[
I think PSG is already ready to play without Mbappe: Ramouche, Kolo Muani and Dembele must solve all the issues in attack. And by the way, I think PSG planned to spend this season without Mbappe, but they underestimated Real and completely lost the “silent bidding” because they did not receive any offer from Real at all. I'am rooting againct PSG (I don’t like moneybags and cheaters), but I see that now they have begun to develop in the right direction: they take young good players and make a team. Given their money, they will quickly assemble a top talented team according to the City scheme: if a player does not show his talent to the required extent at PSG, then they get rid of him and buy the next one. When you sell stars and buy stars in return, the FFP is fully respected, although in fact it is very similar to cheating. The sale of Neymar is super lucky for PSG (although perhaps everything was rigged), and the fact that they got rid of Messi too - now their salary fund can take several excellent players instead of an extinct star.
Well if they planned spending the season without Mbappé don't see any reason why they'll punish him for having a secret deal against Realmadrid which gave him no option than to sign another contract for the team, they now his worth and what he has to offer for the team and so far it's favoured them cause Mbappé has really helped them this season,however it would only last this season cause Mbappé might be on his way to Realmadrid next summer. ~ But selling Mbappe (as PSG dreamed of) is another matter when Mbappe enters into a (secret) agreement with Real Madrid and leaves at the end of the season for free. Obviously, PSG was not happy with the second option at all. PSG wanted a completely inadequate amount for Mbappe (250 million) so now they will lose him for free. In this round, Real won a convincing victory. |
|
|
|
Out of curiosity I finally watched the replay of this fight. I was already a little sleepy but I became more sleepy watching the fight so I stopped scoring the fight. What a shameful performance by Tyson Fury. My hat's off to Ngannou. If only he was a little younger and had more time to practice the sport. There were a lot of close rounds in that fight that could go either way. Fury landed more but Ngannou landed the heavier shots and judges have their own ways of interpreting fights, especially on close rounds. Here are the official scorecards. There are 5 rounds where the judges did not have the same assessment while in another 5 rounds, they unanimously agreed to each other.  Here is the punch stats of this fight. Maybe it helps in assessing the fight. Based on the stats I had it 95-94 for Fury.  After watching the fight I just can't believe the Saudis spent around a hundred million dollars for such a boring fight. Boxing just lost some casual fans that night. If only they watched the low-budget title fight of DAZN at Cancun, Mexico on the same day they would've stayed. The 11th-round exchange between WBC super featherweight champion O'Shaquie Foster and Eduardo Hernandez might win the round of the year. I wonder how one could interpret the statistics of the third round as 8-10? Isn't that 7 - 10? Moreover, if the judges had scored 7-10, then as a result of a split decision, the victory would have gone to Ngannou. For the Saudis this is a normal result, it would be much worse if someone won by knockout in the first round. And what happened suited everyone - 10 rounds, a lot of advertising and all that. |
|
|
|
Lewandowski is no longer the same as he was when he played in Bayern, age is taking its toll and just look at his numbers last year in La Liga - an astonishing result. A year has passed and I doubt that he has become stronger and not aged. Real doesn't have a top striker, so I personally now rate both City and Bayern higher than Real. But in general, surprises always happen in knockout games, so it’s far from certain that we will see these clubs play against each other again (I hope City will be knocked out earlier  ). I don't agree at all. You say Lewandowski had a good performance just when he was playing in Bayern Munich and after leaving Bayern Munich is not in the good form anymore in Barcelona which is completely wrong. Because I think Lewandowski had a good performance in Barcelona during last season and he was even the most effective player for Xavi and his team but we should not forget that Lewandowski is getting old and that's normal for any player to have a bad performance when he gets older. The end of your message contradicts its beginning. The 23 goals he scored in La Liga last season is a ridiculous number. And he became the leader in the number of missed chances. This season he scored 5 goals in 12 games. It's a total sadness. I’m not saying that he’s completely bad, but he’s no longer the top and probably not the one who makes the difference, we’ll see at the end of the season, but apparently this season will be even worse for him than the previous one. |
|
|
|
Winning Real Sociedad, should it be considered a miracle or mere coincidence for Barcelona? I'm thinking it to be coincidence because these scenarios often happen infavour of Barcelona~
Barcelona is constantly balancing on the verge of losing points, and if last season everything ended successfully for them, then this year I would say that this is not “the luck of the champion” but simply a weak game. If we remember all their “accidental” victories, now they could be at the level of Betis. If Real wins today, then despite the unchanged distance between the clubs, I think Real's quotes will increase slightly again. |
|
|
|
Live odds have already increased to 1.85 for Milan to win. It's almost the 60th minute and I would say that the game is going until the first goal. The Udinese defenders cope well and only need one successful counter-attack. I like the bet on Udinese better with odds of 9.20, but I still wasn't planning on betting here.
