Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 08:51:55 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 [325] 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 ... 426 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 829561 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
March 20, 2014, 07:35:33 AM
 #6481

As of 0230 am on 3/20/14  the past 200 closed shifts have earned 1962 blocks for a per shift average of 9.81 blocks per shift. That might not be the same as PPS but its not as bad as it seems at times.
1481359915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481359915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481359915
Reply with quote  #2

1481359915
Report to moderator
1481359915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481359915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481359915
Reply with quote  #2

1481359915
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481359915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481359915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481359915
Reply with quote  #2

1481359915
Report to moderator
IYFTech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 02:24:52 PM
 #6482

For asia region, which better server to use?

Server                          Miners   
stratum.btcguild.com:3333   23287
eu-stratum.btcguild.com:3333   7620

Ping them - then you'll know which is the faster one for sure  Smiley

-- Smiley  Thank you for smoking  Smiley --  If you paid VAT to dogie for items you should read this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018906.0
syber
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 05:45:14 PM
 #6483

For asia region, which better server to use?

Server                          Miners   
stratum.btcguild.com:3333   23287
eu-stratum.btcguild.com:3333   7620

Also interested in learning the answer to this.

BTC - 1A1K78dLJitiKnZHt3MAKgFwqMGP1vY1TW
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
March 20, 2014, 05:57:55 PM
 #6484

From what I've been told, the US server is better for connections from Asia.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
syber
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 06:15:18 PM
 #6485

From what I've been told, the US server is better for connections from Asia.

Thanks will test both once I'm ready to move over to BTC guild. Still working out some electricity calculations to make sure our rigs have 24/7 up time.

If your experience adding upwards of 4-5 TH/s in the next coming days would seem viable to get a decent share? Or would I be better off going with a smaller pool?

BTC - 1A1K78dLJitiKnZHt3MAKgFwqMGP1vY1TW
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
March 20, 2014, 06:24:52 PM
 #6486

From what I've been told, the US server is better for connections from Asia.

Thanks will test both once I'm ready to move over to BTC guild. Still working out some electricity calculations to make sure our rigs have 24/7 up time.

If your experience adding upwards of 4-5 TH/s in the next coming days would seem viable to get a decent share? Or would I be better off going with a smaller pool?

Pool size is mostly irrelevant.  Smaller pool means you get a larger share of the blocks, but they're further apart.  Smaller pools have more variance, so higher highs when you're lucky and lower lows when you're unlucky.  So your speed really doesn't play a huge factor in picking a pool (although I'd probably avoid pools so small that you're larger than the entire pool).

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
abyssmu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 08:46:40 PM
 #6487

Hello all!

I just got my first miner setup with BFGminer. I'm running an Antminer U2. It is working, but the h/s is really low. Much lower than what it should be. It is currently running from 200-500 Mh/s when it is supposed to do 2 Gh/s w/o being overclocked.

Here is the command line that I am using. I typed it directly from the Support page of the BTCGuild website:

-o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u ****** -p ****** -S all --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100

Is there anything I can add to it to make it run up to par with its specifications? I tried Googling it and I noticed things like the clocking speed command for Antminers -> –set-device antminer:clock=x0981. I tried adding that at the end and it had no effect.
BRADLEYPLOOF
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 08:47:39 PM
 #6488

Hello all!

I just got my first miner setup with BFGminer. I'm running an Antminer U2. It is working, but the h/s is really low. Much lower than what it should be. It is currently running from 200-500 Mh/s when it is supposed to do 2 Gh/s w/o being overclocked.

Here is the command line that I am using. I typed it directly from the Support page of the BTCGuild website:

-o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u ****** -p ****** -S all --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100

Is there anything I can add to it to make it run up to par with its specifications? I tried Googling it and I noticed things like the clocking speed command for Antminers -> –set-device antminer:clock=x0981. I tried adding that at the end and it had no effect.

it should be -o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u ****** -p ****** -S antminer:all

Get rid of that icarus crap...it's no good...
abyssmu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 09:00:38 PM
 #6489

it should be -o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u ****** -p ****** -S antminer:all

Get rid of that icarus crap...it's no good...

Simply replacing the icarus and all with antminer:all doesn't work. The miner won't even recognize the asic without me going in and manually adding it. I got rid of the antminer and left it at -S all and the hash rate has gone up slightly. it now runs at 600-800, but still much less than I would like it to be.

Edit: It seems to be going up at a very slow rate. It is currently averaging 1 Gh/s. Not entirely sure what is going on, but it seems to be getting better slowly. I doubt it will get up to the 2 Gh/s, so I would still like some help in figuring it out.
syber
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 09:20:10 PM
 #6490

From what I've been told, the US server is better for connections from Asia.

