|
1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
Sent 4 with links showing domain availability..
Actually I think the 2nd one is pretty good and the .com domain is only $8.99..
|
|
|
|
[/b]
Seems like a pretty active project still..
Then go and join them. Thy really deserve such a "Valuable" shitcoin supporter. Nah, I'm not all that into altcoins.. It's more about me personally vetting dragons for my own reasons.. Maybe I'll have to start a rep thread about it to get to the bottom of it.. I see lots of positive posts in the deeponion thread by a lot of users without neg tags.. Why dragons? |
|
|
|
Seems like a pretty active project still... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2683530.38360What does it having a sketchy release have to do with dragons? Plenty of other still very popular coins have had sketchy releases but are still active and have supporters who are not tagged scammers.. Dragons is a much better member than just some shitposter shill so if he needs a red tag I really want to understand why he is deserving of it.. Which I do not yet.. And stop harassing me.
Dude.. This is my thread.. And you have made my shitlist for acting very questionably, and generally pissing me off, so congratulations.. You can expect me to remain suspicious of you for quite some time.. In the time since you have been gone for a while I have heard something that made me concerned for you so I was curious how you are doing, hoping I heard wrong.. |
|
|
|
DEEPONION PAIDSHILL
Good to see you back.. How are you? I have looked into dragons and the onion situation a bit, not finished, but I'm still trying to figure out why he deserves negative trust for being interested in that project.. |
|
|
|
|
This devil account has aroused my suspicions a while ago but it had nothing to do with this 50 merits thing..
|
|
|
|
It's interesting to watch as the odds of official Trump winning are quite high. Eddie13 is actually at an advantage, if I'm not wrong and could make money playing it right. So, for every 1 BTC he's betting he's going to receive 1 BTC (if Trump wins). It could be smart for him to bet 1:1 with you and also against himself at the same time with the current 1/6 odds, getting 6 BTC for every 1 BTC wagered (if Trump loses). Say, he bets 1BTC against all of the forum members together. If he wins, he's going to have 2 BTC next year. If he also bets 0.5 BTC against himself today and wins, he'll get 1BTC from you, but also loses 0.5 BTC, so he'll have a profit of 0.5. If Trump loses, he'll get 3 BTC from the bookies, but will have to pay you 1, so that will leave him with 2 BTC of pure profit. Looks like a win- win situation to me. Bookie suggestions? |
|
|
|
Iraq says something like 5 missiles just hit around our US Baghdad embassy..  |
|
|
|
|
Figures this gives the US a green light to "erase" that Hassan Rouhani guy and his buddies?
BTW BTC is about $30k USD in Iran right now according to localbitcoins..
1BTC = a hair over 1 BILLION Iranian reals rials whatever they are..
|
|
|
|
I owe eddie a signed message confirming BTC.01 on Trump not getting reelected with same terms as suchmoons bet.
Just saying.
Ok don't want this on my todo list any longer. I just stole all the terms from suchmoon/eddie bet in OP and changed the amount. I'm fine with forgetting the arbitrator clause as long as this bet is settled the same as your bet with suchmoon. Let me know if everything looks good and I'll sign it with 1JqxhKj4CdRqFb7mGdXVMYTMy1MQ5qShsn I could've sworn I had it in the staked address thread, but can only find this post at the moment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1243970.msg12951413#msg12951413TwitchySeals's address: 1JqxhKj4CdRqFb7mGdXVMYTMy1MQ5qShsn
eddie13's address: 1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
TwitchySeal agrees to pay 0.01 BTC to eddie13 if Donald J Trump wins the 2020 US presidential election, and eddie13 agrees to pay 0.01 BTC to TwitchySeal if Donald J Trump does not win the 2020 US presidential election.
The outcome of this bet will be the same as the outcome of the [url=https://archive.is/wip/pTbBg]bet between suchmoon and eddie13[/url].
Decision logic is
Election result is considered decided by the Electoral College meeting. If the Electoral College elects Donald J Trump the president of the US following the 2020 US presidential election eddie13 wins the bet, in any other case TwitchySeal wins the bet except for the draw conditions listed below.
Conditions for a draw (neither side pays the other side):
If there is no presidential election in 2020.
If Donald J Trump is not on the ballot in at least 26 states.
If the Electoral College doesn't meet by midnight January 31, 2021.
Additional terms:
EC decision is final regardless of popular vote, pledged electors, unfaithful electors etc.
No presidential election in 2020 (martial law, martians invading, etc) means a draw.
Donald J Trump not running for any reason (primaried out, dead, impeached, etc) means a draw even if he wins via write-in.
Any other candidate getting elected (democrat, republican, third party, etc) means Twitchyseal wins.
If Donald J Trump is elected but doesn't get sworn in (dies, goes to prison, moves to Slovenia, etc) eddie13 wins.
Signed 2020-01-04 eddie13 accepting the following on 1/5/2020
TwitchySeals's address: 1JqxhKj4CdRqFb7mGdXVMYTMy1MQ5qShsn
eddie13's address: 1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
TwitchySeal agrees to pay 0.01 BTC to eddie13 if Donald J Trump wins the 2020 US presidential election, and eddie13 agrees to pay 0.01 BTC to TwitchySeal if Donald J Trump does not win the 2020 US presidential election.
The outcome of this bet will be the same as the outcome of the [url=https://archive.is/wip/pTbBg]bet between suchmoon and eddie13[/url].