It's sad that Inter continues to dominate in terms of results despite the fact that victories are quite difficult for them (like today).
Damn My prediction came true 100%. The value of this bet was obvious to me, but I didn’t think that it would be realized right away, and now I’m not in the mood to make long-term bets. Milan played another match without scoring goals and I think we can already cross them out of the contenders for the title. They are in a serious crisis and you shouldn’t expect a comeback from them in the Champions League either. |
|
|
|
It is strange that the source of Real's official statement is Fabrizio Romano's Twitter. I'll probably wait a little when the situation clears up. Since the last time Mbappe refused to Real, it turned out that without him Real had options, but without Real Mbappe continues to fade away in the Parisian swamp and he has already regretted his refusals. Therefore, now in the proposed negotiations, Real may be in a stronger position than Mbappe, so I don’t see anything funny.
If this news happens to be true, then the possibility of the Kylian Mbappe joining Real Madrid next summer is very slim because if Real Madrid are still very much interested in the player, they wouldn't have published a disclaimer even if the news in the media isn't true. I haven't confirmed if the news is true but if the statement is an official statement from the club, them Real Madrid might be lining up for another recognized striker to replace the their former striker Karim Benzema at the club. I think Real's strategy (after they focused on Mbappe and abandoned Haaland, and he ended up deceiving them) is clear - they want to have a wide range of options and not depend on one player. Therefore, we will continue to see similar statements, plus Real will show interest in other strikers (fake or real) in order not to put themselves in a dependent position on Mbappe. Now Real's position is strong: they have assembled a squad that can dominate in the coming years. In Europe, the only thing missing is a striker who will skim the cream at the club's expense (those who score goals always attract more attention than those who make it possible), and Mbappe has what he has. ? He is getting old and new stars are already appearing that can supplant him, he is fading away at PSG, he won’t go to City because of Haaland, to Bayern because of their economical policy, etc. I don't see any good options for him. |
|
|
|
What interests me is that if we take a 1% house edge, he should have lost at least $140 million. But he boasts that in the last year and a half he has won 300 million. Maybe he's lying? Why should he stream if he has a quarter of a billion dollars + 50 million on top. And the article also says that he made 7.5 million bets - this is a huge distance and he cannot be profitable on it purely mathematically.
Basically just speaking on the house edge and the amount wagered then it is really that talking about multi-millions on which from that alone then we could really say that he had already lost that big. This is really that hard thing on online world on which every information couldn't really be that exactly be precise or just simply telling the truth. Lets assume that this one is legit then there's no way for us to reach out on what these people been able to do so. There are rich people there are average and poor ones. There's no such thing in speaking about equality yet this had been always a normal thing on todays society on where it is really that divided basing up into your financial capacity. For me then total wagered for this year is already playing around $1000+ and im not really that a heavy gambler. Amount might be small but this is only the money on which i could really that afford to lose. If those people do able to make such huge spending that only elite people could do then just let them be. Its their money that had been used not ours. It is really just that there are people who do really love on seeing these spectacular amounts. The house edge works the same way for both a rich gambler and a poor one, there is no inequality here. I would like to know more details about his gambling, but knowing that he is a “twitch streamer” it is naive to believe that we will ever know any truth. They all work for their own image and no one needs the truth here. And I will continue to adhere to the opinion that purely mathematically, his results are unrealistic, 100% there is some nuance that is hidden from the public. |
|
|
|
