If I remember correctly, the coefficient is approximately 5.4-5.5? Quite high to go all-in, but if it were a money bet I would say that this choice does not look profitable - Atlético are doing great in the group stage, and Lazio, on the contrary, is quite mediocre. In addition, the price of victory will be very high - if you look at the first places in the groups, there are solid tops that no one would want to meet in the 1/8.

In my opinion, Shakhtar and Feyenoord will be more dangerous than Sevilla (from which it seems that only the brand remains and is now bad in both La Liga and Eurocups).
By the way, PSG still has a good chance of getting into the Europa League - it will be difficult to win against Dortmund away, and Newcastle will most likely be able to beat Milan at home.

The total could have been more than 2.5 only if Napoli had scored first. Juventus plays too rational football, they have scored only 23 goals in 15 games. In my opinion, this is sad for a team that, albeit temporarily, is in first place and aspires to the title. Inter's statistics are much more impressive - they have scored 10 more goals and today they are likely to score a couple more.

Yes, by default it is assumed that a gambler is an adequate adult, capable of making decisions independently. Any advice can be perceived as aggression in the sense that the one who advises doubts the gambler’s ability to behave adequately.
I don't think anyone would want to hear a waiter in a restaurant say, "You should stop eating, you've already eaten enough" or in a pub, "Stop drinking, you've already had too much." 

Yes, Newcastle has a lot of problems and due to the high competition in the Premier League, this immediately affects the results.
As for the upcoming battle between two losers (if we take the top of the standings, but in fact these are good teams), I think that, as always, the most unpleasant outcome will happen - a draw. Thus, both teams will lose 2 points and continue their decline. I've seen this pattern often.

The game statistics are as follows:

Shots - 11:13
Shots on target - 2:1
Corners - 3:6
Ball possession - 34% : 66%

I would say that a fair result would have been a draw, but Juventus successfully played in the Italian style by scoring a goal and then playing to keep the score. I bet on Napoli to win and I can’t say that I’m disappointed with my choice - with such a game, Napoli could easily win one game out of three (the odds were 3.28).
Unfortunately, Napoli's position is now such that it will be difficult for them to even get into the top 4.

I think a dealer first of all has a responsibility to his family - well, he has to work and bring in a salary. If he works against his employer by advising casino visitors to leave with their winnings, he will most likely lose his job very quickly. Now this moral problem looks different, doesn't it? And by the way, in general, there are many people who do not like unsolicited advice, regardless of the circumstances, so it is dangerous to advise something to strangers (even if you had such an opportunity).

Funnily enough, bookmakers continue to rate City as overwhelming favorites in the title race. Their chance is estimated as 1.25, before this round the chances were as much as 1.1, but even now, after such a significant correction, this seems to me to be an overestimation of City. In the end, City has two direct competitors ahead - Arsenal and Liverpool. The likelihood that at least one club will be better is much higher than last season when only Arsenal was in the lead and City’s task was easier.

But Napoli's victory comes with an excellent odds of 3.28. Is Napoli really incapable of winning at least one game out of three? It seems to me that this choice is very suitable for a cash bet.
As for betting on favorites, especially double bets, I always rate them as dangerous if the favorites have not lost points for a long time. Yes, such bets look logical, but even the favorite cannot win indefinitely and the odds for its victory do not cover the risk.

Bayer looks more stable than Liverpool, but like Liverpool, I'm sure Bayer will focus primarily on the Bundesliga. One of the three PSG - Newcastle - Milan will get into the Europa League. Considering that PSG have the Ligue 1 title in their pocket without any problems, and Newcastle has no chance in the Premier League, like Milan in Serie A, any of these teams can concentrate on winning the Europa League. Therefore, one of these three may well become the new favorite.

Thanks again! I had a good chance to start the weekend without the Hoffenheim - Bochum game, but thank God I saw this thread 
Interesting round ahead, isn't it? Teams from the top 7 play among themselves and the results are far from obvious, especially in the pairs Dortmund - Leipzig and Stuttgart - Bayer.
The last pair especially confuses me - both teams should not be so high... will It really be the most unpleasant result for both teams - draw?

So what was the pick? In this round there are only two games with more or less large odds - the victory of Red Star against City and the victory of Antwerp against Barcelona. I bet on the first outcome, although in fact the bet against Barcelona looks more realistic. The team is not just in a temporary crisis (like City) but is experiencing systemic problems, so a motivated underdog can beat them.

