Your post was deleted because it broke some rule.
You don't even know what my post consisted of, so don't assume. If your post did not break any rules of the forum then it would not have been deleted. Authorities aren't omniscient. They are human beings with egos just like you and I Your post was deleted because it broke some rule.
You don't even know what my post consisted of, so don't assume. It sounds like you are concerned about your post count being lowered from deleted posts.
Not really. Assuming things is naughty. you broke the rules, so you'll get no sympathy from me.
Never asked for sympathy from strangers on the internet, and you don't know what the post was so don't assume I broke the rules. Is this an......assumption?  |
|
|
|
I'm interested in buying 1.7 btc from a trusted btc seller here.
PM me please!
Regards,
AkH019
And you will of course promise not to charge back later on? |
|
|
|
@Vod
Please stop to spam this tread.
IridiumCoin is new coin, and not yet available on
big exchanges. Trading volume is low and we cant
exchange enough IRI to BTC or fiat to pay all expenses
So your collateral is really worthless and isn't actually collateral? Its not worthless, we work hard to hit major exchanges. IRI will be very valuable after game launch. Release in 2017. If you can't exchange it, it's pretty worthless, isn't it? |
|
|
|
@Vod
Please stop to spam this tread.
IridiumCoin is new coin, and not yet available on
big exchanges. Trading volume is low and we cant
exchange enough IRI to BTC or fiat to pay all expenses
So your collateral is really worthless and isn't actually collateral? |
|
|
|
I have up to 17 BTC that I can lend out to different people. IF your a serious borrower, PM me how much you need. We can discuss loan duration and interest rate. COLLATERAL a must. Don't bother if you can't provide collateral.
ALL collateral should be held by a trusted third party. |
|
|
|
Instead of offering loans I have decided to invest my Bitcoins into cloud mining.
It would be greatly appreciated if you could close this thread.
Thanks in advance.
You can do so at the bottom. |
|
|
|
Hey guys i have $90 PP and NEED BTC! I will send as friends and family and pay 20% rate. (:
Due to Paypal's reversibility, will you wait 180 days to get your BTC? It may be much easier to try localbitcoins. |
|
|
|
I dont think it will go to neutral trust. there would be still a red color in it, so its still useless
You can neutralise negative trust by gaining trusted feedbacks. However, this guy is probably just trying to scam, but even if he was legitimately selling the feedbacks he'd get busted very quickly and removed from the trust list. As has been said many times: He will just make or move to another account. |
|
|
|
So it seems that this section is still filled with shady requests like this  . And they shall never go away! Also: Holy shit, you're still alive!  |
|
|
|
Almost back to square one, then?! What's the point of having neutrals? Belief is not the same as proof, and should be a lesser rating level (that still displays in yellow on poster_info).
I don't see why I would ever give anyone a neutral rating. If I have had no dealings with them and haven't seen them acting in an untrustworthy fashion, I'll just not leave any rating. Currently I see a bunch of dice sites taking "investments". Historically that's been pretty dodgy, with a few sites running off with the invested coins. Does that mean I should leave a "neutral" rating for the sites which are still running successfully saying I suspect that they might run off with the coins even though I have no proof that they have any such intention? It's a self-fulfilling prophecy right now. Since neutrals ( I'd prefer they be called "suspect") don't get reflected in the design scheme to the left (poster_info) in rating display=on subforums, there's no point in leaving any, or having a neutral rating selector, at all. I would like to see a yellow number under the User name with the amount of warnings to entice others to view, but we have a workable fix for now. Thanks Theymos. Keep in mind: Almost any system implemented will have bugs and abuse at some level. |
|
|
|
why sketchy, if u dont receive u dont release, isnt that more fair??
what transaction cant be reversed???