Thanks will test both once I'm ready to move over to BTC guild. Still working out some electricity calculations to make sure our rigs have 24/7 up time.

If your experience adding upwards of 4-5 TH/s in the next coming days would seem viable to get a decent share? Or would I be better off going with a smaller pool?

Pool size is mostly irrelevant.  Smaller pool means you get a larger share of the blocks, but they're further apart.  Smaller pools have more variance, so higher highs when you're lucky and lower lows when you're unlucky.  So your speed really doesn't play a huge factor in picking a pool (although I'd probably avoid pools so small that you're larger than the entire pool).

More just want to maximize the amount of coins I can pull in with the first few months to ensure good ROI on these asic chips. Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your input thus far eleuthria.

BTC - 1A1K78dLJitiKnZHt3MAKgFwqMGP1vY1TW
suzukii
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 10:03:10 PM
 #6491

...
More just want to maximize the amount of coins I can pull in with the first few months to ensure good ROI on these asic chips. Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your input thus far eleuthria.

Hi Syber.
Ditto that here. I'm waiting on KNC to send me my Neptune 3TH miner to get it going asap so I can make upcthe ROI asap before all hell breaks loose.

Regards,

Suzukii

(Live long & ...keep mining)

Hardware:
Avalon 200Gh/s 55nm | Raspberry Pi model B | Minepeon 0.2.4.3 (...was 0.2.5-pr2) | BFGMiner 3.10.0 | 28x Manhattan USB 2.0/3.0 powered Hub | 5x ASIC Block Erupter @333 MH/s | 3x BFL Jalapeño's Total ~232.7 GH/s
flounderella
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210

Bitcoin Enthusiast and Technology Evengelist


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 10:04:22 PM
 #6492

How come we don't find blocks for hours and then boom boom, two in a row, and then wait again? Just curious how or why it happens.... seen it with other pools too.
wpgdeez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 10:15:44 PM
 #6493

one word ... luck
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 10:46:17 PM
 #6494

How come we don't find blocks for hours and then boom boom, two in a row, and then wait again? Just curious how or why it happens.... seen it with other pools too.

One thing new users tend to not get is there isn't "progress towards" solving a block.  Each share generated and submitted by each user has the potential to be a block.  The next share submitted is in no way affected by the results of the prior one.  

It's like playing poker.  The contents of your last hand has no impact on the contents of your next hand.

The pool is currently around 6.43 ph/s.  That means, on average, one of the shares submitted should be a block every 2838 seconds, or about 47.3 minutes.  (I think that math is right.)  However, that is an average.  There will be times when it's more, and there will be times when it's less.

M


MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
popinjay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 11:06:17 PM
 #6495

How come we don't find blocks for hours and then boom boom, two in a row, and then wait again? Just curious how or why it happens.... seen it with other pools too.

It's completely random and based on the pools hashrate.  Right now I think BTCGuild has about 16-18% of the total hashrate. That means every block we have a 16-18% change to get. If we don't get the current block then the next block starts and we have a 16-18% chance to get that one.  That being said, we could go on a run of 4-5 blocks in a row if we were really lucky (akin to flipping a bunch of heads in a row since we should only be getting one of those blocks).  Or we could go 20-30 blocks without getting one if we were really unlucky.  In the long run in all averages out.

 ♦  Just-Dice.com  ♦  (https://just-dice.com)   ♦  1% House Edge Dice Game  ♦  (https://just-dice.com)   ♦  Play or Invest  ♦  (https://just-dice.com)
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
March 20, 2014, 11:15:06 PM
 #6496

How come we don't find blocks for hours and then boom boom, two in a row, and then wait again? Just curious how or why it happens.... seen it with other pools too.

I replied to an email about luck earlier today, thought this is a good illustration:


Let's say you have a miner that mines at 1 GH/s.  That means every second, your miner is generating 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) hashes per second.  Now, as a miner, your target on BTC Guild (default) is a difficulty 2 share.  That happens *roughly* every 8,400,000,000 hashes, or 8.4 seconds at 1 GH/s.

To make it easy, think of that work you're doing as a billion little scratch-off lottery tickets, where each slot has only two possibilities: Keep Going or Lose.

To get a difficulty 2 share, you need to get 'Keep Going' 33 times in a row.  Once you get that share, you hand your ticket off to the pool as proof that you found one with at least 33 in a row, which happens 1 in 2^33 (~8.4b) times.

Now, your ticket had at least 33, but it may have even more.  If you get enough of them, you "win" the lottery (block).  The pool only cares about you getting 33 in a row, that's what your proving you found, and that's how your paid.  The pool then checks how many more 'Keep Going' entries you have.  Just like a perfect coin flip, each one is a 50% chance.