I'm sure you meant that United were beaten by them.
As for draws, such uncompromisingness probably plays into United's hands - after all, a draw with Bayern will be tantamount to defeat for them. So if this was poker and there was everything on the line with no chance of a draw then United would have to do it. But I’m still sure that Bayern will not lose this game.

Yes, it's a terrible fall from the very top. Unfortunately, in the next round Tottenham plays with Newcastle and again one of the two good clubs (in the sense that I sympathize with them) experiencing problems will again lose points. And I wouldn’t even be surprised if they play a draw and thus it will be a negative result for both clubs. But oddly enough, this whole trio of losers (Tottenham, Newcastle, United) is not so far from the tournament favorite City.

Can anyone explain this?

Winner

Manchester City 1.85

Liverpool 4.41

Aston Villa 25.48

Tottenham Hotspur 40.18

https://sportsbet.io/sports/event/soccer/england/premier-league/premier-league-23-24-64c766be49a198000153bbb8

It's quite funny that the bookmakers changed the City quote from 1.1 to 1.85 in just one round, but why can't they quote Arsenal? Is this a mystical team with unclear odds or is it some kind of technical error?

upd: I swear while I was writing this post, the quotes changed:

Manchester City 1.23

Arsenal 1.64

Liverpool 1.96

Aston Villa 10.78

Newcastle United 16.66

Tottenham Hotspur 20.58

Arsenal are back in business (apparently I got in at the moment when they changed the odds), but City's quote is again depressing - it seems to me that they are still overvalued.

Так в чем же ошибочка? То самое "не до конца"? Пока что вы своими примерами повторили мои рассуждения.

Для меня это уже реально задачей тысячелетия становится: криптаны понимают что вилками могут свободно пользоваться хакеры/педофилы - ноль вопросов. Телевизор хакеры/педофилы тоже могут смотреть - ноль вопросов. Дрелью хакеры/педофилы тоже могут пользоваться - ноль вопросов.
А вот криптой хакеры/педофилы почему-то пользоваться не могут, да аж так не могут что всех остальных пользователей крипты надо поставить раком и заставить брать разрешение на каждый чих.

Nice! It’s a pity that such a bold prediction gives only 1 point of advantage against those who bet on the favorite. Although I remember that the odds were close, most people saw Newcals as the winner no matter what.
For me, this is an unsuccessful round, so I won’t even look at the details, but I think that those who predicted Tottenham’s defeat are even fewer, although the result is classic (2-1) and it will be a full three points.

Wow what happened to Newcastle? I noticed that the quotes were suspicious and made a "safe" bet on Newcastle Double Chance. It was the first choice in a multi-bet of 8 events and it immediately burned out  
Apparently, Tottenham will also kill many bettors today, since it’s already 94 minutes and the score is 2-1 in favor of West Ham. It turns out to be a continuous round of surprises and defeats for the favorites.

Как-будто БТТ в период своего расцвета был чем-то иным 

Да, и напомню что хоть Теймос и вводит цензуру (степень жесткости значения не имеет) скамы по-прежнему на БТТ не модерируются.
Так что вообще-то пользователи других форумов с иными правилами могут тоже так через губу говорить: а, биткоинтолк? помойка состоящая из мошенников и спамеров? Да слышал 

Дичь какую-то пишите. Попробую ответить все-таки.
1 Контент будут делать для тех же для кого делают и здесь - контентмейкеры квалифицированные и нет разницы где будет этот контент "лежать" он будет иметь ценность сам по себе.
2 Почему имитировать? Мы же уже определились с тем что контентмейкеры квалифицированные. А на хороший контент и его обсуждение и пользователи новые придут.
3 Ну так любой продукт когда-то был неизвестным. Наоборот хороший потенциал к развитию.
4 И получат нахуй бан потому что местные "криптаны" стухли и миксеры им не по нраву.
5 Да, да именно поэтому биток плетется за Эфиром нынче (с отставанием в два года - я про НФТ) потому что всем нужно старье.

---

Тем временем идея реализуется хотя и в другой форме: стало возможным "телепортироваться" на другой форум с сохранением ранга.
Посмотрю я где будет активность если там реально миксеры осядут и будут платить по 100-200 баксов в неделю, а здесь еще и казино хлопнут