Also has anyone had any dealings with KOAP, he's insisting I trade with him, says he has many dealings on this forum but his account is only 1 month old and he has made only 2 posts apparently :-/
Paypal can be reversed until the 180 day range, will you wait for your coins? Have you searched for KOAP? |
|
|
|
Hi Forum, I hope I'm in the right place!  I would like to invest and buy some bitcoin! I was recommended by someone on LocalBitcoins to use this forum. I think the prices are more reasonable here. I understand there's a lot of dishonest people out there which is why I would like to have a bitcoin transaction with escrow set up to confirm you can supply 11btc, I can provide photo ID to confirm my identity before transaction and as long as the bitcoin is in escrow I can pay first. I have paypal, skrill and of course bank transfer. If you feel u can provide, please add me on YMessenger: mimisparkles00 . I have YMessenger on my phone and its always online sooo... If u need more info just ask me on there. Hope I can do business!!!! You may be better off using localbitcoins especially with Paypal being easily reversible. Skrill and bank transfers have been reported to be reversed as well. Good luck! |
|
|
|
ok, clearly you are here to feed on drama. ignored.
I get the quick ignore and no bogus red like you freely handed out earlier?  you aren't following me around like a puppy with OCD. Ooops! Did you forget where the Ignore was? No, but like the OP you seem to have forgotten where your life was. At least I can find and use the Ignore feature when I claim I will. |
|
|
|
ok, clearly you are here to feed on drama. ignored.
I get the quick ignore and no bogus red like you freely handed out earlier? you aren't following me around like a puppy with OCD. Ooops! Did you forget where the Ignore was? Ooops again! |
|
|
|
ok, clearly you are here to feed on drama. ignored.
I get the quick ignore and no bogus red like you freely handed out earlier? you aren't following me around like a puppy with OCD. Ooops! Did you forget where the Ignore was? |
|
|
|
ok, clearly you are here to feed on drama. ignored.
I get the quick ignore and no bogus red like you freely handed out earlier? |
|
|
|
MY hypocrisy? In the few minutes it took you to reply to me, are you claiming you found the account I used, read all the feedback I left AND verified it was bogus? Really? You really should stop digging and work out a solution.
What the fuck are you talking about? You admitted you do this, I didn't accuse you of anything.
No? At least I can handle drama without leaving bogus feedback. He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
Exactly. He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
I reported the posts and asked for assistance from the moderators. They were ignored. Some how his abuse is ok though. I am not sure why I should tolerate harassment. You're on the Default Trust list. Your feedback carries more weight than most. I've eaten a lot of crap for the same reason and decided to use an alt. account with no Trust to leave feedback in cases such as these. Maybe the new forum will have a orange warning option for this very reason. Hopefully this can easily be worked out soon. Just my .002 BTC I got on the default trust list by doing hundreds of trades over a period of years without incident. I was not just picked out of a hat. I don't leave negative trust flippantly. I don't see how you using alts to abuse the trust system is some how not as bad as my supposed abuse. People put their trust in me because I don't rip people off and I worked hard to make sure everyone I deal with is satisfied. This guy is completely unreasonable and the moderators refuse to assist me. I don't mind using all the hard work I have put in here to tell everyone else about this guy and his habits of harassment, and that is the point of the trust system, to let people leave feedback freely without coercion. If I was negging everyone who posted in my threads it would be different, but im not. I negged a person who is purposely trying to effect my trading by harassing me in my threads when I have never dealt with them before, and he never intended to deal with me either. Is there another recourse that would provide any results, or is your suggestion simply to deal with the negative effects of this clearly aimlessly obsessive individual who likely wont give up for a very long time? You automatically call mine false feedback and equivocating this with your feedback? Interesting language. I use an alt. when the offense IMO does NOT warrant turning someone's account red but rather serve as a warning to others. Your feedback left in this case was not warranted nor was the fake risked amount of 1 BTC. If you feel you are harassed, do as suggested and make self moderated threads. When all else fails and your temper gets the best of you, add the offending person to your ignore list. in your criticism. I am supposed to close years old threads with thousands of hits and dozens of feed-backs created before self moderation, and start over again because of one troll? I might also add here that I did create a self moderated thread for the original point of contact, but he also showed up in my other threads. Its funny how quick people are to defend perpetrators here over trusted members trading equitably here for years. |
|
|
|
He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
Exactly. He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