Arsenal have already lost this season (to Lens in the Champions League) so this is not the first defeat. But that doesn't really matter, the important thing is that if you take the percentage of points they get now - 72% is pretty good and even often enough to win the title in many leagues, but it is definitely lower than the percentage that is needed when your opponent is City. Now all hopes must be directed towards Tottenham and hope that they will create the greatest meme (title after Kane's departure) If he meant the first in EPL and this is the first lost of arsenal. Glad to see that anthony gordon has become a nightmare for arsenal in this match. Totenham is the only team that is holding a record being unbeaten till this time. It will be facing chelsea. It will be so good to see chelsea will able to play better than the previous match to beat totenham. Son and maddison are the only threats from totenham. My feeling said if manchester city will be winning the trophy again this season. City is now having three points gap toward arsenal at this moment. It's a very good result for the newcastle to beat gordon. That proves that if newcastle is also very strong at this moment. Arsenal potentially become trophyless club again this season. I have no doubt about that. He wrote "this season" so there's no point in guessing what he meant. Newcastle is really strong, as are Arsenal, and also Liverpool + Tottenham. The problem is that they take points from each other, which works in City's favor. As for titles, maybe Arsenal will win the Champions League this year, that possibility exists, plus it would be a really “fresh” event. After all, even City, which won the Champions League for the first time last year, is already completely boring to everyone. |
|
|
|
What interests me is that if we take a 1% house edge, he should have lost at least $140 million. But he boasts that in the last year and a half he has won 300 million. Maybe he's lying? Why should he stream if he has a quarter of a billion dollars + 50 million on top. And the article also says that he made 7.5 million bets - this is a huge distance and he cannot be profitable on it purely mathematically. |
|
|
|
If I'm not wrong, it was the first loss for Arteta and his players in this season, and for the first time during this season, Arsenal lost a game. But I think they will feel regret later for losing his points because right now they are in third place in the Premier League and other teams like Manchester City and Tottenham had perfect performances in this season and they obviously will try to don't let Arsenal to have the chance to reach the first place of the table easily.  Arsenal have already lost this season (to Lens in the Champions League) so this is not the first defeat. But that doesn't really matter, the important thing is that if you take the percentage of points they get now - 72% is pretty good and even often enough to win the title in many leagues, but it is definitely lower than the percentage that is needed when your opponent is City. Now all hopes must be directed towards Tottenham and hope that they will create the greatest meme (title after Kane's departure) |
|
|
|
It is strange that the source of Real's official statement is Fabrizio Romano's Twitter. I'll probably wait a little when the situation clears up. Since the last time Mbappe refused to Real, it turned out that without him Real had options, but without Real Mbappe continues to fade away in the Parisian swamp and he has already regretted his refusals. Therefore, now in the proposed negotiations, Real may be in a stronger position than Mbappe, so I don’t see anything funny.
They didn't clear the whole rumors earlier in the summer when they were said to had made a secret negotiation with Mbappé so why now, well I think it's either they're trying not to make their interest for the player public or maybe they've seen a better alternative or they're no more interested in signing him into their club,however Kylian Mbappé would really make a fine player for Madrid and it would be very lovely to see him playing for the club. But I'm not really convinced about the news yet even though it's from Fabrizio Romano,cause I've seen I previous time where similar news is said about a certain player but he still end joining the club, so let's keep our fingers crossed until summer to see where Mbappé would end up but I think there's still possibility of him joining Madrid. As I understand it, the existence of negotiations with the player is important in a legal sense (for some of the parties), so we will not know the truth (it can be harmful for one party of the negotiations or both). I would be glad to see the end of this series now, but yes, we will have to wait for the summer and at the moment the likelihood that Mbappe will end up in Real Madrid is greater than all other options. While I'm increasingly liking the idea of Haaland joining Real Madrid, he's not getting the respect he deserves at City. |
|
|
|
AC Milan dominated the first half of the game completely without giving much opportunity to udinese although udinese had few targeted shots but AC Milan is ahead in possession and other attempts, just as expected AC Milan is performing well in the first half.
The first half of the game have ended in a goalless draw regardless of how well AC Milan has played they are unable to secure a goal in the first half, hopefully they will in the second half. Currently AC Milan is at the third position on the table with 23 points, if they win this match they will displace Juventus in the mean time because they will be having 26 points staying three points ahead of Juventus.