Decision logic is
Election result is considered decided by the Electoral College meeting. If the Electoral College elects Donald J Trump the president of the US following the 2020 US presidential election eddie13 wins the bet, in any other case TwitchySeal wins the bet except for the draw conditions listed below.
Conditions for a draw (neither side pays the other side):
If there is no presidential election in 2020.
If Donald J Trump is not on the ballot in at least 26 states.
If the Electoral College doesn't meet by midnight January 31, 2021.
Additional terms:
EC decision is final regardless of popular vote, pledged electors, unfaithful electors etc.
No presidential election in 2020 (martial law, martians invading, etc) means a draw.
Donald J Trump not running for any reason (primaried out, dead, impeached, etc) means a draw even if he wins via write-in.
Any other candidate getting elected (democrat, republican, third party, etc) means Twitchyseal wins.
If Donald J Trump is elected but doesn't get sworn in (dies, goes to prison, moves to Slovenia, etc) eddie13 wins.
H2aX6ACUY9ZekeQ8VeO+QoiIJZE+oskWNVhH38P/AjZ3TzW3sJlh3lBPa/nVgxbOVt3EY0vFwdwHzEqkwtiYUf4= |
|
|
|
Iran Puts $80M Bounty on Trump’s Head"“If everyone anywhere in the world supports our initiative in Mashhad, on behalf of all of Iran’s people - 80 million Iranians - and each puts aside $1 US, it would equal $80 million,” the report said. “And we would give this $80 million, on our own behalf, as a gift to anyone who brings the head of the person who ordered the murder of the grand figure of our revolution.” If there were any doubt about whom the mullahs wanted assassinated, the statement concluded, “Anyone who brings us the head of this yellow-haired lunatic, we would give him $80 million on behalf of the great Iranian nation.”" https://pjmedia.com/trending/iran-puts-80m-bounty-on-trumps-head-for-soleimani-hit/Way to dig yourself a hole there Iran..
|
|
|
|
|
I think Trump is about to punk out Iran just like he punked Kim out not too far back..
The USA is no pandering and appeasing pussy under Trump..
We wouldn't have to go to "war" with Iran.. Just push a few more buttons similar to the last one he just pushed, what was it another 52 buttons pre-programmed, and Iran would be in turmoil probably rendering them harmless..
As far as Russia and China.. I don't think they are near as big a threat as most try to make them out to be, and they don't want a piece of the USA either if they know what's good for them, even combined + NK, they don't have much of shit effective much past their boarders so they can all sit down and STFU..
|
|
|
|
For whatever reason, maybe cause they are maybe "friends" Jr Members tends to merit Jr Members and Members uses their merit on Members, and hero merits others hero this is very interesting to me
I'd think that possibly lower ranks have a greater perception of merit scarcity and avoid meriting higher ranked users... Sources may not take this into consideration nearly as much as someone who themselves need merits to achieve rank.. |
|
|
|
Why ask lauda a question in public ?
See if I can drag some honesty of the situation out of them.. If we were on DT they would all be glowing red
Why don't you go leave you own little notes with supporting references on all those you consider deserving? None of that copy/paste shit either.. Detail specifically and thoroughly for each one with good references.. |
|
|
|
If theymos ever made a statement specifically about issuing negative trust feedback for merit abuse, I must have missed it.
Here If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer.
Aside from that, if people complain about whether things deserve merit at all, then that's something to perhaps think about, but if you conclude that they're wrong, then that's that.
I see no evidence that the sky is falling, or that I accidentally broke the trust system.
Funny users aren't flocking in here to defend CH.. If this was a clean legendary with 500+ earned merit, friends, and a good history, I think it would be a different story.. Especially if you want to get into the "good outweighs the bad" debate, just because their isn't much opposition to you tagging CH like that doesn't mean it will work on every user in every case i.e. no "precedent".. a thin, dangerous line
Your Reductio ad Absurdum hypothetical is based on the subjectivity of how egregious each possible case is interpreted to be by every other voting member independently with the threshold rising tremendously based on the credibility of the subjected user in question.. I am unsure about this particular tag, slightly in the negative on it, but I do not believe that this example has any bearing on any other case, past, present, or future, as they are all independently interpreted by many independent interpreters and therefore will vary.. I think that I should better explain what I am trying to do, in terms that are not so abstract.
It would be nice for you to further expound on this subject.. I am unsure what you are trying to do here but am thinking you may be trying to... .. .. . set precedent in what is effectually the Bitcoin Forum’s common law on use the trust system.
Which I would have to wholly disagree with.. |
|
|
|
I actually asked theymos to give input on this
Why? Is it supposed to be a big deal or something? It seems nobody really cares too much other than to say it is a pretty shitty tag and a pathetic choice of a target.. |
|
|
|
WTF is this thread about exactly? The premise of that thread is a flop judging by the lack of support it received.. opinion that I think should set precedent in what is effectually the Bitcoin Forum’s common law on use the trust system.
Pretty pathetic target to try to set some "precident" on accepting neg-tagging for opinions, tagging CH.. Rejected... No "common law" precedent setting for nullius today, sorry.. |
|
|
|
I was obviously referring to people who chose the option "He won't be impeached", because he was impeached.
He seems to still be the president.. Polls look good to me.. Trump will win as long as the odds say he has a minimum of 2% or so chance to win..  I think I chose "deep state"... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