I reported the posts and asked for assistance from the moderators. They were ignored. Some how his abuse is ok though. I am not sure why I should tolerate harassment. You're on the Default Trust list. Your feedback carries more weight than most. I've eaten a lot of crap for the same reason and decided to use an alt. account with no Trust to leave feedback in cases such as these. Maybe the new forum will have a orange warning option for this very reason. Hopefully this can easily be worked out soon. Just my .002 BTC I got on the default trust list by doing hundreds of trades over a period of years without incident. I was not just picked out of a hat. I don't leave negative trust flippantly. I don't see how you using alts to abuse the trust system is some how not as bad as my supposed abuse. People put their trust in me because I don't rip people off and I worked hard to make sure everyone I deal with is satisfied. This guy is completely unreasonable and the moderators refuse to assist me. I don't mind using all the hard work I have put in here to tell everyone else about this guy and his habits of harassment, and that is the point of the trust system, to let people leave feedback freely without coercion. If I was negging everyone who posted in my threads it would be different, but im not. I negged a person who is purposely trying to effect my trading by harassing me in my threads when I have never dealt with them before, and he never intended to deal with me either. Is there another recourse that would provide any results, or is your suggestion simply to deal with the negative effects of this clearly aimlessly obsessive individual who likely wont give up for a very long time? You automatically call mine false feedback and equivocating this with your feedback? Interesting language. I use an alt. when the offense IMO does NOT warrant turning someone's account red but rather serve as a warning to others. Your feedback left in this case was not warranted nor was the fake risked amount of 1 BTC. If you feel you are harassed, do as suggested and make self moderated threads. When all else fails and your temper gets the best of you, add the offending person to your ignore list. I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy in your criticism. I am supposed to close years old threads with thousands of hits and dozens of feed-backs created before self moderation, and start over again because of one troll? MY hypocrisy? In the few minutes it took you to reply to me, are you claiming you found the account I used, read all the feedback I left AND verified it was bogus? Really? You really should stop digging and work out a solution. |
|
|
|
He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
Exactly. He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
I reported the posts and asked for assistance from the moderators. They were ignored. Some how his abuse is ok though. I am not sure why I should tolerate harassment. You're on the Default Trust list. Your feedback carries more weight than most. I've eaten a lot of crap for the same reason and decided to use an alt. account with no Trust to leave feedback in cases such as these. Maybe the new forum will have a orange warning option for this very reason. Hopefully this can easily be worked out soon. Just my .002 BTC I got on the default trust list by doing hundreds of trades over a period of years without incident. I was not just picked out of a hat. I don't leave negative trust flippantly. I don't see how you using alts to abuse the trust system is some how not as bad as my supposed abuse. People put their trust in me because I don't rip people off and I worked hard to make sure everyone I deal with is satisfied. This guy is completely unreasonable and the moderators refuse to assist me. I don't mind using all the hard work I have put in here to tell everyone else about this guy and his habits of harassment, and that is the point of the trust system, to let people leave feedback freely without coercion. If I was negging everyone who posted in my threads it would be different, but im not. I negged a person who is purposely trying to effect my trading by harassing me in my threads when I have never dealt with them before, and he never intended to deal with me either. Is there another recourse that would provide any results, or is your suggestion simply to deal with the negative effects of this clearly aimlessly obsessive individual who likely wont give up for a very long time? You automatically call mine false feedback and equivocating this with your feedback? Interesting language. I use an alt. when the offense IMO does NOT warrant turning someone's account red but rather serve as a warning to others. Your feedback left in this case was not warranted nor was the fake risked amount of 1 BTC. If you feel you are harassed, do as suggested and make self moderated threads. When all else fails and your temper gets the best of you, add the offending person to your ignore list. |
|
|
|
He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
Exactly. He might be a dick, but that's no reason to leave false negative feedback, especially when you're in the default trust network.
I reported the posts and asked for assistance from the moderators. They were ignored. Some how his abuse is ok though. I am not sure why I should tolerate harassment. You're on the Default Trust list. Your feedback carries more weight than most. I've eaten a lot of crap for the same reason and decided to use an alt. account with no Trust to leave feedback in cases such as these. Maybe the new forum will have a orange warning option for this very reason. Hopefully this can easily be worked out soon. Just my .002 BTC |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