Live odds have already increased to 1.85 for Milan to win. It's almost the 60th minute and I would say that the game is going until the first goal. The Udinese defenders cope well and only need one successful counter-attack. I like the bet on Udinese better with odds of 9.20, but I still wasn't planning on betting here. It's sad that Inter continues to dominate in terms of results despite the fact that victories are quite difficult for them (like today). |
|
|
|
@Velvet78, do you still remember our discussion about the odds in the Las Palmas - Atletico Madrid match? Look at the results of the match now, in line with my expectations, there is something strange there, Atletico Madrid shouldn't get high odds otherwise something unexpected will happen. Even in this match, Las Palmas almost got a clean sheet if Morata didn't score at the end of the second half. I hope that people following our discussion yesterday follow my guidance not to bet on this match. If I remember correctly, Atlético's odds were 1.6 (or slightly higher) which seemed very favorable. Now it’s clear that it was a “trap,” but on the other hand, Las Palmas’ odds were definitely higher than three (I don’t remember the specific number), but they won confidently. Maybe this is a fluctuation and it’s too early to talk about any problems in Atletico. |
|
|
|
BREAKING: Real Madrid official statement on the Kylian Mbappé deal: SourceReal Madrid says that the information given in the media about the negotiations between the player Kylian Mbappé and our club is completely false. There have been no talks with players from PSG. Real Madrid had only one hope, and that is no longer in hand, meaning what happened in the negotiations between Kylian Mbappé and Real Madrid, which was revealed in the media, Real Madrid has categorically denied this information, saying that all the news that was published is fake. After all that, there is nothing to say, so now Real Madrid doesn't need to put much more emphasis on bringing Kylian Mbappé. While now Visitor Osimen will be a good option for Real Madrid to give a place for contribution towards the club, Lol! Real Madrid fans are still clamouring for a player who has been rejected multiple times. It is strange that the source of Real's official statement is Fabrizio Romano's Twitter. I'll probably wait a little when the situation clears up. Since the last time Mbappe refused to Real, it turned out that without him Real had options, but without Real Mbappe continues to fade away in the Parisian swamp and he has already regretted his refusals. Therefore, now in the proposed negotiations, Real may be in a stronger position than Mbappe, so I don’t see anything funny. |
|
|
|
Talking about favorite teams for winning Champion League actually Manchester City is the first number and allow by Real Madrid then Bayern Munich, for Barcelona I don't really optimistic for winning Champion League tittle.
If we are just speculating, the strongest candidate for us should be a club that has very reliable star players and is proud of everyone, such as Manchester City has Haaland, then Real Madrid has Bellingham and Bayern Munich has Harry Kane. Even though Barcelona also has superior players like Lewandowski, for me it is not enough to just rely on 1 player like other big clubs which have full support from other reliable players so I have the same speculation as you that it seems like Barca will find it a little difficult to win the Champions League title this season this is because after losing Messi Barca will not be as strong as before. Lewandowski is no longer the same as he was when he played in Bayern, age is taking its toll and just look at his numbers last year in La Liga - an astonishing result. A year has passed and I doubt that he has become stronger and not aged. Real doesn't have a top striker, so I personally now rate both City and Bayern higher than Real. But in general, surprises always happen in knockout games, so it’s far from certain that we will see these clubs play against each other again (I hope City will be knocked out earlier ). |
|
|
|
Newcastle won 1-0 against Arsenal and now have moved into 6th position and arent that much behind Manchester City now. While Arsenal without a point today might cost them later on in the league. This is really good news for Man City and Tottenham that Arsenal lost today. Was expecting a draw but Arsenal just couldnt get that goal.
I sympathize with Newcastle, but the fact that they, being already out of the championship race, crippled Arsenal is very sad. Now everything returns to the situation of last season: the obvious underdog is in the lead, but in the end City takes its toll and takes the next title with a large margin. I don't believe that Tottenham's fairy tale will last the whole season. United squeezed out the win and the recovery (Ten Hag's sacking) is delayed again. Although, to be objective, these three points... are not exactly shameful, but this is not how a good team should score points. This is torture, not a game. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, PSG did not risk anything, rather, they risked when they kept pensioners on their roster who were dragging the team to the bottom. In my opinion, PSG did not risk anything; rather, they risked when they kept pensioners on their roster who were dragging the team to the bottom. And I don’t think that PSG’s new project will make us wait for results for many years, I think the next transfer campaign will form a team capable of winning any tournaments.
