Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com

[sbfree]

I go with (HW*100)/A

HW error % = HW/A+R+HW

where

HW = number of hw errors
A    = number of accepted
R    = number of rejected

with 0.97 I got something like 10-11% after almost 20 hours, whereas before the same miner running with 0.95 I used to have 5-7%

Thanks.  That changes mine from ~4.4% down to ~4.1%.  Although it doesn't agree with BertMod:

Device Hardware%=4.9875
Device Rejected%=4.1048
Pool Rejected%=4.3372
Pool Stale%=0.0000

thanks, that means I am still at 21%, spinning my wheels it feels

Did you try firmware 0.90 then enablecores.bin?  Are you forcing air onto the BBB?  A warmish BBB will drop your hashrate.

SOY, I THINK YOU MIGHT BE A GENIUS....although I am alittle concerned about temps.... here are the numbers for my saturn that was currently underperforming....

new stats

at server
miner_knc   258.17 GH/s   30,875k (99.82%)   52608 / 525k / 2176   noticed immediate change

cgminer stats
KnC 0:                | 305.2G/268.6Gh/s | A:73728 R:3840 HW:5897 WU: 4240.8/m

yay HW ERROR ARE FIXED
BUT

temps went from 40c,45c to now  45c and 52c (alittle worried, should I be?)
watts went from 231w to 381w per bertmod

[sbfree]

STATUS=S
When=1382635987
Code=11
Msg=Summary
Description=cgminer 3.4.0|SUMMARY
Elapsed=1240
MHS av=269079.29
Found Blocks=0
Getworks=45
Accepted=611
Rejected=32
Hardware Errors=6159
Utility=29.56
Discarded=84
Stale=0
Get Failures=0
Local Work=82485
Remote Failures=0
Network Blocks=2
Total MH=333744728.7030
Work Utility=4248.88
Difficulty Accepted=78208.00000000
Difficulty Rejected=4096.00000000
Difficulty Stale=0.00000000
Best Share=163631
Device Hardware%=6.5527
Device Rejected%=4.6634
Pool Rejected%=4.9767
Pool Stale%=0.0000|ASIC Board Info
2 Temperature sensor: 52.0 C

Die ID Cores ON Cores OFF %
0 48 0 100
1 48 0 100
2 40 8 83.3
3 48 0 100
DC/DC ID ON/OFF Status Input Voltage Output Voltage Output Current
0 ON OK 11.7 V 0.928 V 50.9 A (47.2 W)
1 No DC/DC detected
2 ON OK 11.7 V 0.943 V 52.1 A (49.1 W)
3 No DC/DC detected
4 ON OK 11.7 V 0.929 V 49.2 A (45.7 W)
5 No DC/DC detected
6 No DC/DC detected
7 ON OK 11.7 V 0.89 V 54.5 A (48.5 W)
 
4 Temperature sensor: 45.0 C

Die ID Cores ON Cores OFF %
0 48 0 100
1 48 0 100
2 47 1 97.9
3 48 0 100
DC/DC ID ON/OFF Status Input Voltage Output Voltage Output Current
0 ON OK 11.8 V 0.908 V 48.6 A (44.1 W)
1 No DC/DC detected
2 ON OK 11.8 V 0.938 V 51 A (47.8 W)
3 No DC/DC detected
4 ON OK 11.9 V 0.928 V 53.6 A (49.7 W)
5 No DC/DC detected
6 No DC/DC detected
7 ON OK 11.9 V 0.905 V 54.3 A (49.1 W)
 

Total DC/DC power output: 381 W

SHOULD I WORRY ABOUT BOLDED ITEMS ABOVE....thanks.

[soy]

The increased temps is increased hashing.  The warm BBB is overloaded and backing up I suppose which makes work just sit blocking new work from getting done is a possibility.

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

[soy]

Perhaps the warm BBB is changing data and the pool is communicating back the work is wrong.

(...trying to get on my dreadmill.)

[sbfree]

soy are these temps and current outputs ok?

are they similar to your stats?

how long have you been on .90?

[Phoenix1969]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

[soy]

soy are these temps and current outputs ok?

are they similar to your stats?

how long have you been on .90?

I don't have an answer for your first question, as for the rest it's posted a few pages ago.

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills.

[ASIC-K]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

damn, my mercury is topping out at 119 ghs and that with me doing a lot of reboots. i went back to .95 firmware and so far its the best. havent tried .90 though. the pool shows 103ghs unfortunately tho....i might have to try this .90 like you are using

[Phoenix1969]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

few mins later...  couple more WU. 1 more gh/s

[timmmers]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

[soy]

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc...  as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans.  So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine.  ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

 KnC 0:                | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier.  That first figure cycles up and down.

about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills.

warming up in here and need air movement while running so on comes a fan.  won't be after bering sea gold as I swim like a rock.  and the bitcoin may buy me a new car one day

[Phoenix1969]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running...  I know....   seems to continue to rise...  more WU & another GH/s...

[btc_uzr]

(...)  and the bitcoin may buy me a new car one day

I'd say you can do so after some hours of mining, depending on your standards




or maybe never

[sbfree]

soy, .90 crashed....and everything below .94 didn't work or help me...back to .95 square 1 again see what happens....

.90, knc if you are listening had great numbers for me, but not sure what why it crashed....

[timmmers]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running...  I know....   seems to continue to rise...  more WU & another GH/s...

It would be nice to know the theoretical limit. I'm sitting on a merc hashing at 140 solidly. So that may be a good one. Sats should manage 280 at least  then from that? Maybe more in time, it's only been a week after all.

[sbfree]

I think it's time KNC allowed for us to play with some volt settings within reason so we don't fry our units but yet get to squeeze more out of them, they can take it....per .90  

[Phoenix1969]

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s   Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running...  I know....   seems to continue to rise...  more WU & another GH/s...

It would be nice to know the theoretical limit. I'm sitting on a merc hashing at 140 solidly. So that may be a good one. Sats should manage 280 at least  then from that? Maybe more in time, it's only been a week after all.

Yes, I have one Sat that stays rock-solid on 280...

so maybe 560 for Jupiter?...anyone got a Jup with better?

edit:  still climbing WU's & Gh/s on the slo sat.... slowly
was 253/3920  now   262/3973  still going...