As of today, the odds are (roughly) 1 in 2^64 to solve a block with a given ticket.  That might not sound so bad, afterall your 1 GH/s is doing a billion attempts per second!  With the pool at 6.2 PH/s, the pool is doing 6.2 quadrillion attempts per second, it surely can't be that hard.

For those who don't know just how fast powers of 2 increase.  While 2^32 is only 4,200,000,000 (a couple seconds at 1 GH/s), 2^64 is 1 in 18,446,744,073,709,551,616.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
March 20, 2014, 11:48:38 PM
 #6497

it should be -o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u ****** -p ****** -S antminer:all

Get rid of that icarus crap...it's no good...

Simply replacing the icarus and all with antminer:all doesn't work. The miner won't even recognize the asic without me going in and manually adding it. I got rid of the antminer and left it at -S all and the hash rate has gone up slightly. it now runs at 600-800, but still much less than I would like it to be.

Edit: It seems to be going up at a very slow rate. It is currently averaging 1 Gh/s. Not entirely sure what is going on, but it seems to be getting better slowly. I doubt it will get up to the 2 Gh/s, so I would still like some help in figuring it out.
   I use the Antminer U2 and the best results I've had were after changing the order of the start up line.
   bfgminer -S antminer:all -o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u xxxxxxx_# -p 123
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 11:52:59 PM
 #6498

it should be -o http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 -u ****** -p ****** -S antminer:all

Get rid of that icarus crap...it's no good...

Simply replacing the icarus and all with antminer:all doesn't work. The miner won't even recognize the asic without me going in and manually adding it. I got rid of the antminer and left it at -S all and the hash rate has gone up slightly. it now runs at 600-800, but still much less than I would like it to be.

Edit: It seems to be going up at a very slow rate. It is currently averaging 1 Gh/s. Not entirely sure what is going on, but it seems to be getting better slowly. I doubt it will get up to the 2 Gh/s, so I would still like some help in figuring it out.

Post in the BFG Miner support thread here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=168174.msg1750927#msg1750927

Also does that software come with readme files?  If so try reading them.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
mark978
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 11:54:55 PM
 #6499

How come we don't find blocks for hours and then boom boom, two in a row, and then wait again? Just curious how or why it happens.... seen it with other pools too.

It's completely random and based on the pools hashrate.  Right now I think BTCGuild has about 16-18% of the total hashrate. That means every block we have a 16-18% change to get. If we don't get the current block then the next block starts and we have a 16-18% chance to get that one.  That being said, we could go on a run of 4-5 blocks in a row if we were really lucky (akin to flipping a bunch of heads in a row since we should only be getting one of those blocks).  Or we could go 20-30 blocks without getting one if we were really unlucky.  In the long run in all averages out .

Problem in bold !

Isn't that the problem now? "long run" may have been months, now 6-9 weeks and profit has mostly evaporated, unless the btc price has also dramatically risen?

Or is that time frame still long enough that mining on a small pool is still viable, even with some bad luck?
flounderella
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210

Bitcoin Enthusiast and Technology Evengelist


View Profile
March 20, 2014, 11:58:37 PM
 #6500

How come we don't find blocks for hours and then boom boom, two in a row, and then wait again? Just curious how or why it happens.... seen it with other pools too.

I replied to an email about luck earlier today, thought this is a good illustration:


Let's say you have a miner that mines at 1 GH/s.  That means every second, your miner is generating 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) hashes per second.  Now, as a miner, your target on BTC Guild (default) is a difficulty 2 share.  That happens *roughly* every 8,400,000,000 hashes, or 8.4 seconds at 1 GH/s.

To make it easy, think of that work you're doing as a billion little scratch-off lottery tickets, where each slot has only two possibilities: Keep Going or Lose.

To get a difficulty 2 share, you need to get 'Keep Going' 33 times in a row.  Once you get that share, you hand your ticket off to the pool as proof that you found one with at least 33 in a row, which happens 1 in 2^33 (~8.4b) times.

Now, your ticket had at least 33, but it may have even more.  If you get enough of them, you "win" the lottery (block).  The pool only cares about you getting 33 in a row, that's what your proving you found, and that's how your paid.  The pool then checks how many more 'Keep Going' entries you have.  Just like a perfect coin flip, each one is a 50% chance.

As of today, the odds are (roughly) 1 in 2^64 to solve a block with a given ticket.  That might not sound so bad, afterall your 1 GH/s is doing a billion attempts per second!  With the pool at 6.2 PH/s, the pool is doing 6.2 quadrillion attempts per second, it surely can't be that hard.

For those who don't know just how fast powers of 2 increase.  While 2^32 is only 4,200,000,000 (a couple seconds at 1 GH/s), 2^64 is 1 in 18,446,744,073,709,551,616.

Thanks!
Pages: « 1 ... 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 [325] 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 ... 426 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!