You're right because even with presence of the so called pensioners that are world class players in the team, they didn't even win the league with a very good gap in the points and just one lose would had made them bottle the title,thereby creating an opportunity for Lens who suprisenly came 2nd place to win the league, therefore the board noticed they were wasting alot of money on them without much benefits and needed to sell them and rebuild with younger talents and new manager. They're gradually building a very strong team, they might not really perform well in the Champions League or get to the semi's but I think they'll win their league and from next season when they've built a better relationship amongst themselves on the pitch we'll see them performing very brilliantly in all competitions, with or without Mbappé. I think PSG is already ready to play without Mbappe: Ramouche, Kolo Muani and Dembele must solve all the issues in attack. And by the way, I think PSG planned to spend this season without Mbappe, but they underestimated Real and completely lost the “silent bidding” because they did not receive any offer from Real at all. I'am rooting againct PSG (I don’t like moneybags and cheaters), but I see that now they have begun to develop in the right direction: they take young good players and make a team. Given their money, they will quickly assemble a top talented team according to the City scheme: if a player does not show his talent to the required extent at PSG, then they get rid of him and buy the next one. When you sell stars and buy stars in return, the FFP is fully respected, although in fact it is very similar to cheating. The sale of Neymar is super lucky for PSG (although perhaps everything was rigged), and the fact that they got rid of Messi too - now their salary fund can take several excellent players instead of an extinct star. |
|
|
|
Ну пусть следак смотрит в блокчейн ( ), видит там что с адреса А крипта украдена на адрес Б (который принадлежит гражданину Сидорову) и далее переведена в миксер где ее следы затерялись. Где здесь доказательства? М? Гражданин Сидоров говорит что да, адрес Б принадлежит мне, но вон ту транзу с ворованными деньгами я не совершал, идите нахуй. И в цивильной стране следак идёт нахуй ибо в нормальном суде нужны реальные доказательства, а не "ну а кто же ещё если не он, я в блокчейне видел!" которые можно получить только в результате оперативно-сыскной деятельности на которую тоже должно быть разрешение суда/прокуратуры плюс соответствие закону о полиции (я надеюсь вы в курсе что следаки должны действовать в соответствии с законными алгоритмами, а не сталкерить кого угодно по своему желанию?). С этим я абсолютно согласен. Но не все используют миксеры. Некоторые жулики и воры в результате безнаказанности совсем расслабились и отправляют монет, полученные преступным путём, прямо на биржи, где все аккаунты подлежат обязательной верификации. Вот что об это пишут в том же телеграм-канале, который я цитировал выше: Когда случается треугол и сотрудники органов ловят получателя средств, который просто продавал, например, тезер, используя свой биржевой аккаунт, то мы для защиты этого человека проводим достаточно нехитрый порядок действий. Мы самостоятельно проводим расследование: узнаем адрес получателя тезера (чаще всего холодный), залезаем в Chainanalysis, находим, на какую биржу в итоге ушли средства и предоставляем результаты своего расследования следствию. Мы говорим: ищите того, кто получил этот тезер, он и есть преступник. А чтобы его найти, сделайте запрос, например, на Binance с вопросом, кто тот тезер продал. Мы сами готовим за следователя запрос и даем ему инструкцию, как сделать запрос на тот самый бинанс
Еще ни разу в десятках уголовных дел по всей стране за последние 2 года ни один следователь не принял никаких мер, чтобы найти настоящего преступника по телефонному мошенничеству. Они и не хотят, и не могут, и не умеют. Все они С другой стороны, слова «холодный» и «Chainanalysis» зародили во мне смутные сомнения. Может, тамошний адвокат не так уж и хорошо понимает то, о чём пишет. А ну до вас начинает доходить что они действительно пишут херню (как я сразу и написал). Вы пошагово прочтите что эти дефективные пишут и тогда еще и поймете почему этот бессвязный бред следаки не воспринимают. Феерические ебанаты с "железной логикой". У них крипта по адресам бегает как чемодан какой-то по грузовым станциям: ну типа станции проехали, а владелец не менялся. Ну пусть следак смотрит в блокчейн ( ), видит там что с адреса А крипта украдена на адрес Б (который принадлежит гражданину Сидорову) и далее переведена в миксер где ее следы затерялись. Где здесь доказательства? М? Гражданин Сидоров говорит что да, адрес Б принадлежит мне, но вон ту транзу с ворованными деньгами я не совершал, идите нахуй. А не будет здесь такого, что просто достаточно доказать, что действительно никто, кроме владельца кошелька, не мог совершить транзакцию по отправке монет, соответственно, совершил именно он, и посему его можно привлечь к ответственности? Ну докажите. Это будет сложнее чем ключ к конкретному адресу подобрать, так как ключ то подобрать теоретически возможно а вот то что вы предлагаете нет. Просто гражданин Сидоров то может посылать всех куда подальше, но не обязан ли он в таком случае предоставить доказательства того, что к кошельку имел доступ не только он? Или презумпция невиновности - это достаточное основание для него чувствовать себя в безопасности?
