorsement for its very existence as such. Insofar as anonymity impacts fungibility, the coin supply is just as fungible. It isn't affected by the public being able to audit and view movements since the distinction between one address and another is only quantitative, not qualitative and it's the latter that defines fungibility, not the former.

Information for you:

Encrypted blockchains are far less "verifiable" and far less "secure" than unencrypted ones.

Yeah it's called public key cryptography, you can verify the  encrypted block with the public key, that is why Monero supplies a pubkey as well as an additional layer of privacy which you would normally not share.

Indeed. But the problem with encrypted chains is that confidence at the granular level (level of individual users) doesn’t aggregate to the macro level. Users are all firewalled off from each other by this encryption of the transacting environment so there’s nowhere near the consensual level of confidence you’d have in a transparent chain.

It’s all based on trust: trust in the “hopium” than that the client you happen to be using actually faithfully implements the protocol; trust in the ‘experts’ that the chain is ok when either some rogue group says it isn’t or when your own client software says it isn’t; trust in developers that the code isn’t doing some mad corrupt leakage out to an address that nobody can see or audit; trust in a centralised encryption algorithm that it won't be sprung open with a can opener a few years down the line to reveal every transaction in history. (A 'viewkey' doesn't in the least change this fact by the way. All a viewkey is is a private key with read-only privilages, it isn't a substitute for a fully transparent chain).

Whatever way you look at it, any level of blockchain obfuscation whatsoever simply creates a potentially toxic environment for weeds to grow and stay out of view. Meanwhile, any additional “privacy” it might offer is mostly redundant since the blockchain itself is only one of many transacting environments for the asset and the job was already done by Satoshi anyway. The only people that don’t see that are those that erroneously project a legacy “bank account” credit money paradigm onto blockchain assets.

Remember, transparent chains also use a version of public/private key cryptography. That’s why your private key is called a “private key”. It’s also why blockchain asset ownership is legitimately referred to as “private” since any knowledge about keyholder identities has be be gleaned off chain. It's like seeing a house in the street: the house is public but its ownership is private. You don't make the ownership any more private by making the house invisible. But you may make its value practically worthless.

By recycling the supply on a continuous basis, Dash further mitigates even that vector in order to keep your holdings “private” even though they may exist on a transparent chain and even though you may have transacted previously form an address associated with you.

[NibiruHybrid]

Several Dash Debit Cards Now Unavailable Outside of Europe

Many of the major Dash debit card providers around the world have discontinued service to customers outside of Europe.

A number of the prominent Dash debit card services use WaveCrest as the issuers of their cards. Unfortunately, WaveCrest no longer supports customers outside of Europe, meaning that many Dash users in North America and elsewhere are stuck without an easy card solution for the time being. The most recent of these to announce, Wirex notified customers of the recent change via email:

Read more: https://www.dashforcenews.com/several-dash-debit-cards-now-unavailable-outside-europe/

[Diego24]

Thats a big if. It has never happened, despite the big bounty on offer for someone who manages it. Not to mention rival developers of other coins also having vested interest in breaking Dash private send. Stating that it is easy doesn't make it so.  

This guy is full of nonsense. You should read his posts in the AMP thread to know how ridiculous he is. Moreover, he is also known as a liar and manipulator. I am pretty sure he owns Monero and has no Dash. But he pretended yesterday to have both and let the best win. Not only is this nonsense but it also shows he is blind and understands nothing. He doesn't realize that Dash is more than just privacy. Dash is also working hard to make the usage of crypto easy for people. Monero is not working on that. So they might be competitors in the privacy domain but in the usage domain Monero is no competition at all.

[toknormal]

iCEBREAKER on fire this week - posts all individually thought out. Excellent !

(P.S. I keep thinking you're talking about this place).

[Diego24]

iCEBREAKER on fire this week - posts all individually thought out. Excellent !

(P.S. I keep thinking you're talking about this place).

He needs a girlfriend ASAP.

[toknormal]

He needs a girlfriend ASAP.

Who needs a girlfriend when you're aspiring to an ATH in mockery and insults. If he sticks with it he'll reach a climax round about the same time as the Dash price :-)

[bigrcanada1]

Its awesome to see Monerons Clown Posse so engaged...and caring.  LOL.   Love it... oh by the way...how's Fluffy doing with his DASH masternodes?!?  Rumours have it that you guys are running a bunch of masternodes.  We're on to you Monerons.  

[afbitcoins]

I am not confused about Monero and Zcash. Both have opaque blockchains.

No you don't get it. The monero Blockchain can be verified by the pubkey, which only you should have anyway the transactions in the block don't matter from decentralization point of view, the crypto is solid and the format is probably not malleable. So it works perfectly.

While Zcash is totally dark, which means that it totally relies on the trusted initialization phase. And Dash is totally open with "optional" privacy whic is also very weak.

Monero is both trustless and private, it's the golden mean between decentralization and privacy.

No you don't get it 

A pubkey doesn't verify the Monero blockchain, only one single transaction. (thanks for pointing that out chilly2k) (and elaborated on in great detail by toknormal) Trust is required in abundance that opaque blockchains are legit. This is why I don't like zcash, and also one reason (among many others) why I don't like Monero. A bug was caught recently in cryptonote coins which would have allowed undetected coin minting. I'm almost sure fluffypony wouldn't do it on purpose but still, how are you ever sure this isn't happening or will never happen via some other bug?

* What if nodes/miners decide to censor or discriminate transactions above 10,000$...

You're conflating fungibility of the coin supply with "fungibility" of the transacting environment.

They are distinct.

No they are not. You either have fungibility or not. You can't pretend to have fungibility while actually not having it.

It's the same as privacy on Dash. You either have it or you dont. If the TX can be traced back via some blockchain analysis, then you neither have privacy nor fungibility. So why pretend that you do?

Thats a big if. It has never happened, despite the big bounty on offer for someone who manages it. Not to mention rival developers of other coins also having vested interest in breaking Dash private send. Stating that it is easy doesn't make it so. 

[MasterMined710]

Dash Meetups Catch on Across Africa

Dash adoption and awareness has made progress across Africa, with particular success stories in Ghana and Nigeria.

Cryptocurrency has the ability to offer financial services, in many cases superior to those offered by the banking system, to the unbanked. Dash in particular has a focus on being a cheap and easy-to-use digital cash, which can have serious implications to alleviate issues affecting the third world. In Africa in particular, this message is catching on thanks to a series of meetups organized by motivated activists.
https://www.dashforcenews.com/dash-meetups-catch-on-across-africa/

[BrainShutdown]

So Monerons continue to feel the need to advertise on the Dash thread? Old news!

Big Dash conference in 2 days, stay tuned.

[HomoHenning]

iCEBREAKER on fire this week - posts all individually thought out. Excellent !

(P.S. I keep thinking you're talking about this place).

price dont care