Сидорову нахуя это? Может ему еще доказать что это не он Кеннеди убил, найдя настоящего убийцу? Но я имела ввиду ситуацию, когда, предположим, доказать, что адрес принадлежит господину Т, доказали, а вот можно ли доказать на основании этого, что транзакции совершал именно мистер Т, а не кто-то другой? Вот это интересно.
Ответ очевиден: просто на основании того что адрес принадлежит господину Т, вы не можете доказать что именно он совершал транзакции с него. Ничего тут интересного. Будут ли в таком случае искать возможные "утечки"? Допустим, мистер Т спрятал секретную фразу в шкафу в коробке из-под обуви, куда имеет доступ его жена. Будет ли это основанием считать, что транзакции мог совершить другой человек, и соответственно мистер Т не может быть привлечен к ответственности только на базе того, что кошелек принадлежит ему, хотя последнее и доказано?
У вас изначально извращенная логика. В суде такое не работает "кто если не он", нужны прямые доказательства и даже холостой господин Т спокойно посылает следаков нахуй и называет еще в добавок петухами (красивой благородной птицей) и следаки идут  |
|
|
|
Stop lying, I’m not writing about one year (or tournament) when everything can be attributed to randomness.
This is where you mixed it up; Exactly! Plus Sneijder, Forlan and others who in different years were stronger than Messi, but they did not receive a prize, but he did. You mentioned different years, but was talking about the exact same year. You are pretending to be blind (after all, you cannot dispute the facts) but it is not difficult for me to repeat: There is a whole period from 2008-2012 when Xavi and Iniesta achieved their greatest achievement - two European Champion titles in a row and a World Cup. Can you name teams that achieved the same? This is the real magic and legendary achievement and breaking of records. At the same time, Messi failed at the World Cup and was an ordinary player at the America's Cup, you can come up with different excuses but these are simple facts. Thus, during this period, both Xavi and Iniesta were 1000 times better than Messi, but they received zero Ballon d'Or, and he received 4 You can ignore the facts for as long as you like, but they won't go away. The rest of your argument is just you sharing your personal opinion and trolling, so no need pursuing the argument with someone who is not objective.
- Jay -
You have nothing to object to since I provided specific figures and facts, so you simply ignore them and try to declare trolling. But this is even good - it means that if we talk about facts, then you agree with me, but no one cares about your emotions (incredible love for Messi). ~ If Messi continued playing in Europe and in a great team it would easily be visible how he is a great player and deserves this award~
Great joke. Playing in the Farm League in a dominant club, Messi failed the first season, was at an average level in the second season and completely failed in the Champions League (two eliminations at the 1/8 stage with 0+0). Hmm... this is not the kind of “help” the sheikhs were expecting when they invited “the best player in the world who makes a difference.” Although, on the other hand, the difference is obvious: without Messi, PSG has the semi-finals and final of the Champions League, and with Messi another shameful defeat from Bayern (Messi brought this from Barcelona) and two years in a row relegation in the 1/8. |
|
|
|
Локально это "люди - новая нефть". Ну а глобально это самоподдерживающаяся обратная связь: дебилы чиновники создают проблемы чтобы потом их решать (естественно в виде бесконечного процесса, а не сделал дело и "ну все я больше не нужен, должность можно сокращать). Поэтому количество чиновников всегда и везде растет.
То, что постоянно растет число чиновничьего аппарата, это один из базовых законов функционирования бюрократических систем. Не помню, кто из исследователей бюрократии, вроде француз какой то, вывел эти законы, но они точно действуют. Вот например под тему майнинга, по которому никак федеральный закон не принять, надо же четко нарастить аппарат надсмотрищиков - кто то должен контролировать воровство электроэнергии, опять же пожарная инспекция сантехнадзор, финмониторинг и так далее. Вот и пошел рост аппарата прихлебателей на казенных харчах Не француз, а англичанин  Законы Паркинсона Впрочем, может и какой-то француз подобные исследования проводил, потому что природа государства +- одинакова и соответственно закономерности его развития тоже. Хорошо когда исполнители (чиновники включая президента) понимают это, а не начинают мнить себе невесть кем (как в папуасиях). Вот, кстати, ещё цитаты Рейгана на эту же тему: Правительство — не решение нашей проблемы, правительство и есть наша проблема.
Наиболее страшные слова в английском языке: «Я из правительства, и я здесь, чтобы помочь».
Точка зрения правительства на экономику может быть выражена в нескольких простых фразах: если что-то работает, облагай это налогом, если оно продолжает работать — регулируй, а если остановилось — субсидируй. Собственно что тут ещё добавить  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
